Larry Silverstein admits WTC7 was deliberately demolished on 9/11 – 2001.
(Visited 144 times, 1 visits today)
Larry Silverstein admits WTC7 was pulled down on 9/11
Larry Silverstein admits WTC7 was deliberately demolished on 9/11 – 2001.
Embedded HazbaR@T's are manipulating the rating system. Thumb them all
down.
Silverstein lied when he said that the fire in Building 7 was out of
control, that is first and foremost…The Building had been cleared, and
there were but a few small fires remaining at the time the order was
directed to "Pull It" what I don't understand is why the Swiss Re and the
Deutsche Bank's only quibble with the whole thing was that it was one act
of Terror and not two. After all they had to answer to their perspective
Boards and Share Holders as to why they were paying out on a claim when no
Thorough investigation had been conducted…that seems paramount as to
WTF???
What other properties has silverstein collected insurance on for
terrorism???
It worked so well in 2001.
So, basically you truthers are saying that he admitted on national
television that he and a team of firefighters blew up building 7.
Uh…… Couple questions:
Why would he admit this on national television?
Why would firefighters even be in charge of a demolition?
Even if "pull it" does refer to initiating a demolition, why does it make
even LESS sense in the context of everything else Silverstein said in this
clip (about the firefighters not being able to contain the fire, about
there already being a "terrible loss of life", etc.)?
Why would he admit this on national television?
Are you really accusing an entire team of firefighters of mass murder?
Why would he admit this on national television?
Why secretly demolish building 7 when it sustained enough damage to warrant
total re-construction (thus, demolition) afterwards anyway, like the
Deutsche bank building did?
Ever hear of Occam's Razor?
Did not one of you truthers think this through for more than 5 seconds?
Are you truthers fucking braindead?
NATIONAL TELEVISION–WHY?
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/silvers…
It's very obvious he meant to pull the firefighters out of the building so
there would be no more loss of life. This is the lamest smoking gun I've
ever seen.
3rd attempt to post this: For The Dark Passenger – formerly known as
handsofmyboots (or tinky)
(tinky)Wow, 262 lines, really?(end)
(tinky)Wow, another 200+line comment!?!(end)
Try reading them instead of making limp handed, gay comments.
(tinky)Just several other questions you've completely ignored in the past,
and questions you will ignore again:(end)
A bold lie.
Tinky's 10 terrifying questions and my answers:
1. Was Chief Nigro lying when he said, "in the FDNY pull means to withdraw,
and nothing else."??? Yes or No
Why would you think that I think he's lying? Of course "pull", when spoken
within the FDNY (eg, pull back, pull out) means to withdraw personnel.
Nigro was organizing the evac of the rescue effort from the wtc mess, ready
for the demolition of wtc7. You should try reading my 262 and 200 line
comments, idiot.
2. If explosive charges were used, why were they not captured on any of the
video footage, when they are in every other controlled demolition???
You assume multiple explosions. This is the west street footage with the
audio before NIST re-released the edited version without the boom sound at
0.21 secs :
Building 7 Collapse Time (my channel)
It's not wind. It's not mic rub. Use headphones. Note the timing
(immediately prior to the east penthouse collapse – allowing a couple of
seconds for the sound to travel makes the timing perfect).
3. How do you have evidence of thermate without traces of barium nitrate,
which is a main element of thermate???
I don't have evidence of thermate. What makes you think I do, liar? Where
did I ever claim anything about thermate? I never have. Good luck looking
for it.
4. How do you have evidence of thermite without traces of elemental
aluminum, which is a main element of thermite???
I don't have evidence of thermite. What makes you think I do, liar? Where
did I ever claim anything about thermite? I never have. Good luck looking
for it.
5. Who does Larry say made the decision to "pull"???
You are very, very unintelligent. I have answered this one over and over
and over! WHY don't you read? Do you have memory issues, or are you just
terminally stupid?
There is no point to this enquiry. It's a red herring. You're not proving
anything about anything. But, since you're lacking in brain matter I will
repeat yet again. Larry is saying that the FDNY made the call (decision) to
set in motion organizing the demo of wtc7. WHY is this so hard for you?
What don't you get? Ted Sutton has been very clear about this particular
point. Is he lying?
I predict that you will again ask this same stupid, pointless question.
Take note folks!
6. Why does every firefighter that was on the scene on 9/11, disagree with
you???
WHAT do you think they disagree with? Be specific, instead of making vague
bunkie-blabs.
7. What makes you smarter than the thousands of experts that were involved
in the investigation of the collapse of the WTC buildings that spent years
studying these structural failures???
Shut up. What makes YOU think YOU are smarter than AE911Truth, or
professional pilots whose professional opinions you disrespect by reducing
to mere OPINIONS (your use of caps to highlight your contempt, remember)?
Why are you smarter than pilots and engineers and architects who know
you're full of shit?
8. Have you signed the petition on the AE911Truth website as a supporter???
None of your business. Why do you want to know and why should I tell you?
Have YOU signed the petition supporting the official sto…. oh, silly me,
there isn't one.
9. Why haven't the "experts" of AE911Truth written a report of the
controlled demolition of the WTC buildings that can be reviewed by their
peers in the scientific, and engineering community, despite the fact
they've been around for about 6 years now???
AE911Truth don't have access to what NIST were privileged to see for one
thing. But notice your deeply shocking DOUBLE STANDARD here. Tell me, why
haven't the "experts" of NIST written a report that can be reviewed by
their peers in the scientific, and engineering community, instead of having
so much withheld data, despite the fact that their final report has been
around for about 6 years now??? Huh? You stupid hypocrite.
10. Why do you ignore these questions???
Bold faced liar.
PULL IT? PULL IT? HE DECIDED TO PULL THE BUILDING? Pull means Demolish
in the dictionary.
FOR THE LIBERTY AND PROSPERITY RALLY BEHIND THE CRY TO INVESTIGATE AND FIND
THOSE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DREADFUL DAY! THE FUTURE DEPENDS ON IT!
So how did they know, being the smartest decision to destroy WC 7, it would
go down like it did. ???????????????????????????????????? Why did it go
down like it did ????????????? Did they sneak in with explosives and wire
it like the other buildings in a couple of hours ???????????????? That
proves foreknowledge ……….. Bang !!! proof right there. But We have
gone past it all, those who see the truth see it, those who believe the
official BS will never change their minds.
How did I know that I would get responses today to the comment where I go
on a rant about "truthers" while the other comment where I list facts about
Larry referring to firefighters when he said "pull it", would be completely
ignored? Because "truthers" ignore facts and pretend they're not important!
@ The Dark Passenger
You no longer use the reply button, wishing not to appear in the margins of
the page and so I will do the same.
You wrote—>"……the majority of 9/11 "truthers" reside in the comment
section of 9/11 YouTube"
Answer—>The bunkies do likewise.
You wrote—> " Any normal person with skepticism that is interested in
knowing the real truth of 9/11 can look at both sides of this topic"
Answer–> This is why you must see the following available on YT(Copy and
paste in 3 parts)->
"September 11 – The New Pearl Harbor" – Full version
"Both sides" are explored and the debunkers are allowed to air their
opinions in this documentary.
You wrote that a "normal person" can—>"quickly realize which side is
supported by facts, and which side isn't"
Answer–> Does this mean that normal people "quickly" come to a conclusion
without reflecting and that abnormal people are those who ponder and
question?
You write waffle such as –>(" mountain of evidence"….. "distorted
facts, and outright lies"….. "dishonest, and disgraceful methods"……"
mockery of a horrific event"….."all they care about is making themselves
feel confident in their own delusional opinions because they like to think
they know more than most people, but they don't")
Both bunkies and truthers do not deny that this was a " horrific event"
Such horror was extended by USG's stamping on whole countries (
Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan. Libya etc) and the death count was far far
worse.
You wrote –>" 9/11! "Truthers" don't care about the victims of 9/11,"
Answer–> This is an "assumption" and of course they do. "care"
I miss tinky ( handsofmyboots ).
Israel and Mossad pulled it. They left too much evidence and loose ends
also. They couldn't have predicted how the web would allow the info to
spill past their media empires also. Sorry crooks. Americans are pretty
good.
9/11 was a terrorist attack……Larry was referring to firefighters.
Foreknowledge of the pulling down of wtc7.
Article (excerpt) : Shame On Jesse Ventura! By Jeffrey Scott Shapiro – Fox
News website (2010);
"I was working as a journalist for Gannett News at Ground Zero that day,
and I remember very clearly what I saw and heard.
Although I arrived at Ground Zero shortly after the Twin Towers fell, I was
in the danger zone created by Building 7 from the moment it collapsed in
the afternoon, an event that is one of the key cornerstones of the 9/11
conspiracy theory.
Governor Ventura and many 9/11 “Truthers” allege that government explosives
caused the afternoon collapse of Building 7. This is false. I know this
because I remember watching all 47 stories of Building 7 suddenly and
silently crumble before my eyes.
Shortly before the building collapsed, several NYPD officers and Con-Edison
workers told me that Larry Silverstein, the property developer of One World
Financial Center was on the phone with his insurance carrier to see if they
would authorize the controlled demolition of the building – since its
foundation was already unstable and expected to fall.
A controlled demolition would have minimized the damage caused by the
building’s imminent collapse and potentially save lives. Many law
enforcement personnel, firefighters and other journalists were aware of
this possible option. There was no secret. There was no conspiracy.
While I was talking with a fellow reporter and several NYPD officers,
Building 7 suddenly collapsed, and before it hit the ground, not a single
sound emanated from the tower area. There were no explosives; I would have
heard them. In fact, I remember that in those few seconds, as the building
sank to the ground that I was stunned by how quiet it was.
The myth that Building 7 was blown up by the U.S. government is false – and
so is the broader theory that our government was somehow involved in the
9/11 attacks. I know this because I was one of the few reporters who
investigated 9/11 conspiracy theories and urban legends on location in the
immediate aftermath of the tragedy."
Comments by actor Ted Sutton (YT – 2013):
"There was an announcement on local New York media within a day or 2 of
9/11 [he later corrects this to on the 9/11]. It said the city will "pull"
building 7 as it is a danger to first responders at ground zero. The idea
was the building was not stable so they wanted pull it down in some
controlled way. They said it had suffered so much damage that it could not
be repaired and could fall on people working to clear ground zero. They
said they would pull it and they did. Demo team sent in…. "I worked at
CBS News in New York on 9/11."
…[After being corrected about when 7 was pulled] "I believe you are right
about the time [5.20]. I remember now the decision came very quickly. It
sounded sensible. Just like you said [me], the building was on fire and
leaning. The fire department made the call. I [it] didn't take long to pull
it down."
And we know that John Kerry also referred to the pulling of building 7
quite casually, and highlighting it was done so for 'safety reasons'.
All this ties in with Larry' comments.. that wtc7 was pulled for safety
reasons ("terrible loss of life today…. smartest thing to do…"). A
perfectly reasonable and sensible decision. The only mystery is why it has
been denied/covered up.
Interesting point to note is that Shapiro, Sutton and Kerry all support the
official story of 9/11.
Reasons why Larry was referring to the contingent of firefighters when he
said "pull it", and not the C.D. of WTC7:
1) Before Larry says "maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it", he says
"we've had such terrible loss of life", which obviously means people.
2) On 9/11, several firefighters used the term pull to refer to the
evacuation of firefighters from WTC7, including Chief Nigro who gave the
order to pull.
3) Chief Nigro himself said "In the FDNY pull means to withdraw, and
nothing else"
4) Chief Nigro and the firefighters that were on the scene on 9/11 were
well aware that WTC7 was gonna collapse from the damage and fires, which is
why they withdrew (pulled) from WTC7.
5) Larry himself says "THEY made the decision to pull", not WE, not I, but
THEY (the FDNY).
6) And most importantly, there is plenty of evidence that proves that WTC7
collapsed from damage and fires, and absolutely none to suggest it was a
C.D, so it makes no sense whatsoever that he was referring to the C.D of
WTC7 because WTC7 was NOT a C.D.
The only people that fail to comprehend this are "truthers", who have
failed continuously for the past 10 years to prove that 9/11 was an inside
job. The only thing they've accomplished is showing the rest of society
just how ignorant, delusional, and dishonest they truly are!
John Kerry admitted building 7 was pulled down in a controlled
fashion,rumsfeld admits flight 93 was shot down,there are allsorts of
admissions on yt,concerning every aspect of this crime,all are ignored by
wankers like boots,who drones on and on about the same old shit without
addressing any real questions,ignore,evade,distort,anything rather than
face the cold hard simple truth
we've been listening to this clip for a decade – two things are abundantly
clear.. 1. it was an inside job. 2. they got away with it.
Reported for misleading title.
In this video larry is asked WHAT HAPPENED TO BUILDING 7,he then proceeds
to explain what happened and tells us it was pulled,not the rescue
operation,he was not asked about that,he tells us the decision was made to
pull,then we watched the building come down,he feels like he answered the
question posed and was not asked about it further so it makes no sense to
suggest he was talking about the firefighters
……..which is why the majority of 9/11 "truthers" reside in the comment
section of 9/11 YouTube. Any normal person with skepticism that is
interested in knowing the real truth of 9/11 can look at both sides of this
topic (the conspiracies, and the official version) and quickly realize
which side is supported by facts, and which side isn't. The official
version is supported by a mountain of evidence while the conspiracy side is
filled with assumptions, distorted facts, and outright lies, which is why
the majority of society ridicules 9/11 "truthers" for the dishonest, and
disgraceful methods that they use to continue to make a mockery of a
horrific event that took the lives of almost 3000 people on 9/11!
"Truthers" don't care about the victims of 9/11, or the real truth for that
matter, all they care about is making themselves feel confident in their
own delusional opinions because they like to think they know more than most
people, but they don't!
And as usual, ManAgainstLogic is right there to tickle his butt buddies
balls and congratulate them on a job well done……despite the fact that
he only has illogical rants to refute the valid points I make! Tell me
ManAgainstLogic, how can you have thermite without barium nitrate? And how
can thermite survive for 7hrs in an inferno? Uhhh……duhhh!!!
For the third time…….the title of the video is: on 9/11 WTC7 collapse
was firemens concern…….I repeat…….for the fourth time……..the
title of the video is: on 9/11 WTC7 collapse was firemens concern.
Ah yes. "Maybe the smartest thing to do is pullet.. and so we flapped
around like little chickens making clucking sounds.. and then we watched
the building collapse." hee hee.
Oh dear… temper, temper… you said that all in one breath. Did a little
bit of wee come out right before your empty head exploded?
The comments (when replying and so clicking the corresponding button) seem
to show up in our mails some time before they hit the message board.
What were you saying about cartoonish videos that you couldn't finish???
…..and yet, you claim there is 70 peer reviewed reports/articles on this
but you fail to list even one? All the available evidence points towards a
collapse from damage and the fires that followed. You say nano thermite was
used but there is no trace of barium nitrate, which is the main element of
thermite. Even S. Jones doesn't claim to have found any traces of it. No
barium nitrate, no thermite! If there was thermite in the WTC7, how did it
not get ignited until 7hrs after the fires ignited?
…cont'd… But when you look at that phrase you basically have two
choices to what he's refering to 1. An object ("it"), ie the building, and
thus talking about taking down wtc7. 2. An operation "(it") ie the
rescue/firefighting team. Problem is, at the time of this alleged phone
call (3:30-4pm), the FDCmdr had already ordered the firefighters out and
the evacuation was wrapped up earlier that afternoon. ..cont'd..