9/11 Truth responds to NIST with HARD FACTS & Evidence! Please copy and re-post! Spread this like virus! Make sure to use different search tags too! NIST pro…
(Visited 42 times, 1 visits today)
NIST Report on WTC7 debunked and exposed!
You might also like:
Logging you in...
@GetHoney - you idiot lol talk about missing the point lol lol lol
+WarCrime911 great video! But tower 7 did not fall @ free fall speed. It
only did so for 8 stories. The total collapse is around like 15secs.
only did so for 8 stories. The total collapse is around like 15secs.
Thermate isn't the same as TNT. Oh, I hope people start to focus on our
insane government trying to kill us all and start focusing on the
Underground cities that they are building underneath our noses. Jesse
Ventura exposed these underground cities on his last episode The Ozarks on
TruTV. Message by the...tea...party....truther...do...com
insane government trying to kill us all and start focusing on the
Underground cities that they are building underneath our noses. Jesse
Ventura exposed these underground cities on his last episode The Ozarks on
TruTV. Message by the...tea...party....truther...do...com
HA HA!! you can't come up with ONE SINGLE legitimate source for your
nonsense, so now you're trying to enlist the help of another conspiracy
kook?? HA HA!! good luck with that jackass!!
nonsense, so now you're trying to enlist the help of another conspiracy
kook?? HA HA!! good luck with that jackass!!
@12weasel100 Ok show me facts explaining the free fall of wtc7.. PS dont
look at the official report. its a total mystery to NIST as it would be if
you rely on fire and rubble damage alone. No matter how much they load the
official story it still wont go at all.
look at the official report. its a total mystery to NIST as it would be if
you rely on fire and rubble damage alone. No matter how much they load the
official story it still wont go at all.
@admiralPs Thanks for your comment. I read both NIST Reports on WTC7 and
WTC1 and WTC2. (did you?) You can rely on a 9 minute "real 9/11" youtube
video to make up your opinion on this subject or actually spend time and
read the reports. Minor inconsistency are expected in a report of this size
but don't mean it's a conspiracy. I would be more suspicious if a report of
this size was flawless.
WTC1 and WTC2. (did you?) You can rely on a 9 minute "real 9/11" youtube
video to make up your opinion on this subject or actually spend time and
read the reports. Minor inconsistency are expected in a report of this size
but don't mean it's a conspiracy. I would be more suspicious if a report of
this size was flawless.
@12weasel100 " thermite/ thermate cools quickly it would not be found
molten weeks later."thats BS - It contains its own supply of oxygen, and
does not require any external source such as air. Consequently, it cannot
be smothered and may ignite in any environment, given sufficient initial
heat. It will burn just as well while underwater, for example, and cannot
even be extinguished with water, as water sprayed on a thermite reaction
will instantly be boiled into steam
molten weeks later."thats BS - It contains its own supply of oxygen, and
does not require any external source such as air. Consequently, it cannot
be smothered and may ignite in any environment, given sufficient initial
heat. It will burn just as well while underwater, for example, and cannot
even be extinguished with water, as water sprayed on a thermite reaction
will instantly be boiled into steam
@12weasel100 LMAO! I did, in fact listen to statements that claimed the
buildings were in trouble. But I find it odd how they came into play much
later than those that claimed they heard explosions. Also, if the buildings
were "leaning", wouldn't logic tell you that they would fall the way they
were supposedly "leaning"? The simple facts that there were claims of
explosions and the 1993 bombs, should have lead NIST to investigate for
bombs not just fires that caused the collapses!
buildings were in trouble. But I find it odd how they came into play much
later than those that claimed they heard explosions. Also, if the buildings
were "leaning", wouldn't logic tell you that they would fall the way they
were supposedly "leaning"? The simple facts that there were claims of
explosions and the 1993 bombs, should have lead NIST to investigate for
bombs not just fires that caused the collapses!
/watch?v=HvAJQnUJUVY&feature=related in this YT it is claimed a FDNY
engineer calculated the collapse of 7 at appx' 12.15pm 911 as "five hours"
They don't give his/her name or his/her calculations but if this claim was
true the NIST WTC7 report released 2008 would have been a redundant
duplicate and waste of public money.
engineer calculated the collapse of 7 at appx' 12.15pm 911 as "five hours"
They don't give his/her name or his/her calculations but if this claim was
true the NIST WTC7 report released 2008 would have been a redundant
duplicate and waste of public money.
@Tricky1ish there were also statements from professionals on site that
clearly made statements like the building is in trouble. The buildings are
leaning and we cannot save them. It is no a matter if the building will
fall but when. Seems you clearly chose to ignore those statements and
substitute in yours because the others clearly conflict with your bullshit.
Nothing you state is any fact that proves your bullshit. You moron.
clearly made statements like the building is in trouble. The buildings are
leaning and we cannot save them. It is no a matter if the building will
fall but when. Seems you clearly chose to ignore those statements and
substitute in yours because the others clearly conflict with your bullshit.
Nothing you state is any fact that proves your bullshit. You moron.
THIS is exactly why we have all been clamoring for a REAL investigation. so
that we can find answers to the millions of little questions, and of course
the real big ones like: who did this to us and why? in light of all the
evidence debunking the official stories, questions like these take on a
whole new meaning.
that we can find answers to the millions of little questions, and of course
the real big ones like: who did this to us and why? in light of all the
evidence debunking the official stories, questions like these take on a
whole new meaning.
one must ask themselves a question....Is it better to blindly trust those
that stand to gain from that trust and be misled into a situation or
allways be skeptical and ask questions. Many jews said "the government
would never do......." well those jews end up in concentration
camps......The ones that did not say that (Albert Einstien) and left
germany....well look where they end up....not concentration camps
that stand to gain from that trust and be misled into a situation or
allways be skeptical and ask questions. Many jews said "the government
would never do......." well those jews end up in concentration
camps......The ones that did not say that (Albert Einstien) and left
germany....well look where they end up....not concentration camps
Its only falling perfectly symmetrically at PROVEN free fall with everyone
and their dog reporting explosions. The only time a building can EVER fall
at free fall is due to demolition no matter what alternative explanation is
offered. So NIST with thier official story come up with "fire damage"!!!!
Its a lie its bullshit its not even scientifically possible and NIST should
be in court for fraud.
and their dog reporting explosions. The only time a building can EVER fall
at free fall is due to demolition no matter what alternative explanation is
offered. So NIST with thier official story come up with "fire damage"!!!!
Its a lie its bullshit its not even scientifically possible and NIST should
be in court for fraud.
Ryerson University,Dept.of Civil & Environmental Engineering,Toronto
University of British Columbia,Dept.of Science and Engineering,Vancouver
University of Calgary,Emergent Information Systems
Laboratory,Calgary,Alberta University of Ottawa,Dept.of Civil &
Environmental Engineering,Ontario University of Waterloo,Dept.of Civil &
Environmental Engineering,Ottawa,Ontario University of Western
Ontario,Boundary Layer Wind Tunnel Laboratory,London,Ontario, Canadian
Society for Civil Engeneering(CSCE)
University of British Columbia,Dept.of Science and Engineering,Vancouver
University of Calgary,Emergent Information Systems
Laboratory,Calgary,Alberta University of Ottawa,Dept.of Civil &
Environmental Engineering,Ontario University of Waterloo,Dept.of Civil &
Environmental Engineering,Ottawa,Ontario University of Western
Ontario,Boundary Layer Wind Tunnel Laboratory,London,Ontario, Canadian
Society for Civil Engeneering(CSCE)
"AMR Corp. warned investors Friday that it would lose a lot more money this
quarter than last quarter and would have a "significant" fourth-quarter
deficit. If the losses materialize as expected, it will mark the first time
since 1993 that AMR has posted a full-year loss" this was 2 days before
9/11. No wonder there were put options. No surprise, no conspiracy.
quarter than last quarter and would have a "significant" fourth-quarter
deficit. If the losses materialize as expected, it will mark the first time
since 1993 that AMR has posted a full-year loss" this was 2 days before
9/11. No wonder there were put options. No surprise, no conspiracy.
Moreover, you conspirators never deliver positive evidence. You always
refute the official stance, then skeptical, like me, refute your
counterargument and then you find something new. I'm sick of this viscous
circle. What about you come, just once, with a single piece of positive
evidence!?!
refute the official stance, then skeptical, like me, refute your
counterargument and then you find something new. I'm sick of this viscous
circle. What about you come, just once, with a single piece of positive
evidence!?!
It is deceptive to claim Building 7 fell at or near free-fall speed. When
measured from the moment of penthouse collapse, it was at least 12 seconds.
If you measure from the moment the corners started to drop, it is erroneous
to claim the whole building collapsed in that time because the core had
already collapsed, as evidenced by the penthouses collapsing prior to that
time.
measured from the moment of penthouse collapse, it was at least 12 seconds.
If you measure from the moment the corners started to drop, it is erroneous
to claim the whole building collapsed in that time because the core had
already collapsed, as evidenced by the penthouses collapsing prior to that
time.
your proof is that a photo taken possibly 5 minutes apart shows an inferno
going out and starting again on the north face of wtc7 floor 12? i'm done
here....
going out and starting again on the north face of wtc7 floor 12? i'm done
here....
I'm a retired career firefighter, so I know a little about fires. If diesel
can burn hot enough to melt steel, then why don't diesel fueled engines
melt the block? 9/11 was a FALSE FLAG/INSIDE JOB PULLED off by the WH, the
CIA, FBI, Pentagon and ISRAEL.
can burn hot enough to melt steel, then why don't diesel fueled engines
melt the block? 9/11 was a FALSE FLAG/INSIDE JOB PULLED off by the WH, the
CIA, FBI, Pentagon and ISRAEL.
If this were true why wouldn't we just light building on fire and watch
them fall into themselves? This is the only event on 9/11 that doesn't fly
with me. Pentagon the plane could have lost it's wings before it hit (It's
possible) 2 Towers were hit by planes so it's possible for them to fall. I
don't believe they should have fell the way they did, but that's just
opinion. Building 7 was not hit by a plane and should have never fell into
it self.
them fall into themselves? This is the only event on 9/11 that doesn't fly
with me. Pentagon the plane could have lost it's wings before it hit (It's
possible) 2 Towers were hit by planes so it's possible for them to fall. I
don't believe they should have fell the way they did, but that's just
opinion. Building 7 was not hit by a plane and should have never fell into
it self.
Oh yes, I know Ronald Weak. I've watched all of the debates with his top
"debunker" Mark Roberts. There are serious overlapping flaws in the logic
used by these "debunkers". For one: If, NIST's conclusions is that a single
column (79) was responsible for the global symmetric collapse of WTC 7.
Then, couldn't they have just used a small amount of nanothermite to sever
that beam, triggering the cascading collapse in their model? That's an
interesting engineering flaw either way.
"debunker" Mark Roberts. There are serious overlapping flaws in the logic
used by these "debunkers". For one: If, NIST's conclusions is that a single
column (79) was responsible for the global symmetric collapse of WTC 7.
Then, couldn't they have just used a small amount of nanothermite to sever
that beam, triggering the cascading collapse in their model? That's an
interesting engineering flaw either way.
NOT impossible. To state 'impossible" without considering how it fell is
weak at best, and the mark of a con at worst. Careful study of debris and
collapse video shows it indeed, not only possible, but likely, for the free
fall portion of perimeter wall collapse to have been gravitational. Joe Hill
weak at best, and the mark of a con at worst. Careful study of debris and
collapse video shows it indeed, not only possible, but likely, for the free
fall portion of perimeter wall collapse to have been gravitational. Joe Hill
Comments by IntenseDebate
Loading IntenseDebate Comments...
@GetHoney – you idiot lol talk about missing the point lol lol lol
+WarCrime911 great video! But tower 7 did not fall @ free fall speed. It
only did so for 8 stories. The total collapse is around like 15secs.
public investigation of 911 war crimes!
Thermate isn't the same as TNT. Oh, I hope people start to focus on our
insane government trying to kill us all and start focusing on the
Underground cities that they are building underneath our noses. Jesse
Ventura exposed these underground cities on his last episode The Ozarks on
TruTV. Message by the…tea…party….truther…do…com
HA HA!! you can't come up with ONE SINGLE legitimate source for your
nonsense, so now you're trying to enlist the help of another conspiracy
kook?? HA HA!! good luck with that jackass!!
@12weasel100 Ok show me facts explaining the free fall of wtc7.. PS dont
look at the official report. its a total mystery to NIST as it would be if
you rely on fire and rubble damage alone. No matter how much they load the
official story it still wont go at all.
@admiralPs Thanks for your comment. I read both NIST Reports on WTC7 and
WTC1 and WTC2. (did you?) You can rely on a 9 minute "real 9/11" youtube
video to make up your opinion on this subject or actually spend time and
read the reports. Minor inconsistency are expected in a report of this size
but don't mean it's a conspiracy. I would be more suspicious if a report of
this size was flawless.
Thank you for this great commentary video.
@12weasel100 " thermite/ thermate cools quickly it would not be found
molten weeks later."thats BS – It contains its own supply of oxygen, and
does not require any external source such as air. Consequently, it cannot
be smothered and may ignite in any environment, given sufficient initial
heat. It will burn just as well while underwater, for example, and cannot
even be extinguished with water, as water sprayed on a thermite reaction
will instantly be boiled into steam
@12weasel100 LMAO! I did, in fact listen to statements that claimed the
buildings were in trouble. But I find it odd how they came into play much
later than those that claimed they heard explosions. Also, if the buildings
were "leaning", wouldn't logic tell you that they would fall the way they
were supposedly "leaning"? The simple facts that there were claims of
explosions and the 1993 bombs, should have lead NIST to investigate for
bombs not just fires that caused the collapses!
/watch?v=HvAJQnUJUVY&feature=related in this YT it is claimed a FDNY
engineer calculated the collapse of 7 at appx' 12.15pm 911 as "five hours"
They don't give his/her name or his/her calculations but if this claim was
true the NIST WTC7 report released 2008 would have been a redundant
duplicate and waste of public money.
@Tricky1ish there were also statements from professionals on site that
clearly made statements like the building is in trouble. The buildings are
leaning and we cannot save them. It is no a matter if the building will
fall but when. Seems you clearly chose to ignore those statements and
substitute in yours because the others clearly conflict with your bullshit.
Nothing you state is any fact that proves your bullshit. You moron.
THIS is exactly why we have all been clamoring for a REAL investigation. so
that we can find answers to the millions of little questions, and of course
the real big ones like: who did this to us and why? in light of all the
evidence debunking the official stories, questions like these take on a
whole new meaning.
the government is lying.. what else is new?
one must ask themselves a question….Is it better to blindly trust those
that stand to gain from that trust and be misled into a situation or
allways be skeptical and ask questions. Many jews said "the government
would never do……." well those jews end up in concentration
camps……The ones that did not say that (Albert Einstien) and left
germany….well look where they end up….not concentration camps
Its only falling perfectly symmetrically at PROVEN free fall with everyone
and their dog reporting explosions. The only time a building can EVER fall
at free fall is due to demolition no matter what alternative explanation is
offered. So NIST with thier official story come up with "fire damage"!!!!
Its a lie its bullshit its not even scientifically possible and NIST should
be in court for fraud.
Ryerson University,Dept.of Civil & Environmental Engineering,Toronto
University of British Columbia,Dept.of Science and Engineering,Vancouver
University of Calgary,Emergent Information Systems
Laboratory,Calgary,Alberta University of Ottawa,Dept.of Civil &
Environmental Engineering,Ontario University of Waterloo,Dept.of Civil &
Environmental Engineering,Ottawa,Ontario University of Western
Ontario,Boundary Layer Wind Tunnel Laboratory,London,Ontario, Canadian
Society for Civil Engeneering(CSCE)
"AMR Corp. warned investors Friday that it would lose a lot more money this
quarter than last quarter and would have a "significant" fourth-quarter
deficit. If the losses materialize as expected, it will mark the first time
since 1993 that AMR has posted a full-year loss" this was 2 days before
9/11. No wonder there were put options. No surprise, no conspiracy.
Moreover, you conspirators never deliver positive evidence. You always
refute the official stance, then skeptical, like me, refute your
counterargument and then you find something new. I'm sick of this viscous
circle. What about you come, just once, with a single piece of positive
evidence!?!
It is deceptive to claim Building 7 fell at or near free-fall speed. When
measured from the moment of penthouse collapse, it was at least 12 seconds.
If you measure from the moment the corners started to drop, it is erroneous
to claim the whole building collapsed in that time because the core had
already collapsed, as evidenced by the penthouses collapsing prior to that
time.
your proof is that a photo taken possibly 5 minutes apart shows an inferno
going out and starting again on the north face of wtc7 floor 12? i'm done
here….
I'm a retired career firefighter, so I know a little about fires. If diesel
can burn hot enough to melt steel, then why don't diesel fueled engines
melt the block? 9/11 was a FALSE FLAG/INSIDE JOB PULLED off by the WH, the
CIA, FBI, Pentagon and ISRAEL.
If this were true why wouldn't we just light building on fire and watch
them fall into themselves? This is the only event on 9/11 that doesn't fly
with me. Pentagon the plane could have lost it's wings before it hit (It's
possible) 2 Towers were hit by planes so it's possible for them to fall. I
don't believe they should have fell the way they did, but that's just
opinion. Building 7 was not hit by a plane and should have never fell into
it self.
Oh yes, I know Ronald Weak. I've watched all of the debates with his top
"debunker" Mark Roberts. There are serious overlapping flaws in the logic
used by these "debunkers". For one: If, NIST's conclusions is that a single
column (79) was responsible for the global symmetric collapse of WTC 7.
Then, couldn't they have just used a small amount of nanothermite to sever
that beam, triggering the cascading collapse in their model? That's an
interesting engineering flaw either way.
NOT impossible. To state 'impossible" without considering how it fell is
weak at best, and the mark of a con at worst. Careful study of debris and
collapse video shows it indeed, not only possible, but likely, for the free
fall portion of perimeter wall collapse to have been gravitational. Joe Hill
well Mossad is a tool of global Zionism , 911 was indeed a Zionist planned
operation executed by Mossad and CIA ….etc
NIST's (gov wannaB's in labcoats) computer model collapse alone should tell
Law of physics would never allow a building to do what
one this is a farce and a smokescreen. Jeeez don't get me started
again…lol, this is the needle-dik of the tick on the tip of the 9/11
iceberg illusion
NISTS ver did. great stuff WarCrime
@HardcoreJungFunk NIST did not test for explosives because there was no
need to. Nothing indicated that explosives were used. All indication and on
site statements clearly pointed to fire being the cause of collapse.
Research and facts support that it was fire that caused the collapse.Anyway
you still fail to logically explain your bullshit statements using facts
and examples. You fail you retard.
Your assertion of foreign govt involvement is probably spot on. But, we
cannot get caught up in a name calling match. The people who wrote PNAC
stole TRILLIONS outright and ran home to Palestine to kill more Natives
with the money. I don't argue that. The seat of the US President is a
throne who's king is chosen by the so-called, Middle East's, most
aggressive Nuclear power. No doubt. Hide it? How? Every seat of power in
this nation and our press is filled by them?
Maybe the diesel engines have protective material inside. & The puffs of
material below the collapse points were strongest as they ended, proving
that they were implosions of the building, NOT bomb explosions.
no. the official story is that thousands of pounds of explosive would be
needed to bring down the building, because that's a conspiracy theory so
the laws of physics would have to apply, whereas ordinary and fairly small
fires could cause sudden collapse, because that's official truth, where the
laws of physics have been repealed. isn't that clear?
Firemen said they would not be able to contain the fires. They were not
fighting the fires either so they burned out of control. Do you have a
logical reason why you think you know more about a building fire than the
firemen at the scene? Firemen were predicting WTC7 was going to collapse.
Are you actually arguing that is a coincidence?
The building was brought down by uncontrolled raging fires weakening the
steel and destroying the core of the building so when it actually fell, it
was only the outer shell you saw falling. These fires lasted an estimated 7
hours. Long enough for all of the damage on the inside of the building to
occur. Steel expanded, weakened, and failed leaving a hollow center. It's
as simple as that.
@SPAGHETTIMONSTER1 You need a lot of Thermate to do that. How did they put
them in place with no one knowing? Who did it and how did they do it?
Warcrime911 is full of crap. There was no conspiracy. Please produce
evidence based on reality and not what's in your head. You have nothing
because there is nothing.
But we do have answers, in fact the only answer still remaining is what are
we going to do about it now?, shall we continue to wait on answers from
people who are NEVER going to give them to us, or are we going to start
filing lawsuits aginst those WE have found to be complicit. Ask Sorros why
he sent all those israelis back to israel who were actually arrested
before, on and after 9/11. Im sure you have heard about the israelis caught
by cops in a van loaded with explosives on the GW bridge?
NIST NCSTAR 1A aka the? official final report on wtc7? direct quote "This
acceleration was 32.2ft/s² (9.81m/s² ) equivalent to the acceleration of
gravity g." Thats the official report admiting free fall BTW
9/11 WAS A MOSSAD JOB!!
Nist is pist
NIST NCSTAR 1A aka the official final report on wtc7 direct quote "This
acceleration was 32.2ft/s² (9.81m/s² ) equivalent to the acceleration of
gravity g." Nist cant explain it but stick to fire damage story whern its
obviously impossible.