Senator Chuck Robb asked about Building 7 Omission in 9/11 Report

Senator Chuck Robb asked about Building 7 Omission in 9/11 Report.


(Visited 28 times, 1 visits today)

Share This Post

10 Comments - Write a Comment

  1. I like the way he calls the 9/11 Report a "compelling read." The Warren
    Commission was considered a badly written, incoherent jumble, and so he
    implicitly compares the two. Of course, the easy reading of the 9/11 Report
    makes it more of a propaganda document than a technical document. Too hard
    to read, no one gets it. Too easy to read, people call it a fairy tale. Try
    the NTSB aircraft accident reports, they're, to borrow a phrase from Goldie
    Locks and the Three Bears, juuust right.

    Reply
  2. IranContraScumDid911 · Edit

    It was omitted because Larry Silverstrin confessed to calling the New York
    Fire Commissioner and telling him to “pull it”, then they watched the
    building come down. That was only after being on the phone to the insurance
    company to get permission, according to a FOX reporter there with him. It
    saved lives ……. The 9/11 Commission report is a fiction piece written
    to follow a script declared within 15 minutes of the first building
    explosion. 9/11 was treason, period.

    Reply

Post Comment