An astounding video uncovered from the archives today shows the BBC reporting on the collapse of WTC Building 7 over twenty minutes before it fell at 5:20pm …
(Visited 34 times, 1 visits today)
ENHANCED VERSION: News Reports WTC7 Fell Before It Happens!
Thank you. Because I thought a random pilot got distracted!!!
I'd say she's probably in front of a green screen with previous footage (half an hour before maybe?) put in the background.
loooool :D
noooo reallly?!? you don't say….
hmm
<3
and you're a retard!
it would have been SO COOL if it fell during this broadcast,
Neither does the school you went to…
barack obama doens't excist
vetbank
It was planned
watch?v=tAgvsBk2Owo Excellent critique of NIST Report on WTC
Interesting the she mentions the Marriott collapse. The Marriott was almost attached to the south tower and it didn't completely collapse. I wonder why they didn't report on Merrill Lynch damage? Honestly, while I agree there is something completely conspiratory with the whole event, I'm not sure she didn't just make a terrible mistake in not knowing which building housed which companies…
Proof of media involvement. This is why they want control of the web.
Vid keeps crashing wonder why lol
Thanks I'm aware
However, was there not F-16's scrambled to take down the 2nd plane on its way to NY? they could have easily taken it down, those things travel at nearly 2 times the speed of sound while the 767 was probably traveling at like 400-500knots (600-700mph) due to their sudden dive at full throttle from like 10,000ft. An F-16 should have easily taken this aircraft down while it was still over like 24,000ft. . . . . That's the government for you, holding things to the last minute.
Also the American Airlines Flight 11 was a Boeing 767-200ER which is far more capable of holding over 200 passengers, on that morning the plane only had 89 seats filled. Coincidence? I think not. The U.S Government had all this well planned out and there's no way something like this will happen to the Freedom Tower as it will be too obvious that it's all an inside job and they will get completely fucked over!!!
Look at how the two towers fell, they went straight down even though they were both hit at different heights and angles. Also, the steel in the towers melts at 3600C and Aviation fuel burns at only a MAX. of 1700C so no way that fuel could have melted the steel in the time they were hit until collapsing!
C4 was clearly used in the basements causing them to explode and completely ruin the support beams of the towers then making them collapse floor by floor.
Read on…..^^^
At the time of the report only two buildings had fallen, making it impossible to report on a 3rd building that had fallen whether they know which one it was or not. The fact is someone knew , then a 3rd building fell…
The towers fell a couple hours after the attack as far as I know that how one guy survived from the middle floor. I think the second tower fell minutes after it got hit though.
I would say you are wrong, most definitely.
Soo… Who told the bbc bosses who then told this reporter?
>>2: A building that has collapsed would not be visible so it would not be one of the visible ones.
1:"It's pretty hard to be mistaken about whether a building you can clearly see has collapsed or not." Correct. If you know the building you can clearly see is the building you have been told has collapsed. If you don't know which building is which on the skyline and someone tells you a building on that skyline has collapsed you would be likely to think the building that has collapsed is not one of the buildings you can see that is still standing, but some other building that you can't see>>
It's pretty hard to be mistaken about whether building you can clearly see has collapsed or not. It could be just plain mistake, but it's not very likely.
We all know we all discuss . It just shows how little power the people have. If this was important then someone with power would come forward and say lets dig in deeper. No one cares . SO now its just a discussion.
Love it.
Sorry truthers but… /watch?v=yEj-kXPfb_g
Why is it odd to get incorrect information about a building collapsing in a cordoned off area of a city where two other much larger buildings have already collapsed, killing thousands causing a major catastrophe being dealt with by what is left of a fire dept that has lost hundreds of people? When the collapse of this building was being predicted for hours and people were standing around waiting for it to finally fall.
this is a particularly interesting "mistaken report"
It's odd of you just to completely write this off though. It's a very compelling thing and an INCREDIBLE coincidence otherwise. Why would they say the building collapsed before it happened? It's a very odd thing to get wrong.
The footage was not a green screen , the reporter was making the report standing in front of the window. What is amazing about this is the idea that it has any importance whatsoever. A mistaken report. How amazing. Anyone who thinks it has any significance must think the BBC are infallible and couldn't get and pass on a mistaken report.