9/11: Building WTC7 Compilation

A compilation of all the videos available for the demolition of WTC-7. The videos are as they were recorded on the media with the original commentaries from …


(Visited 52 times, 1 visits today)

Share This Post

Comments (29)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
dalawampung hk's avatar

dalawampung hk · 608 weeks ago

Stop media fags. The media in us is the main terrorist The bloodfagging media - the main terrorist. Media always lies. This is how terror is organized so please stop this terror kill media bastards, kill this bloodfagging media bitches and eveyone connected with media shit Cbs Cnn Fox Comcast kill them all they are the main terrorists stop media terror.
isthatameerkat's avatar

isthatameerkat · 608 weeks ago

Seeing is believing ive been blind mentally for 11 years,,life in america use to be cool,,lol
punxsutawneybarney's avatar

punxsutawneybarney · 608 weeks ago

Where's the dust from NIST's alleged internal collapse? Pancake theory says we'd have dust pouring out every window as the inside collapsed, and boiling out of the roofless top of the building.But the clip at 4:01 shows no dust at the top; the camera is attracted to dust at the bottom just before the building falls. And then dust from the supposedly roofless top just sort of hangs there--it has no upward velocity even though it should be very hot from the friction of all those pancakes.
FUCKED BASTARDS ! You killed all those people just to have a reason to attack another country ! BASTARDS !
Building 7 did not drop straight down. The initial move was a twist counter clockwise. That means the lower support folded, or buckled. The debris confirms that rotational movement. The west part of the building landed south, across the street. Parts of the east section landed north across the street. If lower support was removed via demolition charges, the top would have dropped straight down with no twisting motion.
Vehan80107's avatar

Vehan80107 · 608 weeks ago

This is either a controlled demolition or the world's worst construction job.
Eddie Rosado's avatar

Eddie Rosado · 608 weeks ago

Building 7 had literally no reason to collapse. That shit makes no sense.
pepelapiu2004's avatar

pepelapiu2004 · 608 weeks ago

H
You wrote: "it would not be the first time a building has fallen straight down from a block on the one side being blown"

Okay, I give up ....... nane ONE building that has collapsed straight down from damage on a single side. Buildings just dont fall like that.
OfficiallyGod's avatar

OfficiallyGod · 608 weeks ago

Blame George Bush!
pepelapiu2004's avatar

pepelapiu2004 · 608 weeks ago

That is simply ridiculous. What if there was a small office fire? Wouldnt that cause several bombs to detonate? I have worked in construction my entire life and I have never heard of anything so ridiculous. Especially considering that needing to bring down a building due to a terror attack has never been required at any time or any place prior to 9/11. Your terror e periment movie is just that, a movie, not my any reach of the imagination a documentary of any sort.
katrinlove2012's avatar

katrinlove2012 · 608 weeks ago

Princessmilagro, watch a movie called terror experiment with Judd Hirsch.They say that sensitive buildings are prewired for demolition in case the boogieman gains control of them.GodBless!!
Tyler Sharples's avatar

Tyler Sharples · 608 weeks ago

T on one side and the building with collapse from that side being able to support the weight of the whole building.
Tyler Sharples's avatar

Tyler Sharples · 608 weeks ago

Now... I have no reason to believe you guys are wrong... But wouldn't it make sense that the fire and explosion was on one side... But that they new the support was too damaged on one side to keep the building upright so they decided to take out the other side to prevent other damage? And actually, there are things known as physical and scientific phenomena, and it would not be the first time a building has fallen straight down from a block on the side being blown. All you need is a weak suppor
Funkadelic2's avatar

Funkadelic2 · 608 weeks ago

"What are they waiting for?"

I'd say for "necessary" fires to start "raging". I think it was actually meant to come down much earlier.

About the importance of building 7: We have been given zero explanation for the free-fall acceleration admitted by NIST (we are not allowed to see all of their model visualization and neither will they release the parameter data (the reason given: "It would jeopardize public safety"), and a building damaged much asymmetrically not falling over - show us how.
pepelapiu2004's avatar

pepelapiu2004 · 608 weeks ago

@princessmilagro look for a 90 minute video called "9/11 mysteries" on Google Video"
pepelapiu2004's avatar

pepelapiu2004 · 608 weeks ago

9/11 was an inside job. the government did this to its own people to drum up reasons to go to ear against countries that never harmed americans.
pepelapiu2004's avatar

pepelapiu2004 · 608 weeks ago

@princessmilagro they cant rig a building with explosives just in case: what if there were an office fire? the fire would detonate the explosives. i have worked in construction for me whole life and i have never encountered "just on case" explosives. those explosives were installed specifically to prepare for 9/ 11
Linda Chaney's avatar

Linda Chaney · 608 weeks ago

How do the builders, the politicians, and the wealthy behind things like this, sleep at night?!
Linda Chaney's avatar

Linda Chaney · 608 weeks ago

Do builders construct new buildings with explosives in place from the beginning, in case, like bldg 7, they decide they need to "pull" it? If so, this is a frightening fact for all of us who work in or visit a skyscraper that we have faith is a solid structure!
One... no way anyone could have known that building 7 was coming down... how would they know this considering no building in history... even near the size of wtc7 has ever come down from fire..? What a crock... that people by this main stream bull shit story!!!
once again , why do you ignore all the evidence preceding the collapse ? , doe's it not fit your point of view .
pepelapiu2004's avatar

pepelapiu2004 · 608 weeks ago

Well if you can look at the video above, see a 600 ft steel building come down perfectly vertically at free fall speed and conclude "Yup, looks like a fire collapse to me ahright" then there is nothing else to say........don't forget to pay your taxes. Guberment loves you, pay your taxes buddy!
sure does when you factor in the major scoop damage , uncontrolled fires with no sprinklers , the bowing of the building , the creaking sounds heard by people on the scene, the complete lack of demolition explosive sounds, and the utter pointlessness of going to the trouble of demolishing WTC7 in the first place . You must take into account the design of this building , sadly for your theory modern skyscapers are not built like building blocks .
pepelapiu2004's avatar

pepelapiu2004 · 608 weeks ago

Genga is a child's game where a little tower is built out of wooden blocks. Then each kid take a block out of the tower, carefully,making sure the tower doesn't collapse. The goal of the game is to take as many blocks away as possible. If the tower falls during your turn to take out a block, you loose.

It's a very simple game addressed to 5 year old kids. But even a 5 year old understands that if they took block out of a single side, the tower is going to fall to that side.
pepelapiu2004's avatar

pepelapiu2004 · 608 weeks ago

Okay Steve, imagine you are a demolition expert and you want to drop a building. Would you place all the charges on a single side of the building hoping it will fall down vertically?
Or would you carefully place the charges at precise spots all other the structure, because you know this is the only way the building is going to fall down vertically?

Post a new comment

Comments by