On September 11th 2001 there were ‘terrorist attacks in NYC and in Washington D.C. One ‘plane’ hit the Pentagon and two other ones hit WTC1 & 2…so why did …
Jesus christ. Even IF 9/11 were an inside job and this guy was in on it,
why would he reveal on national television that he ordered the demolition
of one of the buildings? Like, did you truthers spend ANY TIME AT ALL to
think this shit over?
God, you truthers are idiots. Stupid. Fucking. Idiots.
They contradict each other… 'And there were no bodies to recover…'
'There was such terrible loss of life that…' Oh wait, as that the point
of this clip?
Question….department of defense releases a fake bun laden video which
they deem proof of his involvement; yet this actual video not edited shows
the actual man saying PULL IT HOW IS THIS NOT THIS PROOF BUT THAT FAKE ASS
BIN LADEN TAPE IS FUCK U MORONS 911 SHADY
hi guys, i am Charlie Veitch in a Pseudonym. I have spent time within the
company of a C.I.A. agent and i can tel you all that he basically revealed
to me that the 9/11 job was NOT an inside job!
How many times before has the fire chief called someone personally to ask
what THEY want the fire department do about their burning building? And the
owner basically say, "Stop what you are doing and let it burn down." Is
that normally a procedure? Seems a little shady.
They have just finished rebuilding WTC 7. Next thing Larry will be telling
us is that it had never been pulled, and that what he meant by "pull it"
was pulling in the renovation crew after the fires, because office supply
fires don't bring steel frame buildings down!
I got caught wanking once by my mother so she told the local catholic
priest. When he announced it in in a packed midnight mass I stood up and
said, "when my mother told the priest she had caught me pulling it she was
actually referring to me pulling my pencil out of my bag to do my homework.
So the Fire Dept.commander called the owner for permission to "pull" the
building. How did the commander accomplish that task? Did he personally
go around and set demos everywhere in the building in less than an hour?
Where did the commander get the explosives from? Were they sitting around
the fire house on some shelf?
I won't reply directly to superboredom but more directly to his vacuous
comment.
People get their script wrong. Lary Silverstein's use of 'pull it' is then
followed by a few other phrases which provide context …. not too hard to
follow.
I'm very skeptical of the official story regarding 911, but I believe "pull
it" was his way of saying to get the responders out of the building, in
order to preserve their lives and avoid further casualties.
"…we've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is
pull it" – i.e. withdraw those currently inside and don't send anymore.
One thing we need to see is the whole original tape of Silverstein in this
interview. It seems to me that should be released from start to finish. The
trouble with edited versions is they can be used in any context. Thats why
so many people make their own recording when being interviewed by a
journalist nowadays so they can put it on to youtube as in the case of
Niels Harrit who was wise enough to do so for the hatchet job the BBC
attempted on him for their pathetic conspiracy files show. Also
Silvertein should be interviewed by someone who is really going to
challenge his account. The interviewer with Silverstein must have entered
into some kind of context prior to what we have been shown and we need to
see the whole thing warts and all. I get the feeling what we are being
shown is similar to the pentagon "plane dissapearing between frames"
video. Ah maybe thats it maybe something Silverstein said in this interview
had dissapeared in between frames. In the context of where the Shanksville
plane was supposed to end up and what the pre planned target was its more
fishy than a fishy fish that a building collapses in its own footprint at
freefall speed when we are being told the reason for the other two
buildings collapsing was plane impact and the fires caused after impact.
Whats more amazing is that the original 9/11 commission report didn't even
think it necessary to even mention Tower 7. Its more than reasonable to
suspect a forth plane was scheduled to hit Tower 7 prior to the "pulling"
of "the fire service rescue operation" and that forth plane impact target
didn't go according to plan. Instead it got swallowed up by some dirt and
just dissapeared!!! Next Bush will be telling us he instructed the CIA to
carry out attacks on 9/11 and then clarify by saying, "I was referring
to the emergency services number 911 and telling the CIA to carry out some
old files on improving the ambulance service and put them in the garbage".
'Pull it' refers to demolition, Christmas crackers and pleasing yourself.
It does not and never has had any meaning in terms of evacuation of
buildings.
Free fall is the critical issue with all THREE buildings – you can't have
free fall if there's something stopping the fall ….. . I'm not sure why
this is such a difficult concept to grasp.
Free fall doesn't just mean that the building came down 'quicker than
expected.'
Drop a stone over the edge of a cliff and that is free fall
@0:43 Larry Silverstein explains why he told the New York fire department
to implode Building 7 in response to the tremendous loss of life. A few
things:
1. No one except for people trained in demolition can just rig a building
of that composition and just blow it up.
2. A demolition of that size takes weeks of planning.
3. Firefighters aren't trained in demolition and they don't perform
demolition.
4. Not Larry's call.
5. Some people still don't know tower 7 went down.
Yes I know. But Larry is not a proffesional. Neither is I. I've always
thought of "Pull it" as a "go for it", "take it down", "bring it on" kinf
of therm. ALWAYS. That however of course doesn't prove anything. BUT he
also said "..and then we watched the tower fall." What does that mean? He
didn't change subject so I'm assuming that he was talking about WTC7 in the
previous statements. And that firecheaf he said he talked too, denies
having that talk with Larry.
"The roof did its job, the gravity engine worked. It provided the energy we
needed to "PULL" the columns inward," said Mark Loizeaux, president of
Controlled Demolition Inc., the Maryland-based company whose handiwork
brought down the Dome." – Seattle Post Intelligencer – Demolition of King
Dome – Quote by Controlled Demoltion official Do you suppose "cables" were
used to "PULL" a Dome down?
Majority of those who died on 911 were bankers and "defense" people. Its
pretty fair to say that 911 was over 50% justified based on the professions
of those who died. We learned in 2003 that the so called "defense industry"
will do anything it can to bilk the american taxpayer. We learned the same
lesson about bankers in 08. These two groups have robbed the nation of its
savings. For those who cant afford healthcare, thats life or death. If
anything, a fuck ton of moochers were killed on 911.
Does it make perfecty sense that a building was announced has fallen
20minutes BEFORE it actually did on BBC news? Does it make sense that it is
the only building in the world to collapse after 2 0r 3 fires? Does it make
sense to fall in freefall speed and that the videos show squibs coming out
of windows?
"We have never, ever heard the term 'pull it' being used to refer to the
explosive demolition of a building, and neither has any blast team we've
spoken with." -Brent Blanchard of Protec in A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF WTC
TOWERS 1, 2, & 7 FROM AN EXPLOSIVES AND CONVENTIONAL DEMOLITION VIEWPOINT
"►IMPLOSION◄ is a process where a small amount of ►EXPLOSIVES◄ is used to
disrupt selected supports in a building. This allows gravity to "PULL" the
structure down in a controlled manner." -University of Louisiana
"I'm glad somebody brought up the Larry Silverstein comment, because we
certainly looked at that… What he says is "they decided to "pull" which
is referring to the fire department. And of course in some circles of the
controlled demolition industry "Pull" is used to mean that you actually
demolish a building." -Benjamin Chertoff, Researcher for Popular Mechanics,
on Coast to Coast AM – March 5, 2005
Your first point is incomprehensible. Your second point about it is easily
answered. Pull it, as in pull the firefighting crew or pull the
firefighting operation or pull the plug on the operation. You couldn't
figure that out yourself?
"Phase 1 continued to fall, helping to "PULL" Phase 2 in. Phase 2 was
►DETONATED◄ several seconds later and collapsed and fell the same as Phase
1." – Controlled-Demolition Inc – Imploding The Kingdome
Jesus christ. Even IF 9/11 were an inside job and this guy was in on it,
why would he reveal on national television that he ordered the demolition
of one of the buildings? Like, did you truthers spend ANY TIME AT ALL to
think this shit over?
God, you truthers are idiots. Stupid. Fucking. Idiots.
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/silvers…
They contradict each other… 'And there were no bodies to recover…'
'There was such terrible loss of life that…' Oh wait, as that the point
of this clip?
Question….department of defense releases a fake bun laden video which
they deem proof of his involvement; yet this actual video not edited shows
the actual man saying PULL IT HOW IS THIS NOT THIS PROOF BUT THAT FAKE ASS
BIN LADEN TAPE IS FUCK U MORONS 911 SHADY
hi guys, i am Charlie Veitch in a Pseudonym. I have spent time within the
company of a C.I.A. agent and i can tel you all that he basically revealed
to me that the 9/11 job was NOT an inside job!
How many times before has the fire chief called someone personally to ask
what THEY want the fire department do about their burning building? And the
owner basically say, "Stop what you are doing and let it burn down." Is
that normally a procedure? Seems a little shady.
They have just finished rebuilding WTC 7. Next thing Larry will be telling
us is that it had never been pulled, and that what he meant by "pull it"
was pulling in the renovation crew after the fires, because office supply
fires don't bring steel frame buildings down!
I got caught wanking once by my mother so she told the local catholic
priest. When he announced it in in a packed midnight mass I stood up and
said, "when my mother told the priest she had caught me pulling it she was
actually referring to me pulling my pencil out of my bag to do my homework.
No one believed me!!!
So the Fire Dept.commander called the owner for permission to "pull" the
building. How did the commander accomplish that task? Did he personally
go around and set demos everywhere in the building in less than an hour?
Where did the commander get the explosives from? Were they sitting around
the fire house on some shelf?
I won't reply directly to superboredom but more directly to his vacuous
comment.
People get their script wrong. Lary Silverstein's use of 'pull it' is then
followed by a few other phrases which provide context …. not too hard to
follow.
I'm very skeptical of the official story regarding 911, but I believe "pull
it" was his way of saying to get the responders out of the building, in
order to preserve their lives and avoid further casualties.
"…we've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is
pull it" – i.e. withdraw those currently inside and don't send anymore.
One thing we need to see is the whole original tape of Silverstein in this
interview. It seems to me that should be released from start to finish. The
trouble with edited versions is they can be used in any context. Thats why
so many people make their own recording when being interviewed by a
journalist nowadays so they can put it on to youtube as in the case of
Niels Harrit who was wise enough to do so for the hatchet job the BBC
attempted on him for their pathetic conspiracy files show. Also
Silvertein should be interviewed by someone who is really going to
challenge his account. The interviewer with Silverstein must have entered
into some kind of context prior to what we have been shown and we need to
see the whole thing warts and all. I get the feeling what we are being
shown is similar to the pentagon "plane dissapearing between frames"
video. Ah maybe thats it maybe something Silverstein said in this interview
had dissapeared in between frames. In the context of where the Shanksville
plane was supposed to end up and what the pre planned target was its more
fishy than a fishy fish that a building collapses in its own footprint at
freefall speed when we are being told the reason for the other two
buildings collapsing was plane impact and the fires caused after impact.
Whats more amazing is that the original 9/11 commission report didn't even
think it necessary to even mention Tower 7. Its more than reasonable to
suspect a forth plane was scheduled to hit Tower 7 prior to the "pulling"
of "the fire service rescue operation" and that forth plane impact target
didn't go according to plan. Instead it got swallowed up by some dirt and
just dissapeared!!! Next Bush will be telling us he instructed the CIA to
carry out attacks on 9/11 and then clarify by saying, "I was referring
to the emergency services number 911 and telling the CIA to carry out some
old files on improving the ambulance service and put them in the garbage".
'Pull it' refers to demolition, Christmas crackers and pleasing yourself.
It does not and never has had any meaning in terms of evacuation of
buildings.
Free fall is the critical issue with all THREE buildings – you can't have
free fall if there's something stopping the fall ….. . I'm not sure why
this is such a difficult concept to grasp.
Free fall doesn't just mean that the building came down 'quicker than
expected.'
Drop a stone over the edge of a cliff and that is free fall
@0:43 Larry Silverstein explains why he told the New York fire department
to implode Building 7 in response to the tremendous loss of life. A few
things:
1. No one except for people trained in demolition can just rig a building
of that composition and just blow it up.
2. A demolition of that size takes weeks of planning.
3. Firefighters aren't trained in demolition and they don't perform
demolition.
4. Not Larry's call.
5. Some people still don't know tower 7 went down.
Yes I know. But Larry is not a proffesional. Neither is I. I've always
thought of "Pull it" as a "go for it", "take it down", "bring it on" kinf
of therm. ALWAYS. That however of course doesn't prove anything. BUT he
also said "..and then we watched the tower fall." What does that mean? He
didn't change subject so I'm assuming that he was talking about WTC7 in the
previous statements. And that firecheaf he said he talked too, denies
having that talk with Larry.
EVIL GREEDY KIKE is definitely going to be burning in hell (if there is
one) believe that.
"The roof did its job, the gravity engine worked. It provided the energy we
needed to "PULL" the columns inward," said Mark Loizeaux, president of
Controlled Demolition Inc., the Maryland-based company whose handiwork
brought down the Dome." – Seattle Post Intelligencer – Demolition of King
Dome – Quote by Controlled Demoltion official Do you suppose "cables" were
used to "PULL" a Dome down?
Majority of those who died on 911 were bankers and "defense" people. Its
pretty fair to say that 911 was over 50% justified based on the professions
of those who died. We learned in 2003 that the so called "defense industry"
will do anything it can to bilk the american taxpayer. We learned the same
lesson about bankers in 08. These two groups have robbed the nation of its
savings. For those who cant afford healthcare, thats life or death. If
anything, a fuck ton of moochers were killed on 911.
Does it make perfecty sense that a building was announced has fallen
20minutes BEFORE it actually did on BBC news? Does it make sense that it is
the only building in the world to collapse after 2 0r 3 fires? Does it make
sense to fall in freefall speed and that the videos show squibs coming out
of windows?
"We have never, ever heard the term 'pull it' being used to refer to the
explosive demolition of a building, and neither has any blast team we've
spoken with." -Brent Blanchard of Protec in A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF WTC
TOWERS 1, 2, & 7 FROM AN EXPLOSIVES AND CONVENTIONAL DEMOLITION VIEWPOINT
"►IMPLOSION◄ is a process where a small amount of ►EXPLOSIVES◄ is used to
disrupt selected supports in a building. This allows gravity to "PULL" the
structure down in a controlled manner." -University of Louisiana
"I'm glad somebody brought up the Larry Silverstein comment, because we
certainly looked at that… What he says is "they decided to "pull" which
is referring to the fire department. And of course in some circles of the
controlled demolition industry "Pull" is used to mean that you actually
demolish a building." -Benjamin Chertoff, Researcher for Popular Mechanics,
on Coast to Coast AM – March 5, 2005
Your first point is incomprehensible. Your second point about it is easily
answered. Pull it, as in pull the firefighting crew or pull the
firefighting operation or pull the plug on the operation. You couldn't
figure that out yourself?
"Phase 1 continued to fall, helping to "PULL" Phase 2 in. Phase 2 was
►DETONATED◄ several seconds later and collapsed and fell the same as Phase
1." – Controlled-Demolition Inc – Imploding The Kingdome
pull it is just another way of saying get out. hes not calling the
firefighters it
you're a fuck, Silverstein.