Jeff 4 Justice https://www.facebook.com/likejeff4justice ○ Amy Goodman of Democracy Now is asked by Jeff 4 Justice if she would support presidential debates …
(Visited 25 times, 1 visits today)
Amy Goodman Dodges Building 7 Question Yet Again!
i used to give money to democracy now! and even bought amy's book…but
while reading her book…saw how little the bankster tools were mentioned
(wolfowitz perle…) and realized at that point she is a tool too….
themoneymasters.com has political truth…and it matches exactly with the
Gospel
Amy Goodman – The Trial: 1.) What are your comments about Building 7? "I
think there should be a better investigation around 911" 2.) What are your
comments about Building 7? "I think there should be a better investigation
around 911" 3.) What are your comments about Building 7? "I think there
should be a better investigation around 911" 4.) What are your comments
about Building 7? "OK, I ADMIT IT!! I DID IT!! I DID IT!!! I ORGANIZED THE
WHOLE DESTRUCTION OF WORLD TRADE CENTER!! ARRGHH!
Also, the links in this video description raise a lot of questions about
Amy and the entire Democracy Now operation.
And my approach was not bad : ) I did not yell at her. She advertised
herself to be at this event to meet people so I went to talk to her and she
walked so I walked with her.
Well, reread what I wrote 10 times and at some point some things might
start to connect. This one though might require a full life to understand:
"I do not believe in absolute incoherency". And I know the reply to my
question: did you read The Silenced Majority? Answer: No.
I thought they were good journalists.
She met many people screaming at her that she was complicit to this or that
before that video up here, many in fact crazier than Jeff, so she avoid
these encounters because she knows what they imply: people trying to force
opinions on her where she has none. She's probably jawdropped at how much
Alex Jones is a cunt, but to protect her image she would never say things
like that loudly. She's funded by Rockerfeller, Carnegie, Ford, many jewish
institutions: if that is embarassing, you tell me.
That doesn't make sense. The "popular opinion" we are talking about is no
mere populist meme, but imply a majority of views from experts in the field
of architectural engineering, people who indeed have scrutinized those
"hard evidences". Consensus on the interpretation of hard evidences makes a
fact, not the hard evidences themselves. What is you authority to decide
that a majority of experts in a field are wrong??
I guess I have never seen an opposing view in any of their interviews.
You come off as incoherent and snaky and want to engage in what you label
as a debate? That's why I am being sarcastic. I asked 2 relevant questions
to Amy who marketed herself on her website inviting the public to go out
and meet her. at this event. If you have a direct question then ask it.
If Amy admitted she doesn't believe in the conspiracy theory (and I don't
think she avoids the topic because she agrees that it's conspiracy), she
would get even more crazies running after her. It becomes an issue of
safety for her to just avoid the topic, I think. I've seen madmen with
megaphones literally in tears, telling her that the Building 7 question is
the QUESTION OF THEIR LIFE (!!!!). Why the fuck does it matter, what she
thinks? She's just a frigging journalist.
I have been known to crap.
So?
She would just give a BS answer anyway, liberals like her don't want to
risk the "conspiracy theorist" title just like they don't want to risk the
"commie" title. It's a shame to see her dodge questions outright like that
though, at one point I thought her show was mostly honest and therefore,
she also would be.
Feraless and Amy Goodman are not synomous. She is too cowardly to give
opposing views equal time when she skews or outright lies about issues
Yes, and that's known as being complicit. Complicity is worse even then
apathy in my opinion.
Have you seen the Amy Goodman AT building 7 video?
Amy Goodman – "Jewish American, the granddaughter of an Orthodox rabbi and
the great-granddaughter of a chassidic rabbi.” shalom
Preach that self righteousness.
Damn your stupid, she is obviously busy and you just missed the Q and A,
and yes she is very, busy and she owes nothing to you.
We're running in circle, because elsewhere she replies calmly that there
should be more investigations, and you refuse that answer. On Wiki,
anyways, most engineers are pro natural cause. You gotta check Alma Mater
into this. The proponents of conspiracy come from places like BYU. That's
opposed to MIT nerds. I'm saying: the experts with best education in
engineering are pro natural cause. Also, I hear elsewhere Amy being called
a zionist gatekeeper. Maybe she's cautious because of such attacks.
Maybe you are just a crappy human being? I met and known a few public
figures who are highly generous and fabulous. You can't be a socialite
without being, hmm, empathic to some degree.
Their show seems to lack credibility, and seems to lack any kind of
professionalism. I'll admit I haven't seen too much of it though. This is
just from what I've seen.
The problem is that she won't take a stance on it, saying "we need a better
investigation" in response to solid facts and evidence showing the
government to be at fault is saving face, and is being complicit.
That isn't a stance, it's avoiding the question which is a 'yes or no''
question. Your stance is either "Yes, I believe it was an inside job." or
"No, I don't.". If she honestly can't decide on either stance, she needs to
look at the arguments and evidence from both sides.
as being a
The demolition collapse of Tower 7 (after rescue workers did a countdown)
is the absolute SMOKING GUN!!! Without a clearly stated position on 911
Truth “Democracy Now” is less than significant, it is irrelevant. Just
another censored news agency afraid to tell the truth of 911 or even
approach the subject in a meaningful way. With great sorrow and
disappointment in Amy and her crew.
We all do, but "crap-py" people tend to mention that they do.
Also, if there was a law forcing inclusion of alternative parties (which by
the way, would mean that if I'm doing Troll Party you are forced to listen
to me), Amy wouldn't gain anything since she's doing that debate on her
show. It would all go to CNN or whatever. It's a war out there in the
Comms. It's Adam Vs. The Jeff. A true journalist should never give their
personal opinion on any topic, I think.
No, you've sent me to debate on other blogs, which I did. I shot down every
of Larry Pratt arguments, one by one: pow, pow, pow, and pow. I sent you a
tons of virtual hugs before but you're only sending me back this heartless
intent on sarcasm. Me attacking your defect in the realm of niceties is my
whole point: in what Amy Goodman is exactly worst than you by being
condescending and avoiding debates when she has a stubborn mindset about
them?
AT building 7 AT
This has been an ongoing debate: there are also videos from sceptics and
specialists who aim at debunking the conspiracy theories (which I
personally think are over-the-top, at times). Asking for a better
investigation is already taking a stand: she doesn't accept the official
answers for granted. I don't take a stand on this issue as well. Apart from
the fact that I think this issue is so much becoming a war of
disinformation that the BEST stance about this topic is probably to retreat.
Sometimes they are heated debates where you don't have a fully formed
opinion because both sides have convincing arguments. Why is her opinion so
important? If she gives a damn about this topic, soon or less she'll bring
it up. She was leaving before the Building 7 question came up, so she's not
avoiding this question, but Jeff. There can be many reasons for that. Maybe
she thought Jeff was rude? Does he come off to you as friendly in this
video?
Yeah, we are running in circles, so there's really no point in discussing
it anymore. Although, you may wish to note that a popular opinion does not
make a fact, hard evidence does.
That's exactly the sort of comment that would make her mega-rolling-eyes
and walk from you. Amy Goodman blogged "Expand The Debate", so she's not an
anti-alternative-parties. She just doesn't want to reveal her political
siding to keep as much as she can an appearance of objectiveness, which is
fair. As for 9/11, she refuses to talk with what she probably perceive as
conspiracy crazies: she asked for further investigations, but doesn't
accept bluntly that it was an inside job until proofs.
I don't talk like a "public figure", and if I ever become one, I will never
consider people as being "my audience". I'm only ever interested in
dialectics, and true debate is not possible with anyone who considers
himself even remotely as a "public figure"
This is why I have learned to have blind faith in no public figure EVER. I
don't care who it is. All public figures (including me) will let you down
at some point.
BS: She deliberately question dodges and in the vid there are plenty of
links showing Amy is a question dodger. She likes to show how tough she
supposedly is when asking others questions yet won't answer any herself.
And I never said she owes nothing to me.
Debate? I send you a virtual hug.
Her refusing to air an opinion on this matter whatsoever has nothing to do
with Jeff's approach, other people have asked her the same things in an
overly polite manner, but she still avoids answering.
So I cannot be a "preacher", simply. Or, if you mean "So what?", well,
that's rhetorical. If I was Amy Goodman you'd probably run after me to know
what I have to say, because for some reason you have decided that she's VIP
and worth your attention or I don't know what attracts you, but I don't
think it is seriously: debate. I think you stick to an agenda like Amy
Goodman is, and everything else is manipulation of media to receive
attention and sell that agenda.
She just doesn't want to aggravate nastiness by telling loud what she
really thinks, mate.
I'll have a look at those.