Aside from the molten metal found under all three towers months after the collapses, the actual video of the collapse of Building 7 conclusively shows a cont…
(Visited 14 times, 1 visits today)
Was Building 7 A Controlled Demolition? You Be The Judge – The Time Is Now
Critical thinking people, WINDSOR TOWER IN MADRID SPAIN, burned uncontrollably for over 24 hours AND NEVER FELL..
911 was an OBVIOUS INSIDE JOB, the evidence is OVERWHELMING.
2.3 TRILLION STOLEN FROM THE PENTAGON CASH COW, as well as ALL THE HOLES IN THE OFFICIAL STORY.
2 all who believe the official lies, why hasn't Saudia Arabia SEEN A REGIME CHANGE? You believe the highjackers had Saudi Passports, not iraqi not afghani, THINK FOR YOURSELF the new fascism is VERY SLICK, MSM IS PURE PROPOGANDA
it was caused by fire get fucking over it idiots!
Building 7 had to be brought down with explosives because even NIST admits freefall, and freefall can only happen with explosives especially straight down into its own footprint. End of story. Any fool can see this, it is not rocket science. What does this mean? Simple, inside job. War on terror is a fraud!
@KungFriedChicken nonetheless its enough to take it out without explosives.
@KungFriedChicken meh I suppose you're right about that.
no mate one hole in one corner of the building in one office
naaa i dont get into the no plane theory it is a pointless argument with no relevance because it was impossible for the building to implode like that even if 5 planes hit each building
naaa i dont get into the no plane theory it is a pointless argument with no relevance because it was impossible for the building to implode like that even if 5 planes hit each building
Another brain dead Truther video. With death metal music. Because its made by the same kind of twits that hang out at the WTC Truth Movement sign waving conferences and when you explain facts to them they stand there with a blank look on their faces…"911 was an inside job man".. (I can't tell you why but it just was)
People who blow up buildings for a living watched 7 come down. They were with the fire dept who were simply waiting for it.
By the way from the previous comment that you can't find were you implying that there were no planes?
debunking911dot(com)/WTC7 There were a lot more than a tiny itty bitty little hole as you suggest.
for some reason i cannot find my ealier reply to your non existent extensive damage proof.. it only shows i tiny itty bitty little hole… wow lol hahaha.. once again for the dummies.. you will not be able to show any evidence of "EXTENSIVE DAMAGE" to building 7
ethwrthwrh
/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Afb7eUHr64U This video shows a large rip in building 7 before the building collapsed. Also, with regard to being the first steel buildings in history to collapse due to fire, there are many factors not taken into account. For example, the twin towers had their steel reinforced central concrete core sheared off by airliners (building 7 lacked these cores altogether). No building before had it's vertical load destroyed by an airliner.
also funny how WTC 4 was it directly below the towers?? the one which took nearly all of the impact damage, yet did not implode regarsles. Buildings must be wired with shit loads of explosives for that to happen there is simply no other way
and please no more testimonials and eye witness accounts for evidence.. I want some real deal physical evidence..
well prove it and show this extensive damage prior to building 7s collapse..and yes they did implod princess … fact is WTC 1, 2 & 7 are the only steal frame high rise buildings in the history of the world to implode due to an office fire, as it was, and still is, considered an impossiblity.. especially considering the massive amount of asbestos fire rating the beams were coated in. True stories simply do not have so many anomalies across the entire chain of events…
I assure you 7 hours of intense office fires is enough to make a building 7 collapse( no implosion took place). Plus, building 7 did receive major impact damage from WTC building 1 falling over even though it wasn't struck by an airliner.
I dont blog handsome..anyway, no office fire is capable of being intense enough to implode the building at free fall speed.. and building 7 received no major impact damage, hence why their is no evidence of it having any major damage before suddenly imploding upon its self. physical evidence is non existant throught the entire set of dramas.. no physical evidence of a 757 at the pentagon either.. none.. only two penals with a letter each lol.. no wings, tail section, 2 massive engines, or video
I'm not sure what conspiracy blogs you're reading, but I assure you that the heavy damage done to the building from debris with 7 hours of intense office fires show no need for controlled demolition.
there is no scientific evidence.. its scientifically impossible. Unless a credible scientist wanted his credibility and perks taken away, they're not going to say anything. Nothing to gain and eveything to lose.. they're not stupid lol 🙂
Who is they? If by they you mean any credible scientist ever then ya I'd suppose.
because thats the explanation they want you to believe I'd imagine huh
@KungFriedChicken Well then maybe you should consider why it is the official explanation.
Official freaks lack the ability to look outside the square
What do you mean by official freak?
whatever dumbass
another official freak.. whatever dumbass
Yea because the filtered bullshit on TV is SOOOOO much better than inbred nutjobs spreading rumors on the internet about their opinion on how buldings should collapse.
Snort. You don't think for yourself at all. You are just one of many nutjobs who feed off tragedy in order to make their conspiracy theories "relevant." My family has long honored Eisenhower. But he was rational and informed. You are not.
Why do you waste so much time calling people childish names who dare to think for themselves, it's as if it frightens you for some reason. Have you listened to Eisenhowers farewell speech where he warns of the industrial military complex? do you think he was just lying? I bet eisenhowers vice- Nixon was aware of it also (evil inside sellout), but then lost to JFK who also warned the public of secret societies.. 9/11 is like what the japanese did at Nanking and still never held accountable
lol a phd in east asian history.. thats so amazing 😐
I guess you're not too busy then.. Fact is princess I rely on facts, not word of mouth and the TV to answer questions for me.. where did the 757 at the pentagon vanish to?.. no wings, no tail section, no massive engines that should of been on the front lawn, no impact damage either side of the explosion where the engines should of hit, the engines did not exist. no suprise they could not provide any footage of something that did not exist huh
Lol. I have a Ph.D. in East Asian history. I don't need any more education. What the world need is less emotionally stunted morons who feed off the suffering of others in order to fill some void created in their sad lives. Facts. Reality. Humanity, look into them. And stop feeding off the suffering of others.
get an education… your argument is put your fingers in your ears and call people names like a child.. yeah you're a level headed person for sure LOL.. dum de dum dum do de dum
So what if your brother worked in WTC 1 ?.. whats the moral to your logic?.. Ooo guilt trip again huh.. dont dare use logil, rational thinking and the laws of motion to guide you. You soley rely on guilt trips, emotions and anger to solve problems.. As soon as irrational people such as yourself use and rely on childish name calling, it immediately indicates your thinking is completely worthless. Thats all you can offer, name calling.. why ? because you cannot use logic to explain yourself
My brother worked in the WTC. I spent months listening to the stories he and his friends told. You jump in with your mentally-ill myths, trying to project your own psychological problems on the suffering of others. You are sick. You are mentally ill. Get some help.
feeding of the suffering of others?.. LOL.. try and use guilt trips as a sheild to allow them to feed of the suffering of others.. You're either dumb, a shill, or unable to comprehend anything beyond MTV
Nutjob. Get a life. Stop feeding off the suffering of others.
handsome
Im beyond primary studies 😉
anyway hansome, you have not answered my question
You wouldn't understand science if you actually enrolled in a science course. Dummy.
757 not 767 hehe 😉 still same same
well that is true, my opinions are irrelevant, and this is why I can get away with agreeing with the only scientifically possible explanations. Imagine being someone of notability and publicly going against an organisation one million times more leathal than the russian mafia.
If you were an insider and new it was an inside job or even a professor who could prove it to be true, do you honestly think you would put your hand up, when they just proved they can get away with anything they want?
@oppressednation The fuck are you talking about?
Be quiet silly,go and build a furnace out of the leaves that fell off the trees this autumn,