BUILDING 7 NEW PROOF? SHOWING EXPLOSIONS INITIATING COLLAPSE FAKE?

40 Comments

This footage surfaced off a digital camera. It seemingly shows detonation charges going off right before the collapse. Yet more smoking gun evidence. or a ve…


(Visited 53 times, 1 visits today)

Share This Post

You might also like:

40 Comments - Write a Comment

  2. Ken Reynolds · Edit

    if your going to go to the trouble of adding the flashes on the north side of wtc 7 at least make sure they're round instead of square like the second one, nice tr. What else did you edit and alter in this video

    Reply
  6. MrEdwardClayton · Edit

    I see a lot of parallels between the 9/11 "Truth" movement and the Intelligent Design movement. Neither apply scrutiny to their own beliefs, and both camps tend to fall for obviously fraudulent "evidence" for their cause, based upon the fact that it appeals to their confirmation bias.
    By the way, did you miss the UFO in the background?

    Reply
  8. Stefan Burns · Edit

    are you guys actually watching this video… this is scary that there is proof right and front of you and you still think merica is honest and true, WE HAVE NO HOPE MAN

    Reply
  10. gobo760 · Edit

    lol seriously. I didn't even know WTC 7 collapsed until like 2 months after, and when I found out it was like, "yeah, so? Add that to WTC 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6." Side note, why do all the videos on youtube that are the biggest crocks of shit, have names like "truth", "proof", "evidence" etc. It's like the ugly people who insist on telling you how "hot" they are… as if you need to be told something that would be obvious if it were true.

    Reply
  14. paulvcope · Edit

    "Here, take a look what do you see?" I see a nutcase falling for faked footage. It doesn't surprise me, the truther movement is based on edited footage and logical fallacies.

    Reply
  18. mecca30 · Edit

    I question it too even though I believe they were brought down with explosives. The only thing that makes me think it could be real is that seems like the closest video of building 7. All other videos I've seen are from pretty far away.

    Reply
  21. SeedlingNL · Edit

    It wasn't crappy engineering. It was, in fact, very smart, because this particular design allows fast building AND offers far more floorspace then any other design. The floors hang from both inner core and outer frame, and do not have to support the floors above. That the buildings stood as long as they did was a testament to their strength. But they simply were not designed with modern fully laden airliners in mind, being flown into the structure for maximum damage.

    Reply
  22. Superlibertytv · Edit

    So what you are saying is that it was crappy engineering even though the buildings were designed to take two impacts from planes… I guess they figured the planes would be low on gas when they arrived. Ok… got it, crappy engineering.

    Reply
  23. SeedlingNL · Edit

    Wow… you did NO research into these questions at all, did you… Steel doesn't need to MELT to lose the ability to support a building, it only has to become SOFT. Other buildings survived being on fire… BECAUSE THEY DID NOT SUFFER MASSIVE STRUCTURAL DAMAGE and BURNING JET FUEL. They were not build like WTC 1,2 and 7, which used a tube-in-a-tube design. And structural points didn't give away at the same time, the videos clearly show floors sagging until the remaining connections failed.

    Reply
  24. Superlibertytv · Edit

    Do you realize how hot it would have to be to melt steel?? How is it that we are the only ones to have a fire for a few hours and have a complete collapse, when there are many building that have had raging fires in history and the steel structure is still standing? Plus, the idea that all of the structure points would give way equally at the same time is absurd, and then to have it happen in three buildings when it never happens anywhere else in the world is even more absurd.

    Reply
  25. Cody Sellers · Edit

    [ IF YOU VOTED FOR OBAMA IN 2008 TO PROVE YOUR NOT AN RACIST VOTE FOR RON PAUL IN 2012 TO PROVE YOUR NOT AN IDIOT].

    THE NDAA NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT TO IMPRISON AMERICAN CITIZENS IN CONCENTRATION CAMPS

    OBAMA: PASSES IT
    MITT ROMNEY,NEWT GREENWICH,RICK SANTORIUM,RICK PERRY [ SUPPORT IT ].

    RON PAUL OPPOSES IT AND ALWAYS WILL

    RON PAUL REVOLUTION LEGALIZE THE CONSTITUTION.

    RON PAUL 2012 RESTORE AMERICAN NOW!!!

    Reply
  27. brownie8757 · Edit

    Well regardless of whether people think the flashes are fake or not, people should find it odd that not only this building, but the World Trade Centers both fell STRAIGHT DOWN. The only time I have ever seen that is in a building being intentionally imploded. Look at all the damage in Oklahoma city, and that building never fell

    Reply
  28. aczjbr · Edit

    Rio de Janeiro. All the information is false controlled demolition. I´m an engineer and all the engineering schools of my country studying the towers and WTC7. to get the WTC1 collapse, the debris were in the WTC6 ence and 7. Causing widespread impacts and fire. Proved by pictures the moment after. Destroying the sprinkler system. And the surviving firefighters evacuated the building WTC7 collapsed and 3:00 PM for damage caused by the Aq Qaeda 17:20PM.Demolition jet was then involved with them?

    Reply
  33. SeedlingNL · Edit

    Firefighters reported insufficient water pressure in WTC7, which isn't surprising considering the collapse of WTC1 and 2, as well as a 20 story hole in the side of the building. 

    The Pentagon doesn't have missile platforms… Are you aware that there's a friggin' national airport just south-east of the Pentagon, one of the runways aimed straight at it? Planes circle the pentagon on their approach to the runway, for crying out loud. Just go to Google Maps and SEE for yourself…

    Reply
  34. SeedlingNL · Edit

    7 hours of uncontrolled fire and a 20 story hole in the side caused by falling debree from WTC1. Also, it did NOT fall within it's footprint. Significant amounts of debree from WTC7 could be clearly seen on Barclay Street and on top of the building across the street. And when they were faced with a building moving in ways it's not supposed to, they pulled the plan to rescue to building.

    Reply
  36. Joecol flyer · Edit

    So we are now supposed to believe that with 7 hours of 911, the went and got the WTC 7 structual BLUEPRINTS, then rigged all the proper support beams with the smll fires going on at the same time inside. SUREEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!! Heres a question why didnt the sprinkler systems work??? Why did the Missle platforms that protect the Pentagon that day work??? The lies and cover ups on for days. Yet keep BAAAAAING LIKE THE SHEEP THEY KNOW YOU ARE, SO THEY CAN CONTINUE TO CONROL YOU..

    Reply
  37. Joecol flyer · Edit

    Heres the example of the Goverment Sheep and what they want you to believe, yeah yeah sure sure 7 hours of fires brought a 47 story structure down into its own footprint??? heck Ill play along, lets just say. That Larry Silversteins remarks Off Pulling it, was the reason. OK,,, heres the problem PROFESSIONAL DEMOLISHENS OF A BUILDING THAT SIZE TAKE MONTHES TO PLAN…

    Reply
  38. SeedlingNL · Edit

    The penthouses went down before the outer walls because it was the interior structure that collapsed due to SEVEN HOURS OF UNCONTROLLED FIRE, and those penthouses were build on that interior structure. The outer walls then collapsed because they needed the support of the floors that just disappeared.

    Honestly.. the US government is supposed to have pulled this one off, yet they fail at every other major catastrophy?

    Reply
  40. Joecol flyer · Edit

    Whats even better and what 99% of people FAIL to understand is if you look closely at the PENTHOUSE ON TOP, IN EVERY WTC7 FOOTAGE IT GOS FIRST!!!! Seconds before the building falls, THIS IS 100% ULTIMATE PROOF IT WAS INDEED A CONTROLLED DEMOLISHION!

    Reply

Post Comment