From: 3/26/11 “Investigate Building 7” Univ. of Hartford, Ct investigatebuilding7.org This presentation will examine the attempts by government-sanctioned in…
(Visited 29 times, 1 visits today)
The Evolution of the Fire-based Theory for Building 7 by Kevin Ryan
Logging you in...
Loading IntenseDebate Comments...
@mooners40 Also, you must also consider scaling which that guy did not in
the video. Again with the ants. Weight is proportional to volume, strength
is proportional to cross sectional area. Those experiments are not relevant
to building 7.
Kevin Ryan is a liar. That's why he was fired.
@phucyoutoob there were 58 perimeter columns and 24 core columns and all
the super structure that combines them – all steel framed – with 730 psi
columns the width of a person – and for 100 feet you believe that the whole
building offered ZERO resistance ?
@mooners40 Effectively zero resistance. Negligible resistance. Like an
anvil on a beer can.
@phucyoutoob the laws of physics are not relevant to wtc7 ??? listen to
yourself you fuckin idiot – ants??? "Without extremely precise instruments,
no one could detect that infinitesimal deceleration. Over an interval of
anything more than about a microsecond, it wouldn't slow down." for 2.5
seconds it didn't slow down at all – 100 feet – all of the fuckin building
strength is proportional to cross sectional area?? What strength did wtc7
exhibit? phucyoutoob
@phucyoutoob how many beams and girders and columns in total were there in
the first 8 floors of wtc7 – do the math genius – let us all know
@mooners40 Well, as long as the earth has mass, an acceleration due to
gravity is continuous. The whole thing didn't come down at once, it started
on the east side and the redistributed weight and loss of support caused
the outside to come down. This stuff is easily accessible information but
it seems 'truthers' don't WANT to know the actual truth. You would PREFER
to go on with your delusions.
@phucyoutoob try applying it to wtc7 – you think that a whole building
vanishes for 100 feet – all the steel and concrete – can you understand
that the only explanation is that the support has been removed?
@phucyoutoob try watching the videos you post on – you might learn
something – tell me how a 47 storey building can free-fall for 100 feet ?
@phucyoutoob you don't understand – that is clear
@mooners40 Depends on how much mass the hammer has, its acceleration, the
cross sectional area of the nail, etc.
You still haven't addressed a single point Ryan makes here.
@edtheball69 With BCCI, the international banking entity that dealt in
contract hits and heroin, it was finally a Manhattan DA that took the case
on and brought it all to light. We need a Robert Morgenthau for 9/11.
Any "Debunkers" care to debate?
@phucyoutoob you must have got it from McDonald's with a toy – free-fall
means that no force other than gravity is acting on the building – for 100
feet – and it 'falls' symmetrically as seen in the videos of the day –
there is no way a 47 storey building with 24 core columns and 58 perimeter
columns can fall like that without all support being removed at the same
time – free-fall means ZERO RESISTANCE – this is impossible – columns and
beams and girders must offer resistance – you ??
@mooners40 As soon as the top 33 floors moved downward, (one fraction of
one inch x the mass of 33 floors) they were doing work on the bottom of the
structure. The mass accumulated with each floor and velocity increases.
That work eventually overwhelmed the 13 floors below and for a time there
was effectively no resistance. If you drop an anvil on a beer can, the
anvil will crush the beer can. Multiply the weight of the anvil by 10^9;
strength of can by 10^3. No evidence for demolition.
@mooners40 Uugh, you 'truthers' are hardly worth it, but… after 7 hours a
steel girder on Floor 13 lost its connection to one of the 81 columns
supporting the building. Floor 13 collapsed, beginning a cascade of floor
failures to Floor 5. Column 79, no longer supported by a girder, buckled,
triggering a rapid succession of structural failures that moved from east
to west. All 23 central columns, followed by the exterior columns, failed
in what's known as a "progressive collapse'.
@phucyoutoob Bullshit! He was fired because he rocked the boat, just like
everyone else that stands up against the 9/11 lies.I hold you in contempt
sir fuckyoutoo but I'll be easy on you though because I can see you are
obviously mentally challenged. And I suppose you or your daddy works for
these 9/11 coverup criminals in some way. Funny, only the "science" that
supports your agenda is valid huh.
@phucyoutoob free-fall means that ALL the potential energy is used for
kinetic energy – no work was done – that's the fuckin point moron –
fre-fall means no work – zero resistance – impossible without the support
being taken away by an exterior force – demolition – do you get it?
@phucyoutoob lol – now you want to change the laws of motion to fit 9/11?
Every action has an equal and opposite reaction – Newton's third law – this
is independent of politics and bin laden cannot make it change when an
object hits another they interact in a collision – elastic or inelastic –
both involve slowing down when a hammer hits a nail the nail goes in and
the hammer stops moving – like newton's cradle – can you understand this ?
You can't change the laws
@phucyoutoob you think that nothing can be filmed slowing down – there's
isn't anything accurate enough ?? LOLOLOL – retard – still – waiting on how
many ?? Let us know genius – do the math
@mooners40 Oh, my, good, lord. The weight of the upper 33 floors and their
height IS the potential energy which became kinetic energy and crushed (did
the work on) the bottom 13. Weight = Force. This is so simple a child could
understand it. What is your problem? There is no evidence for a demolition
and argument for such fails basic logic. You're bad even for a truther.
Maybe that's why someone else has marked your comments as spam (it was not
me).
@ AiresQX4 Debunkers stay away from well researched presentations like
this…..their emotional arguments don't work against solid logic and
observation. The more I learn the more angry I get. How about you?
@phucyoutoob when a hammer hits a nail does it slow down?
@mooners40 What's so clear about it? You can't falsify a thing about the
published reports from real engineers and scientists. Your kids are going
to grow up retarded if you're not careful.
Thanks
@phucyoutoob honest ?? Irrelevant?? "Those experiments are not relevant to
building 7." these experimentsare done with bricks – you think that all the
bricks and concrete and steel super structure did not impact itself for 100
feet – the principle is the same and the laws of physics are the same – you
cannot understand this – in your tiny mind it would involve understanding
that NIST have lied to you – and by extension 9/11 is a complete lie – show
me the fire in wtc7 – evidence
@mooners40 Oh goodness. That video does not show the east side! Total time
was about 14 seconds. When the girder on floor 13 failed, it no longer
provided support to its connecting columns, they buckled and translated,
shifting weight overburdening the rest of the building. The larger
(heavier) a building is, the more important columns are. Weight is
proportional to volume, strength is proportional to cross sectional area.
It's the same reason ants can carry 20x their weight and we can't.
@phucyoutoob What you've cited here wouldn't establish for any honest
person that Ryan is necessarily a liar. Your quick resort to ad hominem
argument and , however, should make your own reliability a little suspect.
@phucyoutoob Wow! Are you full of SHIT! Woooo-eeeee!!
I want to kick the camera guy in his balls…faggot takes camera away from
the slides just when needed
@mooners40 Those EXPERIMENTS are irrelevant to WT7 because of their small
scale. 'Scaling'–look it up. I didn't say the laws of physics were
irrelevant. Now you're not being honest in your responses. You would not be
able to detect any deceleration by a video that ran at 30 frames per second
when the expected slow down would be no more than 0.0001 seconds.
@mooners40 You really are stupid. 1/30 = 0.0333 > .0001. If you can't grasp
basic math, there's no point arguing with you.
It was a controlled demolition and for NIST and BUSH to think we can be
fooled is an insult to humanity. Impeach them all get a grand jury involved
what is america waiting for. Report the crime to the police there must be a
senior officer with balls to make arrests of these criminals.