Counter-Conspiracy: World Trade Center 7 | Jesse Ventura Off The Grid – Ora TV

On September 11, 2001, a third building fell in New York City. What really happened to World Trade Center 7 on that infamous day? Jesse Ventura launches his own Counter-Conspiracy investigation…


(Visited 38 times, 1 visits today)

Share This Post

41 Comments - Write a Comment

  1. Charles Ewing Smith · Edit

    Have Richard Gage on soon Jesse and Alex. He is the best at cutting thru
    the nonsense. A real clear thinker. Judy Wood didn't talk about anything
    really (certainly not directed energy beams and how that idea conflicts
    with the available video evidence) except to remind us over and over again
    of the need and tricks to remain objective. Weird.

    Reply
  2. I'm with Jesse on this one. As a kid living in Brooklyn I would marvel at
    the WTC from my Window and I'm pretty sure there were no cardboard
    buildings. I understand the reason for the Twin Towers falling, but #7 was
    not hit.

    Reply
  3. Like Larry said, 'we decided to pull the building'. He admitted they used
    controlled demolition. He didn't realize I guess that that would have taken
    weeks of preplanning and charge placing. Oops. Building 7 was pulled
    because the headquarters and control of the whole operation had to be
    destroyed.I have no doubt that 'they' set all the fires in building 7,
    otherwise it would have looked real bad if they pulled it with no fires, no
    damage etc. I'm guessing nobody got any photos of any steel beams from
    building 7 either…

    Reply
  4. All you need to know is that steel has a melting point of just below 3000F
    and also a conductor so the heat would travel the whole length and some of
    the heat would be transferred into the air through convection. I'm not
    going to say steel wouldn't melt using a typical fuel but it certainly
    wouldn't in the time frame they claim.

    Reply
  5. TwisterChrisable · Edit

    The purpose of 9/11 is to stop the signing of a law called NESARA. Which
    to free us from this global conspiracy 

    Reply
  6. No question about it. Building 7 fell at free fall speed for several
    seconds following a synchronized set of detonations along the 25 core
    columns as well as the 58 perimeter columns. It fell in its own footprint
    at a uniform speed on all 4 sides and center. Any other scenario than 25 +
    58 perfectly synchronized explosions, like the NIST delusional office fires
    theory, would have resulted in an asymmetrical collapse over a very long
    period of time, or no collapse at all. The 9/11 Commission lied, the
    Federal government lied, the city of NY lied, the press lied, the FBI
    didn't do its job…. Who runs this country? Not the people, that is
    certain. Vote Jesse Ventura in 2016 – it's risk free, because it just can't
    get worse.

    Reply
  7. jacquelyn diamond · Edit

    I forget if it was Rockefeller or who but the guy who owned bldg. 7 (
    pretty sure it was David Rockefeller) said he told them to pull pull it,
    that they put explosives in after because it was unstable from the W T C's
    impact, so you are right! But he freely admitted it in an interview, so I
    never heard this other theory, I live less than 7 miles away, he said this
    in an interview. He has no shame in anything atrocious that he does. I only
    saw that interview once and can't seem to find it anywhere, but I swear
    that is what he originally said! He and his cronies did this!

    Reply
  8. That's awesome that they're putting up billboards and ads in subway
    stations, but why here in Toronto? Too much red tape preventing it in the
    US? Why not in New York too? Perhaps it would hit a bad nerve I suppose..
    Either way I'm proud that my city and public transit corp is allowing this
    to go through. So anyways, building 7, a 4(7) story structure built in
    198(7), including 7 high-profile corporations and agencies falls in 7
    seconds…Ironic..?

    Reply
  9. 9:03 all of the rest of the world trade center buildings were nearly
    obliterated from the collapsed of the twin towers too- but they stood
    standing. In fact- they all needed to be demolished by professionals weeks
    later- why didnt they implode into themselves like wtc7?

    Reply
  10. An engineer friend of mine said that the girders that held up each floor in
    the two main towers rode on rubber slippers to allow the building the move
    with heavy winds. He said that when the fire melted the rubber away, the
    girders were no longer retained and fell down like dominos, gathering
    momentum with each floor that failed. But that still doesnt explain wow the
    other WTC buildings collapsed. I've seen controlled demolitions in densely
    populated areas, and the buildings around the one being fell don't
    spontaneously collapse also. plus jet fuel is basically kerosene, have you
    ever tipped some on the floor and tried lighting it? It doesn't catch on
    fire.

    Reply
  11. dreamwarrior2008 · Edit

    It is evident it was a controlled demolition. In the city where I live, we
    had a controlled demolition a few months back. As I saw that building fall,
    I had flashbacks to 9/11 and my time in NY. It was eerily similar if not
    exact

    Reply
  12. Look at the profit Larry made in the collapse of all of them. He paid 15
    million for lease but in court, received 7 billion. Also building 3, 4, 5,
    and 6 were much closer to 1 and 2, yet they were still standing after the
    three collapsed. These other building did not house important things such
    as the Secret service, international bank data, and etc.

    Reply
  13. Controlled demolition!!! By the way, thermite/thermate is silent. You wont
    hear it like dynamite or c4. 9/11 is such a scam. Fuck all the ignorant
    sheeple.

    Reply
  14. i think this is the worst conspiracy of the 9/11 investigation. If you
    have ever worked for a news station you would know you dont work for the
    government and you arent on "the inside." Something happens then you
    report on it. If government agents come in and tell you to report on
    something the whole station would go public with this information and ruin
    the conspiracy. You think this reporter went to school for a Broadcasting
    degree or she went to school to work for the government then worked
    undercover at a TV station her whole life?

    And the government in NO way would go tell a news station this information
    if they were going to be the ones taking down the building. The news would
    have been seen and reported anyway so the government would not need to tell
    a bunch of people before hand.

    If you work at a news station you also know its usually the interns and
    entry level kids answering phones getting the information that is reported.
    On a hectic day like 9/11, if you get a ton of calls saying this building
    is on fire and falling apart/about to fall/going to fall they might
    accidentally hear it wrong and say it fell when people around the building
    called in saying its going to fall.

    This shows that the building probably was completely on fire to the point
    where random people were calling saying this building is on fire and going
    to fall just like the towers did. Seems logical to me and im a big
    conspiracy theorist.

    Also, people keep saying the buildings fell just like a controlled
    demolition… As compared to what? How many videos have you seen that
    fell not being a controlled demolition? and the towers are actually the
    only buildings I have seen fall straight down. In EVERY controlled
    demolition one side falls, then the other. The world trade centers were
    the ONLY buildings that went straight down, not having one leg taken out
    and dropping one side first.

    Reply
  15. THEY WERE BROUGHT DOWN BY SOME OTHER MEANS THAT FIRE. THE AMOUNT OF HEAT TO
    MAKE THOSE BEAMS BUCKET IS MUCH HOTTER THAN THE FIRES IN THE HI RISE. AND
    IF BUILDING 7 FELL DUE TO DEBRI FROM THE TOWER, WHAT ABOUT THE UNDER
    BUILDINGS AROUND IT THAT WERE CLOSER. TELL ME THAT IONE.

    Reply
  16. Stop, stop stop stop. Who told the BBC about the collapse? You guys are
    doing what mainstream does. JUMP FROM SUBJECT TO SUBJECT, WHY? Jesse, your
    guy changed the subject on you about Jane Stanley and who told the BBC
    about the collapse…why? LOL Skimming the surface and that's it? The
    answer is with the BBC for a fact. We are chasing our tails instead of
    going to the one piece of evidence they can't deny. Talking about a bunch
    of anomalies is just a distraction. I realize it now. smfh

    Reply
  17. For anyone who thinks that our own government does not practice "mind
    control" on it's own citezens….The term "TRUETHER" Is all the proof you
    need.
    Over 2,000 engineers world wide calling "BULLSHIT"! Gives me hope for the
    Human Race.

    Reply
  18. It's pretty much a sure thing since the building manager was heard ordering
    someone to"pull it". It all stinks, and we're just sittin with our
    collective thumbs up our asses! When are we going to take back our country?
    

    Reply
  19. FYI, the online Oxford Dictionary defines 'truther' as: A person who doubts
    the generally accepted account of an event, believing that an official
    conspiracy exists to conceal the true explanation; a conspiracy theorist.

    Reply
  20. If the truth is that a U.S. president, vice president, members of congress,
    corporations, executive bankers, executive brokers, and more…

    Killed American Citizens, started wars, and used the constitution like
    toilet paper for money and turning America into a Fascist state..

    Reply
  21. MrLegoCorporation · Edit

    Alex- I'm just quoting what the NIST says…

    Governor-Yeah, yeah, well they're full of SHIT!
    THIS MAN IS A TANK
    JESSE FOR PRESIDENT

    Reply
  22. JESSE VENTURA FOR PREZ YOU MAKE MORE SENSE IN 12 MIN. THAN ALL THE MEDIA
    COVERAGE TO DATE .FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT THANKS FOR TRUTH MY FRIEND 

    Reply
  23. I saw a show on nuclear weapons, and Jesse the demolition expert might be
    able to speak to this … how atmospheric detonations knock stuff over and
    burn stuff in a radius … and that underground nuclear detonations
    literally caused buildings to collapse into the cavern created by the
    nuclear detonation … incredible heat is naturally attracted to the metal
    superstructure … more plausible than the deathray in my estimation …
    and paint a little thermite all up and down the elevator shafts for good
    measure.

    Reply

Post Comment