Mo’ Money Mo’ Problems (Blame the Federal Reserve)

Nominee for Federal Reserve chair Janet Yellen is awful. But the real problem is the Fed, not who is in charge. Mo’ Money Mo’ Problems. Stop with the qualita…


(Visited 59 times, 1 visits today)

Share This Post

49 Comments - Write a Comment

  1. Let me get people up to speed. FRACTIONAL RESERVE banking is a crime
    against humanity. It works like this. If I belong to the Federal Reserve
    and put $1.00 worth of gold in a vault, I can print up a brand new $10.00
    bill or a $100.00 line of credit. This is because I have a FRACTION of real
    world currency to back up the borrowed $10.00. You can imagine that by the
    end of the week, I will own all the gold in town. Since 1971, Nixon took
    gold out of the equation while still allowing the FED to remain in power.
    Yeah. So now we are indebted to a foreign paper printer who forces us to
    recognize their sovereignty and privacy or else face imprisonment, death,
    humiliation or fines etc. Think about it. Every soldier or person killed
    either on a battlefield, by a cop or in prison has been for the bankers.
    This is all done for international Jewry. 2000 plus years of warning us
    about USURY and some of us are starting to listen. Can't wait for Julie to
    do a video about this. See ya later goyim!

    Reply
  2. Ms Borowski is smarter than 90% of the professoriat at all the Ivy League
    schools plus MIT, Amherst, Stanford, and Duke. You go girl. She is so smart
    it makes you wonder why so many women are SOOOO STUPID!

    Reply
  3. Julie Borowski, I have a question. Are libertarians basically fiscals
    conservatives but social liberals? Also, what do you call someone who
    doesn't necessarily want to ban or legalize gay marriage or abortion but
    believes those decisions should be made by the state and not the federal
    government? Anyone else can answer my question if you want.

    Reply
  4. I like this girl, but I want yo advise whoever is editing the video to stop
    this "cut and skip" editing when all the pauses in speech are removed. It
    sounds unnatural.

    Reply
  5. Since Julie left out the facts
    let me add
    Who Controls the Fed?
    Ben S. Bernanke(Akz Jew) – Chairman, Janet L. Yellen(Akz Jew) – V.
    Chairman, Sarah Bloom Raskin(Akz Jew), Jeremy C. Stein(Akz Jew), William C.
    Dudley(Akz Jew) – President NY, Charles I. Plosser(Akz Jew) – President PH,
    Jeffrey M. Lacker(Akz Jew) – President, Richard W. Fisher(Akz Jew) –
    President TX, Stephen P. Harbeck(Akz Jew) – President & CEO, David I.
    Fisher(Akz Jew) – Chairman, Keith Hartstein(Akz Jew) – President & CEO,

    Who own the Federal Reserve Bank?
    ALL Jewish banks, only Rockefeller isn’t.
    1) Rothschild Banks of London
    2) Rothschild Banks of Berlin
    3) Lazard Brothers Bank of Paris
    4) Israel Moses Sieff Banks of Italy
    5) Warburg Bank of Hamburg, Germany
    6) Warburg Bank of Amsterdam
    7) Kuhn Loeb Bank of New York
    8) Lehman Brothers Bank of New York
    9) Goldman Sachs Bank of New York
    10) Chase Manhattan Bank of New York (Controlled By the Rockefeller Family)

    Reply
  6. The FED is guilty of treason, they print money with no value, which
    devaluates the currency causing inflation, making everything more
    expensive, forcing more and more people to enslave themselves into debt.
    The more we owe banks the more control they have over us and our country!
    If we destroyed the FED we could cut our debt down dramatically! Andrew
    Jackson did it to his national bank, but he was a president with guts.

    Reply
  7. QE has not been reckless. Despite inflating the money supply 3x (Yes, 3
    TIMES) in about 5 years we have been at risk of DEFLATION and time and time
    again can not hit the target of 2% inflation(Suggesting that we need more
    QE). And money being worth less now than 1913 doesn’t really mean anything.
    Wages are very sticky, so if you want more people to have jobs then you
    have to have devalue wages.

    So the question is, do you want to pay 2¢ more or have riots in the
    streets, insanely high amounts of crime and massive instability of our
    government while it is forced to take on more and more debt just to curtail
    short term problems, like starving families?

    Reply
  8. A policy to set loan rates as a means of speeding up or slowing down
    (stabilizing) the economy is not a horrid thing, but printing money simply
    because there isn’t enough money is like saying people should eat metal
    shards because there isn’t enough food. The effect is often buried in the
    stats of our giant economy, but there are certainly effects.
    Unfortunately, as our debt grows and as we buy more of it ourselves
    (monetizing it), we have to remember that someday it has to stop. We may
    be in for a rude awakening when we pull off that bandage!

    Reply
  9. The Reserve will have it’s 100th birthday next month, 100 years of theft
    by Bankers . Watch Arron Russo movie America Freedom To Fascism on
    youtube

    Reply
  10. I think Julie needs to put on black face and white lips to make her videos
    appear a little less like a minstrel show. Julie, to end your videos just
    bug out your eyes and cross them at the same time in black face. Then you
    can yell out, “You be buggin!”

    Reply
  11. Your information is right, however you could add emphasis to the fact that
    every dollar the Fed prints is a loan to our government, therefore there is
    a money=debt paradox, thus an unhealthy economic system. When the debt
    based system was created, the only reason it did even as well as it did for
    a number of years is our economy was healthy enough to use the credit to
    grow and invest back into the Us economy. Now due to a multitude of issues
    (including reckless spending by the fed) we have long ago crossed a
    threshold of no return where we wuld have to collapse the system in order
    to fix it. Unfortunately this may be how they usher in the NWO antichrist
    system. 

    Reply
  12. But what is the problem with decreasing the amount dollar is worth? It
    makes no difference if I have 1 dollar or 1000 dollars, which are 1000
    times less worth, does it?

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Nonya Busnezz Cancel reply