Will Obama Side With The Banks Or The People?

“Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke’s term will not expire until the end of January 2014. But the debate over who will replace him–a man or a woman–has …


(Visited 15 times, 1 visits today)

Share This Post

48 Comments - Write a Comment

  1. Obama is owned by the banks just like every other president.If you haven't figured that out by now you must be a Democrat/republican.You idiots are the definition of insanity

    Reply
  2. You think its persuasive to say " Your a moron. Whatch this video". I mean you even bothered to try and change my mind in a way that is so condescending. The fact you think you will taken seriously by doing this is an inditement on your intellect. Some would say "moronic" but then that might be going to far….

    Reply
  3. buddhacreative69123 · Edit

    Politicians are successful criminals.

    Criminals are unsuccessful politicians.

    Reply
  4. Are you retarded? How is common sense a conspiracy theory?

    Saying "gubmint's hidin aliens and breedin bigfoot supercommandos" is a conspiracy theory.

    Saying that Obama and most of our government works for the rich and not for the people is not a theory, it's a simple fact.

    Reply
  5. please take ur meds and go to the ER I think u r having an bad episode of whatever mental illness u r suffering from..good luck

    Reply
  6. Go back and read GLB. Banks are allowed to affiliate with these company's through a holding company but they are not allowed to gamble there capital in those company's ventures. In fact there strictly forbidden. GS always allowed banks to engage in derivative activates, including CDS.

    Reply
  7. Federal Reserve my ASS! Nothing "federal" about it. Federal Express… is that an elected governmental version of UPS? TYT – are you "free" ? Or, do you an$wer to a ma$ter too?

    Reply
  8. ⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟

    Dοiոg ℮aѕy taѕĸѕ frοm thiѕ οո℮ cοοl ѕit℮ caո briոg yου $85 p℮r hουr!!! I myѕ℮lf ℮arո℮d οv℮r $75,000 iո th℮ laѕt 8 mοոthѕ υѕiոg thiѕ amaziոg οոliո℮? prοj℮ct.

    Ch℮cĸ it ουt yουrѕ℮lf. gο tο..Fox83.com

    ⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟⒟

    Reply
  9. Obama ( or ANY "president" since JFK ) is just a spokesperson, look good in the suit… say what you are told Son, you don't want a JFK headache now do ya? There's a good lad.. now, here change that tie.. nice… you look " presidential " HAHAHAHAAAHAAAHAaaaha…ahaa.haa…haa… ahhh.. read the script kid… it's all been approved. Your kid's got a birthday coming up right? Yeah, be a shame to uhh.. miss it. Ok! Off you go – Osama! HUH? Right… right… O- bomb-a!! Kid.. you are tooo funny!

    Reply
  10. Lol. God bodybag22. Epic downer! Is there anything else that you'd like to share with me? Like, is the Easter Bunny not real?

    If it's any consolation, we were doing silly "what if" scenarios though. (You believe me, right?)

    =)

    Reply
  11. Umm Ron Paul's been retired since January 3rd of this year.
    All he does these days is give speeches about civil liberty at colleges.

    Reply
  12. However, Ron Paul could most definitely break the spending trend that was occurring under the most recent Republican presidents.

    So, in short, I'm still not sure who I would vote for, heh.

    Reply
  13. Reagan increased spending 8.7 percent from 1982-1985 and 4.9 percent from 1986-1989.
    Bush senior increased spending 5.4 percent from 1990-1993.
    Clinton increased spending 3.2 percent from 1994-1997 and 3.9 from 1998-2001.
    Bush junior increased spending 7.3 percent from 2002-2005 and 8.1 percent from 2006-2009.
    Obama increased spending 1.4 percent from 2010-2013

    Even if Republicans deserve all credit for decreased spending, it seems to be in my best interest to vote for a Democrat as president.

    Reply
  14. Anyway, I guess I didn't really answer your question because it's so hard. Ron Paul will bring with him all the baggage of the Republican party. Keep religious views out of the decision making process please, keep government out of my bedroom please, keep government out of medical decisions between my wife and her doctor (like attempts at ending all abortions even in cases of rape (unless you can prove that it's "legitimate")).

    Reply
  15. She is establishment and it's hard to trust her. However, I wouldn't categorize her with the Bush family just because they also happen to be establishment. Like, if it was 2000 and Hillary Clinton and George Bush were my options, then I wouldn't be like, "Eh, it's not like it matters. They are essentially the same thing after all, just different branding." Oh my god, I'd be like "CLINTON!!!!!!!! ANYTHING BUT BUSH!!!!!!" (I was terrified of him before he was elected by the way.)

    Reply
  16. What….a….joke. I am ashamed to say I was sucker-punched into voting for him twice because I thought he was honest and had integrity, neither of which he even knows the meaning of, much less actually practices. Sham, liar, joke….what "legacy"??

    Reply
  17. Those are just her words though. She is as establishment as can be. The Bush family and Clinton family are essentially the same thing, just different branding.

    Reply
  18. BiebersKingOfMusic · Edit

    OBAMA REPTILIAN GARGOYLE!!!! OBAMA REPTILIAN GARGOYLE!!!!!!!! Your president is a reptilian gargoyle. All elites are reptilian gargoyles. I have solid proof of this in my newest video: OBAMA REPTILIAN GARGOYLE. Don't be scared. Don't run away. Face the truth head on. OBAMA REPTILIAN GARGOYLE; WATCH THE VIDEO; LEARN THE TRUTH; THANK YOU.

    Reply
  19. De-regulation surely played a big role in the 2008 crash, it allowed banks to dump off toxic assets and package them as "sound investments" (read: FRAUD).

    Hence the Greeks want to take Goldman Sachs to court. Greece got swindled BIG TIME.

    But Cenk always ignores the role the Left played. The Barney Frank "housing for everyone" push led to government GUARANTEEING risky sub-prime loans that would NEVER, EVER have been made in ordinary free-market conditions!!

    And who got the bill?? Taxpayers 🙁

    Reply
  20. Plenty of them aren't Jews. Why do you think i made the previous comment to begin with??

    One must examine pretty far back into history, to understand why/how Jews came to dominate the banking/finance industry (in its various forms over the years).

    Part of it is rooted back in the day when European Christendom ruled. Christianity – as well as Islam – outlawed usury, deeming it an illegitimate way to earn a living.

    Jews took advantage of this, and in time introduced fractional reserve banking.

    Reply
  21. SantaCruzBeastMode1 · Edit

    Oh no, I've watched TYT since '11. And they have many valid videos. However, like all other media sources, I end up disagreeing on a few areas. They don't understand the bigger picture of politics. For example, that WolfPAC thing is one of the most counterproductive things I've ever heard of, and will NEVER happen.Yet, they have solid morals, so I watch them.

    Reply
  22. Great Recession? More like Second Great Depression with the USDA saying 100 million are on some government food subsidy. Invisible bread lines hidden with EBT cards.

    Reply
  23. Banks were/are still regulated by Glass-Steagall in name only. The Gramm-Leach Bliley Act repealed the restrictions in Glass-Steagall that prevented national and state banks from affiliating with securities companies.

    Glass-Steagall is dead. It is an empty shell of legislation from its former life in 1933. We have huge privacy risks and Wall Street investment banking firms are able to gamble with their depositors' money that is being held in affiliated commercial banks.

    Reply
  24. Or MSNBC not use fear to 'sell' liberal ideas, or FOX in to 'sell' conservative ideas.

    Your not being completely honest with me or yourself to not see that.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to maburg713 Cancel reply