9/11 was an inside job an this documentary proves it

Please subscribe. Douglas Bickford 360-773-1318.


(Visited 71 times, 1 visits today)

Share This Post

46 Comments - Write a Comment

  1. I have an idea. Get someone who has worked in a demolitions company to provide proof of his credentials on video and say that pull it is used as a term to destroy a building.

    Oh wait you won't do that because no twoofer has done it. Know why no twoofer has done it? Because pull it really isn't a term used to blow up a building. The twoof movement came up with that LIE to dupe people. And you fell for it widdle sheeple. Why do you think people who say "pull it" = demo don't work in demolitions?

    Reply
  2. There is one error about C4 though. Bomb sniffing dogs. A bomb on 9/11 would have had to have ALL of the characteristics: crash resistant, fire resistant, evade bomb sniffing dogs, invisible, explode silently yet also explode randomly in an uncontrolled fashion throughout the day.

    There is no bomb in existence that has all of those characteristics.

    Reply
  3. How to be a dedicated truther moron:
    1) Watch Loose Change daily & believe every word.
    2) Type "inside job" on every 9/11 video on YT.
    3) Turn up at Ground Zero every 9/11 and shout "inside job" at the victim's families.
    4) Call anyone who challenges your retarded theories sheep and shills.
    5) Never admit you're wrong, even when you've just had your arse handed to you.
    6) Never explain or offer any evidence to prove your theories.
    7) Say 9/11 twoof is growing when it's dead.

    Reply
  4. Liisten cum tongue, you don't even know you're living, let alone what i been doing the past few years but, just for a once in a lifetime opportunity, i will let you know a little fact about me…IM YOUR FKIN DADDY!!….not true. even if that were true i wouldn't admit to it, infact i would have swallowed a mouthful of lead the moment i made such a horrific discovery. its bigger than george w – its a conspiracy so huge that your empty head could never process such information..WAKE DA FK UP!

    Reply
  5. Look,slow poke. Look at the link on my page. It has all the evidence you claim doesnt exist. You have been infected with notwannaworkicitis.LOL I know you have been on you tube for years,saying the same dumb shit.Asking the same dumb questions. Muslims did 911. Its all on video,you idiot.Why would you feel the need to fantasize that it was George Dubya? Why? Muslims hijacking isnt exciting enough? It has to be an inside job to be exciting enough for you? Or do you just crave personal attention?

    Reply
  6. I didn't specify the quantity of C4, I was just pointing out that explosives CAN and DO stand up to impact, and some can withstand quite a force (being shot carries quite a fair bit of kinetic energy you have to agree).

    I don't profess to know what happened on 9/11, I keep an open mind and don't blindly accept what I'm told from EITHER side. I've seen documentaries saying the jets were holograms for Gods sake, it's getting ridiculous.

    I was just pointing out your error about explosives.

    Reply
  7. Centcom, US Central Command, has a "TROLLING SHILL" software for US service personnel, to respond to online conversations with any number of co-ordinated messages, blogposts, chatroom posts and other interventions. These are usually worked as "teams" similar to "attack poodles" to control, influence and derail conversations of a "national security" nature.

    Reply
  8. Eeesh, what an extreme case of truthtardedness, I hope we can find you some help. I won't even address the rewiring nonsense as that is just farcical. Same with the bomb-sniffing dogs. Which basically means you're in a truthtard vacuum.

    Reply
  9. So you want to compare a tiny bullet hitting a small point of C4 versus a plane that would most likely hit the entire area? Ok, fine. Show me one instance of C4 being completely crash resistant. Since a plane would be rather hard to pull off why don't you show me a video of a car crashing into C4 with no explosion?

    In addition to your gullible ignorant dipshit sheep fairy tale, you don't expect secondary explosions to happen when a jet crashes into a building. Basic common sense they will sheep

    Reply
  10. C4 can survive being shot and not explode, so even if they used C4 it would have been crash resistant from the 400mph plane impact or crash resistant from debris. It's even fireproof (to a certain degree).

    Also a number of witnesses (firefighters & police) reported hearing the sound of explosions before the towers came down.

    Do a little research before calling people "ignorant". Your comment stinks of ignorance and gullibility believing the 'official' version of events you hypocritical shit.

    Reply
  11. yea, i believe he coined the phrase "pull it" in a message for you to pull your head outta your disease ridden anal canal to make way for a FEMA camp!

    Yes, months of preparation, or maybe just a few weeks. records prove there was an entire rewiring of the computer systems of the towers; couldn't that have been the perfect time to do all the explosives wiring….not that the removal of bomb sniffing dogs has any significance? NOW FK OFF YOU IGNORANT CUNT!!

    Reply
  12. MrSavageSucksCcks, i see you're here spreading your Syphilis like Gum Disease you fkin little RAT? Go get a real job you dirty, disgusting little Troll…..I recommend you become a Clay Pigeon!

    Reply
  13. Not only that but the bombs would have to evade bomb sniffing dogs, explode doing no visible damage yet explode silently when the buildings collapse, be completely crash resistant from a 400 mph plane impact as well as crash resistant from debris from tower 1, and finally on top of all that be completely fireproof.

    9/11 Truthers are gullible ignorant dipshit sheep morons.

    Reply
  14. How come there is no one who works in the demolition industry that confirms pull it is used to demolish a building? How come all we have are sheeple like you that say "oh yeah I called a demo company or work with a demo company that confirmed it." All we have is your word that you did. Your word is zilch if you can't back it up, which in this case you can't.

    Get them on video or make a notarized and signed affidavit. Oh but wait you won't because it would disprove your claim. that's right.

    Reply
  15. Re "Pull". Do you fuckwad truthers REALLY think that Larry Silverstein would tell a national television audience that he intentionally demolished a building. Do you fucktard truthers actually believe that he had the place wired for demolition, something that would have taken months of preparation, with magical demolitions materials that don't even make a sound when they detonate. Do you dimwit truthers ever use your fucking brains???

    Reply
  16. No it absolutely is NOT a term used to activate the demolition charges (or "bombs" as you incorrectly state). "Pull" may be a term used when they attach cables to the remains of a demolished building to "pull" down the remnants, but it has NOTHING to do with demolition charges.

    Reply
  17. even some people have shit for brains….i worked with a few guys that do building demolishishon…and even they confirm it…..who is the dumbass…

    Reply
  18. 3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:

    Why did Dr. Steven Jones circumvent the peer review process by not showing his nanothermite paper to the chief editor and printing it without her approval?

    Why won't Kevin Ryan allow ANY of his precious dust samples to be tested by an independent laboratory?

    Why won't Niels Harrit, Steven Jones, or Kevin Ryan refute the recent truth seeking professional scientific study of the WTC dust performed by Dr. James Millette?

    Reply
  19. Wrong shitstain. Its a term used by skeet shooters,you dumb ass, YOu say pull,when you want the skeet launcher to shoot a clay pidgeon,you dumb dumb. No demo team has ever heard of pull. You dumb ass, They meant pull the firefighters from the building because it was buckling and going to collapse,you dumb ass.

    Reply
  20. I have never seen country in the world so much shame less cheater whose president bit by shoes by a defeated country normal citizens in iraq.Gov of USA who claimed to be as super power with high technology but fails to secure their own citizens but plans to kill them like 9/11 in BB and blame to others and impose war kill innocent. I think this time they want to impose war on Chechen whom USA gov make terrorist by showing green dream of freedom.stop innocent blood just for Israel from 50 years.

    Reply
  21. sorry to repeat again…..to PULL…is a therm that is used by demolitionteams to activate the bombs to demolish the building…ask any demolition team or person….

    Reply
  22. And another Thermoron bites the dust…ROFLMAO!
    I gotta do t-shirt with this (and of course I'll give credit to the truther Einstein who came up with one of the best insults for truthers I've heard in a while).

    Reply
  23. Court found CIA FBI and other govt agencies GUILTY GUILTY of killing Martin Luther King Jr. Memphis 1999 - the transcript is online. Media NOT ALLOWED to talk about it.

    Reply
  24. officialAleistaRA · Edit

    its very true! 9 11 was pulled off by the government! its so very obvious!!! yet they have most of the population fooled! its OK Cuz more and more people are finding out the truth!

    Reply
  25. TheServantOfChrist77 · Edit

    The real focus needs to be set on what is coming, Jesus Christ, thats right the thousand year old prophecies are finally being brought to pass, If you didnt already know He is returning to destroy this wicked world, and make it new and free of evil. The way prophecies are unfolding we have but a few years max. He will spare you if you confess, and forsake your sin, and trust in him as your savior. If your not with Him, your against Him, get with Jesus, avoid fury, get mercy!

    Reply
  26. Agree, or could be PBX boxes or electrical junction boxes exploding, or things falling (including humans), or any of a number of things. I think we differ slightly on the issues of moderation in religion (I tend to the moderate in my religion and consider that a reflection of modernity rather than a rejection of fundamentalism, but that's a separate discussion). I would agree though, that in Islam, probably more than in other religions, there is a lower tolerance for moderation.

    Reply
  27. Its also much, much more plausible that those explosions heard are as the result of a gas lines catching fire and blowing. All of Islam is radical. That is evident enough in observing the places where its authority is law, and people are executed for imaginary crimes like homosexuality, witchcraft, and adultery. As Sam Harris said it best, "the moderate religious are nothing more than the failed fundamentalists." If you dont follow the strict interpretations of the scripture, you arent a Muslim.

    Reply
  28. Exactly. They also are fond of the reports of "explosions" around the time the first plane hit the first tower. What a coincidence. Problem is, the the "explosions" are not coincident with the collapse, something that happens in roughly, oh, about 100% of all other controlled demolitions. And yes, I agree that Islam, or at least the radical brand of it, is the real problem.

    Reply
  29. Whats really funny is that controlled demolitions force a building to collapse into itself starting at the base, and on 9/11 you can clearly see that the towers begin falling at the top, and floor after floor, collapsing one on top of another. Most of these people think the planes hitting the towers are imaginary though, so what do you expect from them? They either want to promote their political agenda, or deflect attention from the real problem: Islam.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to wallyszabo Cancel reply