C-SPAN Host Cuts Off Caller Asking Glenn Greenwald About “Building 7” Being Taken Down By Explosives

May 14, 2014 C-SPAN http://MOXNews.com ONE TIME ONLY DONATION https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=MHT8PM5BPSVC8 $1.00 ONE DOLLAR PER MONTH SUBSCRIPTION…


(Visited 43 times, 1 visits today)

Share This Post

37 Comments - Write a Comment

  1. Greenwald had every right in the world to go ahead and field the question
    if he thought it had any merit whatsoever. Clearly he knows of these claims
    and we all know that he IS a whistleblower, if he thought the claims had
    ANY merit at all he surely would have discussed this and not allowed the
    CSPAN host to dictate the conversation. Greenwald knows those claims are BS
    otherwise he'd not only discuss it there, but write about it outside of
    discussions like this.

    Reply
  2. Big deal the topic is the NSA… nothing special here. Anyone with half a
    brain knows 9/11 was a carefully planned out orchestrated event. The
    problem is half of the population has no brains left at all.

    Reply
  3. the constant "building 7" question is a "wearechange" controlled opposition
    campaign. wearechange is a jewish/zionist org whose purpose is to take
    attention AWAY from the fact that ISRAEL DID 911.

    Reply
  4. But… 9/11 is related to the NSA… they were the ones responsible for
    monitoring and tracking the "terrorists" … fucking host.
    Although I don't trust Greenwald entirely either… his good buddy Jeremy
    Scahill has expressed his views on 9/11 in a very unflattering manner:
    Jeremy Scahill comments on Alex Jones and 911 Truth

    Reply
  5. Okay we are talking about the NSA (totally different subject) and some
    asshole caller is is asking 911? Yeah I would cut him off too just as if
    the calling were ask about who shot JFK. IT WAS OFF SUBJECT DO YOU NOT GET
    THAT?! You conspiracy theorists make yourselves look bad when you do shit
    like that and that is why no one listens to you, YOU SOUND LIKE LOONEY
    CULTISTS.

    Reply
  6. FUCK GREENWALD!!! FUCKING SHILL!! IF HE HAS ANY SELF-RESPECT HE WOULD HAVE
    TOLD THAT ANCHOR TO CAN IT AND GIVE HIS OPINION ABOUT BUILDING …

    But NO…. Of course anyone who believes in 911 being an inside job is a
    "Conspiracy Theorist"… YOU KNOW THERE WAS A TIME WHEN THEY SAID THAT
    ABOUT THE "NSA Conspiracy" also… but you were ok to investigate that? Oh
    No.. actually you didn't do any investigating…. he just DID WHAT HE WAS
    TOLD LIKE A GOOD FUCKING SLAVE PIECE OF SHIT!!

    FUCK GREENWALD!

    SHOOT HIM IN THE BACK OF THE HEAD – TRAITOR TO HUMANITY!!!

    Reply
  7. I'm not surprised that the interviewer cut-off the caller. He wouldn't want
    Greenwald's ass hanging out in the wind after he's forced to refute the
    Building 7 evidence.

    Greenwald, the left-gatekeeper.

    Reply
  8. Honestly…What do these people expect to accomplish by constantly calling
    C-span & asking the same question about bldng 7?

    Reply
  9. Cause guess who linked 911and the surveilance state? Every 'leaker' not
    advertised by mainstream tv. All cept the greenwaldsnowjob combo and
    assange. Sleepie sleep time.

    Reply
  10. Gasp!!! Like OMG! Imagine a program being about the NSA and a caller
    wants to ask a question about a completely different subject.

    He should have been cut off and told to call back when the topic was about
    9/11.

    Sadly, MOXNews would rather you think he was cut off just so the Host or
    Guest doesn't have to answer about 9/11. Thanks MoxNews, you just lost me
    as a viewer. I hope everyone else deletes them from their subs list too.
    Its the only way to hold them accountable for their deception.

    Reply
  11. He has a monopoly on the snow job files but his multimillion blowjob with
    omidyar and 'intecept' has yet to release ONE real story after months of
    its useless existence.

    Reply
  12. There isn't time for crackpot nonsense. The issue at hand is the
    unconstitutional surveillance state, the interviewer is doing his job by
    staying course on the topic.

    Reply
  13. The caller correctly notes that justifications for the surveillance state
    arise mostly in the official narrative of 9/11–and CSPAN should lose its
    broadcasting license for racketeering in the cover-up of 9/11. http://911JusticeCampaign.org Time to commence indictments, make arrests,
    interrogate, prosecute and seize assets per RICO statutes.

    Reply
  14. dragonfly111cute · Edit

    Good question Chuck bet he had the answer too…but you know that 9/11 has
    nothing to do with this increased surveillance….right

    Reply
  15. dakotadenverdexter · Edit

    We of course have to at least consider the possibility that the host cut
    him off because by now every news station has had experience with people
    calling in about 9/11 "truth" whenever a controversial guest is on and they
    believe it to be complete nonsense without any verifiable evidence that
    stands up to scrutiny (as I believe).

    Reply
  16. Awesome job CHUCK a little off topic but valid. When you mention tower 7
    all the reporters start to piss themselves. Just to let the people who did
    that to us all. WE WILL NEVER FORGET WHAT YOU FUCKS DID AND HAVE DONE TO
    US. And remember fucks were the good guys not you sellout traitor pieces of
    shit.

    Reply
  17. hmm nuff information for me for a whole day of breaking news! since nothing
    changed i tune in next year same time and we`ll see what 2015 brings!

    Reply
  18. The last thing they want is to talk about it. The excuse they use for the
    two towers is "well it was hit by a plane" and ignorant people don't know
    how much construction planning goes into sky rises. But after the 9/11
    commission decided they weren't going to talk about building 7, because
    they had no rational for it. We are supposed to accept that an office fire
    with materials that don't burn hot enough to melt steel framing collapsed
    within it's own footprint.

    Reply
  19. IgnoranceIs AChoice · Edit

    So are Glenn Greenwald and Edward Snowden just controlled opposition
    because we know the Zionist Jews are close to the top of the pyramid and
    seem to always be skipped over and ignored.

    Reply
  20. CSPAN is sick of 911 and no one actually cares – bitching about it doesn't
    do shit –

    the corporations own you as long as you keep participating in their system

    so you can pat yourself all you want on the 911 was an inside job back, no
    one gives a shit cause you can't fix that – just get away from the system –
    get out now!

    Reply

Post Comment