Journalism? Washington Post Wants To Prosecute Its OWN Source

31 Comments

Sign up to be a TYT member by July 7 and receive a free TYT shirt! http://vid.io/xHD “The Washington Post, the pre-Politico newsletter of choice for The Poli…


(Visited 22 times, 1 visits today)

Share This Post

You might also like:

31 Comments - Write a Comment

  1. niselat · Edit

    the washington post! obama's stenography pool? say it ain't so!

    to be fair, the way the obamastapo has been wiping his ass with the First Amendment and threatening journalists, they may have done this with a gun to their head

    why do we need to fight terrorism anyway? didn't ayatollah obama declare that he had destroyed terrorism in his campaign? that's why he covered up benghazi

    all of a sudden terrorism is back

    Reply
  2. TheHorsenation · Edit

    thanks!
    more people need to become aware of this, so we can put an end to this abuse of everybody for the gain of a few sociopathic control-freaks,.

    Reply
  8. Jani Pontus Toivanen · Edit

    "The technotronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values. Soon it will be possible to assert almost continuous surveillance over every citizen and maintain up-to-date complete files containing even the most personal information about the citizen. These files will be subject to instantaneous retrieval by the authorities. "

    ― Zbigniew Brzezinski, 1970… (Obama advisor)

    Reply
  10. NYCAustinNYC · Edit

    I cannot think of a way to respond to a comment that is so silly and is so devoid of any connection to the real world.

    Except maybe to respond with the obvious : AL QUADA IS NOT A PRODUCT OF AMERICA.

    At best one can make a case that Al Quada was created in response to American activities in the Muslim world. Still even this fails given that Al Quada was first created as a response to Soviet activities in Afghanistan.

    Reply
  13. NYCAustinNYC · Edit

    1. This also means that the funds for things like building roads and educating kids will not be there.
    2. Yes the way that America uses drone strikes is horrible, but are you really making the case that this is worse then (for example) what Al Quada does around the world?

    Reply
  17. deathByStupid · Edit

    45%? The top 5% of americans pay 60% of the tax.

    The government would just have to go after the 5% in order to remain in business.

    But … that said… why would people with money do this? You think they will risk jail just to prevent drone strikes? That's ridiculous.

    If your really being legit, you should call for companies and people to abandon the US and go elsewhere, if people start a emigration movement usually governments tend to notice.

    Reply
  19. greenpeices · Edit

    They can't arrest everyone. But for this to work, you would have to have at least 45% of the US stop paying taxes together.

    Reply
  20. greenpeices · Edit

    No. No. Big Brother love us. He protects us. He care for us. He would never betray our trust. He would never do anything to harm us. He loves us, and we love him.

    Reply
  21. Henbot · Edit

    way it is now in USA. Best not, considering you would see all of TYT carted of to jail. With something like the Guardian, they do have some protection. YouTube wouldnt protect TYT nor would american regime restrain itself.

    Reply
  24. Gooner Tron · Edit

    Seriously everyone in USA should just start getting their news from The Guardian, they is no point at getting any news from a corporate run American news outlet.

    Reply
  25. Piriathy · Edit

    Number one way to fight terrorism? If you're a US citizen, don't pay your taxes; our tax dollars fund drone striking civilians in multiple countries, GLOBAL TERRORISM.

    Reply

Post Comment