“Congressman The Evidence That WTC Building-7 Was Brought Down With Explosives Is Real And Proven!”

December 04, 2013 C-SPAN http://MOXNews.com.


(Visited 33 times, 1 visits today)

Share This Post

Comments (35)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Representative Press's avatar

Representative Press · 590 weeks ago

Michael, World Trade Center Seven was just a building near the targeted
towers. It is extremely illogical to rationalize WTC SEVEN as a target. DId
you know 4 floors within building FIVE also collapsed due to fires? Are we
to believe secret agents targeted that too for some other contrived motive? http://representativepress.blogspot.com/2013/10/w...
Sounds like a classic ID10T Syndrome or a Chairkeyinterface malfunction !
Lonnie Dobbins III's avatar

Lonnie Dobbins III · 590 weeks ago

No building built like that ever collapsed from fire. All three was built
to withstand the worst thrown at them, yet they collapse without touching
another building in a controlled manner. He didn't read the report but
thought it was good enough to explain what happened. Everything was just
too convenient.
MrMahlerman's avatar

MrMahlerman · 590 weeks ago

NO INCUMBENTS! Vote EVERY ONE of them out! This is a good reason. Just
ignoring the question and the truth will not wash with the
starving-for-truth American public. Morons cannot defend the Constitution.
" in every investigation they have ever done" ...how many have they done?
And why can't there be another?
Christopher Marlowe's avatar

Christopher Marlowe · 590 weeks ago

I won't waste my time debating with retard shills. They will talk all day
about the "Kader Toy Factory", which was a poorly built factory in
Thailand. The Kader factory was a series of buildings that were 4 stories
high. 4 stories. Even the most inept, retard, dribbling spittle on his own
chin, will understand the difference between a FACTORY, 4 stories high,
that was built in Thailand and which didn't follow the building code; and
an modern steel frame, 47 story office building that was built to code in
the United States.

The reason why these dishonest, lying sacks of crap talk about Kader is
because NO STEEL FRAME HIGH RISE BUILDING IN 100 YEARS HAS EVER FALLEN DUE
TO FIRE. This is because steel is very strong and doesn't lose its strength
in an office fire temperature. Steel frame buildings are engineered to
carry many times their intended weight, and can only be brought down by
controlled demolition. The Windsor Tower in Spain burned for 24 hours and
did not collapse. The retard liar-shills will tell you that Windsor did
collapse, but that was only part of the top of the building that wasn't as
strongly reinforced. If you look up the Windsor tower, you can see that it
was 32 stories before the fire, and 32 stories after the fire. The Windsor
Tower did not even have a sprinkler system.

Duncan Hunter is an excellent example of the corrupt, idiots that we have
in Congress. He admits he hasn't read the 9/11 commission report, but he
magically knows that we don't need another investigation.

Anyone who looks into 9/11 with an open and LOGICAL mind will soon discover
that the whole story is complete BS, and that it was disseminated as we
watched the events unfold. This is a method of cognitive dissonance known
as "anchoring": the first story you hear becomes the "truth", and it has
predominance over everything you hear subsequently. Intelligence services
use anchoring to steer the public conscience. The result is that you get
people like "Representative Press" going off an irrelevant inquiry based on
a false assumption: "It is extremely illogical to rationalize WTC SEVEN as
a target." This is the sort of non-sequitur you hear when senile people are
watching the news. How the hell does RP know what the "target" was? His
question ASSUMES that there were 19 hijackers flying planes into buildings,
etc...
1. The demolition of WTC7 shows that it was a "target".

I believe that the method of destruction of all of the WTC has been
purposefully hidden from the public and distorted by the perps. I don't see
why all of the buildings could not have been brought down by conventional
explosives.

2. Much of what we "know" about 9/11 has been distorted by the government
and controlled media. They had total control of the crime scene and the
pictures and video could have been altered. Moreover, there are many
"eyewitnesses" who are not the people they purport to be.
3. It is much more intelligent to stick to what we know and can prove.
4. If there is a crime, the motive can often be found by asking "cui bono":
who benefits from the crime?

On the very day of 9/11, even as we were watching events unfold, former
israeli prime minister Ehud Barak was on BBC TV calling for a "global war
on terror". --> Hello!?!?! That is the same slogan repeated by every
western puppet head of state since 9/11. Since 9/11 we have lost numerous
freedoms and have been prodded and poked like cattle wheneve we try to get
on an airplane, and all because of the "global war on terror".

Ever since 9/11, the zionist puppet government of the US has been
destroying all of the countries in the middle east that are unfriendly to
israel.

Many will say that it was just a coincidence that the israeli prime
minister was on BBC to shovel the propaganda during 9/11; or that the US
just happened to destroy all of israel's enemies after 9/11; or that
numerous israel companies have profited directly from the military and
security build-up following 9/11.

5. I say that israel has benefited more than anyone from the 9/11 attacks,
and that they are the obvious perps. There is much, much, much more
evidence tying israel to 9/11. google: israel did 9/11; all the proof in
the world.

If a group of people have a "holy book" wherein they claim that they are
supposed to rule the world; and their leaders continually voice the opinion
they they are better than normal humans, and that ordinary humans are
cattle, made by God to serve them. And these people just happen to control
all of the banks and all of the media... Should it really surprise anyone
that they would enact a plan to take over the world and make all of
humanity into their slaves?
Chris Grooms's avatar

Chris Grooms · 590 weeks ago

MOOOORRROON. He didn't read it but thinks it's adequate. Claims that no
studies have shown otherwise. What a complete and absolute idiot. Not even
intelligent enough to bake cookies much less hold office.
Joel Moserah's avatar

Joel Moserah · 590 weeks ago

His eyes and facial expression gave it away at 0:09-0:13, he knows its
true.
Notice he doesn't even dare question what the evidence is? Even John Kerry
admitted it was controlled demolition. Like my page for more truth - www.facebook.com/Endzionismandnwo.
000deadcalm000's avatar

000deadcalm000 · 590 weeks ago

"Have you read it?"
Connected2U2's avatar

Connected2U2 · 590 weeks ago

All you fucking "Truther" lunatics need to eat a big bag of dicks.
It's you assholes that caused any real investigation into 9/11 to go
undone, with all your "fake planes", " controlled demolition", "free fall
speed", "it's own foot print", "fire can't take down buildings" and a
mountain of other obtuse assertions that took away from real facts ((the
government knew hijackings were going to take place and did nothing)).
But nope, thanks to you morons anyone that even wants to start a real
debate is to fucking scared to... in case they get lumped into the same
boat as you clowns.
Steve smith's avatar

Steve smith · 590 weeks ago

He did not read the report but he agrees with it. What a MORON.
soldier4prophesy's avatar

soldier4prophesy · 590 weeks ago

To hell with what YOU want. How about we take a poll and see how many
people who voted for your dumb ass want a new investigation? 
Did you read it? "no" But you believe it? "yes" WTF lol, I think this sums
up about 99% of Americas politicians. ~give me the money, I'll say whatever
you want me to say~ 
He says that he did not read the 9/11 report and yet he believes it to be
adequate?
Rex Orwell's avatar

Rex Orwell · 590 weeks ago

Great stuff.

Duncan "Didn't read it, but it was adequate." Hunter.

Proper little D.C. Submissive available for bookings. Can't accommodate but
will supply toys. Excellent rates. 
BadBrainPrepp's avatar

BadBrainPrepp · 590 weeks ago

He didnt read it , but it sounds good to him...
Kitswain59's avatar

Kitswain59 · 590 weeks ago

Bet he doesn't know about WTC 7. He didn't read the fake investigations,
yet it was adequate? Huh?
taburdine1's avatar

taburdine1 · 590 weeks ago

Only the US government believes there own lies we know the towers were
brought down by Mossad in Saudi Arabia.The way our government spies on
everything we do there is no way this could have happened the way our
government said it did.According to the Act of 1871 which is on YouTube
.The zionist Jews are in control of America.We you just say corporations
you are missing the point who is the boss of these corporation's. They also
control Hollywood .
Hehe, I did not read it, but it is a goddarn good report..
Hamad Oman's avatar

Hamad Oman · 590 weeks ago

The congressman did not read 9/11 investigation.
He ignored that BBC knew about the implosion of building 7 before happening.
Watch in YouTube this video watch?v=ltP2t9nq9fI
The real name of building 7 is the Salomon Brothers Building. The owners of
the building 7 are Jewish from its name.
Of course NRA's lobbyists have got huge benefits from this endless war
against uncountable terrorists around the world.
I do not want to talk more about who have been controlling the dirty
business of guns and drugs in US. I think Americans know those guys as well
as the congressman. Plastic gun ban helps us to understand the reality.
Altair Zielite's avatar

Altair Zielite · 590 weeks ago

Thanks Moxie!!
What a crock of sh*t. As other commenters note, Bldg 7 wasn't a target, and
the "9/11 Report" the host was referring to didn't even mention Bldg 7. The
NIST report, that came out years later, said it collapsed due to "burning
office furniture." How can anyone with any science background accept this
as reasonable?

I'll throw my guess behind the Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth ( http://www.ae911truth.org/) and claim foul play was involved, and nothing
to do with a bunch of Saudi jihadists in a cave half a world away. No
wonder Congress has a 5% approval rating.
Sammy Spaniel's avatar

Sammy Spaniel · 590 weeks ago

In all fairness the caller was referring to building 7 and not "those
towers". I am no expert and claim no loyalty to either side of this debate
but building 7 did in fact have all of it's core steel columns fail
simultaneously and catastrophically causing the structure to fall at free
fall speeds due to an isolated fire on one side of the structure. If for no
other reason a new investigation should be done to ensure that other
buildings don't fall if some kid decides to play with matches in the
parking garage.
Chris Sarns's avatar

Chris Sarns · 590 weeks ago

Did you read the 9/11 investigation by the committee?
No, I did not.
But you think it was adequate enough?
Ya, I think so.

Post a new comment

Comments by