9/11 Conspiracy Solved: Names, Connections, & Details Exposed!

Was 9/11 really an inside job? According to the author, after reviewing this documentary and checking the evidence the answer will be clear to you. This vide…


(Visited 27 times, 1 visits today)

Share This Post

36 Comments - Write a Comment

  1. I enjoy a good debate, and the logical fallacies of 911 truther claims fascinate me, so it's a good combo. I also spend much time on another site debating pretty much anything, but that site will keep me going for hours so lately I have stayed away. Anyway debating is very good practice. Not just practice in words but in thought. The ability to break down ideas, and uphold your views can make a very big difference in your life if you get good at it. It's been a tremendous help for me.

    Reply
  2. It's just hard to imagine you can't see what's going on here after all of your looking in to the issue. You are very hard at work here. What is your agenda, laughs? It's not that funny really. A rational conversation doesn't rely on ad hominem as the basis of it's argument. I was hoping you were one of the shills. Otherwise, you're just a man on a mission to destroy that which he cannot accept. Entertaining I agree, but sad not funny. If laughs is part of the pay, what's the rest?

    Reply
  3. I get paid partially in laughs, like I did by reading your comment. I have a few conspiracy theorist co workers at my job so the subject comes up sometimes. When I tell my buddies how crazy you guys are I always talk about how funny it is that I can not have a rational discussion with any of you about your beliefs without eventually being accused of being some undercover government paid disinformation specialist. That in itself is very telling in terms of how hopeless your guys are.

    Reply
  4. What are you talking about? You were asking me about the PNAC now you're asking me how the US can be a world leader? It's not complicated. Populations mean nothing on the "world leader" stage. We are a leader because other nations desire our standard of living and our military strength.

    Reply
  5. It really does feel good to be AWAKE, i really hope the idiots that think the gov't didn't have nothing to do with it WAKE UP SOON. Your future depends on it, the NWO has accelerated their plan, and are attacking U.S. citizens every day.This gov't hides the truth like cowards, if they are so honorable then why do they hide everything. (Federal Reserve)

    Reply
  6. Ok well how can the US be a leader of the world when the populations and economies of other nations exceed their own?

    Reply
  7. Why was a structural engineer on the scene picking up parts/evidence in a federal crime scene? Six black/orange boxes in three planes, only one has been supposedly found and released. Throw a lie in with few truths and you have believers.

    Twin Towers – HYPOCENTER OF A NUCLEAR BLAST.

    Reply
  8. PNAC outlines americas striving for pre-eminence amongst the nations…. true or false roman? 8,000 characters is simply not needed and neither is my signing up to a debate webpage.

    Reply
  9. I never said that you claimed it was proof. Read my comment again, slowly. I specifically asked you to send me a challenge to debate whether it is evidence. You know it isn't, which is why you suddenly seem to want to "further discuss". I've looked into literally hundreds of truther claims, they're all nonsense. I am not about to read 90 pages just to entertain another one, especially here on youtube. But if I could get an easy debate victory out of it then ah, why not.

    Reply
  10. You do seem pretty ignorant, but there is nothing I can do to save you from that. Debris disappeared? The first responders seem to remember carrying pieces of the plane in their hands, and the photographs would support that conclusion. But of course that is not good enough, fantasy conspiracy theories are just so much more enticing.

    Reply
  11. Allyn E. Kilsheimer of KCE Structural Engineers

    "It was absolutely a plane, and I'll tell you why," [of Washington, D.C.] "I saw the marks of the plane wing on the face of the building. I picked up parts of the plane with the airline markings on them. I held in my hand the tail section of the plane, and I found the black box. I held parts of uniforms from crew members in my hands, including body parts."

    911 TRUTH DEBUNKED!

    Reply
  12. No…. You read the document. I never said it is proof (evidence is not proof) but read it and tell me what it is about. Then we can further discuss. This aint no game.

    Reply
  13. Oh! By the way… rRoman1332 – IF the head of the CIA in Russia secured the presidency and then his son afterwards – what exactly would you call that?

    Reply
  14. rROMAN3212- You sir, are a genius! Now, explain to me again, where all of the debri field disappeared to from the 757 that crashed into the most guarded structure on the planet with the WHOLE U.S. military oblivious on to how to defend it's own command center. Of course, every word in your response will secure the ultimate truth… WHO and WHAT you actually are, I believe, is the best …TRUTHER! Please! dispense your wisdom upon all of us ignorant ones … PLEASE – save us from our ourselves!

    Reply
  15. I am American. I consider myself a person who – like ANYONE – desires a world that is … of a peaceful nature. I believe, that for the world to change to achieve peace, life changing, progressive ideas and inventions – MUST ONLY – be passed on to trusted others … AFTER many multiple copies of such works are propagated to survive SUPPRESSION from the Financial Global Elite Few – who have invested interests to maintain their corrupt, seemingly sacred, Cash Cows that are old, and wear us out!

    Reply
  16. You don't seen to have a problem understanding the riddles the government feed you..

    5D Warfare understood it perfectly.

    Reply
  17. I'll tell you what, you want me to read the PNAC? Sign up to a website called debate.org, create a user account, and send me a debate challenge titled: "The PNAC is evidence that the US Government planned the 911 attacks". We'll do 3 rounds, 8,000 characters each round, 72 hours to respond to eachothers arguments, then I will have no choice. Of course you won't do that because then you would actually have to understand your own claims.

    Reply
  18. Deceit
    Dissimulation
    Distraction

    The three tools they use to separate the same species to the point they murder one another.

    Reply
  19. In real life, events don't take place in black and white, but in a thousand shades of grey. Just discovering the actual facts and events as they transpire is difficult enough. The river is different each time we step into it, and by the time a reasonable understanding of an event has been apprehended, new events have already made that interpretation obsolete.

    Media stories cover only the tiniest fraction of actual events, but stupidly claim to be summarizing "all the news."

    Reply
  20. Events taking place in today's world are enormously complex. An impossibly convoluted tangle of interrelated and unrelated occurrences happens simultaneously, often in dynamic conflict. To even acknowledge this complexity contradicts a fundamental axiom of media science: Keep It Simple.

    Reply
  21. So all you have to do is name a document and now the onus is on me to explain to you how your document does not prove what you are claiming it proves, and if I fail to read it you win…

    And you are wondering why I say Truthers can't debate honestly? Ok then, this could be fun. Read: "The PNAC and Other Myths: A Short List of Observations" by James Bennett. Uh oh I guess the onus is on you know or I win!

    Reply
  22. I'll be amazed? Really? I didn't realize that. Thank you for opening up my eyes with your intelligence and deep insight into the issue. Now I know.

    Reply
  23. The evidence is what you are arguing against. I know it is easy to forget this in conspiracy land, but arguing that evidence is faked does not mean that it is no longer evidence.

    Reply
  24. Read a statement which refutes your claim, ignore the reasons why it refutes your claim, repeat your original claim with no further support, add an insult and whoa la!

    I guess you win. Congratulations on your incredible display of intelligence!

    Reply

Leave a Reply to John Claypool Cancel reply