NIST FOIA 09-42: R25 — 42A0108 – G25D18, Video #1 (WTC2 Falling Debris, 9:59am) 08:49 – Trapped people above the impact zone inside WTC1, west face. 12:59 -…
(Visited 24 times, 1 visits today)
9/11 World Trade Center WABC NIST FOIA – Video 1 – (SEE INFO).
Logging you in...
Loading IntenseDebate Comments...
There would be no cospiracy theories if Anyone could explain How WTC
Buildings 1,2 and 7 were destroyed. The Theory that these buildings were
destroyed by Airliner Impact(s), jet fuel and subsequent fire are
Physically Impossible.
Give Science some credit here. It is impossible for buildings the size of
WTC 1 and 2 to burn down with a complete collapse of the steel
infrastructure in less than 3 hours. IT IS IMPOSSIBLE. If it were possible,
NIST would have a theory that could be proven over and over again. They
would have constructed the entire buildings to scale, simulated the impact
of the airliners and shown us all how this magic fire did the Impossible. I
don't know how this happened. I don't know who did it or why.
The only thing that can be proven right now is how it happened.
How can Anyone watch what happened and accept the explanation(s) given to
us.
We should demand more from our elected officials.
When did we start accepting what we are told without questioning it?
Wow, not a single paint chip on the sidewalks directly below the supposed
'impacts' of the massive 490,000 lb Boeing 767's that slammed into the side
of the towers. The sidewalks were left PRISTINE! I guess the jumbo 767 just
melted neatly into the tiny hole in the tower! I don't see any plane parts
anywhere directly below the 'impacts'! Not a single plane part!
whaqt was burning so fiercely in the back west corner above the impact
floors? It blazed right up to collapse. Must have been something unusual?
13:22 witness: LIAR
JA JA JA ..
looks like the amricans did a shit job on the cover up…………….
and all americans are really fat to move
You're all fucking nuts. Paranoid loons. A big plane going fast hit them.
It fucked them up. They fell.
it sunk you twat
518735 let me ask you You believe an oxygen starved fire melted steel And
can you tell me why steel being pulled out of the ground ignited
You haven't answered ANY of my questions. I asked my questions first, then
you demand I answer one of your questions before you can give answers?
LMAO! Sooooo typical 911 twoofer!
Arrogance
Nonsense. A 707 is VERY SIMILAR in mass and speed to a 757 or 767.
Care to answer my question little guy?
you are fucking stupid
actually….i did answer one of them. and now i'm waiting on your answer
STILL waiting…….
so you're on the clock again? good. maybe now you'll be man enough to prove
that your questions "debunk" my "theories." but i doubt it! hurry up
cole!!! not all of us get paid for this.
I can see not expecting them to not be hit by another plane, but because
the towers were so close together it would seem frugal to evacuate imo. The
ones that evacuated tower 1 were immediately led from the area to get away
from the buildings. I think of this every day, it haunts me, I know I'm not
alone.
That,I cant answer.But here is a more perplexed question,"Why would ya want
to? I know I wouldn't.Common sense would tell ya,if a building is on
fire,ya don't go back in it.
could someone explain to me how all the concrete was pulverized into a
pyroclastic flow of dust and powder? How did the building fall so quick
without any resistance from the building below? wtf happened?
You still twoofing shill? STILL WAITING FOR YOU TO ANSWER THE QUESTIONS YOU
RESPONDED TO. LMAO! 911 TRUTH = STRAWMAN
They did not expect another plane to hit. So from that point of view it was
the safest decision. Imagine 25000 workers from B tower in the streets
below with all the debris falling from the burning A tower. B tower was
supposed to be evacuated, but floor by floor and in a calm and planned
manner.
High rise buildings are now built so that they have explosive materials in
the structure in order to provide a means to fall in its own footprint in
case of structural damage due to fire or other mans of structural damage.
For the record, I'm not stupid enough to think this was all the terrorists
doing. It was known in 1993 that the WTC is a terrorist's target. There are
many more variables to what happened, but at the end of the day the WTC was
destroyed and it cost the lives of thousands.
i answered one. your turn, shill.
Obviously a troll, he indeed has learned well from Alex Jones.
Here is steel frame tower, collapsing, due to a small fire caused by an
electrical fault, NO JET FUEL to burn. although it collasped only where
there is fire, but it did collaspe in dust almost in its own footprint
/watch?v=lc1Lri34OmY . NO Raging fire in it but Although its rare to happen
but it did happen.
It would make more sense to you if you watched demolishion vids. I'd post
it but Youtube won't allow it. You would see the walls fall down, starting
from the bottom, and the building crumbles into its own footprint. The
layers wouldn't appear like you are saying. In geology its called
pancaking, where a building managed to collapse in such a manner that each
floor is easily recognized when you see the pattern.
So sad to hear over and over the sounds of bodies falling.. I cant even
imagine where my head would be.. i think i would rather jump too than be
burned and crushed alive.. especially when the buildings were imploded into
their own footprints.. God Bless..
LOL……..i'm GIVING you the chance to prove that your questions "debunk"
my "theories" and you CAN'T FUCKING DO IT!!!!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA
WOWWWWWWWWWWWWW
but that still doesn't account for complete destruction, if gravity did
this, we would have seen the floors piled on top of each other, heavily
damaged yes, but there wouldn't have been the incredibly hot piles of
melted, and bent steel we saw in wtc 1, 2, 7. How does all that damage
naturally occur in like 10 seconds?
baaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahahahaa what a BLATANT question dodge. i'll wait
for you to actually answer me. try again….