Demolition of WTC Building 7, 9/11/2001 (September 11th Attacks) – This SHOWS CLEARLY Proof / Smoking Gun of what happened to Building 7.
(Visited 26 times, 1 visits today)
9/11 *RARE* CLEAR Video of WTC Building 7 Controlled Demolition
Demolition of WTC Building 7, 9/11/2001 (September 11th Attacks) – This SHOWS CLEARLY Proof / Smoking Gun of what happened to Building 7.
Dude Stop Talking
GUILTY !!!!!!!!!!!!
"Blindly believes stuff?" Well, I see it on youtube cause that's the source. But it was broad casted on CNN, I did see it fall onto itself, didn't you watch that yourself? Nothing "blind" about it, it fell. According to their explanation, if any skyscraper caught fire on a few floors, then it should collapse on itself? No engineer degree needed. I defy u to POST ONE vid of another building that caught fire on a few floors and the ENTIRE building collapses as this one did…then I'll stop.
You mean why not Afghans. That's where the USA went first. But then there would be less reason to invade Iraq. So the reason had to be al Qaeda which is international. But not the same as the Taliban. Which doesn't matter because Bush sr. already planned to invade Iraq anyhow. Which officially wasn't a war but an armed conflict because the Taliban where there. Or al Qaeda because the Taliban didn't do 9/11. Or whoever. Or who cares.
Next question.
Watch
Weapons of Mass Deception by GMoore49
ooh my … So that collapsed like that. I thought it collapsed like wtc done
Ever consider that all these invasions were merely to further draw your attention away from the true intentions of the destruction? The best way to cover up shady shit is with disinformation. Personally, I don't think Iraq or Afgan had anything to do with the attack at all. I think US gov merely used 9/11 as a crutch to engage in more shady gov shit.
i'm the one who questions everything that's why i question your sources. you're the one who blindly belives stuff just because you see it in youtube videos.
tell me this: if the attack was made in order to justify an invasion of afganistan and iraq why were the hijackers saudis? why didn't they make the hijackers be iraqis, that would have made it much easier to justify the war in iraq
tell me this: if the attack was made in order to justify an invasion of afganistan and iraq why were the hijackers saudis? why didn't they make the hijackers be iraqis, that would have made it much easier to justify the war in iraq
I think the most important question would be, "Why did all of the buildings that contained documentation pertaining to 5 TRILLION dollars worth of gov't spending all destroyed on the same day?" Not to mention the fact that an investigation was just starting on that matter. Are the lives of 2000 Americans worth 5,000,000,000,000 dollars? Thats 2.5 million per person.
Well let's look at the facts here…most everyone is caught in the same illusion and don't question ANYTHING. Don't you think "THEY" are aware of this? Whatever they broadcast on CNN, FOX news ect…the general public is going to buy it and believe it with NO questions. Just look, this video has gotten only 2231 views…Mass media reached WAY more than this, why would they be worried about a slip up? General public is just going to believe WHAT they report, they KNOW THIS!!! Think about it!
i'm not an engineer so I'm not qualifies to answer these questions, however real engineers did investigate this and explained it. I guess building 7 was just weaker, and it caught fire unlike the other buildings nearby.
the better question is why would "they" bring it down and leave you with all these questions. why would such a genius master plan have such a big flaw to raise suspicion? it just doesn't make sense if you really think about it
Well I have a another question? If the towers damaged tower 7 enough to collapse on itself…then how come the other building next to tower 7 didn't implode or themselves?? They were much closer to it than the towers were to center 7! And the destroying of the documents were just a very small fraction as to why they brought these towers down, IF they (documents) were even any of the reason. Man I am not a conspiracy theorist bro, But man you CAN'T honestly say something isn't questionable!
it did get "touched" it got severly damaged from the collapsing twin towers. the damage is on the other side of the building which you dont' see in this clip
No real evidence? Ha HA! What more evidence do you want. A Building that NEVER got touched, fell within one block on top of itself….You GOT to be kidding me… They call them "Conspiracy Theorist" to make them sound silly, so you WON'T listen to them… ..Jeesh WAKE up bro!
if they wanted to get rid of documents they could have just destroyed the documents, it would have been easier than to bring down the whole fucking building.
all these conspiracy theories make absolutely no sense, and have no real evidence
look at what offices were in that building then you will realize a great deal.
Also, the FBI went to a gas station near by and confiscated their security footage that had the Pentagon in it. All I'm saying is do your own research on these things and you will be surprised. Don't blindly follow the mainstream.
They had to say it was demolished because it was obvious that it was, falling in a free fall in a controlled way. The story changed from structural to o hey we had to pull it. Look at the footage and hole from the Pentagon your self and decide if you think a plane was involved.
if your conspiracy theory was true all the things you mention wouldn't happen. why woudl they talk about demolishing the building on television, why would they release the footage of the pentagon and not have a right footage. all these things don't make any sense if all of this was planned
Also, you are still wrong, look up Silverstein's whole interview. They were talking about demolishing the building, also called pulling it.
Look at the surveillance from the pentagon and tell me if you see a plane enter the frame or just an explosion. or if you think a plane made that 16' by 16' hole and left no debris while conveniently hitting the side that was under construction. Sorry for the book.
look it all up. You really think people hate us because we are free? No, maybe because we are the bullies of the world and do what we please with no respect or regard for anything, then spin stories in our favor so the American people can sleep at night knowing their government is only doing what is best for the world with no ulterior motive.
He said that so they had better reasoning for it to fall than heat. People over look details. They needed justification to invade middle eastern countries and take resources. Corporations and banks run this country, not the President and congress. They demolished building seven because of the documents it held. False flag terror attacks to justify military actions have always been used. See the reason for the Spanish American war, lie. Reason we went to Nam, lie. Operation Northswood documents.
he was talking about firemen being inside and then they were told to pull out.
why would he said what you think on live television if he was part of the conspiracy?
and why would the conspiracy involve demolishing a building not even hit by the planes?
what are the goals of the conspiracy? what's the motive? how many people were involved? what convinced all of them to do this and to take such a risk and to kill innocent people?
No, he was saying that the building had structural damage so they had to "pull" the building which is a term that means demolish.
i actually did pass physics 101 and I don't see a demolition. you don't see the other half of the building which was severely damaged. and the "exposions" you see here are simply the air being pushed out as the building started collapsing from the inside first.
please explain who you think did this and for what goal?
no one said it. the man who said it meant they decided to pull out all the firemen
No offense Clark, but anyone who has passed Physics 101 can see that it was a demolition. Please….open your mind and THINK FOR YOURSELF….not just what the news media TELLS you to think. We are being lied to on this, and MANY other events. We are being lied to on a monumental scale…
They said they decided to "pull" the building, demolish it. Do you know how long it takes to plan and set up a controlled demolition?
Structural damage that caused the building to free fall on its footprints?
not just the fire but the the collapse of the twin towers near it caused major damage to its structure
haha.. so a fire causes a building to free fall in its footprints?
Fake Al CIa DUh Actors EXPOSED! Adam Gadahn & Yousef al-Khattab
/watch?v=GsUtvOW6SR0
Why The Military Knows Israel Did 9/11
/watch?v=kVKGRB3cygg
War by Deception 2013
/watch?v=pK6VLFdWJ4I
9/11 Missing Links
/watch?v=GD_vwzjdTi4
9/11 False Flag Conspiracy – Finally Solved (Names, Connections, Motives)
/watch?v=n_fp5kaVYhk
This confirms beyond doubt that this was a controlled demolition.