Proof Facts of 9/11

A copied video. I am making a playlist of a collection of videos proof that 9/11 was an inside job. Challenge yourself to learn that it was in fact an inside…


(Visited 126 times, 1 visits today)

Share This Post

49 Comments - Write a Comment

  1. Let me save you years of research chasing shadows in 4 minutes, if you are just looking into it. Also has information relevant to al-Assad and Syria.

    /watch?v=YlmieB3A_bw

    As for symbolism? Two towers fell, but 3 buildings fell. Building 7 was the Salomon Brothers' Building. Solomon was the builder, Boaz, Jachin were the towers. All roads lead to Rome. Bush's Knight's of Malta. Biden. Same. Clinton same. They want you chasing proxies.

    Reply
  2. Muslims had nothing to do with 911 our USA government framed Muslims for the upcoming holy war.
    911 Conspiracy Visual Proof of Planted Explosives and Cover-Up /watch?v=Z1umtI4RCoQ

    Reply
  3. Your government plan all this to make the WHOLE world hate on Islam/Muslims people. No. We already been hated since 1400 years ago. We suffered a lot because of your government. War on Terror? You believed that? Since you all gonna hate on us that much and wants to wipe us all that much. I pray to God that we will be wipe out as soon as possible and leave you guys in peace. That this world belongs to yours, not us. We take action, We get killed. We speak of freedom, We get shut. We're DONE!

    Reply
  4. Pentagon 911 Fact: /watchv?=4fvJ8nFa5Qks

    Independent research, conducted by a former political journalist, has proved beyond a shadow of doubt that the Boeing airliner model 757-200, alleged to be American Airlines Flight 77, DID NOT crash into the Pentagon on 9/11/2001. The truth speaks for itself.

    Reply
  5. You are silly to think that Socialism is any better than Capitalism, both are failures to its constituents. Both are rooted in money and class stratification, and it is why they both eventually will fail.

    Reply
  6. The "pancaked floor" theory doesn't allow for a building to fall at near free fall speed. Each floor below would slow the decent even if only by a little, would still add up over the entire fall. Also, the top of the second tower tipped over before the building collapsed under it. The building was rigged to be demolished before the planes hit. It's obvious they were brought down with explosives.

    Reply
  7. Did the fuel melted the whole building uniformly? One of the planes didint hit directly towards the tower… but then the top body collapse on the lower body perfectly… why is that? was the fuel dispersed equally and melted all the steel at the same rate and all the steel frames? If it hit above the tower.. how does a small portion of the top of the floors can crush the lower floors… why were there no resistance from the lower floors when the top floor was collapsing?

    Reply
  8. Most intelligent people know WTC was demolished simply by watching the event with an open mind. Many who disagree are incapable of critical thinking and are beyond reach. So much evidence for conspiracy. So few strong enough to be labeled crazy. Dam sheep

    Reply
  9. I CAN PRODUCE UNEDITED ORIGINAL STILL FRAMES FROM a VIDEO TAKEN on 9/11/2001 in NYC which PROVE WITHOUT QUESTION that NO PLANES WERE USED at ANYTIME DURING OPERATION 9/11.

    I'm patiently waiting for one thing and one thing only: – When all…

    …OUTRAGEOUSLY THEATRICAL CONSPIRACY DEBUNKING

    SPECIALISTS ARE IN THE SAME PLACE AT THE SAME TIME…

    We be tawkin' 'bout da' REEL "GROUND ZERO"!!

    Reply
  10. what? your point makes no sense. The reason smoke "puffed" out of the windows as it collapsed was because of the enormous pressure of the tons of materials above it. To be completely honest none of the points in this video make ANY sense.

    Reply
  11. If you watch the towers fall you can see little puffs of dust being blown our of it as the explosives are being ignited, wake up everyone. Our government is planning something.

    Reply
  12. wellifthemediasaysit · Edit

    The vile racist shills/trolls/disinfo (STDs) who desperately defend the official fairy tale for a few bucks an hour are convicted felons! They have been handed a 2nd chance in life by their COINTELPRO masters! It makes perfect sense, it keeps the welfare queues down, employment up, and it explains where that missing $2.3 trillion is going! If they turn against their masters, no one will believe them because of their past! The world knows 9/11 was an inside job, but watch the STDs attack me now!

    Reply
  13. Predictive programming,my friend. I've seen the Johnny Bravo episode. Notice how arabs/muslims are made to be terrorists long before 911 or even the 93 bombings.

    Reply
  14. On an August 2001 episode of "Johnny Bravo", Johnny is walking past a movie theatre. On the outside wall, there is a picture of the twin towers burning in an extremely similar fashion to the real thing, with a sticker partially covering the photo that says "COMING SOON". It was proven that the picture was not photoshopped into the scene on the show. Coincidence? Probably not.

    Reply
  15. Even if the floors were light grade, the WTC building's had about four hundred thousand ton's of undamaged steel below the impact zone that would have ressisted the collapse above.

    The building cannot stand without the floors. If too many floors fail the columns WILL buckle. If the columns buckle.. Forget it. She's coming down..

    You need to understand how the building was made. It was not like other structures. It RELIED on the floors to stand.

    Reply
  16. There was a building in Spain, Madrid a steel structured high rise that burned for 21 hours. It had a partial collapse but not the whole building

    (um.. That building shares absolutely nothing with regard to the WTC. The WTC had a floor system that was in no other building anywhere. Comparing it to Spain or Madrid is absolutely meaningless. So your point is really quite useless.. and then you draw conclusions based on entirely faulty comparisons..)

    Thats the "TM" in a nut shell.

    Reply
  17. Go and listen to what the pilot of the fighter jet dispatched had to say on that. He's interviewed at a BBQ of all places. Its on YT.

    The call to intercept came at 8:36AM. American 11 hit the building 11 minutes later. A fighter needs a bogey dope on a target. Air traffic control could not give them that.

    But moreover.. Nobody knows the true intentions of the hijackers. But them.

    And they're 11 minutes from their objective.

    Reply
  18. If there is a plane where there is no transponder. Then that is more of an alarm to the ATC and they suspected a hijacking anyway. They had fighter jets all over the country doing traning exercises that funny enough replicated planes being flown into buildings. They had so much shit on the radar that they could not tell real world and traning exercise test on the radar.

    Reply
  19. And during the second world war a plane crashed into the empire state building. Due to fog. It's still there. There was a building in Spain, Madrid a steel structured high rise that burned for 21 hours. It had a partial collapse but not the whole building. If you think terrorists done this to america then you are blind. 9/11 was staged by it's own government. Just look back into Bush's oil connections. Look at operation northwood's. It all make's sense.

    Reply
  20. Im sorry but if you think that fire brought WTC7 and the twin tower's. Then you are very wrong. Even if the floors were light grade, the WTC building's had about four hundred thousand ton's of undamaged steel below the impact zone that would have ressisted the collapse above. How did they fall as quick as a brick would have fell at the same height? That tell's me that the ressistane below the impact was taken away. The entire core collum had turned to dust along with the rest of the building.

    Reply
  21. You americans need Socialism to be happy, no today's corporate capitalism, look like it was in Soviet Russia, and it is not true that people were not allowed to go between countries and there are many lies.

    Reply
  22. The hole at the Pentagon was originally 70 feet across before the facade collapsed. Eye witness reports had the wings folding back along the axis of the plane. Its hitting a 3 foot thick masonry wall.

    The Pentagon is not going to have cameras trained on the SKY looking for in coming jets. What a waste of resources!!.. (can you punch up our SKY CAM?). They are focused on areas of entry and exit like parking areas. They also operate at 1 frame/sec. The plane was moving at 800 ft/sec

    Reply
  23. please explain to me how the hole from the pentigon is way smaller that a jet airliner? look at the pictures if you are as smart as you think you are you would relize you couldnt fit half the plane in that tiney hole and why where all the cameras turned off that day where turned off at the pentigon one of the most secure places on earth and why did they take all the footage of what ever actually hit the pentigon and hide it from us and show one breef blury clip of a silver object exploding?

    Reply
  24. were you in the building i guess not point proven so dont make as video based on shit you found on google no 1 knew how hot the temperature was because people in the top of the tower were killed heat rises basic science the top of the tower was hotter then the impact zone so stop making these shitty videos based on facts you pulled from Wikipedia, the towers fell end of people like you cause more agony to the families involved then anything else never forget but put it behind you move on end of

    Reply
  25. Have you read what the firemen had to say on 7? I have. I'll give you one of MANY quotes from it.

    "When b7 came down it was fully involved in fire all 47 stories"

    "Everyone was expecting that to come down"…

    Thats just 2 of 100s of quotes no different.

    Reply
  26. What do tou think about WTC7? That collapsed with very minor and contanible fire's. The only steel structure building to fall due to a fire. The building fell at free fall speed wich means that there was no resistance. How is this posibble without explosive's???

    Reply
  27. Well sorry there Billy boy. The evidence doesn't support that. In fact the evidence utterly lays waste to your story of "inside job"

    If you bother to actually look at it.

    The question is. Do you?

    Reply
  28. Yeah your right stop hiding from the facts. That's what you need to do. Anyone with half a brain cell knows that it was an inside job. I guess you dont even have that.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Fantisan95 Cancel reply