Coincidence or Conspiracy Theatre: 9/11 – Inside Job?

Were the events leading up to and during 9-11 mere coincidence or – CONSPIRACY? DEDICATED to those who perished on 9-11, our Military, and any fellow human b…


(Visited 33 times, 1 visits today)

Share This Post

25 Comments - Write a Comment

  1. @scorpio881. Found it. 28 April 2009 From videnskab.dk ( Danish science
    news service) The Editor in chief resigns after the article on 9/11, “They
    have printed the article without my permission" said Marie Paule Pileni who
    was UNAWARE and does not agree with conclusions of the paper. i have a link
    to the translation of the danish report if you actually are interested in
    the "truth". Thermite cannot cut threw steel column "HORIZONTALLY"
    "SIDEWAYS" , i challenge you to prove it can.

    Reply
  2. @JLaw012 I'd love to know where he has admitted that. I couldn't find any
    source of information about that with a quick look. If you could tell me
    where you've read/heard that? Tell me, in which ways can those dust samples
    get contaminated so badly in people's normal home environments that they
    can't give trustworthy information? What could change the chemical
    composition of the dust so drastically if it's in a plastic bag or in a jar
    the whole time? continued…

    Reply
  3. @scorpio881. Hearing something explode does NOT = demolitions douche! many
    things could make explosive noises, like when the elevators fell from the
    shafts after the plane struck they went plummeting to the basement, like
    the jet fuel that went streaming down the elevator shafts that caught on
    fire and shot fire out,like debris falling down from the building and
    landing on cars, bodies falling to the ground. Besides that, The facts DO
    NOT back up you story no evidence of demolitions was found.

    Reply
  4. @vengencefrom1979. Operation Northwoods was some idea someone had 30 years
    ago which was just one of dozens of other ideas and it was never even
    considered as an option because it was a "bad idea". There is nothing we
    are gaining from being in either country, we are not in control over there
    and we are not getting any oil we have spent billions of dollars. You
    assertions are baseless accusations.

    Reply
  5. @JLaw012 I just told you in my last comment that there are videotapings
    where you can hear an explosion. Right here on Youtube once again! Here's
    one: /watch?v=_A9X_8flGeM , and on the next one there's more of
    eyewitnesses being interviewed on tv and talking about hearing and even
    physically FEELING the explosions + news reports about the explosions:
    /watch?v=8n-nT-luFIw

    Reply
  6. @JLaw012 you truly represent everything that is wrong with modern society
    congratulations 😀 I just cannot believe that you really have confidence in
    your own assertions, i find it somehow comical to the point of absurdity
    that people like you not only Exist but that you run around arrogantly
    asserting shit that doesnt hold up to even a cursory analysis and yet, it
    is absolutely certain, you not only believe this shit, your type is as yet
    the Rule and predominates, you are human cancer

    Reply
  7. @diogeneslaertius666, No you explain geostrategic motive and show evidence
    linking it to an inside job. Then we can talk, that's what i thought…

    Reply
  8. @mikecorbeil Also, 16ft is wide enough for a Boeing 757, and some people
    have said that it's not fully certain how wide the hole was, saying that it
    was anywhere between 16 and 20 feet. People need to be careful about the
    strike on the Pentagon, for the "no plane" theory clearly isn't based on
    real physical science and empirical evidence. Jim Hoffman provides examples
    of huge planes crashing, one in Iran, and smashing into millions or
    zillions of tiny pieces.

    Reply
  9. @JLaw012 You're completely ignoring the forensic evidence for large amounts
    of molten iron and thermite. That evidence isn't going away even if you
    don't trust the countless witness testimonies. The FACTS that thermitic
    materials were found from the WTC dust is on my side, and you didn't
    explain it away just by saying: "Oh, well, the editor in chief resigned so
    that must mean something…". THAT'S not proper proof for anything.
    Especially when she's claiming that she hasn't even read it.

    Reply
  10. @scorpio881 And secondly, I've seen that "debunking video". It was
    hilarious. Did you know that 75% of the National Neographic U.S is owned by
    Fox Cable Networks? Don't forget that when you valuate the reliability of
    their "testing" next time. They used normal thermite loosely piled around a
    steel beam and then claimed that no thermite could ever cut a steel
    diagonally or horizontally. How do they think to disproof nano-thermite
    usage by using normal thermite against all the physical evidence?

    Reply
  11. @scorpio881. 1. There is no forensic evidence of thermite, it was allededly
    found by someone 6 years AFTER the collapse and no independent lab has been
    allowed to verify. 2. It has been proven that thermite cannot cut a steel
    column of a skyscraper horizontally(national geographic), like wise there
    is no proof showing it could work either. 3. i don't know of what molten
    metal you think proves, but i do know that there is not ONE demolition that
    can keep metal molten for days or weeks on end.

    Reply
  12. WonderWomanFan4life · Edit

    she was grabbing the piece of his skull or brains that were shot out. i am
    sure she knew at that point he was of course shot.

    Reply
  13. @JLaw012 you have no fucking idea how irrelevant your inane commentary is
    you expect people to take you seriously but it is becoming more and more
    apparent with each passing day how irrelevant your (and those like you)
    perspective and analysis are am i supposed to show you respect? you clearly
    do not even have the self respect to man up to reality – why should i show
    you even a scintilla of respect? haha, you fucking clown – you deserve
    exactly what you get with your attitude

    Reply
  14. @JLaw012 Do you know anything about the "WTC meteorites"? Google that just
    for the hell of it. But the thing is that the metal didn't harden in
    minutes that day or the next days! Now stop an think for a second. What
    could have made those temperatures in the rubble possible? One theory is
    that there were constant thermitic reactions happening underground. It's
    possible since there was unignited nano-thermite particles found in the
    dust also, but no-one really knows.

    Reply
  15. @scorpio881 And the US military is developing new and improved explosives
    out of this nano-thermite stuff, This is public information!

    Reply
  16. @scorpio881. Harrit admits it. He has not allowed an independent lab to
    verify his work, he cannot prove the citizens got the samples from NYC and
    one of the ladies was a flower arranger, how do these citizens know how to
    take scientific samples of hazardous materials? and why are you ASSUMING it
    came from the WTC attack. And the samples were taken 6 years later funny
    that you don't know this.

    Reply
  17. @scorpio881. Oh you mean one of those interviews edited by someone showing
    a 10 sec clip of the person saying something that you think supports your
    theory? its no mistake they never like to show the whole text or interview
    with the people. Again you get off the real topic because you feel safer in
    ambiguity. i don't want a link answer the question, what part of the
    building did the alleged explosions happen??

    Reply
  18. @norrisshawn1. Bullshit. You can't blow up an entire skyscraper and have a
    video camera literally right in front of it when it started to fall and NOT
    pick up ANYTHING! impossible.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Joshua Roberts Cancel reply