College professors give their analysis.
(Visited 15 times, 1 visits today)
Building 7 – Experts Explain It Was Controlled Demolition!
You might also like:
Logging you in...
people who watch bbc cnn fox are brainwashed with lies and lies.
If you ask america 90% of the people will say they got attacked by al-qaida or bin laden, atleast they got 10 percent who will say it was a inside job, by the bush goverment+help from illuminati/federal reserve and many more puppets. SO the 10% has to awaken the other 90% of sleeping sheeps
If you ask america 90% of the people will say they got attacked by al-qaida or bin laden, atleast they got 10 percent who will say it was a inside job, by the bush goverment+help from illuminati/federal reserve and many more puppets. SO the 10% has to awaken the other 90% of sleeping sheeps
Loooool deluded fools still believe the official fairytale even though thousands of engineers come forward to proclaim its impossibility. I bet you guys got a reason for why there was molten steel under the wtc complex months after 9/11.
It doesn't look like a 'classic controlled demolition' to me. The building melts into the ground,I see no charges going off yet in conventional controlled demolitions, there are massive explosives going off all over the building.
If he was a lucid, and reasonable host who made the claims that he makes. He would not have a radio show anymore.
So you're giving him credit for being right about something anyone can look up on Wikipedia? Pretty weak, I'd say.
He's a fearmonger, nothing more. And people who listen to him are no better off than those who watch Fox News.
He's a fearmonger, nothing more. And people who listen to him are no better off than those who watch Fox News.
He's right about plenty of things, even if hes a sack of shit. About 1/2 the time Alex Jones uses real documentation. gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20010430/northwoods.pdf Proof the Gov't is not above murdering its own citizens to goto war. This document was signed by the joint chiefs of staff. The only reason it didn't happen is b.c JFK would not sign.
No, because he's a lying sack of shit who's never right about anything.
watch?v=ZwURLwd8pEA
watch?v=ZwURLwd8pEA
why because he doesnt have millions of dollars to make elaborate ads and scams to con you into believing something else? Your such a slave it makes me sick. you fucking new world order pig. At the very least, your criticizing an pro-america rallyist for sticking up for what he believes in. go wrap a plastic bag around your head you communist scum and stick your tyrannical mindset in the bag with you
No video with the word "expert" in its title should have Alex Jones in it.
Itzahazylife is absolutely right. I was down there that horrible day, and there was talk on the street as early as 2:00pm that tower 7 could go anytime.
Other high rise fires are irrelevant. You're talking about different structural designs, different variables, etc. WTC 7 only had fire proofing foam protecting the steel. That foam doesn't protect the steel from heat forever. It only lasts long enough to evacuate the building and extinguish the fires. On 9/11, fire fighters had no water pressure to fight the fires in WTC 7, and it's also very likely the sprinkler system was also disabled. WTC 7 also had extensive damage to its south-west region.
The penthouse actually caved in 8 seconds before the rest of the collapse. The penthouse collapse was the first stage of the collapse. Knowing this, how does it make sense that WTC 7 was rigged to come down? Did they plant thermite or bombs in the penthouse? It makes no sense. Everything about it cries out that it was natural.
Why should I talk to them? Just read the logs from the FDNY. They evacuated the area around WTC 7 because they suspected collapse. It was reported by fire fighters that WTC 7 was actually leaning. They even observed it with a transit and detected that it was very slowly going out of plumb. There's not really a question that the collapse was natural. The only thing that's debatable is how exactly the collapse happened. It's hard for even experts to say.
alright man. I saw the building from the other side. Lots of smoke pretty much covering that whole side. I also saw some fires which made wt7 look like panzysauce and of COURSE the skyscrapers didn't go down. But I think you should try your discussion with a structural or fire engineer at AE911truth and come back to us and tell us what happened. Don't forget to log the conversation.
based on their experience with wtc 1 and 2, but not with knowledge of other highrises which had burned, dare I say, much longer, and stood.
show it. I've never seen it. won't and shouldn't believe it until I see it.
nah they probably don't have the evidence. Let's see it!
There's a reason why conspiracy sites only show WTC 7 from the north side and never the south side. They want people to believe the fires were small. According to fire fighters and according to pictures from the south side, the fires were anything but small. Why would conspiracy theorists distort information like that? Because they have an agenda other than the truth.
There is even a video on youtube as WTC 7 was burning where a fire fighter was talking about how there was no way to fight the fires, and how WTC 7 was leaning, and that it was definitely coming down. The FDNY wasn't surprised that it came down. Only you goof balls are.
Wow, you're clueless. There was smoke pouring out of every window on the south side by the time it collapsed. The FDNY evacuated the area around WTC 7 out of fear of collapse. Fire fighters even observed WTC 7 with a transit and detected that it was very slowly moving out of plumb. An underground water main was ruptured by the collapse of WTC 1, which prevented fire fighters from fighting any of the fires in WTC 7. Fire fighters expected there was a good chance it would come down.
Showing me smoke from the windows does not mean there was a fire on every floor. I think this can be assumed by looking at the collapse itself for a start! The NYFD said where the fires were. If you search a little harder you will see video inside the WTC with a secret service agent there. Do the firemen seem interested in WTC7 then? NO. .
Ive seen all of these! please dont waste your time or mine pointing me to this shit. Every floor was not on fire, Even the chief of the firemen will tell you that ffs!
You see smoke coming from 1 side and assume it was all on fire.
You see smoke coming from 1 side and assume it was all on fire.
You asked for it you condescending little twit..
911myths(dot)com/indexold.html
911myths(dot)com/indexold.html
oooo I would love to see your evidence every floor of WTC7 was on fire!
So please post away!
So please post away!
Comments by IntenseDebate
Loading IntenseDebate Comments...
people who watch bbc cnn fox are brainwashed with lies and lies.
If you ask america 90% of the people will say they got attacked by al-qaida or bin laden, atleast they got 10 percent who will say it was a inside job, by the bush goverment+help from illuminati/federal reserve and many more puppets. SO the 10% has to awaken the other 90% of sleeping sheeps
Loooool deluded fools still believe the official fairytale even though thousands of engineers come forward to proclaim its impossibility. I bet you guys got a reason for why there was molten steel under the wtc complex months after 9/11.
It doesn’t look like a ‘classic controlled demolition’ to me. The building melts into the ground,I see no charges going off yet in conventional controlled demolitions, there are massive explosives going off all over the building.
If he was a lucid, and reasonable host who made the claims that he makes. He would not have a radio show anymore.
So you're giving him credit for being right about something anyone can look up on Wikipedia? Pretty weak, I'd say.
He's a fearmonger, nothing more. And people who listen to him are no better off than those who watch Fox News.
He's right about plenty of things, even if hes a sack of shit. About 1/2 the time Alex Jones uses real documentation. gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20010430/northwoods.pdf Proof the Gov't is not above murdering its own citizens to goto war. This document was signed by the joint chiefs of staff. The only reason it didn't happen is b.c JFK would not sign.
No, because he's a lying sack of shit who's never right about anything.
watch?v=ZwURLwd8pEA
why because he doesnt have millions of dollars to make elaborate ads and scams to con you into believing something else? Your such a slave it makes me sick. you fucking new world order pig. At the very least, your criticizing an pro-america rallyist for sticking up for what he believes in. go wrap a plastic bag around your head you communist scum and stick your tyrannical mindset in the bag with you
No video with the word "expert" in its title should have Alex Jones in it.
Itzahazylife is absolutely right. I was down there that horrible day, and there was talk on the street as early as 2:00pm that tower 7 could go anytime.
Other high rise fires are irrelevant. You're talking about different structural designs, different variables, etc. WTC 7 only had fire proofing foam protecting the steel. That foam doesn't protect the steel from heat forever. It only lasts long enough to evacuate the building and extinguish the fires. On 9/11, fire fighters had no water pressure to fight the fires in WTC 7, and it's also very likely the sprinkler system was also disabled. WTC 7 also had extensive damage to its south-west region.
/watch?v=WnYBX6QT0R4
The penthouse actually caved in 8 seconds before the rest of the collapse. The penthouse collapse was the first stage of the collapse. Knowing this, how does it make sense that WTC 7 was rigged to come down? Did they plant thermite or bombs in the penthouse? It makes no sense. Everything about it cries out that it was natural.
Why should I talk to them? Just read the logs from the FDNY. They evacuated the area around WTC 7 because they suspected collapse. It was reported by fire fighters that WTC 7 was actually leaning. They even observed it with a transit and detected that it was very slowly going out of plumb. There's not really a question that the collapse was natural. The only thing that's debatable is how exactly the collapse happened. It's hard for even experts to say.
alright man. I saw the building from the other side. Lots of smoke pretty much covering that whole side. I also saw some fires which made wt7 look like panzysauce and of COURSE the skyscrapers didn't go down. But I think you should try your discussion with a structural or fire engineer at AE911truth and come back to us and tell us what happened. Don't forget to log the conversation.
based on their experience with wtc 1 and 2, but not with knowledge of other highrises which had burned, dare I say, much longer, and stood.
show it. I've never seen it. won't and shouldn't believe it until I see it.
nah they probably don't have the evidence. Let's see it!
There’s a reason why conspiracy sites only show WTC 7 from the north side and never the south side. They want people to believe the fires were small. According to fire fighters and according to pictures from the south side, the fires were anything but small. Why would conspiracy theorists distort information like that? Because they have an agenda other than the truth.
There is even a video on youtube as WTC 7 was burning where a fire fighter was talking about how there was no way to fight the fires, and how WTC 7 was leaning, and that it was definitely coming down. The FDNY wasn't surprised that it came down. Only you goof balls are.
Wow, you're clueless. There was smoke pouring out of every window on the south side by the time it collapsed. The FDNY evacuated the area around WTC 7 out of fear of collapse. Fire fighters even observed WTC 7 with a transit and detected that it was very slowly moving out of plumb. An underground water main was ruptured by the collapse of WTC 1, which prevented fire fighters from fighting any of the fires in WTC 7. Fire fighters expected there was a good chance it would come down.
Showing me smoke from the windows does not mean there was a fire on every floor. I think this can be assumed by looking at the collapse itself for a start! The NYFD said where the fires were. If you search a little harder you will see video inside the WTC with a secret service agent there. Do the firemen seem interested in WTC7 then? NO. .
Ive seen all of these! please dont waste your time or mine pointing me to this shit. Every floor was not on fire, Even the chief of the firemen will tell you that ffs!
You see smoke coming from 1 side and assume it was all on fire.
You asked for it you condescending little twit..
911myths(dot)com/indexold.html
oooo I would love to see your evidence every floor of WTC7 was on fire!
So please post away!
They weren't engulfed like WTC 7. The fires are ultimately what led to the collapse. Practically ever floor was on fire before it came down. I can provide photo evidence of this. Also, just because a building burns, doesn't mean it WILL fall. It just means that it's very vulnerable. Especially when there is no way for fire fighters to fight the fire and there is only fire proofing foam protecting the steel from heat.
so did buildings 3-6 but they didn't collapse and they had just as much if not more damage then tower 7
Because it was struck by chunks of WTC 1 when it collapsed. WTC 7 actually had a lot of damage done to it by the collapse of WTC 1, including the fires.
but why was it on fire? no planes hit it!
Since when the fuck do you refer to people as “it?” Shut the fuck up you faggot ass sheep.