It isn't about ordinary lies – it's about lies like the weapons of mass
destruction in Iraq to justify a war against that country – with around one
million civil casualties, beside many US/GB/FR/GER soldiers who lost their
life or health there. And this is only one of many lies with terrible
effects for many people. It's very suspicious if the government stops an
investigation at certain points, e.g. who bought 95% of the AA & UA put
options for that day? I'm more critical since then
"who bought 95% of the AA & UA put options for that day" This is
demonstrably false, and the fact that I have ALREADY pointed this out to
you shows that your interest isn't in truth. Don't waste my damned time.
You have no case, get an education and move your then educated argument
into politics, or bugger off.
unless you witnessed it in person, no one knew about WTC 7 until someone
told them! and you can find a conspiracy in any event if you want to find
one before December 7, 1941, many senior naval commanders felt the US fleet
was safe at Pearl Harbor, never before in US history had a US Battleship
been sunk in air attack four US Battleships were sunk that day never again
would a US Battleship be sunk in air attack four times in one day, never
before and never after
nuclear demolition is as stupid as the no plane theory — there were
thousands of workers on site — not one had radiation sickness — people
survived the collapse and were rescued alive your hero, dimitri is a proven
liar at one point he claims that US Building codes required nuclear
demolition devices in all high rise structures — he appearently does not
know that ALL US laws are published and available, there are no secret laws
1:06 "I remember THEY told us THEY'VE imploded it, it smoked for days."
Possibly why Danny lost his life by the "speed-up-crash-into-tree-explode"
method, as in the case of Michael Hastings. I see ctcole77 here, so I
suppose the two murders are linked.
You're full of bunk and it's probably why you provided absolutely no
refererences to support your claim that the official conspiracy theory is
indeed and fully true. PC Mag. isn't a vettable reference, either. The mag.
earns most of its $ from large big business, fe. It's in a position of
conflict of interest and can't be counted on for truthful science re. 9/11.
But, anyway, you provide no ref's at all to support your bunk, and what
AE911Truth says, fe, hasn't been proven demonstrably wrong.
"The only one who is ignoring facts is you" I haven't ignored any facts,
and you haven't presented any so I don't see what grounding you have to
make this claim. "I know it's not easy to realized that you may not trust
your government" It would be easy with sufficient evidence. But there ISN'T
sufficient evidence, and the educated truthers admit this. Also lack the
information to make claims like "it wouldn't fall like that". There isn't
another case even close to similar for comparison.
you have absolutely no evidence it was anything other than an accident —
nothing, nada, no evidence — keep looking for the black suits, it may be
the white suits that come for you
Actually, BBC reported the WTC7 collapse 20 minutes before it happened!
"Coincidence", of course. A glitch in the matrix more like. I'm afraid,
that the rest of your comment is a non-sequitur. A response to some kind of
argument I haven't made. Pearl Harbor has nothing to do with anything.
Here's a suggestion. Ask around you how many buildings collapsed on 9/11.
Most people haven't even registered the fall of building 7. It was not even
mentioned in the initial 9/11 report. Holy coincidence!
The official box cutter conspiracy theory isn't abstruse, since it isn't
difficult to understand. What's difficult about it is believing it. It
isn't difficult to laugh at people who promote the bunk theory though.
UNBELIEVABLE. THIS MAN IS KILLED. THIS COULD BE YOU AND ME THERE IS NO GOD.
WE SHOULD SAVE US ALL. REVOLUTION AGAINST ALL ORGANISED CONSTITIONS NOW OR
NEVER.. RIP MR JOWENKO.
truthers believe you are stupid enough to believe anything they tell you
they appear to be correct. Nonetheless. despite your lies, you cannot
change undeniable truth Truth THE FDNY predicted the building would
collapse, all senior comanders on site agreed with that decision WTC 7 did
NOT fall into its own footprint, it destroyed Fitter hall, across the
street the FDNY alerted the media and established a collapse zone the media
has been known to get the story wrong
As they say, "it would be a real shame if something bad were to happen to
him…". It did happen indeed. I assume that in your world, there is no
such a thing as "too many coincidences". Feel free to rationalize away.
Eventually though, all those “coincidences”, explanatory gaps, news
manipulation, hints of deliberate destruction of evidence etc., ad up.
Jowenko just commented on the evidence he was presented. He didn't even
know about WTC7 before he was told that it collapsed on 9/11. Did you?
By the way – There are two recent university studies available about this
technology to remote control automobiles. The first is entitled:
COMPRHENSIVE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSES OF AUTOMOTIVE ATTACK SURFACES. The
second is: EXPERIMENTAL SECURITY ANALYSIS OF A MODERN AUTOMOBILE. Both
papers are collaborations between the University of California at San Diego
and La Jolla, and the University of Washington, Seattle. They make for
fascinating, frightening and informative reading.
THE ZIONIST JEW SILVERSTEIN(OWNER OF THE TWINTOWERS) MADE 2.000.000.000. HE
INVESTED 2.000.000, HE FUCKED THE INSURRANCE, THEY FUCKED THE WORLD. NICE
PROFIT BTW FUCKING ZIONIST JEW. YOU WILL BURN IN HELL, CHILD OF
ISREALHELLLL. LET ME KNOW IF YOU COULD SPEND YOUR MONEY THERE. RIH
SILVERSTEIN
"then you better know, right?" You better damn well have the evidence to
support your claims. Simply lacking "all the answers" isn't a good reason
for you tards to run around screaming an unsupported hypothesis as fact.
The mere fact that you refer to it as "truth" shows that you have an agenda
and that you will only consider information that supports it, ignoring
anything valid in response to your (parroted) claims.
"The Delft Tower, Windsor Tower, and Kadar Toy Factory all failed due to
fire." NIST themself, in their WTC7 report which came out 8 years after
9/11 (yes it took them 8 years to organise a conclusion…lols), say that
it was the first time a structural steel building over 15 stories high had
ever completely failed due to fire. Before the 2009 NIST report was
released, the story being fed by the likes of Popular Mechanics was total
bullshit claiming there was major structural damage…bla bla
it was an auto accident, no law enforcement official and no family members
has ever claimed otherwise why would anyone care to harm him? he had
already said what he had to say, and he frankly hurts you more than he
helps, because he said that absolutely, the towers were NOT demolitions
"Is that member of the BYU faculty an engineer? Is that member of the BYU
faculty an expert in material science? No. He's not. 911 TRUTH = FAKE
THERMITE" – ctcole77 "Received a Ph.D. in Materials Science and
Engineering" – BYU who's the liar again?
If you search for Media Blackout of WTC7 you will find hundreds of blogs
and posts about it from 2006-7. It had been blacked out deliberately for 5
years. Even when Steven Jones was interviewed by Carlson Tucker in 2006
about
Just like anyone who speaks out…you die.
It isn't about ordinary lies – it's about lies like the weapons of mass
destruction in Iraq to justify a war against that country – with around one
million civil casualties, beside many US/GB/FR/GER soldiers who lost their
life or health there. And this is only one of many lies with terrible
effects for many people. It's very suspicious if the government stops an
investigation at certain points, e.g. who bought 95% of the AA & UA put
options for that day? I'm more critical since then
"who bought 95% of the AA & UA put options for that day" This is
demonstrably false, and the fact that I have ALREADY pointed this out to
you shows that your interest isn't in truth. Don't waste my damned time.
You have no case, get an education and move your then educated argument
into politics, or bugger off.
unless you witnessed it in person, no one knew about WTC 7 until someone
told them! and you can find a conspiracy in any event if you want to find
one before December 7, 1941, many senior naval commanders felt the US fleet
was safe at Pearl Harbor, never before in US history had a US Battleship
been sunk in air attack four US Battleships were sunk that day never again
would a US Battleship be sunk in air attack four times in one day, never
before and never after
nuclear demolition is as stupid as the no plane theory — there were
thousands of workers on site — not one had radiation sickness — people
survived the collapse and were rescued alive your hero, dimitri is a proven
liar at one point he claims that US Building codes required nuclear
demolition devices in all high rise structures — he appearently does not
know that ALL US laws are published and available, there are no secret laws
You said it, Google 'hasbara trolls' and 'megaphone ap' to find out more
about these maggots in our midst
Why is the entire interview in Dutch but the one line "This is controlled
demolition" in English?
The CIA is the assassin of Danny! R.I.P!!! I'm SURE!
1:06 "I remember THEY told us THEY'VE imploded it, it smoked for days."
Possibly why Danny lost his life by the "speed-up-crash-into-tree-explode"
method, as in the case of Michael Hastings. I see ctcole77 here, so I
suppose the two murders are linked.
You're full of bunk and it's probably why you provided absolutely no
refererences to support your claim that the official conspiracy theory is
indeed and fully true. PC Mag. isn't a vettable reference, either. The mag.
earns most of its $ from large big business, fe. It's in a position of
conflict of interest and can't be counted on for truthful science re. 9/11.
But, anyway, you provide no ref's at all to support your bunk, and what
AE911Truth says, fe, hasn't been proven demonstrably wrong.
"The only one who is ignoring facts is you" I haven't ignored any facts,
and you haven't presented any so I don't see what grounding you have to
make this claim. "I know it's not easy to realized that you may not trust
your government" It would be easy with sufficient evidence. But there ISN'T
sufficient evidence, and the educated truthers admit this. Also lack the
information to make claims like "it wouldn't fall like that". There isn't
another case even close to similar for comparison.
you have absolutely no evidence it was anything other than an accident —
nothing, nada, no evidence — keep looking for the black suits, it may be
the white suits that come for you
Actually, BBC reported the WTC7 collapse 20 minutes before it happened!
"Coincidence", of course. A glitch in the matrix more like. I'm afraid,
that the rest of your comment is a non-sequitur. A response to some kind of
argument I haven't made. Pearl Harbor has nothing to do with anything.
Here's a suggestion. Ask around you how many buildings collapsed on 9/11.
Most people haven't even registered the fall of building 7. It was not even
mentioned in the initial 9/11 report. Holy coincidence!
"auto accident" ? right ! That would be like saying that the WTC towers
collapsed after a "plane accident".
Jobrelated term also used in Dutch. We borrow a lot of words from your
language. Weekend, goal etc.
The official box cutter conspiracy theory isn't abstruse, since it isn't
difficult to understand. What's difficult about it is believing it. It
isn't difficult to laugh at people who promote the bunk theory though.
naber lan sikko
UNBELIEVABLE. THIS MAN IS KILLED. THIS COULD BE YOU AND ME THERE IS NO GOD.
WE SHOULD SAVE US ALL. REVOLUTION AGAINST ALL ORGANISED CONSTITIONS NOW OR
NEVER.. RIP MR JOWENKO.
truthers believe you are stupid enough to believe anything they tell you
they appear to be correct. Nonetheless. despite your lies, you cannot
change undeniable truth Truth THE FDNY predicted the building would
collapse, all senior comanders on site agreed with that decision WTC 7 did
NOT fall into its own footprint, it destroyed Fitter hall, across the
street the FDNY alerted the media and established a collapse zone the media
has been known to get the story wrong
As they say, "it would be a real shame if something bad were to happen to
him…". It did happen indeed. I assume that in your world, there is no
such a thing as "too many coincidences". Feel free to rationalize away.
Eventually though, all those “coincidences”, explanatory gaps, news
manipulation, hints of deliberate destruction of evidence etc., ad up.
Jowenko just commented on the evidence he was presented. He didn't even
know about WTC7 before he was told that it collapsed on 9/11. Did you?
By the way – There are two recent university studies available about this
technology to remote control automobiles. The first is entitled:
COMPRHENSIVE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSES OF AUTOMOTIVE ATTACK SURFACES. The
second is: EXPERIMENTAL SECURITY ANALYSIS OF A MODERN AUTOMOBILE. Both
papers are collaborations between the University of California at San Diego
and La Jolla, and the University of Washington, Seattle. They make for
fascinating, frightening and informative reading.
THE ZIONIST JEW SILVERSTEIN(OWNER OF THE TWINTOWERS) MADE 2.000.000.000. HE
INVESTED 2.000.000, HE FUCKED THE INSURRANCE, THEY FUCKED THE WORLD. NICE
PROFIT BTW FUCKING ZIONIST JEW. YOU WILL BURN IN HELL, CHILD OF
ISREALHELLLL. LET ME KNOW IF YOU COULD SPEND YOUR MONEY THERE. RIH
SILVERSTEIN
here's the video watch?v=k3wwdI0XawI now go crawl under a bridge you troll
"then you better know, right?" You better damn well have the evidence to
support your claims. Simply lacking "all the answers" isn't a good reason
for you tards to run around screaming an unsupported hypothesis as fact.
The mere fact that you refer to it as "truth" shows that you have an agenda
and that you will only consider information that supports it, ignoring
anything valid in response to your (parroted) claims.
typical truther, uneducated, uninformed, and ill mannered
"The Delft Tower, Windsor Tower, and Kadar Toy Factory all failed due to
fire." NIST themself, in their WTC7 report which came out 8 years after
9/11 (yes it took them 8 years to organise a conclusion…lols), say that
it was the first time a structural steel building over 15 stories high had
ever completely failed due to fire. Before the 2009 NIST report was
released, the story being fed by the likes of Popular Mechanics was total
bullshit claiming there was major structural damage…bla bla
Gee. I am awfully sorry that I am making your vagina hurt!
it was an auto accident, no law enforcement official and no family members
has ever claimed otherwise why would anyone care to harm him? he had
already said what he had to say, and he frankly hurts you more than he
helps, because he said that absolutely, the towers were NOT demolitions
"Is that member of the BYU faculty an engineer? Is that member of the BYU
faculty an expert in material science? No. He's not. 911 TRUTH = FAKE
THERMITE" – ctcole77 "Received a Ph.D. in Materials Science and
Engineering" – BYU who's the liar again?
RIP DANNY
Well, fuck you very much!
If you search for Media Blackout of WTC7 you will find hundreds of blogs
and posts about it from 2006-7. It had been blacked out deliberately for 5
years. Even when Steven Jones was interviewed by Carlson Tucker in 2006
about
probably because they dont know… Its just such a coincedence, it cant
excist