9/11 Street Poll: Public Awakens to WTC Building 7 Hoax – Special Report

infowars nightly news reporter, Darrin McBreen talks to UT Students about building 7 on 9/11, and ask if they think it was brought down by a “control demolit…


(Visited 217 times, 1 visits today)

Share This Post

39 Comments - Write a Comment

  1. We have spent enough time pondering on the idea that 911 was an inside job, guess what it was, lets gut these fuckers for all they are worth..

    Reply
  2. Ben Zygier, was a Mossad spy, a Kidon assassin.
    What did he do to fuck up?. The code of silence of the Kidon.
    What did he know regarding the 9/11 attacks?
    What did he know of the assassination in dubai?.
    What did Ben Zygier know of the infiltation of Mossad of the U.S Republican Party?.
    What did Ben Zygier know of how meany Kidon assassins are there around the world?.

    Reply
  3. hahahahah so what? we all have no "balls"…we have a slave mentality….what are you doing on the Net? you should be lynching Bush and co…but nooo… you have to pay rent..your visa your…wtf else … yeah..somebody else will do it for you….
    greetings from pussy inhabited Greece…

    Reply
  4. If the evidence is so overwhelming then why not a new 9/11 investigation? Does Congress go along with NIST to the point they think a new investigation if not worthwhile? Even Ron and Rand Paul have not called for a new investigation. If neither Rand or Ron Paul will not call for a new investigation, then what hope does John Doe or even Alex Jones have for obtaining a new investigation. Ron Paul and every member of Congress that refuses to open the investigation should be voted out of office.

    Reply
  5. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) reported on the collapse of World Trade 7 following the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. "Our take-home message today is that the reason for the collapse of World Trade Center 7 is no longer a mystery," NIST lead investigator Shyam Sunder told journalists at this morning's press conference in Gaithersburg, Md. "WTC 7 collapsed because of fires fueled by office furnishings. It did not collapse from explosives or from diesel fuel fires."

    Reply
  6. However, Preparing to demolish even a moderate sized building takes weeks of preparation; a building as large as WTC 7– a 47- story skyscraper– must have taken at least as long. Therefore, the idea that the building was demolished in response to fires spread from the Twin Towers is not a satisfactory response, as the building could not have been set up for unexpected demolition in only a few hours, much less while fires burned inside.

    Reply
  7. This matches statements by leaseholder Larry Silverstein regarding the collapse of WTC7 where he said. "We've had such terrible loss of life. Maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it. And they made that decision to pull and then we watched the building collapse."

    Reply
  8. Even John Kerry believes it was a controlled demolition: ""I do know that that wall, I remember, was in danger and I think they made the decision based on the danger that it had in destroying other things– that they did it in a controlled fashion."

    Reply
  9. NIST spent god knows how much of your tax dollars and the better part of a decade to release their WTC7 report least you could do is read the "official" account before turning the conspiracy dial up to 11.

    Reply
  10. 9/11: A Conspiracy Theory
    /watch?v=yuC_4mGTs98
    Why The Military Knows Israel Did 9/11
    /watch?v=kVKGRB3cygg
    War By Deception (9/11, Iraq, PNAC , All Roads Lead To Israel) {Full Film}
    /watch?v=CP5JfKPoIl4
    9/11 – Missing Links ( full movie )
    /watch?v=GD_vwzjdTi4
    Israel Betrays America into War with Iran
    /watch?v=MnT8bTMN4oU

    Reply
  11. I'm gonna see through all the lies of society, to the reality, happiness is at stake.
    I'm gonna hold up my head with dignity, proud of a life where to GIVE means more than to take!
    I'm gonna live beyond the modern mentality where paper is ALL that we're really taught to create…

    Reply
  12. Bare in mind I would want or need the latest generation of shape charges. Blue prints to find the sweet spot for integrity. Honestly dropping building 7 would be a piece of cake. If a contractor was to drop building 7 following current safety standards and using conventional charges and all the typical det cord running everywhere it would be a challenge and lots of labour. One does not need to do it the conventional way. The new shape charges they have can easily vaporize any major columns li

    Reply
  13. Really, that fast? If you are for real then that solves that question. Then one weekend was more than enough time and considering if they had unlimited access with no security theres no telling how large their crew was. I sure wish more people in your industry would speak up and acknowledge your claim.

    Reply
  14. except this tool works for the same guys that run the mainstream. it is difficult to find the truth these days with alex, Icke and others like the thrive movement and zietgeist all trying to bring america down so they can rescue everyone with their NWO. Do you see them offering a solution? no. The solution is love. It is in all of us, we were born enveloped in it and it is up to us to raise our consciousness and see our true power. do not fall for these guy's false Utopia.

    Reply
  15. it was done by terrorists, just not the terrorists they say did it. quit saying it was inside…not one of those terrorists is a true american!

    Reply
  16. @Valyn66 I have worked with shape charges for many years give me a crew of 5 one day and access to one floor and I personally could level a building like WTC#7. The only difficulty I would have is security cameras watching what I was doing. Oh guess what George Bushes cousin was head of the security systems at WTC # 7. Oh and guess what he shut down the entire power and security system the weekend before 9-11. For a Internet upgrade. WTF.

    Reply
  17. And let's not even mention the fact that even if you think all that prep work (drilling holes in the beams, cutting key supports, ferrying in ton after ton of high explosives, and wiring the whole thing with det cord and blasting caps) could have been kept quiet in buildings seeing tens of thousands of foot traffic in a day, that the whole complicated spiderweb of wires and explosives would have had to survive direct impacts by airliners AND sit in burning jet fuel for an hour.

    Reply
  18. Are you kidding? I'm not asking for insider details. You're claiming WTc 1, 2 and 7 were all controlled demolitions.

    If you knew anything about what goes into demolishing a high rise, you'd immediately know how impossible what you're suggesting is. The Hudson building in Detroit is the tallest building ever demo'd with explosives. It took 24 days to wire with over a ton of high explosives.

    Extrapolate those numbers to the Twin Towers. Over three times taller.

    Reply
  19. "Anything that can go wrong will go wrong." – Murphy's Law

    Maybe it hasn't occurred to you, but nothing is perfect. Even the richest men in the world couldn't have executed this event perfectly. Who knows, maybe it was all apart of a larger plot? You expect us to know the insider details as if we have access to the same knowledge as the people who planned this tragic event? The same goes for the bombs placed under G.W. Bridge, which was only covered once by the MSM.

    Reply
  20. It's just hilarious to me how WTC 7 is treated as some incontrovertible "smoking gun" by Truthers.

    It doesn't even make sense. Okay, I get it, you think it was a false flag attack to justify the invasion (what we had to gain from invading oil-devoid and completely resourceless Afghanistan, who knows). WHY kill thousands of American citizens in WTC 1 and 2 along with hundreds of firefighters and then evacuate and demolish WTC 7 hours later.

    They had all they needed for a false flag. So why?

    Reply
  21. Lately, conspiracy theorist nuts have latched on to the Iron Spherules found at the debris site which seemed to suggest molten steel. Jet fuel, obviously, does not burn hot enough to melt steel. They found evidence of molten steel in rather unremarkable quantities in samples taken for a study by the RJ Lee Group. The samples were collected 3 months after the collapse.

    Jet fuel can't melt steel. But plasma cutting torches can. They were searching for survivors and doing salvage for MONTHS.

    Reply
  22. If you want proof that WTC 1 and 2 weren't controlled demolitions, it's as easy as watching a video of the towers collapsing. They very plainly fail at the point of impact from the planes, right? You can see it with your own two eyes.

    Now what, exactly, kind of a demolitions set up, with all the wires, charges, and det chord, could not only sustain the impact of an airliner, but also sit in burning jet fuel for 102 minutes while staying bother functional and remotely operable.

    Think for once

    Reply
  23. There's a reason the "9/11 for 'truth' movement" has changed its story so many times over the years. First it was there were no planes at all. Well, then they realized that was crazy talk, so they shifted to controlled demolition theories. Explosives, then that got debunked, so they switched to thermite. Well, that was proven impossible, so they invent NANOthermite.

    You guys are so emotionally invested in the notion that 9/11 was an inside job that you hear hoof beats and think Tyrannosaurus.

    Reply
  24. Anyone wondering how WTC 7 collapsed should read an actual peer-reviewed article from a reputable civil engineering journal. "Single Point of Failure" by Ramon Gilsanz explains, in detail, how the design of WTC 7 and the damage it sustained from falling perimeter columns from WTC 1 and 2 led to the collapse.

    I'd also like to hear an explanation for WHY exactly the evil conspirators would demo WTC 7? They already had the twin towers down. Why evacuate and demo WTC 7 hours later?

    For funsies?

    Reply
  25. "For these reasons I made the decision (without consulting the owner, the mayor or anyone else – as ranking fire officer, that decision was my responsibility) to clear a collapse zone surrounding the building and to stop all activity within that zone. Approximately three hours after that order was given, WTC 7 collapsed.

    Conspiracy theories abound and I believe firmly that all of them are without merit.

    Regards, Dan Nigro

    Chief of Department FDNY (retired)"

    Reply
  26. 3. WTC 7, we knew, was built on a small number of large columns providing an open Atrium on the lower levels.

    4. Numerous fires on many floors of WTC 7 burned without sufficient water supply to attack them.

    Reply
  27. The following block is a list of reasons sourced by Chief Daniel Nigro explaining why they evacuated, why they feared collapse, and the general attitude of FDNY at the time concerning WTC 7.

    1. Although prior to that day high-rise structures had never collapsed, The collapse of WTC 1 & 2 showed that certain high-rise structures subjected to damage from impact and from fire will collapse.

    2. The collapse of WTC 1 damaged portions of the lower floors of WTC 7.

    Reply
  28. Some people are aware but are afraid to act, some choose not to acknowledge the truth because it's to hurtful to bare.

    Reply

Post Comment