WTC Building 7 was one of the largest buildings in downtown Manhattan. It was 47 stories tall, about half the height of the Towers, and took up an entire cit…
(Visited 28 times, 1 visits today)
9/11 WTC 7 Demolition – Westside Highway CBS Camera Angle
"minor fires on some floors" look at all the smoke coming out of the
building, does that look like a fucking minor fire to you retards? Ha,
dipshits.
All you idiots are speaking from complete positions of ignorance…. shut
the fuck up already. There are multiple videos that show a huge part of the
No Tower cascading into this building causing significant structural
damage: that is why it eventually failed and fell. Look how the building
buckles and part of the top left collapses into itself before the rest of
it fell: that is not what a controlled demolition looks like… same goes
for the towers. Fucking kooks!
really?well if you raise your child to be a stupid,question nothing t.v.
brain washed fool thats up to you. and if at 11 years of age you child
dosent realize a trick from reality,maybe your raising a complete gobshite.
much like yourself.
Oh really? Magicians do it daily!
i gave my life to defend this country.MY LIFE SEE.damn me damn me damn
me.those who are so blind to see.just damn me.protecting the devil
himself.damn me
They didn't fell on it that's bullshit it was pretty far from those
buildings and only some parts fell on the building which couldn't cause
demolition
Told you spontaneous combustion is REAL! >:]
If you knew anything about gravity you would know that a building of that
size would NOT fall down straight like that, due to some minor fires. It
would have leaned in on direction or the other, depending on the location
of the said damage. You are in no way, shape or form able to call anyone a
"Dummy"
How many impacted exterior columns from WTC 2 did NIST recover and examine?
How many WTC 2 core columns did they say were damaged by impact? Which?
Using the exterior panels as reference what was the approx. dimensions of
the WTC 2 impact hole? Which specific WTC 2 exterior panels were damaged
(specification numbers)? How come there is no inward deflection around the
impact hole? What does the second law of motion say happens when you ram
your face into a denser heavier object, at any speed?
"placing blame on an outside force" … Its Arab. Its Muslim. Its never
seen in your real life. Its on TV with a tale. Its from the Himalayas. Its
Radical. Its scary. All psychology used against you to reinforce what you
would never concede to otherwise. All that psych crap is theory. If you
were as smart as you act with the cut and paste, you would apply the laws
of motion and conservation of energy to the 595 foot fail in under 6.5
seconds and know the caveman fire collapse tale is BS.
"Psychological Projection Projection is the psychological phenomenon where
someone thinks everyone else is doing and thinking what they are. It is
usually seen as the externalisation of a person's negative traits, placing
blame on an outside force such as the environment, a government, a society
or other people."
you can see it fall in on itself starting from the east side. It's almost
as if a hole appears under the east side and sucks out the innards,,
leaving a shell to collapse. I wonder what could make a hole that big in
the ground.
"It was a secret Cavemen Conspiracy from the Himalayas" …. a paranoid and
conspiracy theory as it could ever get. YOUR conspiracy is too dumb to
believe, that is why you are having this conversation. Your paranoia has
been exploited and used as a pretext to steal your taxdollars and rape your
Constitution. The sad pathetic part is you conceded to it all, bent over
and took it because oif your paranoia. Your kids will suffer the loss of
freedom and wealth because of your fear of unseen cavemen
Yeah, I must be a troll since you have zero critical thinking skills and
brag about sharing your paranoid conspiracies with your child. You are
disgusting.
fuck off troll.
A "no planer". Awesome! I thought most of you were in mental health
facilities.
Well if that isn't evidence…I mean what is! Good to see you are passing
on your stupidity to your child. It's not like putting her in physics
classes (or yourself for that matter) would be a good idea. She's going to
think "gravity" is just a theory growing up. Good job dummy!
anybody else notice the windows popping before it falls? surely this is an
indication of something.. maybe all the floors giving in or summon
No they did not. The North Tower possibly had ejected material brush down
the south face as it was falling. There is not one piece of evidence to
prove the building sustained even close to enough INTERNAL damage to cause
global collapse. The North Tower did not hit WTC 7 above the roofline, I
have hundreds of videos to verify this. If you were 5 years old when this
happened … STFU, punk.
2 Buildings made of steal just fell on it.
@Lane arndt and 911InvestigationVids…. I am currently getting ready to
launch a new 9/11 website called 911CoverUp (dot) com. I have been
researching since this happened.. it's a team effort to launch. Please
email me at info@911coverup (dot) com.
fire? wt fire? this shit is so fucked up…it doesnt take an engineer to
know that its a demolition… us government will be brought to justice
someday.
and what about the tens of thousands of witnesses, standing on the streets
of NYC who watched the planes fly into the Towers? 'No planes' claims are
not even part of real 9/11 truth, they are some disinfo offshoot nonsense.
The central claims of 9-11 Truth (i.e those that are skeptical of the
'official conspiracy theory.') are based on well-documented facts, not
baseless claims meant to mislead and misdirect.
Building 7 the biggest scam ever no way ever would a steel building free
fall due to fire it has never happened before EVERRRRRR
good stuff cant let this one slide.showed this to my 11yr old and asked if
you can tell me how this building fell ill give you a tenner…she said
after a couple of looks,some body just blew it up.. cant fool a child.
@911InvestigationVids I'm with ya on the planes entering the towers without
being ripped apart and the doubts! I'd be inclined to follow the military
plane riff cause there's not a chance they were AAs!
And the 911 commission never even mentioned this…..wonder why.
Remember there was a hijacked plane missing.. they would have a mysterious
unaccounted for plane if they hit it. they apparently had to proceed as
planned. this building was part of the plot. —remember you heard it 1st
through me. it's my theory that i came up early on.
Right as the building is collapsing, zoom in very very closely at the right
side of the building. Clear explosion. That is an RDX bomb, used by the US
Navy. Also there were napalm bombs used in the planes. After the second
plane hit the South Tower, one of the napalm bombs exited out through the
other side and exploded in the air.
I firmly believe the plane videos are fake and that the plane script was
fully engineered. The explosion was real, the planes were added in before
being fed to the media pool. The engines and landing gear planted, actors
bussed in. The description was a cut and paste, when I try to edit the
sentence Youtube wont save it. The sentence should say the building was
evecuated for a FDNY fire drill at 7:00 am, when the alarms were disabled
and sprinklers were shut off. The glitches are "aftermarket"
Fire does not do this.
Watch the windows at 7:30, even a retard would know a controlled demolition
when they see one.
If you zoom in, you can clearly see RDX explosives going off. Look closely
at the left and right corners of the building, just a couple of stories
below the penthouse, and a few stories below the generator. You can clearly
see explosions.
hello
Pity we can't hear what they're saying with all that engine noise. Other
angles from this scene show guys standing around looking up at 7 like they
knew it was going down that way very soon.
How long would it have taken to set the charges and explosives that you
clearly see working here ? A couple of hours ? Half a day ? A full day ?
This building had been prept before the eleventh. And sadly, so had the the
towers. The explosives may have been different but the result wheir the
same.
The fire wasn't hot enough to break the glass on this side of the building
but it's hot enough to bring it down symmetrically in 6 seconds with the
help of a damaged corner? Wouldn't the damaged corner cause it to fall in
it's direction first if it was any help at all? Lots of smoke, little fire.
Why doesn't this look like other "raging infernos"?
Because there is far too many problems with the plane scripts, I have to be
skeptical and call it bogus unless I can verify it with real life. I don't
believe a single thing I am told about this event unless I can prove it. I
cant prove there were planes, military, drone, or otherwise. There are some
serious physics problems with the collisions, thus I remain in doubt. The
event is so filled with lies, that every single facet of the story should
be considered a lie until proven otherwise.
I was under the impression that you were a no plane advocate but in the
description you mention the plane,can you clarify this please,the digital
"glitches"almost seem as if they are there on purpose the evil neocon