Abby Martin “9/11 Truther” Controversy Explodes!! Inside Job or not?

I've always avoided the "inside job" mantra when referring to the 9-11
attacks
.Obviously major elements of secret agencies and military units were
involved.
The cover up however involves government complicity on a massive scale .

Ehud Barak, the prime minister of Israel until March of 2001, came to the
U.S. shortly after leaving office. He came, ostensibly, to work as a
special advisor for Electronic Data Systems and as a consultant with SCP
Partners, a Mossad-run private equity company focused on "security related"
work. SCP Partners did business with Metallurg Holding, Inc., as well as
Advanced Metallurgical Group, both sharing the same Wayne, PA address. AMG
specializes in the production of the same super-thermite used to collapse
the three skyscrapers on 9/11.

I have stopped claiming any conspiracy as well when dealing with hard
minded people. Since the burden of proof is on the gov't, I simply just
raise the unanswered question regarding conservation of momentum in
WTC1,2,7. And ask for a replicable experiment which can prove the official
explanation. No one has yet answered my question, and they usually shut up
or move the goal post.
The video "9/11 explained in 5 minutes" I think sets it pretty straight, if
anyone really believes in the official story, well then there is probably
nothing I can say to convince them otherwise, since they'll probably
believe in anything.

I figured out Abby Martin is a sell out when she had Oliver Stone and his
writer from his dis-info history mini series he did for "Showtime". They
both were doing product placement by slugging down cans of Coke-a-Cola
while the interview was going on. It's her show & she didn't even say
anything! ! It's on YouTube. Also, she has had on Michael Ruppert, & also
went on his show.

Ruppert's book "Crossing the Rubicon" is the definitive account of 9/11 &
is the main reason why people know who Ruppert is . Ruppert convinced me
without any physical evidence. They took it all away. It's all gone. Ask
Abby Martin 2 questions. "What about Tower 7 & what about the Put Options?"
Hats off to her if she can explain away those points.

She has no integrity if she wont investigate the truth the way
Ruppert did, the way Gary Webb did, & the way Alfred McCoy did. In my
opinion, she's just a very hot looking talking head.

Well, here’s one big problem with saying 9/11 was somehow NOT an inside
job: who destroyed the crime scene? Who, in 13 days, shipped over 95% of
the Trade Center remains to either Chinese recycling facilities (in
mainland China) or else dumped them from barges into the Atlantic and
Pacific oceans? Did Osama bin Laden’s leftover moles do that? No, our
government did. Cheney, Rumsfeld and Rice—the 3 persons who, amongst a
cadre of Israeli-American dual citizens—were running our gov’t at the time.
Any investigation conducted beforehand? Nope.

Still another big problem with saying it wasn’t an inside job: how did we
come across this notion bin-Laden and only bin-Laden was the primary
suspect? Did we determine that out of any thorough investigation of
evidence? Of course not—there was no investigation; the guilty party was
simply “declared” to us by US gov’t officials and corporate media outlets
whose directors sit on the US Council of Foreign Relations, which is an
agency established by John D. Rockefeller to bring corporate heads and US
officials in line with the interests of the privately-owned Federal Reserve.

A third big problem with saying it wasn’t an inside job: who was likely to
benefit from the US military invasions of Afghanistan et all that were sure
to follow? Bin Laden? Muslims the world over? Of course not. Again, the
minters of our nation’s specie, US Federal Reserve Notes—these are the
primary persons most likely to benefit from any petrocurrency wars, seeing
as they’re minting the currency—it would just get the rest of the nation
owing them such outrageous sums of money we’d have no choice but to go
along with whatever they wanted. They would become our de facto government
even more so than they already were—completely unelected and completely
unaccountable. “No agency of government can overrule decisions that we
make”—straight from the lips of former Fed chairman Alan Greenspan.

So, you have a crime scene wherein all the evidence is moved, then most of
it destroyed prior to the investigation. The persons who destroyed it are
the same persons who reported the crime. They are also the same persons who
blamed the suspect. This is why Osama bin-Laden was never indicted by the
FBI: you cannot indict someone without reasonable and provable grounds for
suspicion. There were no such grounds—his guilt was an empty declaration.

The reason it worked so well is when your own nation’s “ruling elders” are
the most likely guilty suspects, that changes a great deal about what your
own future is likely to be. After all, if they had no compunction against
murdering nearly 3,000 Americans in one day just to start a takeover of
oil-rich governments overseas, chances are they have no compunction against
doing it again—and when they do, you might have the honor of being the next
“World Trade Center jumper”.

It also changes-around what you can teach your own children about anything.
If the persons in charge of your nation’s “rule of law” no longer care
about the law, no longer honor it, then it’s only a matter of time before
everyone underneath them stops caring about it as well.

So, it’s like this: grandpa murders grandma, destroying the evidence
immediately afterward. He then tries to frame it on those hoodie-wearing
young black males down the street. There isn’t any evidence to convict a
single hoodlum, aside from grandpa’s say-so. In contrast, there is much to
suggest he did it himself for the insurance money. What do the surviving
family members do?

They go along with grandpa despite every single one of their own intuitive
suspicions declaring him guilty as sin. They go along, as to do otherwise
is “remove” the orderliness of the whole family. How do you teach your
children to respect their elders—any elder—when their elders do such things
as these? How do you take any pride in your own family?

Furthermore, how do you even begin to apologize to the black “hoodlums” who
aren’t really hoodlums anyway, so much as so many disenfranchised youth
trying to get by in their own ghetto? This, after the fact your police have
now killed about 100 of their people for the slaying of grandma? When your
entire family’s income and identity is now based on contributions from
those who support “bringing black thugs to justice for their black-on-what
crimes”?

You then have family members who come out and say, “Well, I think grandpa
had foreknowledge and let it happen anyway,” as well as a few others who
say, “I think he had foreknowledge and even left the door unlocked for the
crooks.” They’re all full of shit. The only “crook” is grandpa, and they
inwardly know this—only to admit as much, again, nullifies everything
they’re teaching their children, as well as all the monetary and civilizing
abstracts they reap from being related to grandpa, themselves.

And that’s how you turn America into a nation of liars.

It’s why Abby Martin is a liar—and why I no longer subscribe to her channel.

And why pursue the truth anyway? Why do I pursue it?

Because it’s who I am, that’s why. I stopped being related to grandpa a
long time ago. I’ve since lived the bulk of my adult life as an orphan.
Therefore, I don’t care what he says, nor what his sycophantic family
members say. I’m not part of their family anymore.

And this doesn’t mean I don’t still support “America” as a concept, that I
don’t still love America as a concept. I very much do. I love it for all it
could be, rather than for anything it presently is. Not every nation on the
planet has a glorious future. America does—but it’s not the sort of glory
it imagines. It’s glorious for other reasons. Glorious, because by then it
will have long since overcome the same obstacles it currently mistakes as
part and parcel to American existence. Greed. Mercilessness.
Power-for-power’s-sake. Intemperate self-interest. Vendettas. Lust and
envy. Flat-out stupidity. Total hypocrisy.

It will overcome these by nearly destroying itself in toto. There is no
other way, nor even any means of altering the grim path it is already on.
It has firmly bound itself in the ropes and chains leading straight to
hell. It will divide, then divide a thousand times over. It will be ruled
by marauding gangs—this, more so than Somalia was for 21 years. And in the
end there will be very little left. However, what is left—that much really
will be great. Really will be glorious, magnificent. And it will be such
because its people will have finally learned to care about one another as
they do themselves. Love each other as they love themselves. But not before
then.

And does saying this make me a “mean and ugly man”?

Good. I’m glad everyone now knows what I am. I was getting tired of
covering it up.

However, I so wish Americans really could clarify what they define as
“beauty”—what they themselves uphold as a single ideal. This, rather than
having such things spoon-fed them by their behind-the-scenes cultural
leaders, by a handful of men with stronger minds (and smaller hearts) than
their own. But right now they can’t. They’re too weak. This is the
“go-along-with-grandpa” era, the go-along-to-get-along with the powers that
be. And so it gets what it gets—this, in the way of deception—in the way of
exploitation—in the way of ruin. And so I’ll take my ugliness. It so
happens I favor mine over the version(s) otherwise offered.

WTC7 is the main smoking gun. The pentagon is not far behind…

I don't really see Abby's reluctance to go full on with it. Other
investigative journalists have no problem with saying "9/11 was an inside
job." <- Period. James Corbett and Jon Rappoport (a journalists'
journalist) for example. At this stage of the game, there is no time for
"pulling punches" and "pussyfooting" (LOL) around it.

Fuck you and tour shitty spam channel. Get out of my recommendations page,
fag. I will be reporting you until then


Who cares what this self-admitted ignorant dilettante says? Stop giving her
oxygen, she's just another presstitute looking for the next rung on the
career ladder.

Building 7. Larry Silverstein (owner and profiteer of building 7 collapse)
on video saying, "we were tired of seeing the loss of life, so we decided
to 'pull it' and then watched the building collapse."

Truther: 9/11 was an inside job.
Debunker: No, it wasn't.

DEBUNKED: 9/11 was an inside job.

…4SURE…there is absolutely positively…NO DOUBT…that the 9-11 fairy tale is
beyond ridiculous & only a complete…MORON…would not realize that yet…

when she said that someone should have THEN asked 'so, then, if that is so,
do you agree with the official narrative of 9/11?'

Tarpley for FED head

main stream corrupt media will always stray away from 911….or call all
those who believe911was an in side job as crazies….the truth is out there
for those who wish to see truth…there is no god higher than truth……