READ THIS: Post to TWITTER AND FACEBOOK for JUSTICE **4409 Activist Store** https://www.wepay.com/stores/4409-store Thank you to all who have spread this vid…
(Visited 88 times, 1 visits today)
4409 — (Unseen Footage) Tower 7 blasted into rubble from NEW angle!
Hmm. Unlesss a holess poked in the other sside.
To learn what happened on 911, visit:
AE911Truth Youtube channel
Also watch the YouTube video: 911 Missing Links
Please help spread the Truth
And the Truth will set the World free!
Yea so the glass blew out on some windows just as the building fell. Did you ever pump up a bike tire with a hand pump, any small push on the plunger forces air out the hose.
And let's not forget the horseshoe beams, thick huge steel beams bent like a horseshoe without any cracks, which requires very very high temps to be present.
Let's not forget the meteorites, fused elements of steel and concrete, displayed at the 9/11 museum for christ sake. Direct evidence of extreme temps which cannot be accounted for by regular officefires.
Yep.
foxnews com/opinion/2010/04/22/jeffrey-scott-shapiro-jesse-venture-book-lies-truthers-ground-zero-sept-shame/
"Shortly before the building collapsed, several NYPD officers and Con-Edison workers told me that Larry Silverstein, the property developer of One World Financial Center was on the phone with his insurance carrier to see if they would authorize the controlled demolition of the building"
And let's not forget about the molten steel that was reported by multiple first responders/rescue workers. 250 C wouldn't even be close to enough.
I know the video wih FF Miller's testimony. He makes remarks that are out of his league, it's not his job to assess if the structural integrity of a buildng is there or not. Nobody knows what he saw and even then, no reason whatsoever for buiding 7 to implode into it's own footprint.
FF's were told not to fight the fires in 7 before it was afternoon. Check that fact on the History Commons site (the Official Timeline for 9/11)
Well besides of the thermitic reactions that took place at the corner, hardly any fires, just black smoke. Documented stuff this. That's why firechief Palmer thought he could knock those two isolated pockets of fires out with two hoselines.
I know u like to disort the facts and evidence, Candy, I also know it's not gonna work.
What kind of steel would fail at 250 C? What kind of architect would build a structure of which the steel would fail at 250C?
Try holding a steel boxcolumn they used in the Twins to a fire & see how fast that heats up.
Speaking of corecolumns, what kind of fuel would've been present in the core, u know where all the elevators are? Would it be the buttons on the elevatorcontrolpanel?
And Candy, u don't even know what steel of 700-800 C looks like. Plus U have no evidence that the steel did so.
His name is "Miller". Not sure of his full name, but here is a video of him explaining the situation to reporters as it is occurring. Oh, and there is nice little footage of firefighers attempting to combat the fires in building 7, but it doesn't look like they are having very much success. Any response? watch?v=XImQ6a-VrnA
No I'm not sure EXACTLY what time firefighters pulled out, but it was obviously between 3 and when the building collapsed.
Debunkers, I'm not here for you. I'm here for "humans." Unlike you…2 come across this thread…And they will be the judge over… what is right or wrong. They will decide! What they think is very relevant and open. Let them have a chance…this is why I'm on here. Let the world have a voice and get the god damn at of our existence, yeah…you asshole debunkers!
Do you see a really big, I mean….huge problem? My thumb is sore@mayoclinic…cum.
I'm lighting my thumb on fire right now. Now, I know my immune system will kick in. Now I'm beating my thumb with a hammer…over and over. Again, I'm organic. If I were steel, your brain not my element.
What is really sad, a lot of people are not standing up for this nonsense.
Larry never owned the world trade center…it was a lease. He was on the phone with his insurance carrier…a reporter…by the gazzet news over heard his conversation. He asked, do I the permission…2 take it down.
It one. Twin two.
Narc. let's dance! And you Mark! Do you prefer a broken knee or a split chin? Because you will be bloodied with my words. Stand up Mark….Stand up for something U piece of shit. Tell me Narc, I mean Mark…Look up at me and say…… and come clean…that you are the biggest, I want to say douche bag. But their is no measurable definition.. but.a century OLD first class asshole.. 911….inside job. My advice…shut up or put up.
There's an interview with the guy that owned one of the places of the twin towers I believe and he was told to " pull it " wich was to forcibly take down the twin towers so that's probably what it was or they just blew it up again
Mark flagged you as spam because you just destroyed his entire argument. Lol.
You can sell a fag waver anything . Just wrap it in that ridiculous made in China flag ,
use the word God a lot followed by the phrase " this great nation of ours "
After they are done wiping the saliva from their faces proceed to sell them any story that no one in their right mind would believe .
Its a patented formula
so Mr NIST Person you cant explain the free fall of wtc 7 at all?
duh no but it was fire damage.
but the free fall from fire damage is totally impossible! what do you say to that?
Duh it was fire damage.
whats your name?
duh it was fire damage.
Hello?
duh it was fire damage.
so we have the free fall of wtc7 totally unexplained in any official explanation.
It only took years for NIST to admit when the sheer seped its falling it is the most obvious thing about it.
Good investigation guys! now that the investigation is over remove the blindfold and earplugs perhaps?
scary, and sad. the truth is sad
no doubt about debunkers are scum.
Put a whole crowd of them together with 2 brain cells between them all and have a rarity.
they must all hate facts and crawl back under their stones getting ready to unleash nothing but insults.
Clever huh?
lost your tongue debunker fuckwits?
911 was a inside job!!.
the mere fact its not being reinvestigated stinks!!!
How the hell does a steel framed building fall at PROVEN FREE FALL from fire damage?
it doesnt except if its an official story.
NIST NCSTAR 1A aka the official final report on wtc7 direct quote "This acceleration was 32.2ft/s²
(9.81m/s² ) equivalent to the acceleration of gravity g."
Thats the official report admiting free fall BTW.
To learn what happened on 911, visit:
AE911Truth Youtube channel
Also watch the YouTube video: 911 Missing Links
Please help spread the Truth
And the Truth will set the World free!
You need 3 marked as spam to get the comment removed.
Every single thing a debunker has to say gets an automatic flag from me.
you mean the Cardington tests that showed that thermal expansion does NOT cause catastrophic global collapse?
"Subsequently, six full-scale fire tests on a real composite frame structure at Cardington showed that DESPITE LARGE DEFLECTIONS of structural members affected by fire, runaway type failures DID NOT OCCUR in real frame structures when subjected to realistic fires in a number of compartments" — Behaviour of Steel Framed Structures Under Fire Conditions
No. I still don't know about the data used by NIST to complete their WTC 7 collapse model. They still won't release it.
spam
Thank you. I have researched but I'm hardly the expert like you apparently. So, you know everything there is to know about 9-11 then?
"lol you've had OVER A DECADE" – mark
"I can't prove what happened in a building over a decade ago" – mark
"No I can't prove what happened to the columns inside" - mark
hilarious
The quote is from The US House Committee on Science in 2002. I'm sorry. I thought you had actually researched 911. My mistake.
It's funny how you no longer want to talk about fire temps or the Cardington tests any more….
hrm…