(NEW 2012 WTC DEMOLITION PROOF) DEBUNK THIS (REMAKE) RARE FOOTAGE AND INTERVIEWS SHOWING NEW PROOF

BRAND NEW IMPORTANT 911 VID COMING LATER TODAY. A remake of the old version of “Debunk this, NEW 2011 WTC demolition evidence”. I fixed all the typos and cha…


(Visited 24 times, 1 visits today)

Share This Post

44 Comments - Write a Comment

  1. Here's the main thing we do (or should) know: planes did not take down or take out the buildings. That was physicaly impossible. So let'e not waste time or energy arguing about planes, which look to be a distraction and a ratinale that the less intelligent would believe.

    No buiding, constructed of steel, aluminum, and concrete, is going to disappear in this manner or in any manner from being hit by planes.
    So let's get to what could have removed the towers and other buildings, ok?

    Reply
  2. Gordon did you see how Xendrius cut Mark Burbank's witness testimony of the black spot? Xendrius uses Evidence Suppression. Photos of drones are also "not good enough" more suppression.

    Reply
  3. unless they planted the wrong plane engine on a busy New York street in broad daylight. Not likely.

    It's my opinion that the "no planes in NYC" stuff is meant to discredit legitimate question like whether or not a plane hit the Pentagon. I'm a firm believer in the flyover (see Rosevelt Roberts) theory because lots of people saw a plane in Washington.

    Reply
  4. Dude i could say there will be a latin president n somewhere down the line that will prob happen. You can predict ANYTHING, and it will most likely happen at somepoint in time. Saying two towers will burn? Oh man he was right two towers did burn. Of course it happened. Wrecklace humans which we all are today make bad shit happen. Every bad non natural event is caused by humanity, your species. Ppl can we please take control of this shit. No more state. No more ruler. For the people

    Reply
  5. not true… there are prediction of huge proportion… that have been predicted before you were born.. and we are the recipients whether negatively or positively.
    Martin Luther King predicted a black president 30yrs b4 it happened and he is not the only one. It is dumb to assume that because we equate time to the present…. we are fooling ourselves… there are things in the making right now the u want c the reality of it till decades later.

    Reply
  6. Also, at 19 mins or so we are shown the bright light in front of the pod on the aircraft again. The bright light is the explosive device ALREADY in the building going off. The plane is non-existant, superimposed onto the film. The speed of the 'planes' calculated by examining frame by frame using a fixed point is MAX ceiling altitude speed (550 mph or so) which is impossible at this low altitude, the air is too dense. Simple physics proves the hoax here, plus aluminium cans cant cut thru steel.

    Reply
  7. Dear Fromalacerated Sky, if like me you live in the UK you are going to get some of that 'action' pretty soon I feel if the coup de gras the CIA have planned for us comes to fruition.

    Reply
  8. It doesent really matter anymore.. None of you are ready to do what needs to be done.. The Government & Military power own you.. Why do you sit their talking like you could do anything about it? You are all untrained civilians who compensate for your lack of courage & action with insane amounts of speculations.. What would you do if you were correct about everything??? Nothing.. You would die a sheeps death silently..

    Reply
  9. Here's my quesiton. If this would have happened while Obama was in office, would the two sides be reversed? In other words, would those who support Bush and hate Obama actually be in support of some (if not all) of the belief the USofA was involved in this tragedy.

    I suppose the question can be said for those who support that Obama administration. Would they be ready to believe the current administration could do this.

    Oh, I know there are die hards who don't care who is in office.

    Reply
  10. Fromalacerated Sky · Edit

    ah the good old US – the rest of us poor westerners just have to deal with arguments in parliament – we don't get a lot of the action.. 🙁

    Reply
  11. Bennyamyn Malovrh · Edit

    At Pentagon there were videos of Firefighters cleaning parts of the plane. If There is no airliners where are the passengers then???
    Same thing at WTC. From which plane is that engine then they found????

    Reply
  12. Wait, you're telling me to ask a CD expert, but you've already ruled out CD. If you have enough knowledge to rule out CD, shouldn't that knowledge logically be enough to answer my questions?
    If truly "we don't know" then please remove the X next to CD above 😉

    Reply
  13. Don't get me wrong, I do respect your beliefs, but as I said, I respect facts and evidence, and although there is some evidence of tamper with the debris, there isn't enough to point the finger squarely at Bush.

    As for the Thermite smoke, that you pointed out pouring out of the towers, who's to say that they didn't put thermite into their bags. luggage screening was much more lax back then, and they didn't really care. The force of the crash would have been enough to spread and ignite it.

    Reply
  14. At the moment after watching your video, I'm at about 50/50 on weather to believe the official reports or the conspiracy. In a way, with this video, you're doing exactly what the U.S. Government did with their official report. Telling what you want people to hear, and what you believe, but leaving out other facts and evidence.

    I respect facts and evidence as much as you do, and it's clear you've done your homework on this topic, and I respect you for that. It's just a little too hard to believe

    Reply
  15. Ya dude they built those towers in 1973 so that they could wait more than 25 years to knock them over. Duh, you are such a sheeple. It's all about the oil man!

    Reply
  16. They planned it for 50 years but they didn't count on you revealing the truth to everyone on the internet, Your going to foil the illuminate with your keen wit and rebellious youtube comment postings. I'm glad that you are on the case.

    Reply
  17. Dharamveer Nimiwal · Edit

    sure is right, i know alot of people who think it is fake. Listen, i get sent a list of high paying surveys every few days and easy make around $60 off each list. its worth a try here: bit.ly15ppbg9

    Reply
  18. Apparently you missed the fact that no demolition took place at the WTC and that there are no demolition experts in your little cult, and that fucking jumbo jets "compromised" the buildings.
    You retard.

    Reply
  19. There's actually a firefox tool called flashblocker. Whenever I browse videos by 9/11 truther retards (or similar scum), I enable it.
    These faggots don't get a single view from me 😀 (they do get a dislike though)

    Reply
  20. EastendBillythekid · Edit

    I love these video's nothing will be done anyway ..Jews go their money ..

    They are laughing drinking spending all that money.

    Reply
  21. Erm, it was their idea to build the twin towers, it was the Illuminati Rockfellers who are responsible for the twin towers. The towers were even called Nelson and David.

    Reply
  22. Defo not planes. Check the photo of a world war 2 bomber that crashed into the empire state. Minimal damage. Defo not explosives. Check footage of cental columns turning to dust & blowing away in the wind! Plus no seismic readings. 2 250,000 ton buildings hitting the deck would have registered. Defo an energy weapon! They were vapourised! Chk work of Dr Judy Woods

    Reply
  23. Apparently you missed the part of the video where the demolition expert discusses how the building must first be compromised in some way.

    Reply
  24. Architects of WTC buildings claimed on interview that they couldn't anticipate the damage caused by THE PLANES, and that them and the subsequent fires caused the collapse. This is a FACT. Yours is an opinion. Can you tell the difference? Of course you can't, you can barely write correctly!!!

    Reply
  25. You mistake fact for fiction grasshopper,,,,,,,the architecs were not prepared for the buildings to be blown up with nano thermate,,,,,more Fluoride for you,,cug -ah- lug,,chug -ah- lug,,,,sho is good,,,!!!

    Reply
  26. I am not interested in your opinion. The largest airline at the time the WTC's were built was smaller than the ones that crashed. The architects of the buildings admitted that they weren't prepared for the damage inflicted by the planes on 9/11. These are facts.

    Reply
  27. I can think of a motive quite easily. If terrorists (from the middle east for that matter) were to attack the US and kill thousands of people, then every citizen would like to get 'revenge' at everything and everyone middle eastern. All Bush had to do was state that he would 'fight terrorism' (control the middle east) and he had the support of almost everybody. Even a child can figure out that a building of that size just doesn't collapse that perfectly after burning for only 40 minutes or less.

    Reply
  28. No,,the architects designed the building to withstand a crash from the largest airliner at the time,,,,,,>>>>our government flew remote controlled military aircraft into the towers that were already rigged with Nanothermite,,,that is what happened,,,,>>>>>>

    Reply
  29. … but the fact is that they collapsed due to the damage caused by the planes. I guess not everything can be anticipated in a design. Same happened with the Titanic or Tacoma bridge.

    Even the architects of the WTC buildings acknowledged that the buildings weren't designed for the massive damage and fires. They just planned for a small jet at low speed, low on fuel, lost in the fog, not fully loaded airliners at top speed. Another case of expecting an apple but finding a chestnut.

    Reply
  30. the WTC towers were much much stronger. In fact the towers were actually constructed to withstand several hits from big commercial airliners. they had actually considered it while contructing the buildings.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Johnny L Cancel reply