9/11 CNN Reports World Trade Center Tower 7 Collapse Before it Happens

Over an hour before the WTC 7 demolition at approximately 4:13 pm on September 11th, 2001 Aaron Brown reports – “Building 7, in the WTC complex, is on fire a…


(Visited 59 times, 1 visits today)

Share This Post

26 Comments - Write a Comment

  1. $35 for NIKE Shoes;sport jerseys $35 for Cucci Handbag;
    $14 for LV Sunglasses;
    $80 for Rolex Watches;
    ……..cheapthestore. com—The Most Cool Shopping site !

    Reply
  2. Yeah, except for the little fact that no building had ever 'collapsed' in such a fashion before.

    To predict an incident that had been theretofore unprecedented is a little far-fetched don't you think? 

    Reply
  3. By "is collapsing" the reporter meant the building was falling apart slowly. Structure, columns, AC units, etc. falling apart piece by piece. As in, "it's in the process of collapsing and is likely to completely fall on its ass sometime soon if it hasen't already done so."

    Reply
  4. BBC reported it early too… Sadam never sent the hijackers, FBI took OBL off the most wanted list, Silverstein made 7 billion dollars fromthe insurance claims on 3 building hit by 2 planes, 2 events was the policy so he doubles the amnt claimed….

    WTC7 was never mentioned in the 9/11 commission report….

    it takes a coward to not ask questions

    Reply
  5. "why did it fall straight down. THE WHOLE BUILDING? i mean not just just the top or it didnt collapse in any angle but STRAIGHT DOWN"

    /watch?v=0HNMcWk5WpY&feature=related

    Reply
  6. makes no sense? you know what makes no sense .. 9/11.. and falling of buildings… its just immposible for a building to go down like that from debri, fire can be taken care of, and if it were to fall, why did it fall straight down. THE WHOLE BUILDING? i mean not just just the top or it didnt collapse in any angle but STRAIGHT DOWN, its how it falls when they MAKE it fall with dynamites… wake up …and i dont believe anything that you say untill i get the REAL reports.

    Reply
  7. Im not going to waste any more time with you, clearly you're either trying to troll me, or are from some hick alabama or texan dumb ass state, good day

    Reply
  8. no it wouldn't, ide be annoyed that you (the media i presume) said she was dead, when she wasn't, but seeing as she died from the cause you said, i wouldn't be suspicious of you because that takes a long time to develop (several months). i cant imagine it wouldn't be so that sometimes today people do report some celebrity has died when really they're just in a coma and about to die.

    Reply
  9. "Somebody told the tv channel, look the buildings gonna go"…

    Who told the TV CHANNELS (plural)?

    How in the ? did they know the building was gonna go – considering such a thing has never (ever) happened before?

    "So WHAT, WHO CARES, HOW DOES IT MAKE A DIFFERENCE?"

    I CARE.

    Maybe you should read my message about your mother again… and ponder on it for a while.

    If you can't figure out how it makes a difference – then I'm sorry but I can't help you.

    Get a helmet.

    Reply
  10. so… somebody told the tv channel, look the buildings gonna go, and so the tv channel reports that, then it turns out the building doesn't collapse for an hour, so WHAT, WHO CARES, HOW DOES IT MAKE A DIFFERENCE. if you watch the cnn report some say it was a cessna that hit the second tower, which was then momentarily reported to the public. Who gives a shit if they just made a mistake and somebody incorrectly predicted when the building would blow?

    Reply
  11. Pretend that I "reported" that your Mother had in fact died of a brain embolism this afternoon.

    You look over at your Mom… and she's still doing macramé, so you're very confused… "What kind of 'News' broadcast is this anyway?" you would say to yourself.

    Now imagine that a half-hour later your Mom actually does die… Not only that – but she dies of a brain embolism – EXACTLY as we had "reported" beforehand.

    That wouldn't arouse your suspicions?

    If so – you're beyond help… Carry on sir.

    Reply
  12. Look – MSNBC, CNN, 2 separate BBC channels and FOX news ALL reported that WTC7 was going to collapse (or already had) before it actually did.

    No steel-framed hi-rise had EVER collapsed that way due to fire before – so HOW did they know it was going to fall?

    The "WTC thing" was mass murder. The cover-up came later.

    Oh and it was not a "wrongly calculated prediction" – it was a bang-on correct prediction. If they said it had collapsed & then it didn't that would be different.

    But NO…

    Reply
  13. You're making a case attempting to prove that the WTC thing was a cover up (which is a fucked up, dick head idea that only a shit head would even think about) by showing a wrongly calculated prediction on a news channel? you're clearly deserving of my last comment

    Reply

Post Comment