May 14, 2014 C-SPAN http://MOXNews.com ONE TIME ONLY DONATION https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=MHT8PM5BPSVC8 $1.00 ONE DOLLAR PER MONTH SUBSCRIPTION…
Greenwald had every right in the world to go ahead and field the question
if he thought it had any merit whatsoever. Clearly he knows of these claims
and we all know that he IS a whistleblower, if he thought the claims had
ANY merit at all he surely would have discussed this and not allowed the
CSPAN host to dictate the conversation. Greenwald knows those claims are BS
otherwise he'd not only discuss it there, but write about it outside of
discussions like this.
Big deal the topic is the NSA… nothing special here. Anyone with half a
brain knows 9/11 was a carefully planned out orchestrated event. The
problem is half of the population has no brains left at all.
the constant "building 7" question is a "wearechange" controlled opposition
campaign. wearechange is a jewish/zionist org whose purpose is to take
attention AWAY from the fact that ISRAEL DID 911.
But… 9/11 is related to the NSA… they were the ones responsible for
monitoring and tracking the "terrorists" … fucking host.
Although I don't trust Greenwald entirely either… his good buddy Jeremy
Scahill has expressed his views on 9/11 in a very unflattering manner:
Jeremy Scahill comments on Alex Jones and 911 Truth
Okay we are talking about the NSA (totally different subject) and some
asshole caller is is asking 911? Yeah I would cut him off too just as if
the calling were ask about who shot JFK. IT WAS OFF SUBJECT DO YOU NOT GET
THAT?! You conspiracy theorists make yourselves look bad when you do shit
like that and that is why no one listens to you, YOU SOUND LIKE LOONEY
CULTISTS.
FUCK GREENWALD!!! FUCKING SHILL!! IF HE HAS ANY SELF-RESPECT HE WOULD HAVE
TOLD THAT ANCHOR TO CAN IT AND GIVE HIS OPINION ABOUT BUILDING …
But NO…. Of course anyone who believes in 911 being an inside job is a
"Conspiracy Theorist"… YOU KNOW THERE WAS A TIME WHEN THEY SAID THAT
ABOUT THE "NSA Conspiracy" also… but you were ok to investigate that? Oh
No.. actually you didn't do any investigating…. he just DID WHAT HE WAS
TOLD LIKE A GOOD FUCKING SLAVE PIECE OF SHIT!!
FUCK GREENWALD!
SHOOT HIM IN THE BACK OF THE HEAD – TRAITOR TO HUMANITY!!!
I'm not surprised that the interviewer cut-off the caller. He wouldn't want
Greenwald's ass hanging out in the wind after he's forced to refute the
Building 7 evidence.
Cause guess who linked 911and the surveilance state? Every 'leaker' not
advertised by mainstream tv. All cept the greenwaldsnowjob combo and
assange. Sleepie sleep time.
Gasp!!! Like OMG! Imagine a program being about the NSA and a caller
wants to ask a question about a completely different subject.
He should have been cut off and told to call back when the topic was about
9/11.
Sadly, MOXNews would rather you think he was cut off just so the Host or
Guest doesn't have to answer about 9/11. Thanks MoxNews, you just lost me
as a viewer. I hope everyone else deletes them from their subs list too.
Its the only way to hold them accountable for their deception.
He has a monopoly on the snow job files but his multimillion blowjob with
omidyar and 'intecept' has yet to release ONE real story after months of
its useless existence.
There isn't time for crackpot nonsense. The issue at hand is the
unconstitutional surveillance state, the interviewer is doing his job by
staying course on the topic.
The caller correctly notes that justifications for the surveillance state
arise mostly in the official narrative of 9/11–and CSPAN should lose its
broadcasting license for racketeering in the cover-up of 9/11. http://911JusticeCampaign.org Time to commence indictments, make arrests,
interrogate, prosecute and seize assets per RICO statutes.
We of course have to at least consider the possibility that the host cut
him off because by now every news station has had experience with people
calling in about 9/11 "truth" whenever a controversial guest is on and they
believe it to be complete nonsense without any verifiable evidence that
stands up to scrutiny (as I believe).
Awesome job CHUCK a little off topic but valid. When you mention tower 7
all the reporters start to piss themselves. Just to let the people who did
that to us all. WE WILL NEVER FORGET WHAT YOU FUCKS DID AND HAVE DONE TO
US. And remember fucks were the good guys not you sellout traitor pieces of
shit.
The last thing they want is to talk about it. The excuse they use for the
two towers is "well it was hit by a plane" and ignorant people don't know
how much construction planning goes into sky rises. But after the 9/11
commission decided they weren't going to talk about building 7, because
they had no rational for it. We are supposed to accept that an office fire
with materials that don't burn hot enough to melt steel framing collapsed
within it's own footprint.
So are Glenn Greenwald and Edward Snowden just controlled opposition
because we know the Zionist Jews are close to the top of the pyramid and
seem to always be skipped over and ignored.
CSPAN is sick of 911 and no one actually cares – bitching about it doesn't
do shit –
the corporations own you as long as you keep participating in their system
so you can pat yourself all you want on the 911 was an inside job back, no
one gives a shit cause you can't fix that – just get away from the system –
get out now!
Greenwald had every right in the world to go ahead and field the question
if he thought it had any merit whatsoever. Clearly he knows of these claims
and we all know that he IS a whistleblower, if he thought the claims had
ANY merit at all he surely would have discussed this and not allowed the
CSPAN host to dictate the conversation. Greenwald knows those claims are BS
otherwise he'd not only discuss it there, but write about it outside of
discussions like this.
WoW!!!
Big deal the topic is the NSA… nothing special here. Anyone with half a
brain knows 9/11 was a carefully planned out orchestrated event. The
problem is half of the population has no brains left at all.
the constant "building 7" question is a "wearechange" controlled opposition
campaign. wearechange is a jewish/zionist org whose purpose is to take
attention AWAY from the fact that ISRAEL DID 911.
Pressitutes Only Serve sATAN.
But… 9/11 is related to the NSA… they were the ones responsible for
monitoring and tracking the "terrorists" … fucking host.
Although I don't trust Greenwald entirely either… his good buddy Jeremy
Scahill has expressed his views on 9/11 in a very unflattering manner:
Jeremy Scahill comments on Alex Jones and 911 Truth
Okay we are talking about the NSA (totally different subject) and some
asshole caller is is asking 911? Yeah I would cut him off too just as if
the calling were ask about who shot JFK. IT WAS OFF SUBJECT DO YOU NOT GET
THAT?! You conspiracy theorists make yourselves look bad when you do shit
like that and that is why no one listens to you, YOU SOUND LIKE LOONEY
CULTISTS.
Scumbag gatekeepers will hang.
Everytime!! This is what restores my faith in the public.
Those who will need to know most, will. May God have mercy on the rest.
FUCK GREENWALD!!! FUCKING SHILL!! IF HE HAS ANY SELF-RESPECT HE WOULD HAVE
TOLD THAT ANCHOR TO CAN IT AND GIVE HIS OPINION ABOUT BUILDING …
But NO…. Of course anyone who believes in 911 being an inside job is a
"Conspiracy Theorist"… YOU KNOW THERE WAS A TIME WHEN THEY SAID THAT
ABOUT THE "NSA Conspiracy" also… but you were ok to investigate that? Oh
No.. actually you didn't do any investigating…. he just DID WHAT HE WAS
TOLD LIKE A GOOD FUCKING SLAVE PIECE OF SHIT!!
FUCK GREENWALD!
SHOOT HIM IN THE BACK OF THE HEAD – TRAITOR TO HUMANITY!!!
Greenwald blows only big meaty whistles.
I'm not surprised that the interviewer cut-off the caller. He wouldn't want
Greenwald's ass hanging out in the wind after he's forced to refute the
Building 7 evidence.
Greenwald, the left-gatekeeper.
Honestly…What do these people expect to accomplish by constantly calling
C-span & asking the same question about bldng 7?
Cause guess who linked 911and the surveilance state? Every 'leaker' not
advertised by mainstream tv. All cept the greenwaldsnowjob combo and
assange. Sleepie sleep time.
Isn't THAT Curious…. Hmmm.
Gasp!!! Like OMG! Imagine a program being about the NSA and a caller
wants to ask a question about a completely different subject.
He should have been cut off and told to call back when the topic was about
9/11.
Sadly, MOXNews would rather you think he was cut off just so the Host or
Guest doesn't have to answer about 9/11. Thanks MoxNews, you just lost me
as a viewer. I hope everyone else deletes them from their subs list too.
Its the only way to hold them accountable for their deception.
No the debate isnt controlled. Its real leaks on real hollywood television!
I promise.
He has a monopoly on the snow job files but his multimillion blowjob with
omidyar and 'intecept' has yet to release ONE real story after months of
its useless existence.
There isn't time for crackpot nonsense. The issue at hand is the
unconstitutional surveillance state, the interviewer is doing his job by
staying course on the topic.
we must throw off the yoke of tyranny, and make our country safe for
hypocrisy!..
smooth
Too bad every caller doesn't do that. That would make for an interesting
show.
The caller correctly notes that justifications for the surveillance state
arise mostly in the official narrative of 9/11–and CSPAN should lose its
broadcasting license for racketeering in the cover-up of 9/11. http://911JusticeCampaign.org Time to commence indictments, make arrests,
interrogate, prosecute and seize assets per RICO statutes.
Good question Chuck bet he had the answer too…but you know that 9/11 has
nothing to do with this increased surveillance….right
We of course have to at least consider the possibility that the host cut
him off because by now every news station has had experience with people
calling in about 9/11 "truth" whenever a controversial guest is on and they
believe it to be complete nonsense without any verifiable evidence that
stands up to scrutiny (as I believe).
this is why youre awesome moxnews!
Some things are blatantly obvious
If 7 was laced with pre-planted "bombs",
how did it burn all day long and not ignite these same "explosives"..?
Awesome job CHUCK a little off topic but valid. When you mention tower 7
all the reporters start to piss themselves. Just to let the people who did
that to us all. WE WILL NEVER FORGET WHAT YOU FUCKS DID AND HAVE DONE TO
US. And remember fucks were the good guys not you sellout traitor pieces of
shit.
hmm nuff information for me for a whole day of breaking news! since nothing
changed i tune in next year same time and we`ll see what 2015 brings!
YouTube 911GATE and "nist foia 9/11" and "9/11 predictive programming"
The last thing they want is to talk about it. The excuse they use for the
two towers is "well it was hit by a plane" and ignorant people don't know
how much construction planning goes into sky rises. But after the 9/11
commission decided they weren't going to talk about building 7, because
they had no rational for it. We are supposed to accept that an office fire
with materials that don't burn hot enough to melt steel framing collapsed
within it's own footprint.
So are Glenn Greenwald and Edward Snowden just controlled opposition
because we know the Zionist Jews are close to the top of the pyramid and
seem to always be skipped over and ignored.
CSPAN is sick of 911 and no one actually cares – bitching about it doesn't
do shit –
the corporations own you as long as you keep participating in their system
so you can pat yourself all you want on the 911 was an inside job back, no
one gives a shit cause you can't fix that – just get away from the system –
get out now!
9/11 was *the* excuse for the surveillance state… CSPAN proves once again
to be complicit in the coverup.