BASE Jumpers Arrested For One World Trade Center Stunt

“Four New York-area men were arrested Monday after a BASE jumping stunt from atop One World Trade Center in September, police said. Watch the full WTC video …


(Visited 9 times, 1 visits today)

Share This Post

31 Comments - Write a Comment

  1. It's more than trespassing. You get caught sneaking in and having a
    sandwich and its trespassing. They are exposing the building and its owners
    to risk, then landing on the street, compounding the risk to others.
    So misdemeanor charges are appropriate, but a whole bunch of them and if
    there is any time to serve, make it consecutive.
    Charging them with fraud is telling. The message they want to send is that
    the prosecution can over reach and arbitrary punishments will not fit the
    crime. Fear our power.

    As for the security, I guess they just don't take a terrorist threat to the
    world trade center seriously.

    Reply
  2. So they are made an example 6 months after they did the jump. And only
    because a teenager also slipped through security. What a load of crap.
    Spend the money a trial will cost on the security. They made a video, it's
    not like they were hiding and only now they are found. Security messed up
    big time twice and instead of fixing that they redirect attention on the
    base jumpers.
    Oh and sending a message will not work. Base jumpers are thrill seekers. It
    will only attract more of them because of the added threat. 

    Reply
  3. I agree with Anna because I do believe if one place should be secure tight
    it should be the WTC. And if average civilians are able to sneak in who
    know's if there's already a trap in the building.

    Reply
  4. Why should they be arrested for base jumping? It's a monument, so what? Get
    over it. These are just teenagers and young guys base jumping. I do agree
    that they trespassed and that's a law and a fair one but that should
    warrent any serious time.

    Reply
  5. eh, let them go. The world trade center's security shouldn't be so shitty
    and if they get away with this then I can see nothing getting done about
    the actual security issues.

    The more you talk about these base jumpers the more I like em. They totally
    should sue because of security, because they probably should have had
    better security! XD

    Reply
  6. Get em Anna. As a freerunner I'm somewhat sympathetic to the base jumpers
    but who doesn't know that of all the bad ideas, choosing the WTC is
    probably the worst thing you could possibly do. There's bad and then
    there's stupid. On the other hand we should be giving them a medal of some
    sorts for showing how terrible the security was and how much it needs fixed
    before someone we didn't want finding out found out first. You know hacker
    logic.

    Reply
  7. Slipping past normal security at a construction of a tower is easy…
    People do it all the time with many different towers.
    I also how Ana instantly assumes towers have top notch security… this
    isn't a federal reserve building… This isn't some sort of military
    arsenal building… this isn't the FBI headquarters… this is simply a
    commercial tower.
    I also found it sad how Ana referred to 9/11 as an excuse for these
    buildings needing better security… Good security in buildings don't
    prevent a major terrorist attack that has nothing to do with internal
    building security.

    People should face some consequences for committing such actions… the
    severity depends of course… I honestly doubt they are gonna get serious
    sentences.

    Reply
  8. What the fuck is wrong with him, that he thinks it's good for society that
    you ARREST people for base jumping…. It is not for their safety, that's
    fucking disingenuous.

    Reply
  9. I find it extremely hard to condemn these people when they doing something
    that looks cool as shit.
    Base jumpers are to cool to jail, Let Em Go!

    Reply
  10. Firstly its breaking an entering, its tresspassing on goverment property &
    what the fuck are people going to do about the goverment? most of you voted
    these people in…

    Reply
  11. Ana, do you thoroughly think through your arguments before you develop such
    strong opinions? If not, wtf are you doing selling opinion and news to
    people. If you do, and this is what you come up with than your narcissism
    knows no bounds. You seem to identify with some sort of millennial
    generation culture, if this is the attitude that culture produces your
    parents should be publicly shamed en masse. 

    Reply
  12. The reason they should not face stiffer charges is very simple: the justice
    system is not a megaphone for the cops. The law is to be applied equally to
    all, and the fact that the NYPD is embarrassed and wants to beat its chest
    is completely irrelevant.

    Furthermore, what exactly is this message of theirs going to accomplish? It
    may well deter other thrill seekers, yes, but the real concern here should
    be the vulnerability of the trade center to attack. And anyone bent on
    attacking the trade center will give precisely zero shits about their
    stiffer penalties.

    Stiffer penalties for the thrill seekers is just NYPD's attempt to avoid
    future humiliation rather than actually doing their jobs.

    Reply
  13. Gabryal Sansclair · Edit

    I guess we're lucky they NYPD didn't shoot them down from a helicopter on
    the way down…

    God it's depressing when reality and my exaggerated statement aren't that
    far apart

    Reply
  14. I suspect Cenk will be more outraged when the sentencing is carried out and
    it turns out they get more time than some people who murder people.

    Reply
  15. Ana is being stupid again, ofcouse they should send a message. Make an
    example of these people, they not only endanger themselves they endanger
    other's lives. They land in the middle of traffic what if they cause an
    traffic accident or land on someone or land on a powerline or any number of
    things that can cause harm to others.

    So far all the charges ana read is exactly what they did.

    Reply
  16. What Anna is saying is the equivalent of being blamed for someone breaking
    into your house because you didn't take enough precautions. 

    Reply
  17. Totally with Ana on this one. How bad is security at the WTC even after
    they have been completely wiped down to the ground? What a joke. You
    will get groped at the air port, but you can walk in masked and with a
    parachute at the WTC? LMAO!!!!

    Reply

Post Comment