WTC Owner Larry Silverstein gave order to “pull” Building 7

In America Rebuilds, a PBS documentary, World Trade Center owner Larry Silverstein admits to giving the order to “pull” building seven. What is the significa…


(Visited 74 times, 1 visits today)

Share This Post

Comments (42)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Don Leonard's avatar

Don Leonard · 604 weeks ago

"pull it" does not mean withdraw the fire fighters you dumb shit. It is what you do with your pud, and demolition guys do when the implode buildings.
ihatelameusernames's avatar

ihatelameusernames · 604 weeks ago

Kevin Spacey's voice?
Then the building was already rigged with explosives then you friggin sick lying scum. Why isn't this freak behind bars right now?
wendy4ronpaul's avatar

wendy4ronpaul · 604 weeks ago

Please watch ( 9/11 experts Speak Out and The Toronto Hearing 9/11) these people are architects and engineers that are speaking. One more video but different subject "Nullification is the Rightful Remedy" The 10th amendment....Read YOUR CONSTITUTION.....Every STATE is a SOVEREIGN state....SEPARATE from the FED. GOV.....
manhattan125st's avatar

manhattan125st · 604 weeks ago

Criminals murderers evil satanic people Silverstein the Mossad caught filming before and after the collapse caught by NJ police and arrested and later released by the FBI .
Look at their Israeli TV interviews , claim they were just there to document the event . Then why the celebration after the buildings fell?
Your agents of the Israeli government and you celebrate the twin towers falling!
MrHaircut1's avatar

MrHaircut1 · 604 weeks ago

You're not even mildly brilliant:

/watch?v=43F54hR0NW8&feature=plcp
iDontbreakPS3's avatar

iDontbreakPS3 · 604 weeks ago

4.5 billion one the Trade centers
Larry, how much did you make from 911?
TheDavidferal's avatar

TheDavidferal · 604 weeks ago

Alright, what is the sense behind this? "Oh look two towers collapsing with 3000 deaths, lets take advantage of this and pull the third down... "WTF?!!
Kevin Danielsen's avatar

Kevin Danielsen · 604 weeks ago

Let me ask you another question... what is it about 9/11 Truth that scares you so much? Does it really threaten your worldview that much?

I give you the floor.
Kevin Danielsen's avatar

Kevin Danielsen · 604 weeks ago

as air, when the force of resistance of the medium is equal in magnitude and opposite in direction to the force of gravity.
3. Ah, I suppose the wings, tail, and the entire body of the plane must have "vaporized". This should be the only way a 124ft wide jet would fit into a 75ft wide hole.
4. According to the NY Times, all firefighters had exited the building by 11:30AM. So, how now should we define the word "pull"?
Kevin Danielsen's avatar

Kevin Danielsen · 604 weeks ago

I'm sorry, but you did not answer my questions.

1. You did not tell our subscribers what Operation Northwoods was, as you appear to be avoiding the answer.
2. Terminal velocity has a great deal to do with the relevance of 9/11, as no damaged building on the planet would fall at that rate without a controlled demolition taking place. (By the way, terminal velocity is "the velocity at which a falling body moves through a medium, as air, when the force of resistance of the medium... (cont.)
1) Again, an operation that NEVER HAPPENED.

2) Terminal velocity has nothing to do with 911 or building collapses. I don't think you even know what it means.

3) I'll refer you to the structural analysis of the Pentagon by the American Society of Civil Engineers.

4) He CLEARLY said he meant to pull all firefighters from the building.

Any more STRAWMAN arguments you need DEBUNKED!
Kevin Danielsen's avatar

Kevin Danielsen · 604 weeks ago

By the way, my sincerest apologies for the strawman question... I should not have done that. I was in the moment when I typed my rebuttal, and I was not thinking clearly. Debates always get my pulse going :)

And I do note the typo on question 2. It should have been, "...there is no such thing as free fall speed, you..."
Kevin Danielsen's avatar

Kevin Danielsen · 604 weeks ago

3. I must admit, I don't think we were speaking of the same hole in the Pentagon, but going on that thought, how wide is a Boeing 757? (Hint: check Boeing.com for the answer)
4. While "pull it" may not be an industry term (as Mr. Silverstein was most certainly not a demolitions expert), to what was he referring?
I eagerly await your answers.
Kevin Danielsen's avatar

Kevin Danielsen · 604 weeks ago

Well, hey hey... there's no need for name calling. I'm just trying to debate the facts.
However, we can use this a a teachable moment, since we're on the topic.
If you will enlighten the class:

1. What was Operation Northwoods?
2. While it is true that there is no such thing as "free fall" is not a speed, you are correct. There is such a thing as "terminal velocity".  So, how long would it take to reach terminal velocity, and how long did it take the towers to fall?

(cont.)
Easy, Gladio and Ajax are NOT false flags and Operation Northwoods NEVER HAPPENED.

Free fall isn't a "speed" Mr. Science, and absolutely no building collapsed at free fall on 911.

The whole in the Pentagon was 75 feet moron.

"Pull it" isn't even a demolition term.

Anymore STRAWMAN questions?

911 TRUTH DEBUNKED!
Kevin Danielsen's avatar

Kevin Danielsen · 604 weeks ago

No no... I am so sorry for trying to think with my little moron 9/11 truther brain. So, can you explain away the false flag operations by the CIA and other military entities (Operation Northwoods, Gladio, Ajax, etc.), how WTC 7 fell at "free fall" speeds, how the Pentagon only sustained an 8 meter wide whole rather than a 38 meter wide whole required for a "jumbo jet", etc. I truly am sorry... I do believe that the definition of the word "pull" has truly debunked 911 truth. Good job.
Dr. James Millette of MVA Scientific Consultants

WTC Dust Study

2/28/2012

"The red/gray chips found in the WTC dust at four sites in New York City are consistent with a carbon steel coated with an epoxy resin that contains primarily iron oxide and kaolin clay pigments."

"There is no evidence of individual elemental aluminum particles of any size in the red/gray chips, therefore the red layer of the red/gray chips is not thermite or nanothermite."

911 TRUTH DEBUNKED!
ImplosionWorld

"We have never, ever heard the term "pull it" being used to refer to the explosive demolition of a building, and neither has any blast team we've spoken with. The term is used in conventional demolition circles to describe the specific activity of attaching long cables to a pre-weakened building and maneuvering heavy equipment (excavators, bulldozers, etc.) to "pull" the frame of the structure over onto its side for further dismantlement."

911 TRUTH DEBUNKED!
DeoMachina's avatar

DeoMachina · 604 weeks ago

It doesn't take weeks to blow up a building.
what about the first responders, the people who helped search through the rubble, many of them got cancer and what does your government do, they offer financial support for healthcare over ten years after the incident, and all these people had to do was pass a terrorist check. the government has their own interests, and you're not in the picture, when did patriotism turn into being willfully ignorant and so obedient to state. the true patriot rejects government abuse.
drewsiboberinski's avatar

drewsiboberinski · 604 weeks ago

lol
I don't care what Larry says,,,,the fact that Building 7 fell in less than 7 seconds,,,,total free fall,,,,confirms it was a controlled implosion.
The fact that Nano Thermite was found in the dust confirms that these were taken down with demolition. Larry's statement just adds fire to these arguments,,,,but it is the other facts which confirm them IMO.
Robert J. Williamson's avatar

Robert J. Williamson · 604 weeks ago

- I was talking about 9/11 - you are the one that wants to talk about Obama's penis. Seems like you must not be able to keep it our of your mind. You are displaying the intelligence level one needs to be at to be a "truther". Well done you are winning the argument for me.

Post a new comment

Comments by