Rep. Jim McDermott– questions about Building 7 are legitimate and merit further investigation

Representative Jim McDermott (D-WA), while a guest on C-SPAN’s Washington Journal on April 3rd, 2014, answered a question from a caller about Building 7’s de…


(Visited 23 times, 1 visits today)

Share This Post

Comments (13)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Benjamin Freedman's avatar

Benjamin Freedman · 573 weeks ago

Who is this hero and where did he come from? 
Richard Lowe's avatar

Richard Lowe · 573 weeks ago

Yes: CRIMINALLY COMPLICIT or just plain stupid.
mikecorbeil's avatar

mikecorbeil · 573 weeks ago

The congressman's response is better than if he claimed that the competent
and very expert 9/11 research about WTC 7 was baloney, but his reply
nevertheless is a very weak one for such an important issue.

He could've simply added that he doesn't think the issue is important
enough for him to fight or seriously work in Congress for the full
investigation that needs to happen. It's what he left inferred, so he
could've just come right out and stated it clearly.

It'd be interesting to know what the caller would've said in response to
the congressman's answer, if C-SPAN had permitted this. It's curious that
C-SPAN didn't allow for this.
winston smith's avatar

winston smith · 573 weeks ago

"..just my personal view" ?! We are talking about mass murder, treason, and
crimes against humanity. Given the fact the 911 attacks have served (and
continue to serve) as pretext to two wars with people being killed with no
due process, in countries all over the world. It has led to the near
complete dismantling of our civil rights (as embodied in section 21 of the
NDAA 2012). Given that the NSA continue to use 911 as pretext for their
continual violation of the law and that there is no statute of limitations
on mass murder and treason, there is no more urgent or timely issue. Given
the fact that military grade, nano-engineered thermitic explosives, has
been found and documented in every sample of WTC dust, a team of scientists
tested, with the results published in a (still unchallenged) peer-reviewed
study (Harrit et. al. 2009). Like the nano-thermite, the anthrax used in
the 'anthrax attacks' (which followed a week after 911 & included letters
that mentioned 9/11), -were also traced directly (and incontrovertibly)
back to US military labs. Given these well-documented facts, there is no
more urgent issue for this government to undertake, than a proper
investigation, by a regulatory agency, that considers all of the evidence,
-something that has yet to occur, into what actually brought down WTC 1 2 &
7. *Please see the link [North Tower Exploding] on my YouTube homepage for
an overview of facts that make the official account impossible.
Richard Lowe's avatar

Richard Lowe · 573 weeks ago

Andrew, I once would have shared your enthusiasm for this, but the time for
weak responses to a BIG LIE responsible for so much death and destruction
is long past. If he really got it, he be shaking the rafters, but he
qualifies everything just like your typical politician.
Richard Lowe's avatar

Richard Lowe · 573 weeks ago

No. This is just one more tap dancing t@rd in Washington. Anyone. ANYONE in
goverment who skirts the WTC evidence at this point is criminally
complicit.
Truth Soldier We Are's avatar

Truth Soldier We Are · 573 weeks ago

This congressman wants the truth about 9/11. We need him interviewed more
about 9/11. The truth is getting out. It's only a matter of time.
Shuddhashabda's avatar

Shuddhashabda · 573 weeks ago

See...now that wasn't so difficult was it? 
Glenn Zarmanov's avatar

Glenn Zarmanov · 573 weeks ago

Good post.
Mark Phelan's avatar

Mark Phelan · 573 weeks ago

#rethink911
Rep. Jim McDermott-- questions about Building 7 are legitimate and merit
further investigation
emerald1one1's avatar

emerald1one1 · 573 weeks ago

TheJetryder's avatar

TheJetryder · 573 weeks ago

Nunya fknbizness's avatar

Nunya fknbizness · 573 weeks ago

Post a new comment

Comments by