2012 version was taken down, this version has more witnesses. For people who ask – who ordered 9/11 and why? Link below. What is the Illuminati?: http://www….
(Visited 22 times, 1 visits today)
2013 WTC Drone/Military Plane Attack Proof (MUST SEE) New Witnesses
I thought it was funny in the video:
"It wasn't no commercial airliner or anything. It was a big, gray, two-engine plane".
Hmmmm…
I'm not arguing a known truth. The sun is at the center, we all know that.
Difference: Kuyper, Copernicus, DaVinci all confirm it through observing and testing. You haven't done any of that. Others have, and you're just parroting their findings.
Furthermore, you know nothing. You are a YouTube kid living in your moms basement.
defenitly does not look like a comercial airplane
Każdy widział inny samolot. W innym filmie ktoś równie głupi jest przekonany, że to nie był samolot tylko kula. Dlaczego ludzie doszukują się debilnych spisków i nie mogą uwierzyć w oficjalną (i zarazem prawdziwą) wersję o zamachu terrorystycznym?
Yea, flat earthers were once the 'majority' shit for brains. Many other examples of the majority turning out to be wrong i'm sure. You're a flat earther, clinging to your childish need to have authority do the 'thinking' for you, bless.
hahahahahahahahaha
Talking bs again. How many of the total number of architects and engineers have been asked their personal opinion? Taken a poll? You assume, that's all. Their silence doesn't mean they necessarily default to the official bs. They have careers and families. What reward is there is speaking up? Ridicule, or career death (or worse) mostly. You have shit for brains little micro-human.
Nope. Many surviviing familiy members don't buy the official crap. The majority is not always right. The tabloid readers are YOU (the irony!). We've never seen Elvis alive after his death. The name is 'Occam', not 'Aukum'.
Go listen to george carlin and bill hicks and wake up.
And anybody who 'votes' for anybody is already a chump.
Nope. 9/11 commissioners trashed their own report. Being starved of funds, having the Bush admina and CIA lie to them and having inside man Zelikow in overall control (not to mention his secret chit-chats with Bush man karl rove) "We were set up to fail" they concluded. Poeple don't talk tho, they have jobs and families, sad truth. They're just aren't too many 'Serpicos' left. When someone does speak up though, you guys dismiss them out-of-hand as nuts. Your condition is called terminal denial.
This video is extremely relevant and on-point, except for the alleged perpetrators. See the following link, "100 Critical Points About 9/11" for details (remove spaces):
instablogg . com / ruqhtm8
watch?v=3jqHV9KS35E
9-11 The Pentagon The Evidence & Conspiracy - Barbara Honegger Pdx 911 Truth
Give this treatise consideration, meditate upon the information presented.
Let there be PEACE between all citizens of the United States of America.
"None of the engineers at AE911 aren't even structural engineers."
None means zero, right? From the AE911Truth org website…
Here's one (1) of many…
Jonathan Smolens, Structural Engineer, license# 38969
Great!!!
Europe's foremost expert on controlled demolitions, Danny Jowenko (RIP), disagrees with you.
/watch?v=877gr6xtQIc
I find it hilarious how you keep with the "minority is right, majority who know better is wrong" mentality. Anything to incriminate Bush and Cheney, regardless of the evidence. Can y'all say "witch hunt"?
Europe's foremost expert on controlled demolitions, Danny Jowenko (RIP), disagrees with you.
/watch?v=877gr6xtQIc
I just received an update from your 6 subscribers.
Their moms said they would be home from day-care later tonight.
If they have enough energy after watching mario brothers, I'll ask them if they know you have a PhD in children's cartoons.
1847 bottom-graduate student loan-owing unemployable crappy engineers all say "No way", while FEMA, 911 commission, NYPD and FDNY, the DOT, CIA, survivors, most eyewitnesses, people who voted for Ross Perot, UFOlogists, and Matt Damon all agree that it was terrorism.
A couple of those are unnecessary, but further illustrate the point.
Dude, nobody but you paranoid sociopaths believe you.you might as well be saying it was aliens or Elvis.
It wouldn't matter anyway. These freaks don't want to believe in the bell curve, the Aukum's Razor principle, nothing. Only some wacky Elvis-sighting bullshit tabloid mag reader would believe.
No explanation will suffice. 3 weirdos in here say "the popular story is a lie", whilst millions, including surviving family members, all say the same thing.
None of the engineers at AE911 aren't even structural engineers.
That's an extremely small number compared to the total number of architects and engineers in the US, who disagree with them and consider the A&E911 people to be a fringe group.
1,864 Architects and Engineers at AE911Truth org disagree with you.
The news is that two main steam media sites (TheAge and SMH) in Australia are now hosting the film "9/11: Explosive Evidence — Experts Speak Out"
Made by AE911Truth org and their 1,800+ Architects and Engineers that use science to prove the official 9/11 story is a fable.
Oh, and it was far less than "285 x", more like 25 to 100x. Nice exaggeration there, though! Always typical of Truthers, overinflating their claims!
Yes the Pentagon has a "no fly zone" but it doesn't extend 50 miles. If it did, no planes at any DC area airport would be able to take off.
Now come on, disprove me. Show evidence rather just posting "wrong, wrong again, you're a degenerate". Oh, wait. Everyone knows a Truther that simply posts "You're wrong" or "you're a shill" is not to be questioned! /sarcasm
If you're going to debunk what really happened, by way of "your theory," then you really should learn how to spell. At 4:50/4:51 the very end in () reads, "Proof in Discription." Should read, "Proof in Description," not "Discription." Anyhow, I'm not buying your theory. Just saying.
-wrong
-the pentagon has a no fly zone. wrong again
-wrong again.
You're a degenerate
Oh…they proven 285 x the regular amount of…is normal…Go F yourself
And the Windsor Building also burned for hours and suffered (partial) collapse. But the difference between that structure and the Towers, the Windsor Building didn't have a plane slam into it, damaging the exoskeleton steel.
The "put option" was investigated and found to be not unusual.
There is no "no fly zone" in the area you're describing, due to the fact that (then-called) Washington National Airport is INSIDE Washington DC city limits. And Dulles Airport is 26 miles west of DC, and there are numerous smaller regional airports in the DC metro area.
1. It wasn't jet fuel alone
2. It didn't take "1 hour" to demolish both Towers
3. Building 7 was hit and damaged by flaming debris from the North Tower (Tower 1) and was left to burn until collapse.
4. How many OTHER 110 story buildings do you know of that got hit by a jet going several hundred MPH then collapsed?
5. Steel LOSES INTEGRITY as it's heated. At 1,100F steel has 50% normal strength and at 1,800F has 10% strength.
Please don't talk about science if you believe jet fuel randomly dispersed fires can demolish 2 intact skyscraper's in 1 hour and then somehow ignites fires on another skyscraper that then decides to get demolished in 7 hours, what kind of fire takes 7 hours to weaken the critical lower columns to cause a symmetrical collapse.
Really, what burns for 7 hours and at temperatures to weaken structural steel?
Something to think about you idiot, take your time.