Short clip of my full case study regarding WTC 1 that can be found here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4_J7ak_IZXk Demo video of the development of the Demo…
(Visited 49 times, 1 visits today)
World Trade Center Simulation
You might also like:
Logging you in...
This still doesn't account for how Newton's 3rd law of motion had to be
ignored in order for the building to collapse. For every action there is a
equal and opposite reaction. This means the upper 15 floors would have
been equally destroyed in as many floors below. There by stopping the
collapse after only 15 floors if the buildings were only designed to
support the load above. They were not! They were designed to support 10
times the load which translates into the buildings should still be
standing. Office fire or no office fire. Period.
ignored in order for the building to collapse. For every action there is a
equal and opposite reaction. This means the upper 15 floors would have
been equally destroyed in as many floors below. There by stopping the
collapse after only 15 floors if the buildings were only designed to
support the load above. They were not! They were designed to support 10
times the load which translates into the buildings should still be
standing. Office fire or no office fire. Period.
CREATE YOUR OWN CATACLYSMIC DEVASTATION VIDEOS TODAY! Hey kids, ever wonder
why your devastation videos never make it on national TV when perverted
world leaders decide it’s time to steal guns? It could be it’s time to
upgrade your video editing software. Move those massive objects fluidly in
HD and with absolute control at 64fps. Who says tanks can’t fly? You’ll
show ‘em and with numerous expected media scams to come, you’res are sure
to get picked. Contact GOVERNMENT PERVERT LOYALIST ENTERPRISES to find out
more.
why your devastation videos never make it on national TV when perverted
world leaders decide it’s time to steal guns? It could be it’s time to
upgrade your video editing software. Move those massive objects fluidly in
HD and with absolute control at 64fps. Who says tanks can’t fly? You’ll
show ‘em and with numerous expected media scams to come, you’res are sure
to get picked. Contact GOVERNMENT PERVERT LOYALIST ENTERPRISES to find out
more.
was that santa and his reindeer filming this in their sled?
I just want someone to give me picture or video evidence of a CONTROLLED
DEMOLITION OF THIS SIZE being rigged?? As this would have been impossible
to CONCEAL FROM THE PUBLIC EYE?? I've not seen one pixel of evidence
capturing a demolitions crew,or the TRANSPORTING OF THESE EXPLOSIVES FROM
VEHICLES INTO 3 BUILDINGS........OR THE RIGGING........as this would have
been a huge operation?? YOU SEE........ALL THE SO CALLED EVIDENCE THAT
TRUTHERS PRESENT(LIKE THERMITE,& EXPLOSIVES TO NAME A COUPLE)ARE LYING IN
PILE OF RUBBLE NOW!! Your evidence is all conveniently buried beneath 3
buildings you claim were a controlled demolition?? I WANT PICTURE OR VIDEO
EVIDENCE OF PRIOR ACCESS GIVEN TO A DEMOLITIONS CREW,OR AN ANONYMOUS GROUP
OF PEOPLE WITH SEVERAL ANONYMOUS PACKAGES(EXPLOSIVES)AS I'M SURE THEY
DIDN'T JUST TRANSPORT THE EXPLOSIVES TO THE BUILDINGS WITHOUT A
COVER..........but still........NO ONE SEEN ANYTHING.......C'MON PEOPLE,GET
A CLUE!! When you can show me SOME EVIDENCE OF THE RIGGING OF THIS
OPERATION instead of all this AFTER THE FACT CRAP........THAT HAS
CONVENIENTLY VANISHED WITH THE BUILDINGS............THEN,I MAY CONSIDER
CONSPIRACY!!!!
DEMOLITION OF THIS SIZE being rigged?? As this would have been impossible
to CONCEAL FROM THE PUBLIC EYE?? I've not seen one pixel of evidence
capturing a demolitions crew,or the TRANSPORTING OF THESE EXPLOSIVES FROM
VEHICLES INTO 3 BUILDINGS........OR THE RIGGING........as this would have
been a huge operation?? YOU SEE........ALL THE SO CALLED EVIDENCE THAT
TRUTHERS PRESENT(LIKE THERMITE,& EXPLOSIVES TO NAME A COUPLE)ARE LYING IN
PILE OF RUBBLE NOW!! Your evidence is all conveniently buried beneath 3
buildings you claim were a controlled demolition?? I WANT PICTURE OR VIDEO
EVIDENCE OF PRIOR ACCESS GIVEN TO A DEMOLITIONS CREW,OR AN ANONYMOUS GROUP
OF PEOPLE WITH SEVERAL ANONYMOUS PACKAGES(EXPLOSIVES)AS I'M SURE THEY
DIDN'T JUST TRANSPORT THE EXPLOSIVES TO THE BUILDINGS WITHOUT A
COVER..........but still........NO ONE SEEN ANYTHING.......C'MON PEOPLE,GET
A CLUE!! When you can show me SOME EVIDENCE OF THE RIGGING OF THIS
OPERATION instead of all this AFTER THE FACT CRAP........THAT HAS
CONVENIENTLY VANISHED WITH THE BUILDINGS............THEN,I MAY CONSIDER
CONSPIRACY!!!!
I was looking into David Chandlers web site, and I thought I would
illustrate how either he is so sloppy in his research, everything he says
should be questioned, or he is deliberately lying to give weight to his
claims, in which everything he says should be questioned. On his web site
he had this to say about the Pentagon attack
#1) Why was the target the newly reinforced west face of the building,
occupied primarily by accountants that were tracing down what happened to
the missing trillions of dollars announced just the day before? Really,
Chandler can't be this stupid, if you go back and READ the actual
transcripts of this speech what Rumsfeld actually said was that the
Pentagon has hundreds of computer networks, that don't talk to one another,
the software does not keep records up to accounting standards. He said we
can not "Track" up to half the purchases at the Pentagon each year. He than
made the case for a upgraded and unified computer network and accounting
system at the Pentagon so they can better manage the defense budget in an
era of shrinking budgets. This has been going on at the Pentagon for over
25 years, do some research and you will find articles at the Washington
post going back into the 80's that talk about fiscal mismanagement at the
Pentagon. So the "missing" money at the Pentagon to total BS and anyone who
does 5 minutes of research into it will find that out.
#2) Why would the purported hijackers perform a difficult spiral descent to
hit the face of the Pentagon that had the least number of people in it, and
was opposite from the offices of the Pentagon high command? The Difficult
spiral is also a myth. The 330 degree descending turn Hani Hamjour mad took
2:55 to complete, it was a basic textbook descending turn.A few FACTS about
the pilot Hani Hamjour
When he arrived at the Pan Am international flight academy for training on
the 737 simulator in February 2001 he had the following.
- 250 Hours Total Flight Time
- 75 Hours Instrument Flight Time
- 29 Hours Multi Engine Flight Time
He had a FAA issued commercial pilot certificate #2576802 issued on 16
April 1999. The maneuvers he performed in flight 77 were not complicated,
expecially for a certified commercial pilot. Once again Chandler either
didn't do any research, or he is just lying to promote his theories.
#3) Why would the purported hijackers risk mission failure by choosing a
difficult ground level approach when they could have simply dived into the
building?
How could an untrained pilot have performed the difficult
maneuvers? Difficult ground level approach? According to whom? Hamjour came
out of his turn lined up the Pentagon, jammed the throttles wide open and
executed a shallow dive that allowed him to hit the Pentagon. Untrained
pilot, since when is a FAA certified commercial pilot with 250 hours of
flight time "untrained". So Chandler either didn't do any research into
flight 77 or he is deliberately lying to support his claims.
#4) Was the plane flown by some kind of automatic controls and/or guided by
a homing beacon? The flight control computer is simple to use, someone who
had training on a 737 would be familiar with it. All he had to do was input
the coordinates and the auto pilot would do the rest. Someone with 10
minutes training on the system would know how to do it.
This is just a tiny sample of his research, if it is this sloppy with so
many errors, how can anyone possibly take seriously anything he has to say.
He clearly doesn't know what he is talking about.
illustrate how either he is so sloppy in his research, everything he says
should be questioned, or he is deliberately lying to give weight to his
claims, in which everything he says should be questioned. On his web site
he had this to say about the Pentagon attack
#1) Why was the target the newly reinforced west face of the building,
occupied primarily by accountants that were tracing down what happened to
the missing trillions of dollars announced just the day before? Really,
Chandler can't be this stupid, if you go back and READ the actual
transcripts of this speech what Rumsfeld actually said was that the
Pentagon has hundreds of computer networks, that don't talk to one another,
the software does not keep records up to accounting standards. He said we
can not "Track" up to half the purchases at the Pentagon each year. He than
made the case for a upgraded and unified computer network and accounting
system at the Pentagon so they can better manage the defense budget in an
era of shrinking budgets. This has been going on at the Pentagon for over
25 years, do some research and you will find articles at the Washington
post going back into the 80's that talk about fiscal mismanagement at the
Pentagon. So the "missing" money at the Pentagon to total BS and anyone who
does 5 minutes of research into it will find that out.
#2) Why would the purported hijackers perform a difficult spiral descent to
hit the face of the Pentagon that had the least number of people in it, and
was opposite from the offices of the Pentagon high command? The Difficult
spiral is also a myth. The 330 degree descending turn Hani Hamjour mad took
2:55 to complete, it was a basic textbook descending turn.A few FACTS about
the pilot Hani Hamjour
When he arrived at the Pan Am international flight academy for training on
the 737 simulator in February 2001 he had the following.
- 250 Hours Total Flight Time
- 75 Hours Instrument Flight Time
- 29 Hours Multi Engine Flight Time
He had a FAA issued commercial pilot certificate #2576802 issued on 16
April 1999. The maneuvers he performed in flight 77 were not complicated,
expecially for a certified commercial pilot. Once again Chandler either
didn't do any research, or he is just lying to promote his theories.
#3) Why would the purported hijackers risk mission failure by choosing a
difficult ground level approach when they could have simply dived into the
building?
How could an untrained pilot have performed the difficult
maneuvers? Difficult ground level approach? According to whom? Hamjour came
out of his turn lined up the Pentagon, jammed the throttles wide open and
executed a shallow dive that allowed him to hit the Pentagon. Untrained
pilot, since when is a FAA certified commercial pilot with 250 hours of
flight time "untrained". So Chandler either didn't do any research into
flight 77 or he is deliberately lying to support his claims.
#4) Was the plane flown by some kind of automatic controls and/or guided by
a homing beacon? The flight control computer is simple to use, someone who
had training on a 737 would be familiar with it. All he had to do was input
the coordinates and the auto pilot would do the rest. Someone with 10
minutes training on the system would know how to do it.
This is just a tiny sample of his research, if it is this sloppy with so
many errors, how can anyone possibly take seriously anything he has to say.
He clearly doesn't know what he is talking about.
The real question is, why did the towers dustificate as they were falling.
Physics unlike this world played a factor. Dust just settles on crisp
boundries, not the other way around! That would be the real question.
Physics unlike this world played a factor. Dust just settles on crisp
boundries, not the other way around! That would be the real question.
I've been messing around with bullet physics and rigid body simulations for
two days now and I still cant figure out how you've made this simulation so
detailed. Have you thought about making a tutorial video on Bullet
constraints/rigid body simulations in blender?
two days now and I still cant figure out how you've made this simulation so
detailed. Have you thought about making a tutorial video on Bullet
constraints/rigid body simulations in blender?
Seems to be missing 47 continuous steel core columns.
You forgot to add the explosives... Aand thermite.
Nice try though, 6/10 for the effort.
+ You got the Top bit wrong. That was still falling as the floors were
being blown below.
Nice try though, 6/10 for the effort.
+ You got the Top bit wrong. That was still falling as the floors were
being blown below.
why so many dislikes, hes giving a perspective of how the building fell
Did you know that there is no indeed "an official version" of the facts?
I am pretty confident that a simulation should somewhat resemble the actual
events. Watch the actual collapse and see if this video meets this obvious
criteria.
events. Watch the actual collapse and see if this video meets this obvious
criteria.
so their cores just disappeared when the planes hit?
Fluorophosphates (among them sodium monofluorophosphate) were first
prepared and described about 75 years ago. In the meantime they found a
wide field of applications. A search for "fluorophosphate" or
"monofluorophosphate" in one of the patent databases reveals more than 200
patents for either keyword. Some of them detail the manufacture of the
compounds, while others provide compositions for usage as corrosion
inhibitor, electrolyte in batteries, or as toe nail and finger nail fungus
killer, to name a few examples. Most of the patents, however, are
related to products for oral and dental care, which also reflects the fact
that most people nowadays associate the terms "fluorophosphate" or
"monofluorophosphate" with toothpaste. Accordingly, one would expect that
information on the history of fluorophosphates (at least sodium
monofluorophosphate, abbreviated as MFP or SMFP) should most probably be
found in dental publications. Indeed, there were a few history articles
written in the early 1980´s (1-3) on which more recent accounts still rely
heavily: In a TV news program "Don´t swallow your toothpaste" (Health
Alert Series in England´s Channel 4, June 19, 1997) it was claimed that
John Hein was the person who developed MFP at the University of Rochester.
John William Hein was a former student of Harold Carpenter Hodge, the
Rochester scientist who worked inter alia for the Manhattan Engineer
District (atomic bomb program). Mike McCoy, on the other hand, explains in
a "Science and Technology" issue of April 16, 2001, that when Procter and
Gamble was on top after invention of their famous product "Crest" (with
stannous fluoride, 1955), "the next dental fluoride breakthrough -MFP- was
already in the works. Ozark had discovered the compound in 1949 and by the
early 1960´s was selling it to toothpaste makers overseas. MFP really took
off in 1967 when Colgate-Palmolive first launched Colgate with MFP,
providing new competition for Crest and cementing fluoridated toothpaste as
the marketplace standard."
However, neither Ozark nor Hein did actually "discover" the compound. And
when it was prepared for the first time it was not in the first place
thought to be useful as a toothpaste additive. In fact, there have been
fears for certain reasons that the substance was quite toxic, as Ozark´s
Wayne E. White details in a review of the history of monofluorophosphate
(1). And it is only here that one reads about the involvement of Dr. Willy
Lange, who is often cited in another context together with Gerda von Kruegerfor the discovery of the highly toxic nature of certain organic
fluorophosphates (so-called "nerve agents"). Wayne White writes :
prepared and described about 75 years ago. In the meantime they found a
wide field of applications. A search for "fluorophosphate" or
"monofluorophosphate" in one of the patent databases reveals more than 200
patents for either keyword. Some of them detail the manufacture of the
compounds, while others provide compositions for usage as corrosion
inhibitor, electrolyte in batteries, or as toe nail and finger nail fungus
killer, to name a few examples. Most of the patents, however, are
related to products for oral and dental care, which also reflects the fact
that most people nowadays associate the terms "fluorophosphate" or
"monofluorophosphate" with toothpaste. Accordingly, one would expect that
information on the history of fluorophosphates (at least sodium
monofluorophosphate, abbreviated as MFP or SMFP) should most probably be
found in dental publications. Indeed, there were a few history articles
written in the early 1980´s (1-3) on which more recent accounts still rely
heavily: In a TV news program "Don´t swallow your toothpaste" (Health
Alert Series in England´s Channel 4, June 19, 1997) it was claimed that
John Hein was the person who developed MFP at the University of Rochester.
John William Hein was a former student of Harold Carpenter Hodge, the
Rochester scientist who worked inter alia for the Manhattan Engineer
District (atomic bomb program). Mike McCoy, on the other hand, explains in
a "Science and Technology" issue of April 16, 2001, that when Procter and
Gamble was on top after invention of their famous product "Crest" (with
stannous fluoride, 1955), "the next dental fluoride breakthrough -MFP- was
already in the works. Ozark had discovered the compound in 1949 and by the
early 1960´s was selling it to toothpaste makers overseas. MFP really took
off in 1967 when Colgate-Palmolive first launched Colgate with MFP,
providing new competition for Crest and cementing fluoridated toothpaste as
the marketplace standard."
However, neither Ozark nor Hein did actually "discover" the compound. And
when it was prepared for the first time it was not in the first place
thought to be useful as a toothpaste additive. In fact, there have been
fears for certain reasons that the substance was quite toxic, as Ozark´s
Wayne E. White details in a review of the history of monofluorophosphate
(1). And it is only here that one reads about the involvement of Dr. Willy
Lange, who is often cited in another context together with Gerda von Kruegerfor the discovery of the highly toxic nature of certain organic
fluorophosphates (so-called "nerve agents"). Wayne White writes :
"First, there was the idea that had originated with Dr. Lange that a
fluorophosphate should be effective as a mothproofing material and might
therefore be toxic also to humans. But a more compelling basis for the
belief that this might be quite poisonous was the knowledge that when the
PO3F2- group is combined with two isopropyl groups to form
the ester, diisopropyl-monofluorophosphate, known during and after World
War II as DFP, it is a potent inhibitor of choline esterase and hence is
one of the ´nerve gases´. The early studies by Shourie et al.
(1950) immediately relieved us of the thought that we might have a
very poisonous substance and that finding combined with the report on
caries inhibition pointed the way toward dental and possibly medical
applications" (1)
fluorophosphate should be effective as a mothproofing material and might
therefore be toxic also to humans. But a more compelling basis for the
belief that this might be quite poisonous was the knowledge that when the
PO3F2- group is combined with two isopropyl groups to form
the ester, diisopropyl-monofluorophosphate, known during and after World
War II as DFP, it is a potent inhibitor of choline esterase and hence is
one of the ´nerve gases´. The early studies by Shourie et al.
(1950) immediately relieved us of the thought that we might have a
very poisonous substance and that finding combined with the report on
caries inhibition pointed the way toward dental and possibly medical
applications" (1)
Comments by IntenseDebate
Loading IntenseDebate Comments...
This still doesn't account for how Newton's 3rd law of motion had to be
ignored in order for the building to collapse. For every action there is a
equal and opposite reaction. This means the upper 15 floors would have
been equally destroyed in as many floors below. There by stopping the
collapse after only 15 floors if the buildings were only designed to
support the load above. They were not! They were designed to support 10
times the load which translates into the buildings should still be
standing. Office fire or no office fire. Period.
Yes, but where did the core go, and why?
CREATE YOUR OWN CATACLYSMIC DEVASTATION VIDEOS TODAY! Hey kids, ever wonder
why your devastation videos never make it on national TV when perverted
world leaders decide it’s time to steal guns? It could be it’s time to
upgrade your video editing software. Move those massive objects fluidly in
HD and with absolute control at 64fps. Who says tanks can’t fly? You’ll
show ‘em and with numerous expected media scams to come, you’res are sure
to get picked. Contact GOVERNMENT PERVERT LOYALIST ENTERPRISES to find out
more.
was that santa and his reindeer filming this in their sled?
I just want someone to give me picture or video evidence of a CONTROLLED
DEMOLITION OF THIS SIZE being rigged?? As this would have been impossible
to CONCEAL FROM THE PUBLIC EYE?? I've not seen one pixel of evidence
capturing a demolitions crew,or the TRANSPORTING OF THESE EXPLOSIVES FROM
VEHICLES INTO 3 BUILDINGS……..OR THE RIGGING……..as this would have
been a huge operation?? YOU SEE……..ALL THE SO CALLED EVIDENCE THAT
TRUTHERS PRESENT(LIKE THERMITE,& EXPLOSIVES TO NAME A COUPLE)ARE LYING IN
PILE OF RUBBLE NOW!! Your evidence is all conveniently buried beneath 3
buildings you claim were a controlled demolition?? I WANT PICTURE OR VIDEO
EVIDENCE OF PRIOR ACCESS GIVEN TO A DEMOLITIONS CREW,OR AN ANONYMOUS GROUP
OF PEOPLE WITH SEVERAL ANONYMOUS PACKAGES(EXPLOSIVES)AS I'M SURE THEY
DIDN'T JUST TRANSPORT THE EXPLOSIVES TO THE BUILDINGS WITHOUT A
COVER……….but still……..NO ONE SEEN ANYTHING…….C'MON PEOPLE,GET
A CLUE!! When you can show me SOME EVIDENCE OF THE RIGGING OF THIS
OPERATION instead of all this AFTER THE FACT CRAP……..THAT HAS
CONVENIENTLY VANISHED WITH THE BUILDINGS…………THEN,I MAY CONSIDER
CONSPIRACY!!!!
Where´s the people jumping????
I was looking into David Chandlers web site, and I thought I would
illustrate how either he is so sloppy in his research, everything he says
should be questioned, or he is deliberately lying to give weight to his
claims, in which everything he says should be questioned. On his web site
he had this to say about the Pentagon attack
#1) Why was the target the newly reinforced west face of the building,
occupied primarily by accountants that were tracing down what happened to
the missing trillions of dollars announced just the day before? Really,
Chandler can't be this stupid, if you go back and READ the actual
transcripts of this speech what Rumsfeld actually said was that the
Pentagon has hundreds of computer networks, that don't talk to one another,
the software does not keep records up to accounting standards. He said we
can not "Track" up to half the purchases at the Pentagon each year. He than
made the case for a upgraded and unified computer network and accounting
system at the Pentagon so they can better manage the defense budget in an
era of shrinking budgets. This has been going on at the Pentagon for over
25 years, do some research and you will find articles at the Washington
post going back into the 80's that talk about fiscal mismanagement at the
Pentagon. So the "missing" money at the Pentagon to total BS and anyone who
does 5 minutes of research into it will find that out.
#2) Why would the purported hijackers perform a difficult spiral descent to
hit the face of the Pentagon that had the least number of people in it, and
was opposite from the offices of the Pentagon high command? The Difficult
spiral is also a myth. The 330 degree descending turn Hani Hamjour mad took
2:55 to complete, it was a basic textbook descending turn.A few FACTS about
the pilot Hani Hamjour
When he arrived at the Pan Am international flight academy for training on
the 737 simulator in February 2001 he had the following.
– 250 Hours Total Flight Time
– 75 Hours Instrument Flight Time
– 29 Hours Multi Engine Flight Time
He had a FAA issued commercial pilot certificate #2576802 issued on 16
April 1999. The maneuvers he performed in flight 77 were not complicated,
expecially for a certified commercial pilot. Once again Chandler either
didn't do any research, or he is just lying to promote his theories.
#3) Why would the purported hijackers risk mission failure by choosing a
difficult ground level approach when they could have simply dived into the
building?
How could an untrained pilot have performed the difficult
maneuvers? Difficult ground level approach? According to whom? Hamjour came
out of his turn lined up the Pentagon, jammed the throttles wide open and
executed a shallow dive that allowed him to hit the Pentagon. Untrained
pilot, since when is a FAA certified commercial pilot with 250 hours of
flight time "untrained". So Chandler either didn't do any research into
flight 77 or he is deliberately lying to support his claims.
#4) Was the plane flown by some kind of automatic controls and/or guided by
a homing beacon? The flight control computer is simple to use, someone who
had training on a 737 would be familiar with it. All he had to do was input
the coordinates and the auto pilot would do the rest. Someone with 10
minutes training on the system would know how to do it.
This is just a tiny sample of his research, if it is this sloppy with so
many errors, how can anyone possibly take seriously anything he has to say.
He clearly doesn't know what he is talking about.
The real question is, why did the towers dustificate as they were falling.
Physics unlike this world played a factor. Dust just settles on crisp
boundries, not the other way around! That would be the real question.
frostbite 8 engine hahaha
An awful day
Where are the core columns?? Bogus experiment.
I've been messing around with bullet physics and rigid body simulations for
two days now and I still cant figure out how you've made this simulation so
detailed. Have you thought about making a tutorial video on Bullet
constraints/rigid body simulations in blender?
lololololololololololololol
Seems to be missing 47 continuous steel core columns.
You forgot to add the explosives… Aand thermite.
Nice try though, 6/10 for the effort.
+ You got the Top bit wrong. That was still falling as the floors were
being blown below.
can you do a simulation of wtc7 building ?
fuckin stupid
why so many dislikes, hes giving a perspective of how the building fell
Did you know that there is no indeed "an official version" of the facts?
David Smith YOU are a fucken idiot
I am pretty confident that a simulation should somewhat resemble the actual
events. Watch the actual collapse and see if this video meets this obvious
criteria.
You forgot the demolition charges-
so their cores just disappeared when the planes hit?
Fluorophosphates (among them sodium monofluorophosphate) were first
prepared and described about 75 years ago. In the meantime they found a
wide field of applications. A search for "fluorophosphate" or
"monofluorophosphate" in one of the patent databases reveals more than 200
patents for either keyword. Some of them detail the manufacture of the
compounds, while others provide compositions for usage as corrosion
inhibitor, electrolyte in batteries, or as toe nail and finger nail fungus
killer, to name a few examples. Most of the patents, however, are
related to products for oral and dental care, which also reflects the fact
that most people nowadays associate the terms "fluorophosphate" or
"monofluorophosphate" with toothpaste. Accordingly, one would expect that
information on the history of fluorophosphates (at least sodium
monofluorophosphate, abbreviated as MFP or SMFP) should most probably be
found in dental publications. Indeed, there were a few history articles
written in the early 1980´s (1-3) on which more recent accounts still rely
heavily: In a TV news program "Don´t swallow your toothpaste" (Health
Alert Series in England´s Channel 4, June 19, 1997) it was claimed that
John Hein was the person who developed MFP at the University of Rochester.
John William Hein was a former student of Harold Carpenter Hodge, the
Rochester scientist who worked inter alia for the Manhattan Engineer
District (atomic bomb program). Mike McCoy, on the other hand, explains in
a "Science and Technology" issue of April 16, 2001, that when Procter and
Gamble was on top after invention of their famous product "Crest" (with
stannous fluoride, 1955), "the next dental fluoride breakthrough -MFP- was
already in the works. Ozark had discovered the compound in 1949 and by the
early 1960´s was selling it to toothpaste makers overseas. MFP really took
off in 1967 when Colgate-Palmolive first launched Colgate with MFP,
providing new competition for Crest and cementing fluoridated toothpaste as
the marketplace standard."
However, neither Ozark nor Hein did actually "discover" the compound. And
when it was prepared for the first time it was not in the first place
thought to be useful as a toothpaste additive. In fact, there have been
fears for certain reasons that the substance was quite toxic, as Ozark´s
Wayne E. White details in a review of the history of monofluorophosphate
(1). And it is only here that one reads about the involvement of Dr. Willy
Lange, who is often cited in another context together with Gerda von Kruegerfor the discovery of the highly toxic nature of certain organic
fluorophosphates (so-called "nerve agents"). Wayne White writes :
"First, there was the idea that had originated with Dr. Lange that a
fluorophosphate should be effective as a mothproofing material and might
therefore be toxic also to humans. But a more compelling basis for the
belief that this might be quite poisonous was the knowledge that when the
PO3F2- group is combined with two isopropyl groups to form
the ester, diisopropyl-monofluorophosphate, known during and after World
War II as DFP, it is a potent inhibitor of choline esterase and hence is
one of the ´nerve gases´. The early studies by Shourie et al.
(1950) immediately relieved us of the thought that we might have a
very poisonous substance and that finding combined with the report on
caries inhibition pointed the way toward dental and possibly medical
applications" (1)
right because the towers were made of crackers and rocks they fall like
crackers and rocks what a fucken stupid video
Hey Pal, your simulation is wrong. I was there, watched it from two blocks
away. The So Tower tilted over toward Church St in as one solid chunk a
loud cracking sound that echoed over all of downtown. It then pancaking
all the floors underneath it. It began at the hole of impact. Search all
the YouTube videos, there's one or two that accurately show the top tilt
over and come down.
@David Smith the official story does not explain why THREE buildings
disintegrated into dust. Planes crashing into them don't do that.
Imagine being in that..fuck.
Looks like minecraft
fuck the freemasons all degrees,,dead to the bank and freemasons and
zionisme will be detroy to,,,people are Asleep and making the devil
happy,,and all people pray to the devil,,,what you think when your in fire
whit the devil,,,drink some ice
Come on you lot, enough of this 'inside job' rubbish, bush, cheney, rummy
etc said 'they didn't do it', the bush admin then investigated itself and
found itself…'not guilty!', all the proof you need! Also, although no vid
shows a plane hitting pentagon, a cartoon vid was made, showing a cartoon
plane hitting a cartoon wall!! And so what if all you see on 9/11 of any
plane whatsoever is a 4 second blur that hit the 2nd tower? so what! the
news anchors read the truth off their screens….ok!!!?
The problem with WTC conspiracy is that there isn't a single piece of
evidence that holds up to actual scientific inquiry. The main problem is
people read things on the internet and assume their true and than parrot
them like they are facts, never bothering to do any actual research
themselves. Here is a simple demonstration that conspiracy theorists can't
explain.
8:46am Tower 1 is hit between floors 93-99, 10:28am Tower 1 collapses, the
building remained standing for 1 hour and 42 minutes after impact. 9:03am
Tower two is his between floors 77-85, 9:58am tower two collapses. Tower
two remained standing for 55min after impact. This is the most damming
evidence to the conspiracy case. Tower two which was hit last, fell first,
why?
Simple physics tell is that tower 2 had been hit much lower and that the
damaged sections had to support a much greater weight than tower one. Hence
it failed first. The buildings behaved naturally and in accordance with the
laws of physics.
Expand this comment »Collapse this comment
You are the parrot
All those who say "there are no proofs about the official version being a
FAKE, either they don´t have read enough about the subjet, or they
intentionally lie in order to help the mighty ones, in deceiving The World.
Maybe some of the ones who say that are the jokers of the Owners of Tthe
World.
Did you know that Mohamed Atta used to eat pork and drink alcohol,
according to what his girlfrind says (you can watch the interview on
youtube)? Do you know that Islam prohibits it, and that no islamic
fundamentalist does?
Did you know that there are no charges against Osama Bin Laden in the FBI,
in realtion of September the 11th? There are charges against him, for other
crimes, but no for the attacks against the WTC and The Penthagon. The
answer of the FBI is: "Until now, there are no evidences of the
involucration of Osama Bin Laden in the attacks of september 11th".
According to what was said, "the temperature of the fires in the WTC, was
so high, that even the black boxes of the planes (made of a special steel
alloy) and the corpses, including the bones of the passengers, were
completely melt down"…Even so the passport of Mohamed Atta, made of paper
and carton…..WAS INCREDIBLY FOUND INTACT, with Atta´s picture included in
the middle of the rubble of the towers!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
IS THIS A JOKE?
Except the top of the north tower fell over, not down, so there was nothing
coming down to crush the floors below.
mickey mouse farce science propaganda to coverup high treason, false flag
murder.let us never tolerate malicious lies concerning 9/11 to cover the
truth and to shift away from the guilty, away from the evil.
Hey John Quiggins….You're an idiot
ISRAEL DID 911 > on YT
Can you expain why nanotermite, a modern military explosive that can melt
down steel, was found on the basement of the Twin Towers?
How is it propaganda? There literally is nothing in the video but animation
of a building falling.
this isn't well done.
The problem with WTC7 is that the HQ bunker was not used for what it was
intended. Instead they went directly to a free space far away form the
towers and WTC to establish their HQ their. Why do you build a command
bunker inside WTC7 and don't use it? Only one plane had hit when they
decided that!