Something is really fishy here.
(Visited 220 times, 1 visits today)
Building Number 7
You might also like:
Logging you in...
where is the part of the video where the penthouse falls in......and then
the building collapsing?
the building collapsing?
Or you could just watch the Pentagon Surveillance Videos of the plane
hitting it?
hitting it?
From debris coming from the collapse of the WTC buildings.
Very odd.. so no plane crashed into that building yet it collapsed?
70 reasons?? How about one. Go and read the fire dept debriefing interviews
on this. You'll never make the same comments on this structure again. " B 7
took a big hit from the North tower when it came down. We were afraid that
with the fires and the missing steel the building was in serious risk of
collapsing" (FDNY Chief Frank Fellini) And there is quote after quote of
statements like that.
on this. You'll never make the same comments on this structure again. " B 7
took a big hit from the North tower when it came down. We were afraid that
with the fires and the missing steel the building was in serious risk of
collapsing" (FDNY Chief Frank Fellini) And there is quote after quote of
statements like that.
70 reasons minimum. Most American sheep don't know anything about building
7.
7.
Building 7 one of many pieces of obvious evidence that 911 was an INSIDE
JOB!
JOB!
He's the only one that saw any wings, engines, luggage etc at the pentagon
Inside job?? that an entire battalion of firemen were completely aware was
going to collapse. Something the fire dept were preparing for and had
cordoned off the building?? What's the purpose of blowing up the building?
Oh wait its to erase all of the computer hard drives and file cabinets from
existence right???? This is the kind of nonsense that constitutes a good
idea in Troof land. You people are a bunch of morons.
going to collapse. Something the fire dept were preparing for and had
cordoned off the building?? What's the purpose of blowing up the building?
Oh wait its to erase all of the computer hard drives and file cabinets from
existence right???? This is the kind of nonsense that constitutes a good
idea in Troof land. You people are a bunch of morons.
@markh1011 Example: the moon is pretty massive, yes. It stays in orbit
around the earth due to gravity. The force of gravity is reduced but the
inverse square law relative to distance from the source. The moon is quite
a distance away, meaning the gravitational force from the earth would be a
number too small for you to comprehend. Now if the moon was sitting on the
face of mars and mars was as close as the moon is now the earth would have
no affect on it.
around the earth due to gravity. The force of gravity is reduced but the
inverse square law relative to distance from the source. The moon is quite
a distance away, meaning the gravitational force from the earth would be a
number too small for you to comprehend. Now if the moon was sitting on the
face of mars and mars was as close as the moon is now the earth would have
no affect on it.
Allyn E. Kilsheimer of KCE Structural Engineers "It was absolutely a plane,
and I'll tell you why," [of Washington, D.C.] "I saw the marks of the plane
wing on the face of the building. I picked up parts of the plane with the
airline markings on them. I held in my hand the tail section of the plane,
and I found the black box. I held parts of uniforms from crew members in my
hands, including body parts." 911 TRUTH DEBUNKED!
and I'll tell you why," [of Washington, D.C.] "I saw the marks of the plane
wing on the face of the building. I picked up parts of the plane with the
airline markings on them. I held in my hand the tail section of the plane,
and I found the black box. I held parts of uniforms from crew members in my
hands, including body parts." 911 TRUTH DEBUNKED!
it was close to freefall either way it was pulled
The light poles are interesting, because they indicate a flight path south
of the gas station, but all witnesses, including the police, say the 'plane
went north of the gas station. The police witnesses were actually in the
gas station so a mistake is implausable, and other witnesses would not have
had a sightline to a southern approach.
of the gas station, but all witnesses, including the police, say the 'plane
went north of the gas station. The police witnesses were actually in the
gas station so a mistake is implausable, and other witnesses would not have
had a sightline to a southern approach.
see
911debunkers.blogspot.com/2011/07/charlie-veitch-parroting-outdated.html
for a thorough rebuttal of your unsourced claim that half the building was
taken out by damage from the twin towers' collapse. Even the peddlers of
the official government conspiracy theory don't claim that half of WTC 7
was taken out.
911debunkers.blogspot.com/2011/07/charlie-veitch-parroting-outdated.html
for a thorough rebuttal of your unsourced claim that half the building was
taken out by damage from the twin towers' collapse. Even the peddlers of
the official government conspiracy theory don't claim that half of WTC 7
was taken out.
@PoetryHound your soeone who would say everyone that believes in god hates
fags and that would never admit to being wrong, be a man
fags and that would never admit to being wrong, be a man
thats what they excactly wanted to say: these buildings are there with high
damage but never were nuked up by the responsible figures. the wtc7 was
huge and important, no damage. and it disappeared. so u said it in best
words!
damage but never were nuked up by the responsible figures. the wtc7 was
huge and important, no damage. and it disappeared. so u said it in best
words!
It makes perfect sense to me. And Jane Standley of the BBC has explained it
a thousand times. It was simply a mix up from her people in the field
advising her. The "its going to collapse" got turned in to "It has
collapsed". Just some confusion on a very mixed up and confused day. I
don't see this as a big deal in the least. And Jane cleared it up years
ago. The fire dept were saying it was going to go at 3pm. It came down at
5. Why is this a big deal at all?
a thousand times. It was simply a mix up from her people in the field
advising her. The "its going to collapse" got turned in to "It has
collapsed". Just some confusion on a very mixed up and confused day. I
don't see this as a big deal in the least. And Jane cleared it up years
ago. The fire dept were saying it was going to go at 3pm. It came down at
5. Why is this a big deal at all?
@aczjbr So what you are really saying is only 0.0001% of engineers have
balls? BTW, thanks for the list of idiots, good to know.
balls? BTW, thanks for the list of idiots, good to know.
@markh1011 Well I do have to give you some props, you are getting better at
debating. If you want to debate the entire “Official” story. There are
plenty of things that don’t add up.
debating. If you want to debate the entire “Official” story. There are
plenty of things that don’t add up.
Blunder?. How do you think CNN could report that the building is GOING to
collapse?. How do you think Scott Pelley of CBS could make the same report.
Or any number of about half a dozen other news outlets? Because the Fire
dept knew at 3pm it was going to come down. Go read some of their reports
for Christ sake. The fire dept knew all about 7's situation. A zone was
established around it so nobody else got hurt.
collapse?. How do you think Scott Pelley of CBS could make the same report.
Or any number of about half a dozen other news outlets? Because the Fire
dept knew at 3pm it was going to come down. Go read some of their reports
for Christ sake. The fire dept knew all about 7's situation. A zone was
established around it so nobody else got hurt.
georgewashington2.blogspot.com/2008/09/clarifying-collapse-time-of-wtc-7.html
911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/wtc7/speed.html
911debunkers.blogspot.com/2010/02/ultimate-proof-nist-is-lying-about-wtc7.html
for additional discussion (this one has a link to a NIST report admitting
free fall speed, but NIST removed it.
911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/wtc7/speed.html
911debunkers.blogspot.com/2010/02/ultimate-proof-nist-is-lying-about-wtc7.html
for additional discussion (this one has a link to a NIST report admitting
free fall speed, but NIST removed it.
Comments by IntenseDebate
Loading IntenseDebate Comments...
where is the part of the video where the penthouse falls in……and then
the building collapsing?
Or you could just watch the Pentagon Surveillance Videos of the plane
hitting it?
Amazing
From debris coming from the collapse of the WTC buildings.
Very odd.. so no plane crashed into that building yet it collapsed?
70 reasons?? How about one. Go and read the fire dept debriefing interviews
on this. You'll never make the same comments on this structure again. " B 7
took a big hit from the North tower when it came down. We were afraid that
with the fires and the missing steel the building was in serious risk of
collapsing" (FDNY Chief Frank Fellini) And there is quote after quote of
statements like that.
70 reasons minimum. Most American sheep don't know anything about building
7.
Building 7 one of many pieces of obvious evidence that 911 was an INSIDE
JOB!
He's the only one that saw any wings, engines, luggage etc at the pentagon
Inside job?? that an entire battalion of firemen were completely aware was
going to collapse. Something the fire dept were preparing for and had
cordoned off the building?? What’s the purpose of blowing up the building?
Oh wait its to erase all of the computer hard drives and file cabinets from
existence right???? This is the kind of nonsense that constitutes a good
idea in Troof land. You people are a bunch of morons.
@markh1011 Example: the moon is pretty massive, yes. It stays in orbit
around the earth due to gravity. The force of gravity is reduced but the
inverse square law relative to distance from the source. The moon is quite
a distance away, meaning the gravitational force from the earth would be a
number too small for you to comprehend. Now if the moon was sitting on the
face of mars and mars was as close as the moon is now the earth would have
no affect on it.
Allyn E. Kilsheimer of KCE Structural Engineers “It was absolutely a plane,
and I’ll tell you why,” [of Washington, D.C.] “I saw the marks of the plane
wing on the face of the building. I picked up parts of the plane with the
airline markings on them. I held in my hand the tail section of the plane,
and I found the black box. I held parts of uniforms from crew members in my
hands, including body parts.” 911 TRUTH DEBUNKED!
it was close to freefall either way it was pulled
The light poles are interesting, because they indicate a flight path south
of the gas station, but all witnesses, including the police, say the ‘plane
went north of the gas station. The police witnesses were actually in the
gas station so a mistake is implausable, and other witnesses would not have
had a sightline to a southern approach.
yes, but that is a good thing
see
911debunkers.blogspot.com/2011/07/charlie-veitch-parroting-outdated.html
for a thorough rebuttal of your unsourced claim that half the building was
taken out by damage from the twin towers’ collapse. Even the peddlers of
the official government conspiracy theory don’t claim that half of WTC 7
was taken out.
@PoetryHound your soeone who would say everyone that believes in god hates
fags and that would never admit to being wrong, be a man
thats what they excactly wanted to say: these buildings are there with high
damage but never were nuked up by the responsible figures. the wtc7 was
huge and important, no damage. and it disappeared. so u said it in best
words!
It makes perfect sense to me. And Jane Standley of the BBC has explained it
a thousand times. It was simply a mix up from her people in the field
advising her. The “its going to collapse” got turned in to “It has
collapsed”. Just some confusion on a very mixed up and confused day. I
don’t see this as a big deal in the least. And Jane cleared it up years
ago. The fire dept were saying it was going to go at 3pm. It came down at
5. Why is this a big deal at all?
fuck cia fuck america gouvernement!!
@aczjbr So what you are really saying is only 0.0001% of engineers have
balls? BTW, thanks for the list of idiots, good to know.
@markh1011 Well I do have to give you some props, you are getting better at
debating. If you want to debate the entire “Official” story. There are
plenty of things that don’t add up.
Blunder?. How do you think CNN could report that the building is GOING to
collapse?. How do you think Scott Pelley of CBS could make the same report.
Or any number of about half a dozen other news outlets? Because the Fire
dept knew at 3pm it was going to come down. Go read some of their reports
for Christ sake. The fire dept knew all about 7’s situation. A zone was
established around it so nobody else got hurt.
georgewashington2.blogspot.com/2008/09/clarifying-collapse-time-of-wtc-7.html
911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/wtc7/speed.html
911debunkers.blogspot.com/2010/02/ultimate-proof-nist-is-lying-about-wtc7.html
for additional discussion (this one has a link to a NIST report admitting
free fall speed, but NIST removed it.
@Bcm80 hate to shame you out in public, but you did ask for it. youtube the
following and go to 5:59 Dimitri Khalezov – WTC Nuclear Demolition [12/26].
next time do some research before spouting shit on here boy. i know youre
only 22 but still, u should be old enough to look for yourself
In magical twoofer land, buildings can be imploded with no audible/visible
explosion before, during, or after!
it stood as long as it did, because no fires in history have ever led to
the vertical collapse of steel skyscrapers, until supposedly this one.
Please see my other evidence below.
@stelley08 You do know that video says your thermite conclusion is
impossible. It says that the towers were brought down by nuclear bombs
right? I’m just wondering if you have watched your own evidence.
Jesus help us all. The world is run by evil mean and this is just the start
of things ro come. Please lets all just get right with God.
Um, NIST agrees that it collapsed at virtual free fall speed. Take it up
with NIST.
The minions of A&E. No university, research centers, technical journals,
scientists, associations of engineers, pilots, architects, firefighters and
medical believe the lies and the demolition of the A&E. The same in Asia,
Oceania, Canada, Europe and South America. The list below is today. I have
the link of all. Always find more on the internet. There evidence against
the towers and WTC7.Only 0,0001% of U.S. engineers are in A&E. Without the
insurance job
@MrTHEORIGINALICEMAN “That is why when a building collapses, it for the
most part falls over” – Where is the force going to come from the make 20
floors of the WTC move to the left? Wind? 20 floors smash down on one
weakened floor… it cannot stop them or move them… the structural
strength for that floor is smashed and 21 floors fall onto the next… then
22 onto the next.. and it continues.