A serious video: The “unexplainable” collapse of 7 World Trade Center is the most compelling case put forth by 9/11 Truthers. But there is more than enough e…
(Visited 72 times, 1 visits today)
Building 7 Explained
A serious video: The “unexplainable” collapse of 7 World Trade Center is the most compelling case put forth by 9/11 Truthers. But there is more than enough e…
Truthers are illogical fucking idiots. Retarded monkeys are smarter than Truthers.
10 points for including the ''believe whatever you see on TV'' straw man fallacy that is a favourite by so many collusion babblers.
"Do people really still believe that counties are run by presidents they elect"
some might but oil corporations pretty much run USA government.
"vaccines are good for their health".
yeah. i pretty believe that one. silly me. had TB lately?
"Ben laden managed to get 4 airplanes into the heart of the USA from a cave in Afganistan"
yes i believe some terrorists can take over some planes and aim em into massive skyscrapers. again silly me for not believing in some crackpot conspiracy theory
Do people really still believe that counties are run by presidents they elect, vaccines are good for their health, Ben laden managed to get 4 airplanes into the heart of the USA from a cave in Afganistan, money is backed by gold ? yes they do…why because they are too stupid and too lazy to do the maths "and accuse those who do to be stupid" unable to think by themselves and believe what ever airs on TV…do your homework than accuse the first class student to be stupid
youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=bHQPaAkIl0I#at=135
Come on Jesus, even you know what really happened that day. 😉
do ppl really still believe in aliens, astrology, ghosts, religions and world conspiracy of scientists. yes they do. proving most people are extremely stupid. so believing the government planned 911 is a walk in the park for most people.
IT WAS THE JOOZ…. You are a moron. Holocaust fraud? You must be joking.
No, The steel warmed up and was weakened by the heat, allowing it to break. Also the big skyscraper next to it was hit by a fucking plane so a shit ton of debris and concrete was dropping down and smashing the shit out of the building, The concrete inside collapsed due to the metal heating up and not being able to support it;s weight. You realise the building burned for 7 hours uncontrolled right?
Yeah, yeah
So all the steel and concrete burned leaving a empty shell ?…lol
Study nuke lies and holocaust fraud if you are awake to the 911 fraud. The holocaust fraud is exposed by jewish person david cole and a character "denierbud" here on youtube. The final solution was the transfer agreement when Hitler from -33 moved german jews to palestine after they were forced to buy expensive transfer pass ports. Nuke lies are exposed by debunking hiroshima and the propaganda movies , they does not claim that the nukes does not exist but no proofs exists of them to do so.
They do when they are pretty much hollow shells that have burned from the inside out. DId you even watch the video?
So you're explained too simply, how it happened, but you're just going to ignore it and claim people who believe it are stupid? Typical truther argument, you have no evidence or proof so you call anyone who questions it stupid because you want to be so smart. Fucking sheep.
Because it still had some form of control, internal sprinkler systems were still going.
Perhaps it was a different type of fire, a plane didn't hit it, it was a completely different structure.
According to the U.S. Government fire causes buildings to collapse at nearly free fall speed.
LOL
i stumped you with my first question.
why are you afraid to answer the question(s)
"Unless of course, YOU have the WTC7 collapse model data that NIST is withholding?"
"so i'll take that as a "No" to my question about you having NIST's WTC7 collapse model data??"
"You have that WTC7 collapse model data for me? yes? or no? "
well…..?
still nothing?
awww…..edge loses 🙁 🙁
still no answer from you?
didn't think so.
why are you afraid to answer the question(s)
"Unless of course, YOU have the WTC7 collapse model data that NIST is withholding?"
"so i'll take that as a "No" to my question about you having NIST's WTC7 collapse model data??"
"You have that WTC7 collapse model data for me? yes? or no? "
well…..?
awww….edge loses 🙁
Still nothing?
Well….?
BAM! Edge wins!!!!!
And at what point in that video do I see govt agents participating in the attacks?
Just asking questions.
The hotel/skyscraper in Chechnya burned for around 7 hours why didn't it fall?
OK, I totally believe it when a comedian claims that the US government tells the truth. No shit. BTW all your pension funds & bank accounts are safe too. Like in Cypress.
This is BS, but good to show how stupid people who believe this fine gentlemen explaining the reason why the building is disappearing !
youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=CFDC7zmJgQg
haaaaaaaaaaaaaa Take your fire arm and please go fight in Iran, why ?
your F**** government is saying to you that they are bad guys
And why is BBC reported the building collapsing way before it actually collapse ??
youtube.com/watch?v=s0qdLoobkUI
would you please cut off the bullshiting
youtube.com/watch?v=NledRP4H8bE
and could you also explain why is this man dead now ??
youtube.com/watch?v=CEsesnzDBvA
That is one of the best jokes i have ever heard, would you now please explain to us the (the stupid people who who question the 9/11 official bullshit) why is this building didn't exactly fall down:
…. + rt.com/news/chechnya-tallest-building-fire-280/
Stop please we just know that all that bullshit is just bullshit you can either be stupid like us and start asking the right questions or play the smartass card
You can smash away half a standing pyramid of cards and some of the other half may still stand. Gently take out one of the bottom middle cards, most pivotal to the structure, and it will all collapse in on itself. The amount of damage to a part of the building doesn't necessarily mean a pivotal point in the structure has been compromised enough. Plus tower 7 would have been a lot heavier than the windsor tower, and a shit load heavier than the murrah federal building.
And what about the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building (Oklahoma City Bombing). That building had more damage than both twin towers and building 7 COMBINED. Half the building was blown away. Just google it and look at the images. That building was attack on April 19. It had to be demolished on May 23. That means that since the bombing, it stood for 35 days, and would have continued to stand. Why didn't that building fall into it's own footprint?
@CathartikRequiem Exactly its like trying to teach calculus, to 1st graders
@stretmediq But other fuel sources are widely available in office buildings since plastics are made from petroleum and burn at high temperatures
@tacoma1968 Happens all the time all you need is fuel (jet fuel would do nicely) and oxygen
@UnaFatsaUnaRasta22 Because they weren't damaged to the point of failure