Representative Jim McDermott (D-WA), while a guest on C-SPAN’s Washington Journal on April 3rd, 2014, answered a question from a caller about Building 7’s de…
The congressman's response is better than if he claimed that the competent
and very expert 9/11 research about WTC 7 was baloney, but his reply
nevertheless is a very weak one for such an important issue.
He could've simply added that he doesn't think the issue is important
enough for him to fight or seriously work in Congress for the full
investigation that needs to happen. It's what he left inferred, so he
could've just come right out and stated it clearly.
It'd be interesting to know what the caller would've said in response to
the congressman's answer, if C-SPAN had permitted this. It's curious that
C-SPAN didn't allow for this.
"..just my personal view" ?! We are talking about mass murder, treason, and
crimes against humanity. Given the fact the 911 attacks have served (and
continue to serve) as pretext to two wars with people being killed with no
due process, in countries all over the world. It has led to the near
complete dismantling of our civil rights (as embodied in section 21 of the
NDAA 2012). Given that the NSA continue to use 911 as pretext for their
continual violation of the law and that there is no statute of limitations
on mass murder and treason, there is no more urgent or timely issue. Given
the fact that military grade, nano-engineered thermitic explosives, has
been found and documented in every sample of WTC dust, a team of scientists
tested, with the results published in a (still unchallenged) peer-reviewed
study (Harrit et. al. 2009). Like the nano-thermite, the anthrax used in
the 'anthrax attacks' (which followed a week after 911 & included letters
that mentioned 9/11), -were also traced directly (and incontrovertibly)
back to US military labs. Given these well-documented facts, there is no
more urgent issue for this government to undertake, than a proper
investigation, by a regulatory agency, that considers all of the evidence,
-something that has yet to occur, into what actually brought down WTC 1 2 &
7. *Please see the link [North Tower Exploding] on my YouTube homepage for
an overview of facts that make the official account impossible.
Andrew, I once would have shared your enthusiasm for this, but the time for
weak responses to a BIG LIE responsible for so much death and destruction
is long past. If he really got it, he be shaking the rafters, but he
qualifies everything just like your typical politician.
No. This is just one more tap dancing t@rd in Washington. Anyone. ANYONE in
goverment who skirts the WTC evidence at this point is criminally
complicit.
Who is this hero and where did he come from?
Yes: CRIMINALLY COMPLICIT or just plain stupid.
The congressman's response is better than if he claimed that the competent
and very expert 9/11 research about WTC 7 was baloney, but his reply
nevertheless is a very weak one for such an important issue.
He could've simply added that he doesn't think the issue is important
enough for him to fight or seriously work in Congress for the full
investigation that needs to happen. It's what he left inferred, so he
could've just come right out and stated it clearly.
It'd be interesting to know what the caller would've said in response to
the congressman's answer, if C-SPAN had permitted this. It's curious that
C-SPAN didn't allow for this.
"..just my personal view" ?! We are talking about mass murder, treason, and
crimes against humanity. Given the fact the 911 attacks have served (and
continue to serve) as pretext to two wars with people being killed with no
due process, in countries all over the world. It has led to the near
complete dismantling of our civil rights (as embodied in section 21 of the
NDAA 2012). Given that the NSA continue to use 911 as pretext for their
continual violation of the law and that there is no statute of limitations
on mass murder and treason, there is no more urgent or timely issue. Given
the fact that military grade, nano-engineered thermitic explosives, has
been found and documented in every sample of WTC dust, a team of scientists
tested, with the results published in a (still unchallenged) peer-reviewed
study (Harrit et. al. 2009). Like the nano-thermite, the anthrax used in
the 'anthrax attacks' (which followed a week after 911 & included letters
that mentioned 9/11), -were also traced directly (and incontrovertibly)
back to US military labs. Given these well-documented facts, there is no
more urgent issue for this government to undertake, than a proper
investigation, by a regulatory agency, that considers all of the evidence,
-something that has yet to occur, into what actually brought down WTC 1 2 &
7. *Please see the link [North Tower Exploding] on my YouTube homepage for
an overview of facts that make the official account impossible.
Andrew, I once would have shared your enthusiasm for this, but the time for
weak responses to a BIG LIE responsible for so much death and destruction
is long past. If he really got it, he be shaking the rafters, but he
qualifies everything just like your typical politician.
No. This is just one more tap dancing t@rd in Washington. Anyone. ANYONE in
goverment who skirts the WTC evidence at this point is criminally
complicit.
This congressman wants the truth about 9/11. We need him interviewed more
about 9/11. The truth is getting out. It's only a matter of time.
See…now that wasn't so difficult was it?
Good post.
#rethink911
Rep. Jim McDermott– questions about Building 7 are legitimate and merit
further investigation