WTC 7: The Smoking Gun of 9/11

WTC 7 collapsed in 6.5 seconds at 5:20pm on 9/11. Multiple emergency workers reported a countdown over the radios immediately preceding the collapse. Witness…


(Visited 48 times, 1 visits today)

Share This Post

39 Comments - Write a Comment

  1. The explosions heard were almost certainly electrical explosions.
    As for the nuke theory or mass underground explosion; the building was cleaned and there was no evidence of high level radiation, the towers flooring was also intact after cleanup

    Reply
  2. i was there too and there were many witnesses that said they heard explosions,

    there are two different angles of the north tower collapse shot from tripods, in both of them you can see the ground shake 12 seconds prior to the collapse.

    do we just ignore the evidence that there may have been secondary explosions?

    Reply
  3. Philippe Pomerleau · Edit

    Go take a look at Lifting the fog Session 2 with Steven E. Jones. Alex Jones isn't the most credible in the 9/11 movement.

    Available on youtube

    Reply
  4. There were obviously electrical explosions in WTC.
    The towers did not fall in or near free fall speed. You can time it yourself with the videos, use the free fall formula h=-16t^2+s
    Use the calculation with the towers height.
    Time the videos from the beginning of the fall until the end.
    Do the equations yourself, stop taking Alex Jones word for it.

    Reply
  5. Witnesses to the collapse… saw a "shockwave ripping through the building" – this is from the 150kt nuclear demolition device being detonated as a final take-down after the preliminary conventional explosions weakened the structure of the building. Google "Dimitri Khalezov nuclear demolition" for his research which lays out how an earthquake strength nuclear shockwave was felt at ground level just before each tower fell – the ground shook like an earthquake of about 5.5 on the Richter scale.

    Reply
  6. Sorry lying loser but 911 twoofers LIED.

    First 911 twoofer said WTC 1 and 2 collapsed at "free fall speed".

    Then 911 twoofer got their dumb asses DEBUNKED because WTC 1 & 2 collapsed 60% – 150% SLOWER than freefall.

    Next 911 twoofer said WTC 7 collapsed at "freefall speed".

    Then 911 twoofers got DEBUNKED because WTC 7 did not collapse at "freefall speed".

    Then 911 twoofer changed their story yet again to "near freefall".

    And…..freefall isn't even a speed Mr. Science.

    911 TRUTH DEBUNKED!

    Reply
  7. Nobody changed their story, it is just scientifically inaccurate to say that any controlled demolition occurs EXACTLY at freefall speed because even explosions can redirect the energy and give a small amount of resistance. saying "near free fall" is simply to be more scientifically accurate.

    You resort to name calling rather than backing up your statements with logic and fact. You kick and cry like a bullied child.

    Many eyewitnesses reported hearing explosions from both above and below.

    Reply
  8. You are flat wrong, and now I am calling you out I searched google and there is no information about pulleys being used in the demolition of WTC 7. They used a pulley to move some debris from between buildings that day, but that's it.

    Got any more bs stories or are you done now? If not I will go ahead and begin debunking all of your arguments faster than you can respond. Good day sir.

    Reply
  9. please tell me how the high line steel building in Russia yesterday that was completely on fire didn't collapse then? r t .com/news/chechnya-tallest-building-fire-280/

    Reply
  10. Media is propaganda. The United States is in debt to China 15 or so TRILLION dollars and I'm sure not one news station in America reported the carbon filled gold bars given to China as payment for our debt. Are any of you aware that gold bars from fort knox forged during the clinton administration were fake….IF AMERICA DOESNT HONESTLY PAY ITS DEBTS OR HAVE INTEGRITY…then wtf?!…seriously….this is a very sad world we live in….

    Reply
  11. I think it is a damn shame that our government was involved with the murder of thousands of americans. I believe the bush administration were destroying evidence linking them to the enron scandal, because all of the enron files and evidence were stored in wtc7. I believe that if there are outfits in place that can get away with this type of treason and fool the masses into believing it was another country, sounds oddly similar to the whole invading iraq under the premise of WMD's.

    Reply
  12. Robinson Ray is either a shill for terrorists inside the US Government/military, or is clueless of classical physics. No way, in *this* universe, can a steel frame building can fall through the line of greatest resistance at or near freefall acceleration by gravity alone. It never happened before 9/11, and its never happened since. However, it allegedly happened 3 times on 9/11, and the cowards and treasonous filth that own the US corporate weasel media supported and coddled the mass murderers.

    Reply
  13. 2/2
    WTC7 was already shitty and way too dangerous/unstable beyond repair so firefighters decided to take advantage of the fact that WTC7 & the whole WTC perimeter was evacuated [something rare & expensive in NYC] and they used a pulley to finish the job. WTC7 did not fall on its footprint, there are photos of a whole street that was overtaken by WTC7. No 1 died in WTC7 collapse so who gives a shit.Secret service was in WTC7 because they ALWAYS had their offices there.

    Reply
  14. Allot of baseless conspiracy theories being said on youtube. It seems many people haven’t researched the official science behind the collapse. In this world there are conspiracies but it’s better to research the most accepted version before praising a conspiracy theory….because you may seem foolish.
    WTC got hit with a shitload of debris from WTC2 collapse, this gave it massive column damage in 2 sides. There was also a fire which made WTC7 unstable. Firefighters decided to pull it [PULLEY].

    Reply
  15. unclesamsnephew666 · Edit

    "WTC 7 collapsed in 6.5 seconds at 5:20pm on 9/11."

    wrong. the collapse took about 14 seconds, and that doesn't count the initial part of the collapse that happened internally but cannot be seen. we know there was internal, unseen collapse because that is what led to the east penthouse collapsing.

    most truthers don't know about the east penthouse because truther sites don't show it.

    alex jones is cancer. the "countdown" was another unsubstantiated bullshit story.

    ZERO evidence of inside job.

    Reply
  16. Yawn heard it all before. my real name is 911needs a new investigation.
    My surname is since there is a lot of controversy and we need to get to the bottom of this.
    My middle name is if theres nothing to cover up then a new investigation should be welcomed with open arms to vindicate the official 911 report.
    the pentagon crash files can be released for a start alonmg with an estimated 68,000 files witheld by NIST so people can see h=what really happened yet they ARE NOT RELEASED.
    wonder why?

    Reply
  17. Lol still here you utter dick?Your infamous quote?
    remember that eh?
    Just to remind you here here it is.
    "explosions do not always equal explosions"
    LOLOLOLOLOL HAHAHAHA
    You really are the worlds penis,
    Please explain it to me?
    It might be a great truth for you and debunkers but to anyone sane its utter nonsense.
    Come back and post when your half sane

    Reply
  18. but the buildings are clearly showing movement above the impact points preceding the collapses , you can see the buildings are under stress and there is clear footage of the twin towers sagging more and more before they collapse . Only if you decide to ignore that can you consider a controlled demolition which I bet you will since you are a DICK! (haven't used that word in 25 years !) . keep on dreaming zenoist2 or whatever name you hide behind .

    Reply
  19. Maybe you'd like to answer the question twoof seeker?

    Why did 911 twoofers change their story yet again to "near free fall" collapse?

    Please explain gullible troll.

    911 TRUTH = 911 LIES

    Reply
  20. So if I understand truther logic, the buildings came down because of explosives, but the reason people didn't hear or see detonation charges is because quiet thermite was used, but people heard explosions so explosives were used, but the reason no detritus of blasting caps or detonators were found is because instead of explosive charges, thermite was used, but only explosives could eject steel such a long distance, but thermite was used to disguise the demolition, but people heard explosions.

    Reply
  21. FAKE THERMITE

    911 twoofers LIED about finding thermite at ground zero, FAKED a peer review paper on it, then published that paper without the chief editor's knowledge.

    Does that sound like a "truth seeking" movement?

    It doesn't really matter because Dr. James Millette DEBUNKED Liars Harrit's fake thermite paper!

    JUST SAY NO TO 911 TWOOF

    Reply
  22. Why can’t you answer the question lying shill?

    Why do 911 twoofers like David Chandler keep on saying NEAR FREE FALL?

    ANSWER THE QUESTION!

    NO 911 TWOOFER QUESTION DODGING ALLOWED!

    Reply
  23. You just plain ignored this. didn't you.

    watch?v=4ZZNnHolebc

    CTCOLE77 = Paid internet 911 LIAR

    Do you know that you've been visible for YEARS as a paid FULL TIME bullshit artist ?

    you evil blood-soaked, little -wanker-

    Reply
  24. Then why do 911 twoofers like Richard Gage keep on saying NEAR FREE FALL?

    Please explain gullible troll 🙂

    911 TRUTH = STRAWMAN

    Reply

Post Comment