September 11th 2001 Looking Down at Building 7 and it falls? CBS-Net Dub6 45
(Visited 48 times, 1 visits today)
September 11th 2001 Looking Down at Building 7 and it falls? CBS-Net Dub6 45
September 11th 2001 Looking Down at Building 7 and it falls? CBS-Net Dub6 45
it really dosnt take an expert to reilise there were nano thermite planted
i know demolition n thats just how a condemed building goes down
Question: what suddenly attracted the photographers attention to WTC7
before it started dropping? It must have been something that happened
before the beginning of this video. Maybe several very loud explosions?
Maybe large puffs of dust from the base of WTC7? The “VEOH video” also
shows the photographer’s attention suddenly attracted to the base of WTC7.
Ideas?
@TheManInTheMasks If it fell in it’s own footprint those debris would not
be there “facepalm”.
@IIMoses740II Secondly, you come in here to try to sell your “belief
system” and attack others because you don’t see a “controlled demolition”.
The restrictions of your own beliefs allow for this limitation and just
because you know nothing of the tech. involved, based on your “limited
understanding” and “beliefs”, does not mean it didn’t happen. Because it
sounds more like you have a god inferiority complex. Your God is better
than the one in the koran, even thou they are the same dam one.
well said
@IIMoses740II Based on your YT channel I can understand how you don’t
understand the science and physics. You “believe” in an imaginary person
that no one has ever seen, thinks a man can walk on water and can rise
after 3 days of being dead. The only person here which is deluded and being
manipulated is yourself. Society controls itself through “beliefs” and
members of the “Church of Governmentology” are just as deluded and it would
seem that you belong to both as they are for moral cowards.
-This onlooking camera-person is obviously NOT a part of the “NWO
jewZionist 9/11 Attack on NY/Tri-Towers”, –they’ve made valuable
contribution, this great piece of evidence speaks for itself; –stop the
inane suggestion they were part of the Jews murderous attack on Amerika.
Since the Jews hyjacked our usTreasury in 1913, we’ve been living in a
Bank’ster tyranny folks; –they are totally ruthless greed-driven
arch-criminals whom flea to Isra’hell like nasty cockroaches when lights go
on…!!!
@TheManInTheMasks Explosives in controlled demolitions are really small.
Just big enough to cut beams not launch debris all over the place. I have
never seen a controlled demo with debris launching out and utterly
destoying buildings.
@Skeptic121 – I don’t think it could be explosions: with lots of all kinds
of noises outside the window at that time, even explosions could not be
possible to immediately pinpoint among many other nearby buildings; note
that the photographer does not hesitate and quickly zooms in on WTC7, not
any other building nearby. If we discard the impossibilities, the only
possibility that remains is that the photographer at that second received
the command to zoom in on WTC7. Btw, who did the video?
@Grundalizer I agree, but it is not compatible with the official story
shown in the NIST simulation.
@TheManInTheMasks Yeah, it bucked inward at the south side because some
time before the main collapse, a whole fucking part of it collapsed and
ripped it open. The collapse lasts way longer than “free fall” myth. And
even if we look just at the main collapse, the thing slows down after it
reaches 1/3 of its height. Free falls accelerate objects. And it didn’t
fall in its footprint. It smashed everything around itself.
@haeresy What a “noble” Trooth-seeker you are; I said nothing about
religion yet you not only post nothing countering my original posts but
instead spend two comments to bash a belief system that has nothing to do
with the “science” dealing with WTC7’s collapse. This is ironic because
this sounds like the demeanor of the heartless & manipulative people
running the supposed secret government that was behind 9/11. Way to
generalize people like the prejudice simpleton that you are. GG man, lol
what was so important or unimportant to the illuminati in building 7 that
it had to be destroyed?
ask the man or woman in the street what was the numerical designation for
the third building that collapsed in New York that day and expect many
duhs………
I remember plainly the owner of that building being interviewed and said it
was a controlled demolition that morning he was smiling almost laughing
while he spoke
@marvelfannumber1 Googled it. Saw it. It was from DEBRIS from WTC 7 that
fell in it’s own footprint (which is pretty clear from the video, but I
guess people who don’t want to see it blind themselves from it. Don’t
worry, I bet you believe JFK was they was the way the Warren Commission
said too, so I don’t expect much from you…
@halftimesportscards Buildings don’t fall at free-fall speed unless they’ve
been demoed.
THIS VIDEO NEEDS TO GO VIRAL!!
@fennucci Wow, that answer may work on children and most of the ignorant
public, which is most people, but in no way does reality work that way. For
something to fall evenly without resistance (which the building obviously
did), the resistance must have been removed simultaneously, assuming
gravity is a real thing. Fire will not do this since it does not burn even
close to hot enough, it astonishes me how people cannot see something like
this and not realize the truth when it is presented….
By the way: Camera position is probably 105 Duane Street, between Duane and
Thomas St, perhaps 30th floor or so.
-This video stands as clear evidence there were NO airplanes flown into
Tri-Towers, nor into Pentagon on 9/11/2001; –its been a massive jewZionist
conspiracy to further the insane jewBank’ster-mafia Tyranny we’ve been
living in since 1913. A grand-illusion, facilitated by Jews total control
of our usaFCC-TV/Radio; -whereby ‘we the sheeple’ have been
media-mesmerized! Time to round-up usual suspects, bring out the
guillotine, -cockroaches shall scurry to Isra’hell as the lights go on…!!!
@endimion17 Prof. Barnett and the engineers were not allowed access to the
rubble. They might have found all the columns buckled as you claim. The
question would still remain why they buckled such that the facade dropped
together (within 0.5 sec) according to NIST. One engineer was able to sneak
out one piece that appears to show thermate damage, high temperature
sulfidation, which could NOT have been due to drywall (calcium sulfate). It
was high temperature SULFUR, the yellow stuff.
@haeresy So out of four comments, all you’ve got to argue is how you think
I’m not worth arguing with? That’s very logical there, Troother. And
ridicule is “a known society odour for moral cowards”, you do realize this
works for your comments as well In any case, from my original first two
comments you responded to, by all means, please enlighten me what’s so
“faith based” about the content of the posts. And just so you know, this
video is about the events of WTC7 on 9/11 not religion…
@Skeptic121 I’m supposed to take that for granted?
@endimion17 No myth: NIST has acknowledged 2.25 seconds of free fall, equal
to about 25 meters. The rest of the descent was NOT at free fall. So? It
means that a 25 meter section of vertical support was suddenly removed from
all over the base. Not weakened; suddenly removed. After the building
dropped 25 meters, what happened? The (relatively) intact, undamaged part
of the building hit the ground. Kinetic and potential energy was used to
crush the structure. Anger is not an argument.
There was lots of Security Exchange Commission documents and many title
documents related to the 1999 end of the 3(70) year cycles of the United
states Chapter 11 reorganizational Bankruptcy. You do know that it is a
corporation? You do know that they are bankrupt and have to borrow their
own fiat currency from the Federal Reserve and pay it back at interest.
Ever expansion of debt, and the debt cannot be wiped out because that means
less money in circulation…
HOW DO THREE TOWERS ALL RIGGED WITH CONTROLLED EXPLOSIVES SURVIVE TWO
IMPACTS FROM FULLY FUELED PLANES,? HOW DO THEY ALL GO OFF PERFECTLY? YOU
ARE ALL INSANE! Just cause something APPEARS like something doesnt mean it
is. Just cause it looks like an explosion doesnt mean it was.
-Camera-person is suddenly alerted aurally & tremor to record this best
video of B-7’s explosive initial basement destruction (-note explosion
erupting at street-level on left), and progressing upward therefrom.
Initial video-frames capture Penthouse still structurally intact, but then
collapses an instant before zoom-in, revealing core-structure has
disintegrated via numerous skillfully timed diagonal Thermite-cuts, upon
order of jewZionist criminal Larry ‘just pull-it’ Silverstein et’al…!!!
@CokesnortinFreemason no, YOU’re mom, and in the butt.
People who believe that WTC7 imploded into it’s own footprint because of
random fires burning inside are the most ignorant, gullible and offensive
animals in the human race! This clip is a video record of a PERFECT
STRUCTURAL IMPLOSION CAUSED BY DEMOLITION! The top demo guys in the world
all agree too!
@Skeptic121 I know that, but if there was a localized “almost free fall”
(complete free fall is impossible), that doesn’t mean the whole event was
an “almost free fall”,but people that like to scream about this don’t
actually understand the difference. Sudden removal of forces can exist.You
clearly don’t understand how do columns work. If a columns buckles,its
loading capabilities drop sharply.Yes,it could support a small child,but
that’s negligible when calculating the whole event.
That darn Iraq, Afghanistan and Al-Quaida with their expertise in leveling
buildings
@brianalbright No shit. Everyone who believes that three buildings fell
just like the controlled demolition we have seen time and time again. Three
buildings all fell like controlled demolition on the same day within hours
of each other? And one wasn’t even hit by an airplane! This is the
coincidence theory. The odds of this happening to these three buildings are
astonomical and if youbelieve this fantasy you had better start buying
lottery tickets cuz you are due to win the big one.
@silvernail6 oh yeah look up Barry Jennings
Really people buildings don’t collapse perfectly in on themselves like
that!!!!!!!!!
@IIMoses740II What is there to counter? Nothing I’m going to say, nor
anyone else is going to “convert” or convince you. You have already made up
your mind as it’s based on beliefs, not science nor physics. What I find
odd and what I’ve already said is that you have come in here to try and
“sell” us your beliefs and that if we disagree with you, we’re “delusional”
and our argument is flawed as stated by your first attacks. The sweet smell
of ridicule, a known society odour for moral cowards.
Fire makes sky scrapers free fall into their own footprints, dont you know.
@TheManInTheMasks Structural instability. At around 1700f the steel that
was supporting most of the load had lost probably 85% of its integrity.
Naturally it will come down, and down it went. I don’t know what is so hard
about this. Why would they even need to use explosives? What is this trying
to accomplish? That hijackers wouldnt? Starting a war? Invading our
privacy? etc.. all this couldve been done without such an elaborate
conspiracy. A theory more plausible: GWB paid them to do it.
Move along folks! Nothing to see here. Right this way to the amazing
EGRESS!!!
“this freefall drop continued for approximately 8 stories.” — The NIST,
Final WTC 7 Investigation Report, November 2008 The only way free fall
could be attained for 8 stories is if there was no resistance (no support)
from approximately 8 stories near the base. Named officials at the NIST are
lying for and hiding evidence on behalf of the mass murderers of Americans.
To think of football stadiums full of innocent women and children in
Afghanistan and Iraq who’ve been killed for their lies
@fennucci Great question that many people on both sides of the argument
would look over, fortunately that answer is very easy. Most types of
explosives used in demolition are detonated. These detonators emit the
necessary amount of heat and shocks (those which are not found in such a
concentrated area almost anywhere on the planet, and yes, even inside a
burning building) to ignite the explosive. So once again, explain how “just
fire” caused a steel frame skyscraper to fall in on itself together
@endimion17 Had you the most basic understanding of even those which you
claim to be fools, you would realize that the “lean” you are seeing is due
to the side of the building caving inward; as those who stood on the other
side saw the same and most likely ignorantly believe the same thing you do,
but unfortunately for those ignorant people (including you) this is very
typical of controlled demolitions as a simultaneous weakness is needed
throughout the building for a uniform collapse, PWNED!!!
@haeresy BTW “science and physics”? That sounds like a phrase an uneducated
teenager would say while trying to conjure up something to sound smart.
Well you can talk about some “Church of Governmentology” as much as you
want(as random as it is), but by the way, even with my supposed “limited
understanding” I know that physics is a branch of science & that you did
nothing but try to sidetrack arguing against my original posts by attacking
my personal beliefs; way to fail at life Troother…
Even IF WTC7 was rigged with explosives…why does it matter? If the CIA,
FBI, NSA, Apple or whoever had classified information in that building,
they had every right to destroy it. Fire, police, and other individuals
would be crawling through each of those buildings looking for people. What
would happen if they came across classified information? My “theory” IF
this was a controlled demolition…this wasn’t a massive cover up of
information, it was a means of protecting information.
@TheManInTheMasks You have no idea what you are talking about. Search
fiterman hall sometime on google or something then come back to me and tell
me it felll in it’s own footprint.