Using Logic To Prove 9/11 Conspiracies to Americans (Building 7)

Red Pill on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/RedPillPhilosophy Cool Shirts: http://www.redpillphilosophy.com/store Become a “Red Pill Member” for Exclusive …


(Visited 13 times, 1 visits today)

Share This Post

44 Comments - Write a Comment

  1. Hey Chris, are you familiar with Richard Grove and Tragedy and Hope podcasts? I am just curious if you've heard his whistleblowing story or the other great stuff he talks about.

    Reply
  2. The English voted against the USA's plan to bomb Syria and the American media has been quite vocal about why this is a bad thing, in the USA its all about the American response and why the rest of the world is wrong its an American issue in your media
    They don't even mention the Syrian people or the civil war that caused the problems instead they promote American interests talk about natural gas supplies and tell the public its for the good of the USA, nothing about the Syrian people at all

    Reply
  3. What makes you think i haven't reviewed the evidence? The comment i made about Syria is not about the English at all look on G+ at how many posts/blogs are listed by Americans about the situation its clear they do not understand what is going on, posts claim it was organised by the CIA and America is behind this,The English dont make these posts they do not view the world in the same egocentric way, its the American media and public I never suggested the English were misinformed just Americans.

    Reply
  4. i say we don't know it could be either and either wouldn't surprise anyone.
    in other words there's good evidence for both.
    and that attitude is only relevant to a certain sect of america that believe america is the only country that matters i also think your an idiot for not properly reviewing the evidence before making your stupid assumption's .
    american's and English* people aren't blaming the civil war in Syria on their governments they just don't want to get involved get your facts right

    Reply
  5. No most the world laughs at this idea, its only paranoid uneducated Americans who believe it was anything but a terrorist attack We saw the god dam planes hit the buildings and you idiots still think it wasn't real, you cant believe anyone but another American could be responsible for anything because you dont realise the world doesnt revolve around your country that your country isnt behind every world event,even Syria is being blamed in the us on your own government and its a foreign civil war

    Reply
  6. Well you would have to consider the following conditions of building 7

    1.no causalities because nobody was in the building
    2.Its possible that there was a office fire and it most likely occurred but what are the possibilities of islamic extremists being granted access to a government facility and starting a fire or planting bombs? or perhaps, what is the likelihood of a building coincidentally catching on fire on 911 for no apparent reason?

    Reply
  7. What is the indication that leads everyone to automatically think that these buildings were detonated by bombs? Because the fact of the matter is a office fires cannot collapse a building instantaneously, especially if these buildings were designed to withstand such catastrophes.In retrospect, just about everyone can easily comprehend that if a building is susceptible to fires than it will show signs of deterioration and the collapse would take more than a mere 4-5 seconds if the signs persist.

    Reply
  8. If you utilize any form of critical thinking than it doesn’t take an extensive background to know that a building cannot collapse in a matter of seconds due to a office fire.To elaborate, all government buildings/facilities uphold the regulations/standards when constructing these facilities. These facilities are designed to counter/inhibit scenarios such as a fire. Scientifically, it is inconsistent due to the fact that most structures that endure fires stay perfectly intact.
    (to continue)

    Reply
  9. So you are saying that you must be an architect/engineer in order to determine if a building was detonated by bombs (controlled demolition) According to your logic, it takes a farmer to know if a cow is distributing milk.
    (to continue)

    Reply
  10. Wait, so you think 9/11 was a complete inside job? Just wondering cause I was about to subscribe. Building 7 is at the very least shady but anything is possible right? If you think it’s possible that the government did this then you have to at least be open to the idea that the official story is at least possible right? Also I am curious what part of FL are you in if you don’t mind. I am right outside of Tampa here. Well you made me type this much so I am subbing. lol

    Reply
  11. nonsense, I could not have been more vague and resistant to using the word "controlled demolition", given the fact that the question "what does that look like to you" is already vague enough. That aside, if you don't think Building 7 at least LOOKS like a controlled demolition, then your eyes do not function properly.

    Reply
  12. No but expert will tell you the same, you don't have to be a professional to tell the difference between a building collapsing from the base and from the top…
    But you're right about the leading language.

    Reply
  13. You're using leading language. Also, are these people, are you demolition experts/architects? You and they are making assumptions, and this is hardly 'proof'.

    Reply
  14. it came down pretty fast but even if a person jumped off the top of that building it would take em at least 8 seconds to reach the ground. You know what they say, you drop a feather and a bowling ball, they'll reach the ground at the same time.

    Reply

Post Comment