Were the events leading up to and during 9-11 mere coincidence or – CONSPIRACY? DEDICATED to those who perished on 9-11, our Military, and any fellow human b…
@scorpio881. Found it. 28 April 2009 From videnskab.dk ( Danish science
news service) The Editor in chief resigns after the article on 9/11, “They
have printed the article without my permission" said Marie Paule Pileni who
was UNAWARE and does not agree with conclusions of the paper. i have a link
to the translation of the danish report if you actually are interested in
the "truth". Thermite cannot cut threw steel column "HORIZONTALLY"
"SIDEWAYS" , i challenge you to prove it can.
@JLaw012 I'd love to know where he has admitted that. I couldn't find any
source of information about that with a quick look. If you could tell me
where you've read/heard that? Tell me, in which ways can those dust samples
get contaminated so badly in people's normal home environments that they
can't give trustworthy information? What could change the chemical
composition of the dust so drastically if it's in a plastic bag or in a jar
the whole time? continued…
@scorpio881. Hearing something explode does NOT = demolitions douche! many
things could make explosive noises, like when the elevators fell from the
shafts after the plane struck they went plummeting to the basement, like
the jet fuel that went streaming down the elevator shafts that caught on
fire and shot fire out,like debris falling down from the building and
landing on cars, bodies falling to the ground. Besides that, The facts DO
NOT back up you story no evidence of demolitions was found.
@vengencefrom1979. Operation Northwoods was some idea someone had 30 years
ago which was just one of dozens of other ideas and it was never even
considered as an option because it was a "bad idea". There is nothing we
are gaining from being in either country, we are not in control over there
and we are not getting any oil we have spent billions of dollars. You
assertions are baseless accusations.
@JLaw012 I just told you in my last comment that there are videotapings
where you can hear an explosion. Right here on Youtube once again! Here's
one: /watch?v=_A9X_8flGeM , and on the next one there's more of
eyewitnesses being interviewed on tv and talking about hearing and even
physically FEELING the explosions + news reports about the explosions:
/watch?v=8n-nT-luFIw
@JLaw012 you truly represent everything that is wrong with modern society
congratulations 😀 I just cannot believe that you really have confidence in
your own assertions, i find it somehow comical to the point of absurdity
that people like you not only Exist but that you run around arrogantly
asserting shit that doesnt hold up to even a cursory analysis and yet, it
is absolutely certain, you not only believe this shit, your type is as yet
the Rule and predominates, you are human cancer
@mikecorbeil Also, 16ft is wide enough for a Boeing 757, and some people
have said that it's not fully certain how wide the hole was, saying that it
was anywhere between 16 and 20 feet. People need to be careful about the
strike on the Pentagon, for the "no plane" theory clearly isn't based on
real physical science and empirical evidence. Jim Hoffman provides examples
of huge planes crashing, one in Iran, and smashing into millions or
zillions of tiny pieces.
@JLaw012 You're completely ignoring the forensic evidence for large amounts
of molten iron and thermite. That evidence isn't going away even if you
don't trust the countless witness testimonies. The FACTS that thermitic
materials were found from the WTC dust is on my side, and you didn't
explain it away just by saying: "Oh, well, the editor in chief resigned so
that must mean something…". THAT'S not proper proof for anything.
Especially when she's claiming that she hasn't even read it.
@scorpio881 And secondly, I've seen that "debunking video". It was
hilarious. Did you know that 75% of the National Neographic U.S is owned by
Fox Cable Networks? Don't forget that when you valuate the reliability of
their "testing" next time. They used normal thermite loosely piled around a
steel beam and then claimed that no thermite could ever cut a steel
diagonally or horizontally. How do they think to disproof nano-thermite
usage by using normal thermite against all the physical evidence?
@scorpio881. 1. There is no forensic evidence of thermite, it was allededly
found by someone 6 years AFTER the collapse and no independent lab has been
allowed to verify. 2. It has been proven that thermite cannot cut a steel
column of a skyscraper horizontally(national geographic), like wise there
is no proof showing it could work either. 3. i don't know of what molten
metal you think proves, but i do know that there is not ONE demolition that
can keep metal molten for days or weeks on end.
@JLaw012 you have no fucking idea how irrelevant your inane commentary is
you expect people to take you seriously but it is becoming more and more
apparent with each passing day how irrelevant your (and those like you)
perspective and analysis are am i supposed to show you respect? you clearly
do not even have the self respect to man up to reality – why should i show
you even a scintilla of respect? haha, you fucking clown – you deserve
exactly what you get with your attitude
@JLaw012 Do you know anything about the "WTC meteorites"? Google that just
for the hell of it. But the thing is that the metal didn't harden in
minutes that day or the next days! Now stop an think for a second. What
could have made those temperatures in the rubble possible? One theory is
that there were constant thermitic reactions happening underground. It's
possible since there was unignited nano-thermite particles found in the
dust also, but no-one really knows.
@scorpio881. Harrit admits it. He has not allowed an independent lab to
verify his work, he cannot prove the citizens got the samples from NYC and
one of the ladies was a flower arranger, how do these citizens know how to
take scientific samples of hazardous materials? and why are you ASSUMING it
came from the WTC attack. And the samples were taken 6 years later funny
that you don't know this.
@scorpio881. Oh you mean one of those interviews edited by someone showing
a 10 sec clip of the person saying something that you think supports your
theory? its no mistake they never like to show the whole text or interview
with the people. Again you get off the real topic because you feel safer in
ambiguity. i don't want a link answer the question, what part of the
building did the alleged explosions happen??
@norrisshawn1. Bullshit. You can't blow up an entire skyscraper and have a
video camera literally right in front of it when it started to fall and NOT
pick up ANYTHING! impossible.
You are right. It says nothing about 9/11
http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/topten/usama-bin-laden
@scorpio881. Found it. 28 April 2009 From videnskab.dk ( Danish science
news service) The Editor in chief resigns after the article on 9/11, “They
have printed the article without my permission" said Marie Paule Pileni who
was UNAWARE and does not agree with conclusions of the paper. i have a link
to the translation of the danish report if you actually are interested in
the "truth". Thermite cannot cut threw steel column "HORIZONTALLY"
"SIDEWAYS" , i challenge you to prove it can.
@JLaw012 then you should know a Demolition when you see one
@JLaw012 I'd love to know where he has admitted that. I couldn't find any
source of information about that with a quick look. If you could tell me
where you've read/heard that? Tell me, in which ways can those dust samples
get contaminated so badly in people's normal home environments that they
can't give trustworthy information? What could change the chemical
composition of the dust so drastically if it's in a plastic bag or in a jar
the whole time? continued…
@scorpio881. Hearing something explode does NOT = demolitions douche! many
things could make explosive noises, like when the elevators fell from the
shafts after the plane struck they went plummeting to the basement, like
the jet fuel that went streaming down the elevator shafts that caught on
fire and shot fire out,like debris falling down from the building and
landing on cars, bodies falling to the ground. Besides that, The facts DO
NOT back up you story no evidence of demolitions was found.
@vengencefrom1979. Operation Northwoods was some idea someone had 30 years
ago which was just one of dozens of other ideas and it was never even
considered as an option because it was a "bad idea". There is nothing we
are gaining from being in either country, we are not in control over there
and we are not getting any oil we have spent billions of dollars. You
assertions are baseless accusations.
@JLaw012 I just told you in my last comment that there are videotapings
where you can hear an explosion. Right here on Youtube once again! Here's
one: /watch?v=_A9X_8flGeM , and on the next one there's more of
eyewitnesses being interviewed on tv and talking about hearing and even
physically FEELING the explosions + news reports about the explosions:
/watch?v=8n-nT-luFIw
@JLaw012 you truly represent everything that is wrong with modern society
congratulations 😀 I just cannot believe that you really have confidence in
your own assertions, i find it somehow comical to the point of absurdity
that people like you not only Exist but that you run around arrogantly
asserting shit that doesnt hold up to even a cursory analysis and yet, it
is absolutely certain, you not only believe this shit, your type is as yet
the Rule and predominates, you are human cancer
@diogeneslaertius666, No you explain geostrategic motive and show evidence
linking it to an inside job. Then we can talk, that's what i thought…
@mikecorbeil Also, 16ft is wide enough for a Boeing 757, and some people
have said that it's not fully certain how wide the hole was, saying that it
was anywhere between 16 and 20 feet. People need to be careful about the
strike on the Pentagon, for the "no plane" theory clearly isn't based on
real physical science and empirical evidence. Jim Hoffman provides examples
of huge planes crashing, one in Iran, and smashing into millions or
zillions of tiny pieces.
@JLaw012 You're completely ignoring the forensic evidence for large amounts
of molten iron and thermite. That evidence isn't going away even if you
don't trust the countless witness testimonies. The FACTS that thermitic
materials were found from the WTC dust is on my side, and you didn't
explain it away just by saying: "Oh, well, the editor in chief resigned so
that must mean something…". THAT'S not proper proof for anything.
Especially when she's claiming that she hasn't even read it.
Awesome!!! And yes…Hendrix IS GOD!!! Cheers mate!
@JLaw012 the fact that you cannot understand the geostrategic motive in and
of itself constitutes my refutation
@scorpio881 And secondly, I've seen that "debunking video". It was
hilarious. Did you know that 75% of the National Neographic U.S is owned by
Fox Cable Networks? Don't forget that when you valuate the reliability of
their "testing" next time. They used normal thermite loosely piled around a
steel beam and then claimed that no thermite could ever cut a steel
diagonally or horizontally. How do they think to disproof nano-thermite
usage by using normal thermite against all the physical evidence?
@scorpio881. 1. There is no forensic evidence of thermite, it was allededly
found by someone 6 years AFTER the collapse and no independent lab has been
allowed to verify. 2. It has been proven that thermite cannot cut a steel
column of a skyscraper horizontally(national geographic), like wise there
is no proof showing it could work either. 3. i don't know of what molten
metal you think proves, but i do know that there is not ONE demolition that
can keep metal molten for days or weeks on end.
she was grabbing the piece of his skull or brains that were shot out. i am
sure she knew at that point he was of course shot.
good, but too fast. hard to enjoy the shots.
@JLaw012 you have no fucking idea how irrelevant your inane commentary is
you expect people to take you seriously but it is becoming more and more
apparent with each passing day how irrelevant your (and those like you)
perspective and analysis are am i supposed to show you respect? you clearly
do not even have the self respect to man up to reality – why should i show
you even a scintilla of respect? haha, you fucking clown – you deserve
exactly what you get with your attitude
@JLaw012 Do you know anything about the "WTC meteorites"? Google that just
for the hell of it. But the thing is that the metal didn't harden in
minutes that day or the next days! Now stop an think for a second. What
could have made those temperatures in the rubble possible? One theory is
that there were constant thermitic reactions happening underground. It's
possible since there was unignited nano-thermite particles found in the
dust also, but no-one really knows.
@scorpio881 And the US military is developing new and improved explosives
out of this nano-thermite stuff, This is public information!
@2JOHNNYT Your timing is perfect, that Butt somehow warps time.
@scorpio881. Harrit admits it. He has not allowed an independent lab to
verify his work, he cannot prove the citizens got the samples from NYC and
one of the ladies was a flower arranger, how do these citizens know how to
take scientific samples of hazardous materials? and why are you ASSUMING it
came from the WTC attack. And the samples were taken 6 years later funny
that you don't know this.
@koneye Me to I was the same way you need to check out Jorden Maxwell He
was the go to guy about Zeitgeis
@scorpio881. Oh you mean one of those interviews edited by someone showing
a 10 sec clip of the person saying something that you think supports your
theory? its no mistake they never like to show the whole text or interview
with the people. Again you get off the real topic because you feel safer in
ambiguity. i don't want a link answer the question, what part of the
building did the alleged explosions happen??
@norrisshawn1. Bullshit. You can't blow up an entire skyscraper and have a
video camera literally right in front of it when it started to fall and NOT
pick up ANYTHING! impossible.