Jekyll_Island_Scene10_Excerpt

Here is the first peek at one of the scenes in “Jekyll Island”. This is the “birds” scene in front of Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris. Bill Still You can now P…


(Visited 22 times, 1 visits today)

Share This Post

41 Comments - Write a Comment

  1. 150 minutes! I didn't mind the length of the Money Masters. In fact, I didn't realize it was as long as it was until i looked at the running time after I watched it. For the crowd you're reaching, no need to pare it down. We're thirsty for all the info you've got.

    Reply
  2. HUH? We have had nearly unfettered banking activities for the last 20 years. How's that been working out for us? #1 is to break the back of government borrowing. It can't be trimmed, or slowly paid off over time. It has to be made illegal immediately in every nation on earth. Nothing good can happen until this step is achieved.

    Reply
  3. Explain what "freeing up the markets" means.
    Does this mean de-regulation of banks and corporations that already have little oversight? 

    Reply
  4. XistentialFocalPoint · Edit

    Thank you for responding (I know you are VERY busy) & true…Andrew Jackson "killed the bank" but it 'rose from the ashes'. I will research & watch your video's & am interested on your solution('s) to that problem…(got your message on the 'Cyprus thing' thanks) don't bother responding to this (again) I know your are busy & 'we all' thank you

    Reply
  5. BILL'S RIGHT….I'M AN ALL CAPS LIBERTARIAN AS OPPOSED TO CAPITAL L LIBERTARIAN OR SMALL L LIBERTARIAN…THIS IS EXTREMELY ADVANCED STUFF I'M TALKING, PLUS I SEE A MUCH FULLER SPECTRUM HOLISTIC LIBERTARIAN CONCEPTS THAT MERGE WITH FACTORS SUCH AS HEALTH, ENVIRONMENT, SPIRITUALITY, PSYCHOLOGY. THE PAUL'S DIDN'T REALLY ADVANCE ANYTHING I'M LOOKING AT, BUT THEY DID TRY THEIR BEST TO KEEP THE BALL ROLLING ON A NATIONAL STAGE.

    Reply
  6. Yes, no matter how much debate over this, that is EXACTLY what will result. At the very least we will edit down a version for TV, which means somewhere south of 60 minutes. Those will be very tough decisions however.

    Reply
  7. Well said, however, who said I want to give the money power to politicians? Those who want to keep you confused. The money power must come from a new 4th branch of government. It must truly be controlled in the public interest by we, the public. There are numerous ways of doing this, and I don't care which one you pick.

    Reply
  8. You pose the question well, and I think it boils down to whether you think self-governance has basic value. Do you believe in the rule of law, or the rule of the jungle?

    Reply
  9. Right on all points EXCEPT ending the Fed. End the Fed tomorrow and what changes??? NOTHING. The banks would go on lending money they just made up and charging both us personally, and our government phoney money at interest. And once you lend a government money, then, BY DEFINITION you have a plutocracy as the lender comes into control of the political structure of the nation. That's the problem we have today — plutocracy. Ending the Fed doesn't fix that. It's a diversion.

    Reply
  10. I've watched Webster and he seems on point only sometimes. There are lots of folks who are on point 90% of the time who are much more interesting to me. "Seize the Fed for Credit producing"??? You see, this is not sharp. Seizing the Fed does EXACTLY NOTHING. The Ron Paul people labor under this misconception that ending the Fed would actually do something. That's EXACTLY what the banksters want you to think. What if we ended the Fed tomorrow. Would anything change? No. Banks would just go on.

    Reply
  11. The "old" system of which you speak is actually the "new" system — a plutocracy wrapped in the outer shell of a democratic republic. It's like an M&M — looks colorful and shiny on the outside.

    Reply
  12. Firstname Lastname · Edit

    I personally would like to see a 150, but unfortunately, Mr Still, I think the shorter you could make it, the more "folks" would be willing to sit through it and learn something… ie "150 mins!!! Man!! I got football to watch!!" See my point? Love. Bless.

    Reply
  13. Mr. Still, can you provide a link to your Facebook page? The only page I can find under your name hasn't been updated in over a year.

    Reply
  14. Bill what is your opinion on Webster Tarpley's approach…
    Seize the Fed for Credit producing and TAXING Wall st trading @ 1%?

    Reply
  15. LOL Gotta love them PAULtards. Dennis(es)

    All I keep seeing is the scene from the Holy Grail, King Arthur comes by and the people are MUD FARMERS.

    "there you go thinking about clAss again, Think about MUD."

    Reply
  16. XistentialFocalPoint · Edit

    Kill 'the fed' & print our own (interest free) money, make fractional reserve banking retro actively illegal (wiping out most personal debt), and refuse to pay the interest on national debt ('we' own the military…What can they 'force' us to do?)…By the way what's the latest on the Cyprus situation? / B Still…And learn

    Reply
  17. I'VE SEEN YOU AROUND….WHAT YOU SHOULD DO IS PUT THE FREE MARKET OF COMPETITIVE CURRENCIES AHEAD OF EVERY OTHER ALTERNATIVE AND REASON THE SUBJECT OUT THAT WAY, WHICH YOU HAVEN'T…I'M NOT THE TYPICAL DUMMY KID YOU'RE USED TO, JUST GO WATCH MY VIDEOS…WHAT YOU'RE MISSING IS THAT YOU'RE PITCHING SOME CURRENCY FEATURES WITH NO DEBT, THIS KIND OF BACKING, YADA YADA AND YOU'RE MISSING THE REAL DEAL WHICH IS TO CREATE WHOLE NEW MARKETS FOR A BURGEONING INDUSTRY OF TRADING VEHICLES AND SERVICES.

    Reply
  18. One more question: Why not let the free market dictate what is to be considered money?

    "The separation of money and state is vital. People should be free to choose which form of money they will accept. Money should not be controlled by governments or government sanctioned agencies (IE, the Federal Reserve)."

    Reply
  19. Hi Bill Still. can you (or did you in this movie) give a reason why a hard money like gold, is better than entrusting the politicians with the task of printing the money? This has always been a sticking point with me. Go with gold and the elites have most of it. Go with debt-free paper and the elites control it's supply. Why it's better to have the elites supply fiat money than to have the elites supply gold? That is why I like local currencies, but still it is local. How do nations square debt?

    Reply
  20. Just a FYI, lots of people (myself included) won't use FB or anything like it. But that isn't my main point. I don't know about the length to release but if you can manage it, perhaps release two versions. One for people that aren't currency wonks but need to be informed and the longer one for those of us who are have a deeper interest. Your work is very much appreciated Bill!

    Reply
  21. Hi Bill,

    Your paypal donate link isn't working. I get this message when I click on your above link.:

    "We cannot process this transaction because there is a problem with the PayPal email address supplied by the seller. Please contact the seller to resolve the problem"

    Reply
  22. I love your documentaries! I've watched The Money Masters three times, and Oz twice. What's going to be the approx the running time on Jekyll Is.? just curious.

    Reply
  23. OH MY GOD…IT SOUNDS LIKE YOU’RE PROMOTING ONE GOVERNMENT SANCTIONED MONOPOLIZATION OVER ANOTHER WHEN THE REAL SOLUTION IS TO FREE UP THE MARKETS PERIOD…STRANGE HOW THIS BASIC CONCEPT ALLUDES PEOPLE WHO CLAIM TO BE FOR THE LIBERTY MOVEMENT….MUST BE SOMETHING IN THE WATER OR FOOD…

    Reply
  24. I whole heartedly congratulate you for having the courage and stamina to continue on this never ending journey to enlighten the plebs about the chicanery brought about a century ago. The big question I have (will need to wait to see your film) is if you have a viable solution to 'force' indebted (read=controlled) governments to ditch 'central private issuing banks' and gain 'independence. Everybody remembers what happened to JFK and Muammar Gaddafi for 'defying' central bankers (Rothschilds)

    Reply

Post Comment