Fox News also reported the building had collapsed before it came down. They tell us it has ALREADY collapsed, then they show a live shot and it falls before …
It was not George Bush. It was well placed warmongering Neo-Con Jews and
the the Jewish state Mossad. The Jews traveled around acting all
terroristic while using assumed/stolen identities and passports. I believe
the ‘terrorists’ were Jews pretending to be Arabs. I say they never even
boarded the planes. The planes were guided remotely by tapping into the
existing autopilot systems. I think they were likely guided using something
placed inside the buildings they were meant to hit.
Fine, whatever. It was George Bush at the order of [Insert Name of
Influential Jew Here], and not the Islamic terrorist committed to waging
war on the United States.
“The building was designed to have a fully loaded 707 crash into it. That
was the largest plane at the time. I believe that the building probably
could sustain multiple impacts of jetliners because this structure is like
the mosquito netting on your screen door—this intense grid—and the jet
plane is just a pencil puncturing that screen netting. It really does
nothing to the screen netting.” – Frank A. Demartini, on-site construction
manager for the World Trade Center
“We looked at every possible thing we could think of that could happen to
the buildings, even to the extent of an airplane hitting the side… Our
analysis indicated the biggest problem would be the fact that all the fuel
(from the airplane) would dump into the building. There would be a
horrendous fire. A lot of people would be killed. [But] the building
structure would still be there." – Lead WTC Structural Engineer John
Skilling, 1993, The Seattle Times
The Boeing 707 could carry 23,000 gallons of fuel. The Boeing 767 could
carry 23,980 gallons of fuel. The maximum takeoff weight for a Boeing
707-320B is 336,000 pounds. The maximum takeoff weight for a Boeing
767-200ER is 395,000 pounds. The length of a Boeing 707 is 153 feet. The
length of a Boeing 767 is 159 feet. The cruise speed of a Boeing 707 is 607
mph = 890 ft/s. The cruise speed of a Boeing 767 is 530 mph = 777 ft/s. The
two planes are virtually identical.
Quote: “Airplane impact tests conducted by WTC structural engineers during
the design of the Twin Towers used the Boeing 707, which was one of the
largest passenger jets in the world at the time. The results of the test,
carried out early in 1964, calculated that the towers would handle the
impact of a 707 traveling at 600 mph…”
50 ton, 100 ton… Are you just pulling these numbers from your anal
orifice? The engineers *of course* factored in the potential fuel dump! For
you to say otherwise casts suspicion on you. You’re literally just making
things up! If you factor in all of the fuel (which is the vast majority of
the weight in any jumbo jet) a 707 (not a 737 as you have mistakenly
stated) and a 767 are virtually identical in weight.
The WTC was indeed designed to survive a plane strike. It was meant to
survive a 50-ton 737 that was bingo fuel, moving slow, lost in the fog
looking for Laguardia; not a 100-ton 757, fully-fueled, hijacked kamikaze
moving at 500 miles an hour. They were designed to survive an accident, not
an attack. Saying this is somehow indicative of conspiracy is like saying
it's odd that my Ford Escape is designed to survive of head-on collision,
but not designed to soak up a HEAT round from an Abrams.
I don't know how I missed your reply to me here but I just saw this now…
I know towers sway. That was my point. They're designed to sway… The twin
towers were *designed* to withstand impacts from jumbo jets. They were
therefore constructed so as to withstand the resultant fuel dump and fire.
He was trying to say that because the twin towers were swaying – then it
was natural that they should also both proceed to explode into a trillion
pieces in all directions.
CNN, BBC, etc all did the same thing in reporting it early so I’m going to
say this is just another channel fitting the same pattern. They all rely on
the same feeds from Reuters, Associated Press, etc. They all got the same
feed and they all reported on it. And they were all too early because WTC7
had not been imploded yet. Can you prove that this wasn’t live footage?
@MrBennSin You wrote: “It was sweawing.. I thought they would both fall as
soon as they got hit..” I’m guessing you meant ‘It was swaying’? You
thought they would fall? That’s just silly! Do you have any idea how
insanely sturdily these towers had been constructed?
Good point. Can you pin point when it was cut. I was wondering if your
stove at home has ever collapsed during a prolonged exposure to
heat/flames? I am just saying. Ours simply turned into a pile of ash and
very little rubble. I did find a passport. o.O
“Facts”? What facts?That doesn’t prove anything. “Do we have pictures?”
Yes, we’re looking at live feed right now. MSNBC, CNN and 2 different BBC
channels ALL reported that WTC #7 was going to collapse BEFORE it actually
did. But you have a hard time believing that we should add FOX to that
list? All MSM news outlets receive wire feeds from Reuters and Associated
Press… So when they all spout the same prediction, it’s not too hard to
fathom that they all got it from the same source. Is it?
it was sweawing.. I thought they would both fall as soon as they got hit…
For the guy talking bad about America… shame on you… why are you able
to see the video? American Technology and democracy.. get your facts
together.. BTW… We don’t scare…..
BTW. Why are you so scared of your own government and the true… I should
be scared that someday you retards will go for third war with a smile on
faces. Just because somebody put shit to your heads!
“We’re getting word from New York. Do we have pictures?” Then they play a
video that happened several minutes earlier. All of you conspiracy
theorists really need to get your facts straight.
@ cmtetony, En la parte inferior del reproductor, haga clic en “CC”. Haga
clic en “Transcribe Audio” A continuación, haga clic en ‘Leyendas
Translate’ (Translate Captions) Luego haga clic en el idioma y desplazarse
al español (Spanish) o lo que quieran.
They are designed to sway. Another thing. Does your stove collapse when you
have a continual flame burning. Look at your homes stove. Seems rather
flimsy. Just some food for thought.
hahahahaha americans are soooo retarded. I suggest to change your education
system… You got a proof in front of your eyes in many YT movies and
amatour records and still belive in words from TV station? 😀 HAHHAHAHA
This is trully unbelievable…
It was not George Bush. It was well placed warmongering Neo-Con Jews and
the the Jewish state Mossad. The Jews traveled around acting all
terroristic while using assumed/stolen identities and passports. I believe
the ‘terrorists’ were Jews pretending to be Arabs. I say they never even
boarded the planes. The planes were guided remotely by tapping into the
existing autopilot systems. I think they were likely guided using something
placed inside the buildings they were meant to hit.
Fine, whatever. It was George Bush at the order of [Insert Name of
Influential Jew Here], and not the Islamic terrorist committed to waging
war on the United States.
“The building was designed to have a fully loaded 707 crash into it. That
was the largest plane at the time. I believe that the building probably
could sustain multiple impacts of jetliners because this structure is like
the mosquito netting on your screen door—this intense grid—and the jet
plane is just a pencil puncturing that screen netting. It really does
nothing to the screen netting.” – Frank A. Demartini, on-site construction
manager for the World Trade Center
“We looked at every possible thing we could think of that could happen to
the buildings, even to the extent of an airplane hitting the side… Our
analysis indicated the biggest problem would be the fact that all the fuel
(from the airplane) would dump into the building. There would be a
horrendous fire. A lot of people would be killed. [But] the building
structure would still be there." – Lead WTC Structural Engineer John
Skilling, 1993, The Seattle Times
The Boeing 707 could carry 23,000 gallons of fuel. The Boeing 767 could
carry 23,980 gallons of fuel. The maximum takeoff weight for a Boeing
707-320B is 336,000 pounds. The maximum takeoff weight for a Boeing
767-200ER is 395,000 pounds. The length of a Boeing 707 is 153 feet. The
length of a Boeing 767 is 159 feet. The cruise speed of a Boeing 707 is 607
mph = 890 ft/s. The cruise speed of a Boeing 767 is 530 mph = 777 ft/s. The
two planes are virtually identical.
Quote: “Airplane impact tests conducted by WTC structural engineers during
the design of the Twin Towers used the Boeing 707, which was one of the
largest passenger jets in the world at the time. The results of the test,
carried out early in 1964, calculated that the towers would handle the
impact of a 707 traveling at 600 mph…”
50 ton, 100 ton… Are you just pulling these numbers from your anal
orifice? The engineers *of course* factored in the potential fuel dump! For
you to say otherwise casts suspicion on you. You’re literally just making
things up! If you factor in all of the fuel (which is the vast majority of
the weight in any jumbo jet) a 707 (not a 737 as you have mistakenly
stated) and a 767 are virtually identical in weight.
The WTC was indeed designed to survive a plane strike. It was meant to
survive a 50-ton 737 that was bingo fuel, moving slow, lost in the fog
looking for Laguardia; not a 100-ton 757, fully-fueled, hijacked kamikaze
moving at 500 miles an hour. They were designed to survive an accident, not
an attack. Saying this is somehow indicative of conspiracy is like saying
it's odd that my Ford Escape is designed to survive of head-on collision,
but not designed to soak up a HEAT round from an Abrams.
I don't know how I missed your reply to me here but I just saw this now…
I know towers sway. That was my point. They're designed to sway… The twin
towers were *designed* to withstand impacts from jumbo jets. They were
therefore constructed so as to withstand the resultant fuel dump and fire.
He was trying to say that because the twin towers were swaying – then it
was natural that they should also both proceed to explode into a trillion
pieces in all directions.
CNN, BBC, etc all did the same thing in reporting it early so I’m going to
say this is just another channel fitting the same pattern. They all rely on
the same feeds from Reuters, Associated Press, etc. They all got the same
feed and they all reported on it. And they were all too early because WTC7
had not been imploded yet. Can you prove that this wasn’t live footage?
All this proves is that news teams have a time delay in their footage.
I was thinking the exact same thing.
@MrBennSin You wrote: “It was sweawing.. I thought they would both fall as
soon as they got hit..” I’m guessing you meant ‘It was swaying’? You
thought they would fall? That’s just silly! Do you have any idea how
insanely sturdily these towers had been constructed?
Good point. Can you pin point when it was cut. I was wondering if your
stove at home has ever collapsed during a prolonged exposure to
heat/flames? I am just saying. Ours simply turned into a pile of ash and
very little rubble. I did find a passport. o.O
“Facts”? What facts?That doesn’t prove anything. “Do we have pictures?”
Yes, we’re looking at live feed right now. MSNBC, CNN and 2 different BBC
channels ALL reported that WTC #7 was going to collapse BEFORE it actually
did. But you have a hard time believing that we should add FOX to that
list? All MSM news outlets receive wire feeds from Reuters and Associated
Press… So when they all spout the same prediction, it’s not too hard to
fathom that they all got it from the same source. Is it?
it was sweawing.. I thought they would both fall as soon as they got hit…
For the guy talking bad about America… shame on you… why are you able
to see the video? American Technology and democracy.. get your facts
together.. BTW… We don’t scare…..
BTW. Why are you so scared of your own government and the true… I should
be scared that someday you retards will go for third war with a smile on
faces. Just because somebody put shit to your heads!
Every tower sways, genius. Have you ever been in a tall building, ever?
The video wasn't live
“We’re getting word from New York. Do we have pictures?” Then they play a
video that happened several minutes earlier. All of you conspiracy
theorists really need to get your facts straight.
@ cmtetony, En la parte inferior del reproductor, haga clic en “CC”. Haga
clic en “Transcribe Audio” A continuación, haga clic en ‘Leyendas
Translate’ (Translate Captions) Luego haga clic en el idioma y desplazarse
al español (Spanish) o lo que quieran.
@TheAllmanBrother Says who?
They are designed to sway. Another thing. Does your stove collapse when you
have a continual flame burning. Look at your homes stove. Seems rather
flimsy. Just some food for thought.
hahahahaha americans are soooo retarded. I suggest to change your education
system… You got a proof in front of your eyes in many YT movies and
amatour records and still belive in words from TV station? 😀 HAHHAHAHA
This is trully unbelievable…
so unbelievable ? – too true ??
Alguem poderia fazer a gentileza de por legendas, muitos agradeceriam.