June 2012 – New 9/11 inside job evidence ?

MAKE THIS ONE VIRAL, THERE IS NO OTHER 9/11 DRONE VID LIKE THIS. THANKS TO WEARECHANGENJ FOR MUCH OF THE FOOTAGE. A remade video of an older version, this on…


(Visited 34 times, 1 visits today)

Share This Post

36 Comments - Write a Comment

  1. Till then live your lives for the Lord Jesus Christ, and when he comes back, these Reptilian Scum who've done these awful things will get whats coming to them. God Bless you all.

    Reply
  2. Listen everybody. This happened. We all know it was an inside job. America is it's own worse enemy. But Vengeance is for the Lord Jesus Christ, not for us. Leave it to him. As for the saying "We'll Never Forget, Of course we won't, but years later we shouldn't be beating it into our heads still either. Enjoy the rest of your lives. Another thing everyone needs to know…There is going to be things so horrific to come, that 9/11 will be nothing compared to it. Times of Tribulation are coming

    Reply
  3. 1) I did some more looking and emailed 2 people to confirm it.The engine wreckage that landed near Murray and Church is definitely a Pratt & Whitney JT9D-7J. It is nearly identical to the JT9D-7R4D except the Stage1 Cooling Duct Assembly is slightly different.The 7J was used exclusively on Boeing 747's. For a while I thought I had made a mistake since the plane that crashed at WTC2 was certainly not a 747, but I remembered a video showing something jettisoned from the plane just before it hit.

    Reply
  4. 2) View – WTC ***HARD EVIDENCE*** Quality is poor and it's the only one I know showing an object released from the plane just before impact. It could be fake, but I tend to think it's genuine because of the trajectory of the engine. Careful measurement shows an engine released from the plane would have fallen almost exactly where the wreckage was located. I believe the plane was controlled to hit the building off center so the engine would miss the core columns and go out through the north wall.

    Reply
  5. 3) The engine wreckage was planted evidence, released to make the deception more convincing. But something went wrong. Someone got the wrong engine specification, or copied the number wrong, or a shipment got mixed up, or any of a hundred other things that resulted in the wrong type of engine getting loaded onto the drone plane (yes it was a drone). I don't know if the engine wreckage still exists and could be traced, but fortunately the photos are clear enough to prove it was not from UA175.

    Reply
  6. it was an inside job, and it was obviously planes/drones + explosives. Anyone whose been to the towers would know that planes alone would not be able to melt in seconds these massive structures.
    'Inside job' means its done from the inside. and you don't do a military operation like this with 5 ppl. its basic common sense. I wonder why no one talks about Saudi involvement and who in the Saudi gov. knew about this or even planed it.

    Reply
  7. so, what type of planes would have these types of engines? ( General Electric CF6 80C2 or Pratt & Whitney JT9D-7J,) Military planes? I'm surprised they let anyone close to see these engines.

    Reply
  8. in any case, it doesn't matter, because there will never be another investigation and no one will go to jail for these crimes. so, its just an intellectual debate. I think most people believe that it was passenger planes, but if you look into it you'll see that's not possible. have a nice day.

    Reply
  9. unless you your self have flown this plane, you can't call my views illogical when they are based on the opinions of pilots who flew and know these planes. I grew up in Israel with terrorism, I know how these idiots think, and what they are capable of. I'm sure these Saudi pilot/actors are live and well in some arab country.

    Reply
  10. 1. Al-Qaeda is a undercover CIA organisation. They recruit terrorists around the world to make them attack other countries. This indeed is nothing new but an old strategy. Just like i stated. These terrorists had no knowledge of being trained by the CIA. Do you understand?

    2. Actually many of them were qualified pilots. And even if they weren't it is not a problem to make the plane as a Autopilot.

    To believe that the plane was a drone is to be illogical.

    Reply
  11. in this case you are right, these Saudi worked for the CIA and pretended to belong to Al Qaeda. Now why would Arabs working for the CIA be willing to kill them selves? second, why would the CIA send unqualified pilots to do a mission which they will fail? As you heard the pilot say, this is 'mission impossible.' They weren't even trained on these aircrafts and had 0 experience. Drones on the other hand have great precision, as you can see, Americans love them and use them in combat all the time.

    Reply
  12. [Not it isn't my first language]

    Maybe it could be like that but it doesn't exclude the fact that the they hijacked the plane and went into the world trade center. There is no doubt about them being terrorists. You can see the recording tapes of Mohammed Atta being in Afghanistan.

    Just like i stated. These terrorists were trained by CIA agents without their knowledge. This is what they did in Libya, Syria, Lebanon and other countries. They brainwashes them with "support" from the religion.

    Reply
  13. First of all. See what i wrote. I said that Al-Qaeda is a CIA project. It doesn't mean that the terrorists of Al-Qaeda are conscious about that. Actually Al-Qaeda was created back in the 80s against the Soviets. Even Hilary Clinton said that they founded Al-Qaeda. Search on Youtube!

    And yes. 15 of the 19 hijackers were citizens of Saudi Arabia. Members of the Al-Qaeda organisation. The cover project.

    Reply
  14. maybe English is your second language. ? Let me simplify what the person says on this video, who is obviously familiar with these planes and maybe a pilot: These planes(United) are programmed to be flown by a computer. A new/ inexperienced pilot like these Saudis — could not do this. In order for the Saudi pilots to fly the plane in a new route (to the towers) they would need to first reprogram the computer and then fly without the assistance of the computer which is 'not easy to do.'

    Reply
  15. you are mixing everything together. You call Al Qaeda CIA and you say that these Saudis did a suicide attack with these planes. when it comes to suicide mission its usually the educated ones who brainwash desperate poor Arabs, they usually just send them in a truck with explosives or an explosive belt. This type of attack in not typical and even if they wanted to do it they couldn't.

    Reply
  16. But there is not suspicious that they had the skills and the motives if they were trained by CIA themselves (Al-Qaeda cover-up organisation).

    Just take a look at Syria. CIA financed terrorists killing civilians in the name of God. We saw it in Libya against Khaddafi. In Lebanon. We have seen it in Afghanistan in the 79-89 when CIA created Al-Qaeda against the Soviets inc. Bin Laden. We have seen it against Iran 1951. We have seen it in Egypt against Naseer. Just Everywhere. This is the US!

    Reply
  17. of course there were bombs in the building, that's what caused the buildings to fall. I don't understand your logic that the Saudi flew the planes into the buildings. its a nice story but not possible. They didn't have the skill, the motive and regular planes wouldn't be able to do this circus act. Young ppl now adays watch too many science fiction movies, they'd believe anything.

    Reply
  18. Haha no, think logical. There is no reason to put a missile under the airplane. I saw that photo and i am sure that this wasn't anything else than a metal panel from from an oblique angle. It would be enormous stupid to put a missile under the plane but not in the other and fly it into New York City where all people can see that missile.

    It is more possible that they planted bombs in the buildings but that is another story. Believe me i have studied this and the whole Al Qaeda organisation.

    Reply
  19. first of all these planes had an extra attachment on the bottom, which was probably a missile that went into the buildings and created 'a hole' for the plane to go in. Regular planes crash, they can't penetrate a building. Look at the precision of these attacks, not possible with a regular plane. American Pilots say its not a regular plane. listen to pilots for 9/11.Witnesses say the planes had no windows. Maybe not drones, but unmanned military planes, which is the same as drones.

    Reply
  20. I understand what you are saying. that is terrible that moderate ppl join the Taliban because what the military is doing. I don't blame it on the soldiers, they are just victims in this game. I'm still not sure why the American went into Afghanistan. did they want to set up a pipe line?

    Reply
  21. And yes they should be wiped, but here is what actually happens, when the media shows they fight these religious mad men, this is what actually happens, the military just kills innocent people and shows them as terrorists.They never bother killing real terrorists.As they have no choice but to defend themselves, they later join Taliban to take revenge.

    Reply
  22. These Taliban r created by CIA itself. Look at past history, they were friends and media supported them, they were brought in U.S military air crafts to Pakistan and from there local military was paid to take them to afghan.They became enemies after 9/11. Do u really think that a super power can not destroy some men wearing towels on there heads.Its not just about afghan, when ever CIA touches a country it becomes plagued with wars,bombings and extremism.Do your own research, if don't believe me

    Reply
  23. The people from the airliners are still missing and i do not think that US gov took them and buried them under grand canyon. Actually this is how it went:

    * All 4 hijacked planes were normal airplanes.
    * The hijackers were 19 arabic terrorists secretly trained by CIA in the Al-Qaida organisation without their knowledge.

    Don't be confused by the Zeitgest movie because they are confusing people with illogical nonsense. Really i do not see the reason by using drones or rockets etc.

    Reply
  24. No, You are wrong. I do also believe that 9/11 was an inside job but your argument is illogical and we need to think how it could be done. The planes were not drones. It was american airliners without any doubt because they clearly went of from the airport. What's the reason by using drones? Why would the US gov use drones if they could use american airliners?

    Reply
  25. you know what the Taliban do to their own people? 9/11 was an inside job but I could care less if the Taliban gets wiped off the face of the earth. and I don't feel bad for the Iraqis either.

    Reply
  26. both planes that went into the buildings were drones. I don't think they said that one was a normal plane. 'United' went off the radar, not because it went into the building but because they didn't want it to be tracked. its not rocket science. lol

    Reply
  27. those who dont remember history are destent to repeat it. Every time when there are two stories for single event, in history, the goverment story was always false.

    Reply
  28. I am not sure of this one. Why should it make sense if the first plane was a normal one and the other not. What's the reason behind it?

    Why use a military plane if the first plane wasn't one.

    Reply
  29. voskos100, you can quit pretending now; I already know the truth. It WAS an inside job.

    The info war has already passed you by, and YOU LOST. 

    Reply
  30. Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe,
    Chemical Physics Journal, 2009, 2, 7-31
    Based on our observations, we conclude that the red layer of the red/gray chips we have discovered in the WTC dust is "active, unreacted thermitic material, incorporating nanotechnology, and is a highly energetic pyrotechnic or explosive material"
    you can yourself see the scientific paper in the science journal

    Reply
  31. Not an inside job, u still didn't understand don't u, 9/11 was an excuse to attack afghan, these people had earned trillions from these wars. these Taliban were good people before this, once used, they became bad guys after 9/11,but now even this work is finished,its time for another type of terrorists,citizens of US ,there will another false flag attack on US and people of US will be blamed for this. after the incident martial law will be imposed and people will be imprisoned in F.E.M.A camps.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to ReigningBlood227 Cancel reply