Amy Goodman Dodges Building 7 Question Yet Again!

Jeff 4 Justice https://www.facebook.com/likejeff4justice ○ Amy Goodman of Democracy Now is asked by Jeff 4 Justice if she would support presidential debates …


(Visited 25 times, 1 visits today)

Share This Post

Comments (43)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
i used to give money to democracy now! and even bought amy's book...but
while reading her book...saw how little the bankster tools were mentioned
(wolfowitz perle...) and realized at that point she is a tool too....
themoneymasters.com has political truth...and it matches exactly with the
Gospel
Neurozumim's avatar

Neurozumim · 581 weeks ago

Amy Goodman - The Trial: 1.) What are your comments about Building 7? "I
think there should be a better investigation around 911" 2.) What are your
comments about Building 7? "I think there should be a better investigation
around 911" 3.) What are your comments about Building 7? "I think there
should be a better investigation around 911" 4.) What are your comments
about Building 7? "OK, I ADMIT IT!! I DID IT!! I DID IT!!! I ORGANIZED THE
WHOLE DESTRUCTION OF WORLD TRADE CENTER!! ARRGHH!
jeff4justice's avatar

jeff4justice · 581 weeks ago

Also, the links in this video description raise a lot of questions about
Amy and the entire Democracy Now operation.
jeff4justice's avatar

jeff4justice · 581 weeks ago

And my approach was not bad : ) I did not yell at her. She advertised
herself to be at this event to meet people so I went to talk to her and she
walked so I walked with her.
Neurozumim's avatar

Neurozumim · 581 weeks ago

Well, reread what I wrote 10 times and at some point some things might
start to connect. This one though might require a full life to understand:
"I do not believe in absolute incoherency". And I know the reply to my
question: did you read The Silenced Majority? Answer: No.
jeff4justice's avatar

jeff4justice · 581 weeks ago

I thought they were good journalists.
Neurozumim's avatar

Neurozumim · 581 weeks ago

She met many people screaming at her that she was complicit to this or that
before that video up here, many in fact crazier than Jeff, so she avoid
these encounters because she knows what they imply: people trying to force
opinions on her where she has none. She's probably jawdropped at how much
Alex Jones is a cunt, but to protect her image she would never say things
like that loudly. She's funded by Rockerfeller, Carnegie, Ford, many jewish
institutions: if that is embarassing, you tell me.
Neurozumim's avatar

Neurozumim · 581 weeks ago

That doesn't make sense. The "popular opinion" we are talking about is no
mere populist meme, but imply a majority of views from experts in the field
of architectural engineering, people who indeed have scrutinized those
"hard evidences". Consensus on the interpretation of hard evidences makes a
fact, not the hard evidences themselves. What is you authority to decide
that a majority of experts in a field are wrong??
jeff4justice's avatar

jeff4justice · 581 weeks ago

I guess I have never seen an opposing view in any of their interviews.
jeff4justice's avatar

jeff4justice · 581 weeks ago

You come off as incoherent and snaky and want to engage in what you label
as a debate? That's why I am being sarcastic. I asked 2 relevant questions
to Amy who marketed herself on her website inviting the public to go out
and meet her. at this event. If you have a direct question then ask it.
Neurozumim's avatar

Neurozumim · 581 weeks ago

If Amy admitted she doesn't believe in the conspiracy theory (and I don't
think she avoids the topic because she agrees that it's conspiracy), she
would get even more crazies running after her. It becomes an issue of
safety for her to just avoid the topic, I think. I've seen madmen with
megaphones literally in tears, telling her that the Building 7 question is
the QUESTION OF THEIR LIFE (!!!!). Why the fuck does it matter, what she
thinks? She's just a frigging journalist.
jeff4justice's avatar

jeff4justice · 581 weeks ago

I have been known to crap.
jeff4justice's avatar

jeff4justice · 581 weeks ago

So?
zack21000z's avatar

zack21000z · 581 weeks ago

She would just give a BS answer anyway, liberals like her don't want to
risk the "conspiracy theorist" title just like they don't want to risk the
"commie" title. It's a shame to see her dodge questions outright like that
though, at one point I thought her show was mostly honest and therefore,
she also would be.
MagicKirin's avatar

MagicKirin · 581 weeks ago

Feraless and Amy Goodman are not synomous. She is too cowardly to give
opposing views equal time when she skews or outright lies about issues
zack21000z's avatar

zack21000z · 581 weeks ago

Yes, and that's known as being complicit. Complicity is worse even then
apathy in my opinion.
Have you seen the Amy Goodman AT building 7 video?
Abe Foxman's avatar

Abe Foxman · 581 weeks ago

Amy Goodman - "Jewish American, the granddaughter of an Orthodox rabbi and
the great-granddaughter of a chassidic rabbi.” shalom
jeff4justice's avatar

jeff4justice · 581 weeks ago

Preach that self righteousness.
Damn your stupid, she is obviously busy and you just missed the Q and A,
and yes she is very, busy and she owes nothing to you.
Neurozumim's avatar

Neurozumim · 580 weeks ago

We're running in circle, because elsewhere she replies calmly that there
should be more investigations, and you refuse that answer. On Wiki,
anyways, most engineers are pro natural cause. You gotta check Alma Mater
into this. The proponents of conspiracy come from places like BYU. That's
opposed to MIT nerds. I'm saying: the experts with best education in
engineering are pro natural cause. Also, I hear elsewhere Amy being called
a zionist gatekeeper. Maybe she's cautious because of such attacks.
Neurozumim's avatar

Neurozumim · 580 weeks ago

Maybe you are just a crappy human being? I met and known a few public
figures who are highly generous and fabulous. You can't be a socialite
without being, hmm, empathic to some degree.
Filling the Void Rev's avatar

Filling the Void Rev · 580 weeks ago

Their show seems to lack credibility, and seems to lack any kind of
professionalism. I'll admit I haven't seen too much of it though. This is
just from what I've seen.
zack21000z's avatar

zack21000z · 580 weeks ago

The problem is that she won't take a stance on it, saying "we need a better
investigation" in response to solid facts and evidence showing the
government to be at fault is saving face, and is being complicit.
zack21000z's avatar

zack21000z · 580 weeks ago

That isn't a stance, it's avoiding the question which is a 'yes or no''
question. Your stance is either "Yes, I believe it was an inside job." or
"No, I don't.". If she honestly can't decide on either stance, she needs to
look at the arguments and evidence from both sides.

Post a new comment

Comments by