It takes over two weeks to set up a controlled demolition of a building. So by admitting that he ordered the demolition of building 7 on September 11th Larry…
(Visited 55 times, 1 visits today)
Larry Silverstein admits to having demolished wtc building 7
They threw his body into the only place it could never be found. Like that's a coincedence.
Obama's assassination of OBL is funny and completely not confirmable. He needed him "dead" to boost his numbers.
And you judge me so harshly based on a few comments on a youtube channel. Care to tell me how you composed such a nice list of personality qualities I possess. How can you be sure I don't research anything, because I don't make my case to you? Someone who has been rude with immature name calling and an aggressive over-tone since the beginning? Why would I want to engage in a conversation with such a simple minded person such as yourself.
You haven't thought this through. Enjoy the dunce cap
I have been accused of being paid by the government to promote the official story, trouble is I don`t even live in US. If I got paid for my comments on here I would be a wealthy man. The truth is I see some of the comments and they are so illogical and the supposed proof is so lacking in any foundation, that I feel compelled to try to point out the many flaws. That of course means I have either been paid or brainwashed, maybe both.
I see a reply to one of my comments, it says "MrRandomGuy is a government troll so its no point in arguing with him. Go look at his comment history to see what I`m talking about." I did not know I was arguing with you, and who is this NUNYAHBIZZNESSMAN who I have not seen any comments from and he withdraws his comment to me so no one else sees it. If he is too cowardly to make comments on his own and thinks I will argue with you, he really got that wrong, I fully agree with you.
Oh by the way deadbeliefs, you just answered your own question.
"If a car blows up it's because of the gas tank."
Hm, gee, do planes have gas tanks? Hmmmmm……………..
Comment posted too early. Comment 2
You do ZERO research on your own. ZIP, NADA, NONE ZERO. You 100% listen to the conspiracy shepherds and believe them without looking it up for yourself. I know a retarded autistic child that can look up information better than you. I know a paranoid schizophrenic who doesn't believe in this bullshit paranoid crap of a conspiracy. It's really sad when people with mental illnesses are smarter than you. What's your excuse dumb sheep?
and did you not read what I said earlier? Apparently you like a sheep still continue to FAIL to factor in everything like the plane impact.
You won't answer? Oh ok then you don't give a shit about the truth. You won't take less than 2 minutes to look up a simple wanted poster to figure out what it says, which shows my point that you do ZERO
Did you even read my last comment? I'm not answering anything you demand from me. You people have a false sense of entitlement. If you believe all those buildings came down because of fire then you are the one in need of serious educating. If a car blows up it's because of the gas tank. Where are the sources of explosions from the buildings? All the kitchens were electrical, no gas stoves or anything. I'm curious about how you're going to wiggle out of this one moron.
I completely agree. What strikes me the most about 'twoofers' (apart from their stupidity and general dishonesty) is their tendency to reverse the burden of proof and also their belief that they are allowed to make the most remarkably implausible (indeed impossible) claims without having to provide a shred of proof.
When a normal, reasonable, thinking person calls them on it and asks for evidence they immediately accuse that person of being as government agent, troll or shill. It is absurd.
No I know what the wanted poster says. YOU need to tell me what it says because YOU need to be educated on how to FACTOR IN EVERYTHING.
Oh well, Bush was a terrible president anyway and somewhat of a moron.
Tell me exactly where the official report says there were zero secondary explosions? Which document is it in? What page number? Secondary explosions happened because of fire. If a car catches fire then there's an explosion are you going to say "must have been a bomb?" No it was fire sheep.
If you want to know what the wanted poster says, go look for yourself dumbass, I'm not here to do what you want. Why are you all so self entitled? Look up his most wanted ad and see for yourself. As for the president 'mis-speaking' he said it multiple times on multiple days, meaning he rehearsed the speech, and still didn't correct it. Secondary explosives aren't in the official report so that's bullshit to, the official report states NO secondary explosive which contradicts eye witnesses
Dummy
And what makes you so sure the FBI doesn't believe he was behind 9/11 dumb sheep? Are you among the crew that are like "well he wasn't wanted for 9/11 so they don't believe he was apart of it?" Go look at his wanted poster and tell me EVERYTHING it says dumb sheep.
Eyewitnesses hear multiple explosions? Easy dumb sheep, fire can cause secondary explosions
Why the president said he saw the plane hit on tv? Ever think he misspoke dumb sheep? Maybe it was the news ABOUT the plane crash dumb sheep
Thank`s, a lot of people don`t like it when anyone asks simple questions like that, They seem to think they can shout conspiracy and we have to disprove their claims, they don`t have to prove them.
The bottom line is you are dishonest and playing dumb. U know your theories are lies and are trying to weasel and pretend you don't. U are using the classic Ray Comfort trick that he uses in creation/evolution debates. He pretends to be really stupid and not understand – so he doesn't have to prove HIS points. Then if his opponent doesn't have an answer for every single detail, Comfort pretends he has won. He slyly & dishonestly shifts the burden of proof and you are using the same method.
And I would just love to hear how Bush getting something wrong means there was a conspiracy. Presumably he meant the second plane, not the first. Even if he meant the first that means nothing except that he is thick.
President Reagan referred to the late Princess Diana in a speech as "Princess David". Does that mean we should all believe that Diana was actually a man in disguise??? According to 'Twoofers' the answer is probably 'yes'.
As I say, 'twoofers' are sooooo stupid it is painful.
Which President? Bush? How bout because he is an idiot? A moron? Terminally stupid and confused? Are you REALLY saying that because George "Stupidest President in History" (unless we ever elect a Twoofer) Bush said something stupid that means Larry Silverstein blew up his own building????
This is classic 'argument by anomaly' which characterises the 'Twoof' movement. Find some tiny detail that isn't clear, some tiny anomaly and pretend that invalidates a mountain of evidence against you.
Do you really think fires like that can burn without things like photocopiers, computers, flammables, nearby damaged cars etc exploding? If you do you are a fool.
What NOBODY heard and what no recording captured was the phenomenally loud and unmistakeable explosions that would be consistent with demolition charges going off. Sounds like that would have been heard by EVERYBODY within hundreds of yards and would have been captured by every TV camera or recording device remotely nearby.
You want to know how WTC7 collapsed? There is a 10,000 page report produced by NIST that goes into excruciatingly thorough detail on the point. GO READ IT!!!
I know you won't, because if you read it you would know and you prefer to be able to pretend you don't know so you can doubt it. This is a cognitive dissonance resolving pattern called Selective Exposure.
Why did eye-witnesses hear explosions? Because three f**ing huge buildings were on fire, you numpty. To be continued
This is the most pathetic garbage – even by Twoofer standards.
1. Stop playing the innocent – I can see right through you. Don't try to reverse the burden of proof with me, boyo! Every si ngle intelligence and law enforcement agency in AMerica believes OBL was behind 9/11 including the FBI. Produce your evidence that the FBI think differently!! Stop weaselling! Stop lying! Stop hiding behind your affected innocence. Produce any evidence that the FBI doubt OBL's involvement.
Cont'd
Why should I believe OBL was behind 9/11 when the FBI doesn't believe he was behind 9/11?
Instead of me disproving the official story, take a stab at proving it for me.
Prove to me how in (tower seven) a single support collumn failure on the far right side can lead to a full collapse of the entire building within a matter of seconds? Or why so many eye witnesses heard multiple explosions, why the president is on record saying he watched the first plane hit on TV when it wasn't even aired?
I am basing my impression of you on the fact that you spout endless illogical, self-contrdictory nonsense on this thread. Maybe you are sweet to children and kind to animals – I don't care. This thread is about 9/11 and so far you have shown yourself to be nothing but ignorant, illogical and dishonest.
I am debating by putting forward facts and evidence and disputing your nonsense. You are dancing around and avoiding answering any questions or producing any evidence.
Point one was thoroughly and comprehensively debunked YAERS back. If you think differently produce evidence. Where are these alleged hijackers who are still alive? Who are they and where are they?
Answer the questions you lying douche-bag.
On what do you base your risible claim that OBL was not believed to be behind 9/11.
ANNNNNND again you base your opinions of me on a youtube channel, which sheds but one aspect of my personality/life, and yet you feel comfortable enough to judge my entire existence. You should be ashamed of yourself for being so closed minded, that is if you're aware of the concept of shame, I know how you proud/superior folk can't do no wrong right?
See this isn't a debate, you're not debating, you're claiming superiority without even glancing twice.
If you mean to tell me that the government isn't willing to dispense of the most hated man in the US (bin laden) to cover their own asses, you're stupid beyond repair.
Also, point number one isn't completely wrong, it wasn't debunked years ago, the fact you believe so only furthers your ignorance.
As for that third part, you're demanding answers from me, I don't work for you, ask politely.
Pathetic! Dont play the innocent with me. WHo needs to be an insurance broker to know that insurance companies don't pay billions to people who have declared to them that they intend to defraud them.
You seem happy enough to set out conspiracies that would require some knowledge of the alleged plot and then when questioned you hold up your hands and play innocent. There is absolutely NOTHING honest about you.
1. False. Completely wrong. Debunked YEARS ago. How can you POSSIBLY still be pushing that garbage???
2. If Bin Laden wasn't wanted for 9/11 why did the US government have him assassinated for that crime? And if he was being framed why would the government not frame him properly? You base your spew on an old myth from a website that the Feds hadnt updated.
3. If it wasnt a plane, what was it? Tell me what you think it was and provide evidence.
I don't work for, nor am I an insurance broker, so how the hell am I supposed to give an honest correct answer for that when I don't even know how the insurance for such a structure works. I admit my intelligence when it comes to money laundering isn't where it should be, I apologize for being an honest citizen.
You don't care about the dead at all. You are only interested in peddling lies because you get some kick out of it. Every delusional 'twoofers' claims they are standing up for the families and victims when they are really just promoting poison because it meets some need.
Get back to the evidence (which you keep ducking). Why the Hell would an insurance company have paid billions to LS if he had called them and tipped them off he planned to blow up his own building? Answer the questions.
This has gone far off topic, if you care to actually debate with me than we might as well start from the top.
1. Several of the suspected terrorists are still alive and well.
2. Bin Laden wasn't/isn't/was never wanted for his connections to 9/11 (look on the FBI's most wanted list if you wish, he's wanted for the 1998 attacks at the embassy, no evidence to put him into the 9/11 boat)
3. The 84 cameras taken from around the pentagon after whatever hit it (because it wasn't a plane)
Start there.
Like I need your approval of what's credible? How highly do you see yourself? You just made me laugh out loud again