C-SPAN Host Cuts Off Caller Asking Glenn Greenwald About “Building 7” Being Taken Down By Explosives

May 14, 2014 C-SPAN http://MOXNews.com ONE TIME ONLY DONATION https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=MHT8PM5BPSVC8 $1.00 ONE DOLLAR PER MONTH SUBSCRIPTION…


(Visited 43 times, 1 visits today)

Share This Post

Comments (37)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
vadimcream's avatar

vadimcream · 569 weeks ago

Greenwald had every right in the world to go ahead and field the question
if he thought it had any merit whatsoever. Clearly he knows of these claims
and we all know that he IS a whistleblower, if he thought the claims had
ANY merit at all he surely would have discussed this and not allowed the
CSPAN host to dictate the conversation. Greenwald knows those claims are BS
otherwise he'd not only discuss it there, but write about it outside of
discussions like this.
WoW!!! 
Fuckyouyoutube.'s avatar

Fuckyouyoutube. · 569 weeks ago

Big deal the topic is the NSA... nothing special here. Anyone with half a
brain knows 9/11 was a carefully planned out orchestrated event. The
problem is half of the population has no brains left at all.
justa factsonly's avatar

justa factsonly · 569 weeks ago

the constant "building 7" question is a "wearechange" controlled opposition
campaign. wearechange is a jewish/zionist org whose purpose is to take
attention AWAY from the fact that ISRAEL DID 911.
kicktroolinface's avatar

kicktroolinface · 569 weeks ago

Pressitutes Only Serve sATAN.
TekkGnostic's avatar

TekkGnostic · 569 weeks ago

But... 9/11 is related to the NSA... they were the ones responsible for
monitoring and tracking the "terrorists" ... fucking host.
Although I don't trust Greenwald entirely either... his good buddy Jeremy
Scahill has expressed his views on 9/11 in a very unflattering manner:
Jeremy Scahill comments on Alex Jones and 911 Truth
DMalenfant1's avatar

DMalenfant1 · 569 weeks ago

Okay we are talking about the NSA (totally different subject) and some
asshole caller is is asking 911? Yeah I would cut him off too just as if
the calling were ask about who shot JFK. IT WAS OFF SUBJECT DO YOU NOT GET
THAT?! You conspiracy theorists make yourselves look bad when you do shit
like that and that is why no one listens to you, YOU SOUND LIKE LOONEY
CULTISTS.
Scumbag gatekeepers will hang.
Everytime!! This is what restores my faith in the public.
DetroitDog's avatar

DetroitDog · 569 weeks ago

Those who will need to know most, will. May God have mercy on the rest.
FUCK GREENWALD!!! FUCKING SHILL!! IF HE HAS ANY SELF-RESPECT HE WOULD HAVE
TOLD THAT ANCHOR TO CAN IT AND GIVE HIS OPINION ABOUT BUILDING ...

But NO.... Of course anyone who believes in 911 being an inside job is a
"Conspiracy Theorist"... YOU KNOW THERE WAS A TIME WHEN THEY SAID THAT
ABOUT THE "NSA Conspiracy" also... but you were ok to investigate that? Oh
No.. actually you didn't do any investigating.... he just DID WHAT HE WAS
TOLD LIKE A GOOD FUCKING SLAVE PIECE OF SHIT!!

FUCK GREENWALD!

SHOOT HIM IN THE BACK OF THE HEAD - TRAITOR TO HUMANITY!!!
RJ_Inferno's avatar

RJ_Inferno · 569 weeks ago

Greenwald blows only big meaty whistles.
I'm not surprised that the interviewer cut-off the caller. He wouldn't want
Greenwald's ass hanging out in the wind after he's forced to refute the
Building 7 evidence.

Greenwald, the left-gatekeeper.
Dedhedted71's avatar

Dedhedted71 · 569 weeks ago

Honestly...What do these people expect to accomplish by constantly calling
C-span & asking the same question about bldng 7?
Shawn Jones's avatar

Shawn Jones · 569 weeks ago

Cause guess who linked 911and the surveilance state? Every 'leaker' not
advertised by mainstream tv. All cept the greenwaldsnowjob combo and
assange. Sleepie sleep time.
Mathew Titus's avatar

Mathew Titus · 569 weeks ago

Isn't THAT Curious.... Hmmm.
Gasp!!! Like OMG! Imagine a program being about the NSA and a caller
wants to ask a question about a completely different subject.

He should have been cut off and told to call back when the topic was about
9/11.

Sadly, MOXNews would rather you think he was cut off just so the Host or
Guest doesn't have to answer about 9/11. Thanks MoxNews, you just lost me
as a viewer. I hope everyone else deletes them from their subs list too.
Its the only way to hold them accountable for their deception.
Shawn Jones's avatar

Shawn Jones · 569 weeks ago

No the debate isnt controlled. Its real leaks on real hollywood television!
I promise.
RJ_Inferno's avatar

RJ_Inferno · 569 weeks ago

He has a monopoly on the snow job files but his multimillion blowjob with
omidyar and 'intecept' has yet to release ONE real story after months of
its useless existence.
There isn't time for crackpot nonsense. The issue at hand is the
unconstitutional surveillance state, the interviewer is doing his job by
staying course on the topic.
Johnny Kat's avatar

Johnny Kat · 569 weeks ago

we must throw off the yoke of tyranny, and make our country safe for
hypocrisy!..
smooth
saintearth's avatar

saintearth · 569 weeks ago

Too bad every caller doesn't do that. That would make for an interesting
show.
Ed Kendrick's avatar

Ed Kendrick · 569 weeks ago

The caller correctly notes that justifications for the surveillance state
arise mostly in the official narrative of 9/11--and CSPAN should lose its
broadcasting license for racketeering in the cover-up of 9/11. http://911JusticeCampaign.org Time to commence indictments, make arrests,
interrogate, prosecute and seize assets per RICO statutes.
dragonfly111cute's avatar

dragonfly111cute · 569 weeks ago

Good question Chuck bet he had the answer too...but you know that 9/11 has
nothing to do with this increased surveillance....right

Post a new comment

Comments by