Fake Building 7 video debunked by Dr Judy Wood on The Vinny Eastwood Show

Why did it take 10 years to release this footage? Why was it uploaded in such poor quality? Audio of explosions can be laid over the original audio, Pixels c…


(Visited 83 times, 1 visits today)

Share This Post

Comments (29)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Ted Hughes's avatar

Ted Hughes · 577 weeks ago

Judy Woodification
Michael Standcumbe's avatar

Michael Standcumbe · 577 weeks ago

I think it is high time we all come clean and admit that it was not box
cutters that the "Terrorists" used. It is now crystal clear that it was
tooth picks!
Robert Schumann's avatar

Robert Schumann · 577 weeks ago

Has anybody seen Bigfoot?? Something tells me the people here have some
secret evidence..
Loki Research's avatar

Loki Research · 577 weeks ago

I don't believe a word this woman said. I use my on mind, intellect and
common sense. It brings be to a very different conclusion. It was no
accident or fire that caused this building to fall. None, nadda, no way on
God's green Earth did this building completely and totally collapse from a
fire and other falling debris.
Judy Wood is Disinformation 
The "official version" (per NIST, and chorused repeatedly to this day by
the media, left and right) is the most absurd conspiracy theory proposed to
date. ObL's name hit the air well before the dust had cleared (literally).
It took the FBI nearly 4 days to identify the presumptive Boston bombers.
How did they identify 19 'hijackers' whose names were not on the flight
list so quickly?
Vincent Eastwood's avatar

Vincent Eastwood · 577 weeks ago

@letsgomd Already did, it didn't explain how dust particles can fall to
earth getting smaller as they go.
sanluisskywatch's avatar

sanluisskywatch · 577 weeks ago

Has Wood ever talked about September Clues and the fact that most of the
video evidence we were shown was faked?
1dayU2canBdaGreatest's avatar

1dayU2canBdaGreatest · 577 weeks ago

It is a inside job otherwise the u.s government would have done a thorough
investigation to present to the public! Experts will tell you alot of the
official story is not possible. Even the most highly educated people are
labelled nutjobs and ignored!
Mike Smith's avatar

Mike Smith · 577 weeks ago

Hey Vinny. Have you heard of a person on YouTube who go's bye the name
"TheAntiTerrorist". Would be worth you're time checking him out. Quite an
insightful person.
you are also asserting that their should have been pock marks in the
building opposite, really ? did you climb the face of the building to see
all that - would a coke can have really indented a concrete building
standing opposite, WT7 is a large building, very wide, so explosions taking
place at the core, would perhaps not have projected that much debris,
especially after most of it had burnt away, so there is a possible
explanation for there not to have been much projectile matter on collapse
@TheDochollidaytexas This event doesn't conform to the profile of a
demolition. Demolitions are intended to cause collapses. A collapse is
defined as a "fall into a jumbled or flattened mass through the force of
external pressure." With a great deal of evidence Dr. Woods has proven the
WTC towers disintegrated, their mass (1,000,000 tons) turning into fine
particulate matter. Such disintegration has the profile of a directed
energy weapon.
Vincent Eastwood's avatar

Vincent Eastwood · 577 weeks ago

@letsgomd Already did, it didn't explain how dust particles can fall to
earth getting smaller as they go.
You`re comment lacks credibility and is also contradictory,why do people
make stupid comments like these.You say a C-D on one hand & the steel is
real good on the other so how was all this steel turned to dust on its way
down,if it was a C-D it would Slam to the ground,as they were built on
Bedrock why was there not a bigger sisemic signal,a C-d can NOT turn steel
to dust.Where was the debris pile,Seattle Kingdome left a pile 12% of its
original height,WTC should have been near 15 storys high.
investigate911 d.o.t. org AE911truth d.o.t. org Search: Active Thermitic
Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe
@MRNEWSguerillamedia hi again mr guerilla, sure, i was saying this again as
a response to the lady in the video, saying she could not see pock marks
from the explosions (the ones which support the controlled demolition
scenario) she literally says she sees none, thus her summary is: no
demolition scenario - bit simplistic, im sure there was impact marks on
other buildings, or why would other buildings be on fire, unless of course
building 7 was set on fire by hand ... anyway.
you are so full of shit mrnews - seriously, it didnt slam to the ground,
are you blind of simply mentally deficient - it is clear that the mass of a
building being burned out never takes a building down, and not the way it
did - not equally across the whole breadth of the building - your comments
dont criticise this, you are a pure truther with no critical judgement -
i.e just as bad a hardcore conspiracy theorist - go tree hugging, youd be
more useful to society doing that.
Simpleton DJ.
cptskellern's avatar

cptskellern · 577 weeks ago

Great insult, You think that up all by yourself?
FreedumbFighter28's avatar

FreedumbFighter28 · 577 weeks ago

JUDY WOOD???!!! hahahahahahaha She has stated 9/11 WAS NOT AN INSIDE JOB,
on several shows...C2C Bob Tuskin. And she wants us to believe terrorists
used a space based laser to take down the towers. FOR TEAN TEARS she has
said poof and dustified and other BS NO FACTS,NO SCIENCE
/watch?v=ymVay70U_pQ <--sounds like debris to me ANd whoever this guy is
talking, Didnt notice its revrsed, no forground buildings, flashes stay the
same size even after zoom. NO WONDER HE DONT KNOW....XD
scrollandkey's avatar

scrollandkey · 577 weeks ago

the nz accent... ugh
FreedumbFighter28's avatar

FreedumbFighter28 · 577 weeks ago

OMG...you guys were fooled by Eddie Currents FAKE video?? lol.....and judy
woods bs. How sad
Bombs go over the speed of sound? Are you fucking kidding lady? It's 22,000
fps for c-4 or 28,000 for T-4 and or TNT.
also you yourself say that the fires burnt more on one side, wouldn't that
indicate an eventual uneven collapse ....... you dont make sense, sorry
godbluffvdgg's avatar

godbluffvdgg · 577 weeks ago

@TheDochollidaytexas Actually, it was they who attacked Dr. Wood. But, lets
not let facts get in the way.

Post a new comment

Comments by