Architects & Engineers – Solving the Mystery of WTC 7 – AE911Truth.org

Architects & Engineers: Solving the Mystery of WTC 7 AE911Truth’s new 9/11 documentary Solving the Mystery, the destruction of World Trade Center Building #7…


(Visited 45 times, 1 visits today)

Share This Post

Comments (41)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
bradspicks's avatar

bradspicks · 629 weeks ago

who do you work for X1 ??? . . . . don't be idiot or a shrill -- the truth will set you free too
VideoVerifying's avatar

VideoVerifying · 629 weeks ago

Lol in holland even the ingenieur teachers say it was controlled demolition to ther studens
Here is some more proof for you, go look up "WTC 7 still standing bbc news" and tell me that they aren't just psychic.
How is the bubble world like?
Actually, who cares who is to blame for this or any other so-called "conspiracy"... the FACT remains that these events have *all* been used to take away our freedom! We can no longer fly without someone shoving their hand in our pants, the guv can search our houses without a warrant (even when we are not home), etc. Do some research and stop pretending like everything is "just fine" to make yourself feel better. "As in the days of Noah..."
source please?
tony rooke's avatar

tony rooke · 629 weeks ago

Could you provide me a list of the 'over 200,000 other a&e's' and how do you know for a fact they've studied this evidence? When? Where. What materials? I'm genuinely curious.
chrissarns's avatar

chrissarns · 629 weeks ago

We have investigated and the evidence for controlled demolition is conclusive. Watch Blueprint for truth and Experts speak Out.

The call for an official investigation is the legal option in our system of government but it will not happen until the case is presented and won in the court of public opinion.
Stetson Griffin's avatar

Stetson Griffin · 629 weeks ago

They like their life just the way it is. Thats the only reason.Just like rock-stars ,movie-stars, if you wanna be on TV. Then you say as your told or your not on TV. I hope this puts some balance in your belief.
GawdMachine's avatar

GawdMachine · 629 weeks ago

200,000 who don't have the balls to go through their cognitive dissonance and face the truth eh'?
Whatever gets you through the night.
That would make sense, except ask a random person how many buildings were brought down on 9/11 and they will say two. Nobody gives a crap that T7 fell. It was never part of the pro-war propaganda. Bringing T7 down is completely unnecessary and just risks the mal-doers being caught.
libertydefined31's avatar

libertydefined31 · 629 weeks ago

Beats me.

Have you seen the "9/11" episode of Lone Gunmen?

It's almost as if the people who planned it broadcast their intentions ahead of time to the world so as to laugh at all of us or something.

Assuming of course it was planned by insiders.
Rob McLean's avatar

Rob McLean · 629 weeks ago

I would like to see your comments in regard to Dimitri Khazelov's evidence regarding 911. You architects and engineers would have access to the WTC Demolition Plan that was submitted in order to gain building permit?
AlphaOptimusPrime's avatar

AlphaOptimusPrime · 629 weeks ago

I really wonder how much evidence do people need to believe the obvious... sometimes I feel like I am in favor of the global elite that want to massively reduce the human population... its hard to argue against them when so many people are so stupid and willingly accept there own servitude...
SchoolrejecT's avatar

SchoolrejecT · 629 weeks ago

This is less about trying to convince those who believe the offical report, and more about conjuring excuses to refute what you see with your own eyes. It's one of those situations when the truth is so terrifying to think is accurate, you have to grab at every straw just to keep your sanity.
CryptoKni9ht's avatar

CryptoKni9ht · 629 weeks ago

I like how 1600 Architects and Engineers are brave enough to look at the evidence and speak out about it, with risks of being ridiculed and/or losing their jobs or careers due to corporate mass media propagandised, false unscientific stories. When you study all the available evidence, AE911Truth has the best explanation and found the hard evidence you just can't deny.
guscaldas2's avatar

guscaldas2 · 629 weeks ago

Hi, have you thought about having a pool of experts to bring counter-arguments on the site, in order to provide some cognitive dissonance and persuade people to weigh the evidence without running the risk of "being led" by strong corroboration?
Wheres your source for that?
chrissarns's avatar

chrissarns · 629 weeks ago

grazie,
"I'm confused though, why would they make it a controlled implosion?"
Asking speculative questions is a denial technique. Another is "It can't be because ..."

Deal with the facts. WTC 7 fell at free fall acceleration for about 100 feet. If you understand what that means then you know that it could only have been a controlled demolition. If you can't figure that out you will be forever "confused".
grazie55555's avatar

grazie55555 · 629 weeks ago

Again that doesn't answer my question.
chrissarns's avatar

chrissarns · 629 weeks ago

The other 200,000 people have not stated their opinion so no assumptions can be made.
David King's avatar

David King · 629 weeks ago

I take it you mean "explain." The explanation is simple. Terrorists are the only people who use truck bombs. Terrorists who wired truck bombs on the day and at the site of the Twin Towers had a high probability of being involved. When you consider that one of the vans had a mural of the Twin Towers and a plane crashing into it; then the probability reduces to one. So here is a question that needs to be asked. Why didn't the US invade ersatz israel?
Boris Crépeau's avatar

Boris Crépeau · 629 weeks ago

I kook at this video, and I wonder if at least part of the equation could be shoddy construction in the 1970s? It would not have been the first time... I think that the collapse of the WTC (even the north and south tower) was a disaster that was bound to happen... But one MUST be open minded about a planned catastrophe...
Okay, and the other 200,000 people who have no affiliation? according to you? Where are your sources?
ae911truth's avatar

ae911truth · 629 weeks ago

There are only about 23 qualified people (other than the people who wrote the NIST and FEMA reports) that support the official collapse theory.

Post a new comment

Comments by