WTC 7 NIST Model vs. Reality

Special Thanks to: http://www.YouTube.com/user/Femr2 http://femr2.ucoz.com This video shows that the NIST Report on WTC 7 is not representative of reality an…


(Visited 62 times, 1 visits today)

Share This Post

29 Comments - Write a Comment

  1. it's over shilly. you can no longer pretend all of AIA disagrees with
    ae911truth. you were proven wrong. sorry kid. it didn't work. you put up a
    good fight though. well…you didn't, but i don't want you to feel TOO bad.

    Reply
  2. hey…..hey shillfirbin! ……i found the "conspiracy website" that Kamal
    Obeid (Structural Engineer – Masters Degree in Civil and Structural
    Engineering – Practicing Engineer for 30 years – Licensed Structure
    Engineer for 25 years) belongs too. and guess what, not only does he belong
    to it, but according to his Linked In page…..he is the OWNER!
    landtech(dot)com what a "conspiracy" nut! ……..right?!?!?! lol. you
    fucking moron.

    Reply
  3. i didn't say he was "unqualified" i said he's a crackpot. and he is. from
    his bio: "Only recently have I begun to examine the structural collapse of
    the buildings." excellent! sounds like he really knows the subject matter.
    i can see why you have so much faith in his opinion. "evidence of thermite
    in the debris" oh no, he's not a crackpot at all seems totally legit. HA
    HA!!

    Reply
  4. there are over 1700 now. and growing! not to mention the over 15,000 other
    individuals who have signed their petition, including myself.

    Reply
  5. are you so stupid as to try to use that as some kind of "proof?" you ask if
    anyone takes them seriously, i link you to the many, many architects and
    engineers who do, and by your failed logic, you claim that those people
    don't count? lmao. so according to you, the group can't be taken seriously
    because no one supports them. and all their thousands and thousands of
    supporters can't be taken seriously because they're in the group. you do
    see how stupid you are, correct?

    Reply
  6. ""DO science?" wow……that is just……wow……" yeah, you know. DO
    math, DO science. it's pretty common parlance. maybe you'd know that if you
    stepped away from the computer and interacted with an actual real human
    being now and then.

    Reply
  7. do you think "conspiracy theory" means "always wrong?" yeah, you see here
    on earth conspiracy theory is a figure of speech for "paranoid nonsense." i
    know you don't do very well with figures of speech, since your big "do
    science" quandary. "have disproven 0 things" ah, wouldn't that mean they
    would have had to prove something first, which they haven't? other that the
    fact that there are a lot of suckers like you out there, but we already
    knew that, didn't we.

    Reply
  8. "because their public relations department doesn't want to be associated
    with conspiracy theories" so you acknowledge that a&e 911 truth are
    promoting conspiracy theories. good job. "members from AIA who have signed
    on saying that they're against ae911truth." burden of proof backwards
    again. the AIA have disowned a&e for 9/11 "truth" go ahead and pretend it's
    just their "PR department."

    Reply
  9. lmfao. you must have passed statistics with flying colors!!!!! so,
    according to your logic…..ONLY actual members of the KKK follow their
    belief structure. good thing too. i thought there were a lot more racists
    out there!

    Reply
  10. HOLD a RULER to the screen on the edge of the building at the right from
    :10 to :14 I know its not much time since the building fell oh so slowly.
    Not as if it was violating the law of conservation of momentum or like the
    only thing missing was Godzilla's foot.

    Reply
  11. wow…..ok….. yes. here are the exact people, among others, who take them
    seriously. ae911truth(dot)org/signpetition(dot)php
    ae911truth(dot)org/signpetition(dot)php?o=1 including Kamal Obeid, licensed
    structural engineer for over 30 years with a masters degree and his own
    business. she how your shitty logic fails you? nah…you probably can't
    figure it out

    Reply
  12. be a man. you said you wanted to "do science." well so do i. so answer the
    question. are you not smart enough? what's the problem?

    Reply
  13. you're meaningless comments are just that…meaningless. you've made one
    pathetic, nonsensical attempt at denouncing ae911truth which didn't work.
    you've made 0 towards the rest of the groups mentioned. this is because
    you're weak. until you come up with something substantial, i'll continue to
    consider you a joke. stillllll waiting….

    Reply
  14. 1500 engineers have said demolitions brought the buildings down…what more
    do they want? Have they cahnged any building codes? NO, not one.

    Reply
  15. wellifthemediasaysit · Edit

    @NowKillYourself do the research shilltard!!! you know it as well as us,
    you are simply paid to 'sway our opinion' on the net eh?? jeeez you
    cointelpro trolls dont make it obvious do you??? awww poor stupid paid
    disinfo troll, at least keep the BS more realistic!! we all know full well
    9/11 was an inside job, no shills/trolls/disinfo (STDs) make any
    difference!!

    Reply
  16. Richard Gage, AIA, Architect Harry G. Robinson, III, FAIA, AICP, NOMA
    Daniel B. Barnum, B.Arch, FAIA David Paul Helpern, M.Arch, FAIA Kevin A.
    Kelly, FAIA Paul Stevenson Oles, M.Arch, FAIA Eason Cross, M.Arch, FAIA H.
    Theodore Elden, Jr., B.Arch, AIA Timothy Cannell Davis, BA, M.Arch, AIA
    Paul Adams, B.Arch, M.Arch, AIA, NCARB, LEED AP Raphael Sperry, M.Arch, AIA
    Reuben Gene Walters, B.Arch, Assoc. AIA Cynthia Howard, M.Arch, AIA running
    out of room on AIA ae911truth members

    Reply
  17. of course you don't attempt to prove me wrong. this is because you can't.
    instead you make weak, vague, baseless attacks against me. you do realize
    how painfully obvious this is, correct? nah. you're not quite smart enough
    for that. this science still stands, kid. and i didn't have to "do"
    anything. 😉

    Reply
  18. "Aside from Gage, though, there was not a single other architect in the
    room, much less an official from AIA, or even another member." d'oh!

    Reply
  19. you've already proven yourself wrong by refusing to provide said "fact." i
    can literally sit back and watch you squirm. your legs must be getting
    tired holding that tail though…. you should just tell me what this "fact"
    is already…. lol

    Reply
  20. "because no one supports them" didn't say no one supports them. i said only
    nutjobs and suckers like you support them and you've yet to prove
    otherwise, other than the members themselves, speaking of most moronic
    thing on the internet. meanwhile, i've shown you that a respected
    professional organization expressly disavows them, which you of course
    dismiss with your pathetic hand waving.

    Reply
  21. you're really on that hamster -wheel today, huh? round and round you go?
    allow me to refresh for the learning-challeneged in our midst: me: "who
    takes the flat-earth society seriously?" you: "well, the flat earth
    society, naturally!" but hey, when you apply for your next menial job and
    they ask for references, just tell them you'll vouch yourself. see how that
    works out for you.

    Reply

Post Comment