Watch this and you will believe 9/11 was an inside Job

Watch this and you will believe 9 /11 was an inside Job Part 1.


(Visited 31 times, 1 visits today)

Share This Post

32 Comments - Write a Comment

  1. ░░░░░░███████ ]▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
    ▂▄▅█████████▅▄▃▂ ☻/ kill google+
    l███████████████████]. ▌
    ◥⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙◤.._ / 

    Reply
  2. Just do more research on it. There's a lot of inconsistencies in the
    official story and they seemed hide, protect, and manipulate implicating
    evidence of foul play. Instead of this video, check out Loose Change. It
    sheds light on the right questions you need to ask yourself.
    /watch?v=rU48jWXYyeA

    Reply
  3. WTC1&2 were Designed to withstand a much larger 707-4 engine Jet Impact &
    fire. WTC-7 Wasn't hit by Any Plane, minor damage to one corner yet Dropped
    Symmetrically into its footprint? Yet WTC-3-4-5-6 remained upright after
    2×110 towers fell on them? No Steel framed Hi-rise has ever fallen down due
    to fire; Hi-Rise infernos of 19&21hrs have been recorded Without Collapse
    Architects&Engineers for 9/11 Truth are 2,000 EXPERTS backed by 20,000
    people, explain the NIST/Govt info is BS As is yours

    Reply
  4. anyone can put random video clips together to shift the views of people. I
    could make a video with clips of hitler that make him look like a swell
    guy. dont listen to these paranoid skitsos.

    Reply
  5. First of all, I'm not American, so, no… I didn't vote for Obama.
    Secondly, *your grammar is so bad it's hurting my brain. And by the way,
    insulting me in such childish way isn't making you any smarter, matey.

    Reply
  6. Hey dumb ass lying moron, the Empire State Building was hit by a B-25
    weighing 40,000 lbs at 140 mph. Yes, the WTC was designed for a 300,000
    lbs. Boeing 707 impact at 200 mph. But if you did ANY research other than
    watching Loose Change first edition you'd know that a 400,000 lbs Boeing
    767 hit the WTC at 560 mph. You suck at research lying moron. 911 TRUTH
    DEBUNKED!

    Reply
  7. Nothing like fitting facts into a theory, is there? Illogical, spurious
    bunkum. I watched (with an open mind) and I don't believe. Try harder!

    Reply
  8. The gov't has a very long history of manipulation and lying to the public,
    so we are now finding possible loop holes and twisting words to accuse the
    gov't. I'm not saying it wasn't an inside job because I really don't know.
    But the gov't really had this coming for the constant lies and manipulation.

    Reply
  9. the government DID kill 3000 people that day. Then they sent our soldiers
    into phony wars and killed 4000 more. Your tax dollars at work!

    Reply
  10. I watched this and I am not convinced. What exactly is the proof for the
    government's involvement in 911? I still don't see the proof.

    Reply
  11. Of course Silverstien wanted to make sure the insurance on the new lease
    covered "acts of terrorism". Why is this so surprising? If you bought a
    house that was previously flooded, you would want flood insurance…
    wouldn't you? I guess most of you are either too young or too stupid to
    remember that the WTC was attacked by terrorists in 1994.

    Reply
  12. Better to ask questions even if they sound crazy and think outside the box,
    then to follow every single thing the someone tells you.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Christel Vinot Cancel reply