Senator Chuck Robb asked about Building 7 Omission in 9/11 Report.
(Visited 29 times, 1 visits today)
Senator Chuck Robb asked about Building 7 Omission in 9/11 Report
You might also like:
Logging you in...
I really don't like this mans attitude and body language...
I like the way he calls the 9/11 Report a "compelling read." The Warren
Commission was considered a badly written, incoherent jumble, and so he
implicitly compares the two. Of course, the easy reading of the 9/11 Report
makes it more of a propaganda document than a technical document. Too hard
to read, no one gets it. Too easy to read, people call it a fairy tale. Try
the NTSB aircraft accident reports, they're, to borrow a phrase from Goldie
Locks and the Three Bears, juuust right.
Commission was considered a badly written, incoherent jumble, and so he
implicitly compares the two. Of course, the easy reading of the 9/11 Report
makes it more of a propaganda document than a technical document. Too hard
to read, no one gets it. Too easy to read, people call it a fairy tale. Try
the NTSB aircraft accident reports, they're, to borrow a phrase from Goldie
Locks and the Three Bears, juuust right.
3000 people died but we didnt atemt to evaluate
It was omitted because Larry Silverstrin confessed to calling the New York
Fire Commissioner and telling him to "pull it", then they watched the
building come down. That was only after being on the phone to the insurance
company to get permission, according to a FOX reporter there with him. It
saved lives ....... The 9/11 Commission report is a fiction piece written
to follow a script declared within 15 minutes of the first building
explosion. 9/11 was treason, period.
Fire Commissioner and telling him to "pull it", then they watched the
building come down. That was only after being on the phone to the insurance
company to get permission, according to a FOX reporter there with him. It
saved lives ....... The 9/11 Commission report is a fiction piece written
to follow a script declared within 15 minutes of the first building
explosion. 9/11 was treason, period.
Larry Silverstein we know you pulled WTC7 down, you can't keep up the lie
forever.
forever.
larry Silverstein is GUILTY. The Neo Cons are guilty. Who is this guy?
Richard Nixon's son in law???
Richard Nixon's son in law???
Ah HA! NOW I know what a bumbling idiot looks like!
Comments by IntenseDebate
Loading IntenseDebate Comments...
I really don't like this mans attitude and body language…
I like the way he calls the 9/11 Report a "compelling read." The Warren
Commission was considered a badly written, incoherent jumble, and so he
implicitly compares the two. Of course, the easy reading of the 9/11 Report
makes it more of a propaganda document than a technical document. Too hard
to read, no one gets it. Too easy to read, people call it a fairy tale. Try
the NTSB aircraft accident reports, they're, to borrow a phrase from Goldie
Locks and the Three Bears, juuust right.
3000 people died but we didnt atemt to evaluate
It was omitted because Larry Silverstrin confessed to calling the New York
Fire Commissioner and telling him to “pull it”, then they watched the
building come down. That was only after being on the phone to the insurance
company to get permission, according to a FOX reporter there with him. It
saved lives ……. The 9/11 Commission report is a fiction piece written
to follow a script declared within 15 minutes of the first building
explosion. 9/11 was treason, period.
Larry Silverstein we know you pulled WTC7 down, you can't keep up the lie
forever.
an interview where nothing was said…
what a slime ball
larry Silverstein is GUILTY. The Neo Cons are guilty. Who is this guy?
Richard Nixon’s son in law???
He couldn’t stuff his face before the interview.
Ah HA! NOW I know what a bumbling idiot looks like!