WTC 7 collapsed rapidly and symmetrically, even though fires were randomly scattered in the building. WTC 7 fell about seven hours after the Towers collapsed…
(Visited 28 times, 1 visits today)
Building 7: Truth & Lies of 9/11. Architect Richard Gage Speaks of Freefall Speed Explosions
The government lied about 9/11.
1032 architectural and engineering professionals
and 6549 other supporters including A&E students
have signed the petition demanding of Congress
a truly independent investigation.
im pretty sure most people DO know that 3 towers collapsed…
That was a controlled demolition job.
dont you love how they alway edit out over 50% of b7 collapse
great video
spread it
🙂
Great video, BTW, I'm an atheist. I don't have to believe that this was done by religious fanatics to support my disbelief in god.
9/11
WAS AN
JOB!
PoHo, you're right that the videos don't show the back side of WTC 7, but the back side didn't collapse before the part we see in the videos. It's impossible for buildings to collapse in sections. And even though the collapse damaged some of the surrounding buildings, I still say the collapse was symmetrical. Explosives make buildings collapse symmetrically. When the firefighters said the building was unstable and likely to collapse, they were lying.
Richard Gage is absolutely right. The periods of freefall and the symetrical collapse are sure telltale signs of a controlled demolition.
fuck bush :S he brings the shame to america 🙁 its by americans gov. not terror
no huge commercial jets destroyed building 7
The science of quantum physics already tested this. And the unbreakable physical laws of the universe has proven that this was not a gravity collapse.
WTC 7 was NOT severely damaged by falling debris. NIST no longer claims that damage from debris but fir and fire alone caused 7 to fall. This is not true. Here's some good evidence that NIST lied about 7.
watch?v=_3uQI2msoDA
The building DOES fall at free fall speed.
Cheney was present at the U of WI before the sterling hall and econ blds bombing. in 1970. No one puts this stuff together. The trial evidence had to be "sealed" for 50 years or more. i tend to think it was the beginning and lead up to 911. It was a long term game of special interest party based terrorism. Of course prior to that there was Pearl Harbor. Just cause i wouldn't do it does not mean someone else would not do it for money or power.
The thing is; that if you believe a huge lie, then you have totally screwed your ability to discern what is truth, or handle evidence. Official answers rarely make sense, because they only mix a smattering of truth into a huge conspiracy of lies self intested and liars. i'm sure they have special degrees from Joebob Blather University of texting during rush hour driving and excuse phoning in.
The pulverizing concrete tell the story about what was going on. The fall would not pulverize the concrete since it had not reached that point and the energy of the fall had not been transferred to the panels. What is going on there is there was a mass of pulverized concrete that equalled the entire mass of all the panels falling and obscuring the basic stuctural demolition. i suppose somebody would like a prize for that. Maybe they have secret demolition awards. Cheney deserves one.
You might as well try to get the Pope to admit that he is not really on the side of God and Jesus. Won't happen! There are two kinds of mental activity; these are believing and knowing. "Believing" is the mortal enemy of "knowing with truth", but "knowing" more or less tolerates "believing" but doesn't mix well since they have opposing attributes. Knowing is like life, believing is like the "landfill".
i think those buildings must have been secretly made out of decks of cards with appropriatly place dabs of super glue. All that other evidence must be periferal and essentially worthless. Having said this, i think i could now be eligible to accept a high position in government. As a matter of fact this kind of believing could make me eligible to be a Republlican President. I wonder if i would have to take a secret overriding oath to lie about everything and stay loyal to cash.
The only plan that will keep this from happening again is to take money and status away from people who prize money and status. It's like a big board game where the one with the most property and points gets to screw the crap out of everyone else. Of course people don't have to be rich to be liars, all they need is the desire to be rich or hold status. That's just how modern life and crowding work in conjuction with ability to lie. The Pope knows, but he's not talking.
wake up,,
Controlled demolition job..
Dr Phil says to examine a persons recent history to determine what is going on now. I guess that can be applied to a country too.
One thing is it is confusing but the excuses (more recent documentaries) get even more crazy as time goes on.
"Who are you going to believe, me or your lying eyes" Groucho Marx.
This is reeeeealy confusing on what to believe, Why dont they just take George W. Bush, get a lie detector and ask him if it was an inside job ??? so we can ALL know the truth
I think it was an inside job kind of, i think terrorists put explosives in the building or sumtn and maybe the government is involved but this is true, its common sense that the planes didnt cause the collapse of the building
great video! im still very unsure on what to believe but something isnt right here at all 🙁
Itsallcoolio, just because the bbc is funded by the people, doesn't mean it's not run by the state. There are more and more structural engineers waking up to this stuff. It's not a nutcase movement. The government has been lying to us about 9-11. Period. It didn't happen the way they said it did. It took them 2 years to form the 9-11 commission, they had to be forced into doing it by the 9-11 families who didn't get 75% of their questions answered. People need to wake up to the turth.
see its ALL TRUE you can learn more about it from the Zeitgiest Movement which is even cooler than a bowel movement!!!!!!
Ron Paul 2012
I havent gotten around to Hegelia Effect either. There are plenty of journos looking for a giant expose that will make name for themselves. Jim Corr, of singing group The Corrs, was on Irish mainstream radio TodayFM, doing an interview about his opposition to the 'Lisbon Treaty', and went into an unexpected attempted expose of NWO and 9/11. He is the butt of tin-hat jokes now. Check that out on YT.
Hey! WTF? It was below. Now it's on top. Sorry. I meant that I should check out what DeathOfEscobar recommends above, "hegelian dialectic", but I looked it up in wikipedia, and have no clue. I even read it a few times. Anyway, my point was that while I am totally convinced 9/11 was an inside job, I carry the same doubt as you about the media white-wash. If I was going to recommend a video myself, it would be 9/11 Ripple Effect. AWESOME DOCUMENTARY!
I too get it's impossible for buildings to fall like that, but have a complete and absolute white-wash of the media is hard to fathom.
Check out which vid?